yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
French and Dutch colonization | Period 2: 1607-1754 | AP US History | Khan Academy
Although the Spanish were the first European colonists in the New World, they didn’t remain alone in the Americas for very long. Just three years after Hernan Cortez captured Tenochtitlan, the French government sent its first explorer to poke around North…
Heart 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] The heart pumps blood throughout the body, carrying oxygen and nutrients to every cell. It’s this circulation of blood that is vital to sustaining life. The heart is an organ made up of several tough layers of muscle. The pericardium is the thi…
Electromagnetic Levitation Quadcopter
How much does this thing weigh? -Well, try to pick it up. -Okay. Alright. -Be nice to it. -105 lbs -105 lbs -It consists of four motors connected up to these spinning magnet arrays, and if you spin these fast enough, it will actually levitate. -That’s cor…
What Is Gravity?
So what is gravity? A downward force? Yeah, something that stops you from flying away. Well, it keeps me on the Earth. I— it just— I don’t fly away. It’s this indescribable thing that kind of keeps us from flying off into space. Is it what’s keeping me on…
Remarks by Kirsty Nathoo
So that wraps up the day of talks. We do have a reception now downstairs; that’s downstairs where you had your lunch, and also outside in the courtyard. Before everybody disappears, I do have some thank yous. Thank you very much to everybody who has been…
How To Fix A BAD Credit Score ASAP
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, a few weeks ago I made a video going over all of the techniques and tricks that you could use to get past that legendary 800 credit score, all without costing you any money out of pocket. And even though the strat…