yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Battle on the Tundra (Deleted Scene) | Life Below Zero
He’ll, there ain’t no beavers! That is a big kill, guys. I didn’t get to this set; I got tied up doing some other things. The weather got cold, everything froze right back to the full thickness of the ice, and I didn’t want to leave these snares in there.…
Animal Life in the Forest Canopy - Meet the Expert | National Geographic
And welcome back to the channel! We are live yet again for our fifth Meet the Expert. Oh boy, what a journey we have been on! We’ve been down deep into the ocean, we’ve met with experts who study bears, we’ve been out in Hungary to see venomous snakes, we…
Tornado Tree Mind Twister
Okay, smart man with your smart physics degree, let’s say your state gets ravaged by tornadoes. You go to the local EMA volunteer center; you volunteer. You and some buddies go out with chainsaws and try to do the best work you can to help people. Okay, …
I tried Emma Chamberlain's workout routine for a week
Hi! I’m Rudy. Welcome to, or welcome back to my channel! I tried Emma Chamberlain’s workout routine for a week, and it was insane. Just at the beginning, I just can’t do that, and even now I really cannot do exactly what she does. Actually, I’m gonna sho…
Solar Roads: Can Streets Become Giant Solar Panels? | National Geographic
[Music] [Music] There is a project in the United States called solar roadways, which consist of concrete slabs including the solar cells, plus tempered glass on top of it. There’s a quite similar project in the Netherlands called solar Road. A section on …
Photographing America’s Wounded Soldiers in Iraq | Nat Geo Live
In 2004, I got a call from LIFE magazine. They said we have this incredible assignment for you. It’s to photograph the wounded coming out of Fallujah. When we flew in, this is one of the first scenes I saw. This is on my birthday in 2004, and it was durin…