yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Dilation scale factor examples
We are told that pentagon A prime B prime C prime D prime E prime, which is in red right over here, is the image of pentagon A B C D E under a dilation. So that’s A B C D E. What is the scale factor of the dilation? They don’t even tell us the center of t…
I’m an IDIOT for getting a credit card...
What’s up you guys, it’s great I’m here. So let’s just say this: I did not expect to get so many views on the unboxing of the JP Morgan Reserve card. So if you’re brand new here, welcome! My name is Graham. I flex credit cards, duplexes, and lotuses. So h…
How to 10x Your Intelligence
The best way to 10x your intelligence is to go on a difficult books reading regimen. That’s where you read ten or less books a year, and each one should be harder than the last. And this is probably the opposite of a lot of what you see and hear on YouTub…
The importance of networking.
This is the day in the life of a jet broker. I flew out to Switzerland for eBay. For anyone who loves jets, eBay is like being a kid in the candy store. It’s where you’ll find the latest and greatest in jet innovations while providing unparalleled network…
Quirkiest Investments that Have DOUBLED IN VALUE | Kevin O'Leary
Sharks! All right, we’re here to pick up the Maki-E MontBlanc. I’m among one of 88 in the world. This is number 13, and it’s on its way into Mr. Wonderful’s pen collection. At the prototype, I shot that with Shark Tank. Here it is for the first time. Wow…
The TRUTH Behind Passive Income
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we’re going to be talking about the truth behind passive income. Because when I make a video about passive income, I love talking about passive income—it’s one of my absolute most favorite topics to ta…