yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
15 Things That Make You IRREPLACEABLE
In a world of constant change and competition, standing out and becoming irreplaceable is a goal many of us look for. Whether it’s at our workplace, within our personal relationships, or in broader social circles, certain qualities and behaviors can help …
Safari Live - Day 384 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Well, we couldn’t have asked for a better way to start our Sunday than the brand-new “Oh balls of fluff” for the Inkuhuma p…
2d curl intuition
Hello everyone! So I’m going to start talking about curl. Curl is one of those very cool vector calculus concepts, and you’ll be pretty happy that you’ve learned it once you have it, for no other reason than because it’s kind of artistically pleasing. Th…
Cruel Bombs
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. Every cloud has a silver lining. Except nuclear mushroom clouds, which have a lining of Strontium-90, Caesium-137 and other radioactive isotopes. Upon detonation, atoms are literally gutted and glutton at temperatures exceeding…
Poop Splash Elimination - Smarter Every Day 22
Hey it’s me Destin. So here’s the deal. If you watch this video, it has the potential to change every day of your life for the rest of your life. However, you also have the potential to think about me, and whoever sent you this video, every day when you’r…
Most Important Lifestyle Habits Of Successful Founders
Let’s examine the facts. Yes, fact, fact, fact, fact, great, you’re fine. Yes, however, sometimes we look at the facts, and you’re not fine. [Music] This is Michael Seibel with Dalton Caldwell. In our last video, we talked about the setbacks that make fou…