yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Media as a linkage institution | Political participation | US government and civics | Khan Academy
You have a government and you also have the people that are governed. In previous videos, we talked about this idea of linkage institutions, which are institutions that connect the government to the people and the people to the government. So, people know…
Professor Brian Harvey on why not to cheat
There are limits to your working together. You’re going to be hearing this from every single instructor this week, right? You’ve probably already heard it six times. Don’t cheat. I think that some of what people tell you about this is nonsense. For examp…
Riding the Avalanche | Edge of the Unknown on Disney+
[INAUDIBLE]. [BEEPING] We’re here, yeah. We’re in Valdez. It is 7:35. We’re five minutes behind. Um, bluebird morning—we got some snow yesterday. Gonna ride some lines and do some flips. It’s going to be a good day. [HELICOPTER ENGINE REVVING] I was up i…
The Warning Of Hyper Inflation | DO THIS NOW
So, as most of you know, I usually intro my videos with “What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here.” But the only thing up today is inflation, and it’s getting much, much worse than most of us initially expected. Throughout the last week, it was revealed that…
Fractions in context
In this video, we’re going to think about how fractions can be used to represent things in the real world. So, here we’re told that on the sharks dive team, there are three divers. In third grade, there are eight total divers on the team. What fraction of…
A.I. Policy and Public Perception - Miles Brundage and Tim Hwang
Alright guys, I think the most important and pressing question is, now that cryptocurrency gets all the attention and AI is no longer the hottest thing of technology, how are you dealing with it? Yeah, Ben Hamner of Kaggle had a good line on this. He sai…