yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
First Look: The Long Road Home | The Long Road Home
♪♪ KELLY: Memory is a powerful thing. ♪♪ There are some events that stick in the mind… forever defining the difference between before and after, and instantly redefining everything that matters. For the soldiers and families of the Army’s 1st Cavalry Divi…
Peter Lynch: How to Invest Small Amounts of Money
I think the public can do extremely well in the stock market on their own. I think the fact that institutions dominate the market today is a positive for small investors. These institutions push stocks on usual lows; they push them on usual highs. For som…
Principles for Success “Be Radically Open-Minded” | Episode 7
Principles for Success: An Ultra Mini-Series Adventure in 30 Minutes and in Eight Episodes Episode 7: Be Radically Open-Minded Taking risks and occasionally being ruined wasn’t acceptable, and neither was not taking risks and not having exceptional resu…
How Big is the Moon? MM#1
How big is the moon? In the night sky, the moon seems rather small, but in reality, it really isn’t. Central Europe would easily fit under it. The surface area of the moon is huge. To give you some perspective, it’s as big as the whole European continent,…
Recognizing quadratic factor methods part 2
In the last video, we looked at three different examples. It really is a bit of a review of some of our factoring techniques and also to appreciate when we might want to apply them. We saw in the first example that it was just a process of recognizing a …
Internet Safety Course Introduction
Hi everyone. Sal Khan here from Khan Academy, and I just wanted to welcome you to this course on internet safety. Now, you might be saying, “Why should I look at this course? The internet seems like this fun and fabulous place where I can interact with …