yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Summing op-amp circuit
Another form of an op-amp circuit is called the summing op-amp. We’re going to work through how this one works. What’s drawn here now is an inverting op-amp circuit with a single input. We’re going to call this V_a. We’ll call this A for now, and we have …
How To Buy A Home In 2024 (THE STEP BY STEP TUTORIAL)
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So this video is meant to be a step-by-step beginner tutorial for anyone looking to buy a home for themselves to live in in 2019. Now, I made a few of these videos in the past when it came to focusing on buying invest…
Democratic ideals of US government
What we’re going to do in this video is discuss some of the foundational ideas for the United States of America. We could start at the most foundational of ideas, and that’s the notion of natural rights. John Locke, one of the significant Enlightenment th…
Top 10 Most Expensive Suits In The World
Top 10 Most Expensive Suits in the World Welcome to A Lux, the place where future billionaires come to get inspired. Hey there, Alexis, and thanks for choosing to spend some time with us today. If you’re craving some facts and figures pertaining to the b…
Talking Investing, Business and YouTube with @NateOBrien
[Music] Well, welcome back to the channel, everybody! We are continuing on with our big new money advent calendar. I’ve got a pretty awesome video coming today because I’m sitting down with the man, the myth, the legend, Mr. Nate O’Brien. How you going, m…
The Truth About My Coffee Company (I Screwed Up)
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here! So, two years ago, I made the decision to start my own coffee company, and this video is a prime example of what not to do because I’ll admit I made some pretty stupid mistakes. For those unaware, the idea of starting…