yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Homeroom with Sal & Anant Agarwal - Thursday, June 24
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here. Welcome to the Homeroom live stream! We have a very exciting guest today: Anant Agarwal, founder and CEO of edX. Sorry, I’m messing with my video settings probably at the exact wrong moment, but before I get into that, I will g…
Separate Boys From Men | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
It’s untie and get out of here. Oh yeah, slow right down, Tyler. You’re gonna snap your welds right off. Yeah, getting everything ready now. We’re not done. Yeah, our green stick is so tall we have to lower it to get underneath the bridge, but now we’r…
Free Will is Incoherent
In this video, I’ll explain why libertarian free will is, at best, meaningless and, at worst, incoherent. By the way, if your worldview depends on its existence, your boat is leaking badly. According to a naturalistic worldview, here’s a rough sketch of …
Wildlife Disappearing at the Border | National Geographic
[Music] This wildlife refuge was established for the protection of native fishes. Eight species of native Rio Yaki fishes. [Music] The jaguar occurs in the Rio Yaki down all of these drainages. Now these drainages are completely dammed up. We’re going to …
What Motivated Soldiers to Be the First to Climb the Siege Ladder?
Being the first on the wall in a siege often meant certain death. It involved battling through to the wall, climbing an exposed ladder or siege tower through a hail of projectiles, only to meet a superior force of defenders upon reaching the top. Neverthe…
Ask Sal Anything! Homeroom with Sal - Monday, June 29
Hi everyone! Welcome to our daily homeroom. For those of you who don’t know what this is, this is really a live stream that we started during Covid but have kept up. I guess it’s still going on, but it’s really a way to have interesting conversations or j…