yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Growth Mindset: Khan Academy's Director of U.S. Content on academic belonging
My name is Brian John Jude and I manage the arts, humanities, and social science curriculum here at Khan Academy. I was the first person in my family to attend college, and I remember my freshman year. The first course I was taking was in literature and …
The Dangers of Oversharing | STOICISM
In a world saturated with unfiltered thoughts and endless streams of personal confessions, the true strength lies in restraint. While the modern ethos screams to share everything everywhere, the ancient Stoics whispered the timeless secrets of wisdom and …
What Is Gravity?
So what is gravity? A downward force? Yeah, something that stops you from flying away. Well, it keeps me on the Earth. I— it just— I don’t fly away. It’s this indescribable thing that kind of keeps us from flying off into space. Is it what’s keeping me on…
Confucius and Confucianism
Now, I am going to talk about one of the greatest philosophers and teachers in human history, and that is Confucius, known to the Chinese as Kong Fuzi, which means Master Kong, or Kongzi, which means Grandmaster Kong. Once again, my apologies for my pronu…
Do Aliens Exist?
Do you think there is life beyond the earth? >> Yes, I do. >> Why is that? >> Scientifically been proven? >> Are we alone? Or is there life elsewhere in the universe? This is a question humans have wondered about for millennia and …
2015 AP Calculus AB/BC 1d | AP Calculus AB solved exams | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Part D. The pipe can hold 50 cubic feet of water before overflowing. For T greater than 8, water continues to flow into and out of the pipe at the given rates until the pipe begins to overflow. Right, but do not solve an equation involving one or more int…