yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
James Cameron on Exploration of Deep Sea and Space | StarTalk
So it’s not just you’re interested in the oceans or space; you’ve touched and been touched by engineering and technology. There was a lot about the cameras used for Avatar, but you go farther back than that. Well, yeah, just, I just love engineering. I l…
PEOPLE WHO LIKE TO BE ALONE HAVE THESE 10 SPECIAL PERSONALITY TRAITS | STOICISM INSIGHTS
In a world that never stops talking, where silence is often filled with the next notification, there’s a truth we seldom acknowledge. The loudest moments in our lives are not the ones filled with noise but those heavy with our own thoughts and reflections…
Divergence intuition, part 2
Hey everyone! So, in the last video, I was talking about Divergence and kind of laying down the intuition that we need for it. You’re imagining a vector field as representing some kind of fluid flow where particles move according to the vector that they’r…
STOICISM | How Marcus Aurelius Keeps Calm
As emperor of Rome, he was the most powerful man on the planet. Yet, as opposed to many of his successors and predecessors, Marcus Aurelius aimed to live virtuously on a consistent basis. He followed a philosophical school called Stoicism. Part of Stoic p…
Steve Jobs: How a Dreamer Changed the World
We are delivering today the iPad, the new iMac, the iPod, ioto, MacBook Air, iTunes. It’s a revolutionary. He was one of the most creative and daring CEOs, a global icon who shaped the worlds of technology and media for over 30 years. Computers, music, mo…
Representing alloys using particulate models | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
In many videos, we have already talked about metals and metallic bonds. In this video, we’re going to dig a little bit deeper, and in particular, we’re going to talk about alloys, which are mixtures of elements but still have metallic properties. So firs…