yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
15 Ways To OPTIMIZE Your LIFE
15 Ways to Optimize Your Life Life is whatever we make of it. Optimizing your life means making the best or most effective use of your life. It means making the most of your resources and opportunities while striving to reach your full potential. Making …
Predatory lending | Loans and debt | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
So let’s talk a little bit about predatory lending. As the word “predatory” seems to imply, it sounds like something that you want to be very careful about how you engage in it. Generally speaking, a predatory lender is someone who is maybe using someone…
Orca Hunt Seven Gill Sharks | Orca vs. Great White
[Music] Ingrid Visser and Ken Iscolet are looking for evidence that orcas are hunting great white sharks in New Zealand waters. Ingrid has evidence that there’s a disturbing pattern in orca hunting. New Zealand orcas are hunting sevengill sharks, just lik…
Kevin Systrom at Startup School SV 2014
Kevin: Thanks a lot for joining us today. Audience: Absolutely! Kevin: Thanks for having me. This is a nice big crowd. Audience: Yeah, this is quite a few people. Kevin: Well, we can just launch right in, of course. I guess you know the crazy thing ab…
Three types of sentence | Syntax | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! Hello Paige! Hi David! So, we have three different sentence varieties that we’re going to talk about today. All right, um here are their three flavors: Flavor number one, declarative sentences; flavor number two, interrogative sentence…
There Are No Get Rich Quick Schemes
We skipped one tweet because I wanted to cover all of the tweets on the topic of the long term. The tweet that we skipped was, “There are no get-rich-quick schemes; that’s just someone else getting rich off you.” This goes back to the world being an effi…