yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
15 Things You Buy That Make You Richer
Poor people think that spending money makes you poor, but that’s not a universal truth. When the average person spends money, they do get poorer; but smart and successful people have figured out ways to spend money and get richer because of it. By the end…
Science Is an Error-Correcting Mechanism
So getting back to good explanations, where do these explanations come from? There’s currently an obsession with induction. Induction being the idea that you can predict the future from the past. You can say, “I saw one, then two, then three, then four, …
My All-Time FAVORITE Credit Cards
Lots of you guys, it’s great here! So, I realize I’ve been slipping up a lot lately. I’ve let a lot of you guys down, and this is just unacceptable. And that’s because it’s been way too long since I’ve made a credit card video—four months ago, to be exact…
Exploring scale copies
We are told drag the sliders, and then they say which slider creates a scale copy of the shape, or which slider creates scale copies of the shape. So, let’s just see, explore this a little bit. Okay, that’s pretty neat! These sliders seem to change the s…
Tremor Relief at Last | Brain Surgery Live
Yeah, as FGO, all right, we’re gonna, we’re gonna, we’re gonna, we’re gonna turn the thing on for the first time. You ready, dude? They’re on. Okay, let’s turn it off. Okay, let’s get you back. Where’s your ice? Okay, tell me the months here backwards, s…
Inventing Graphics on Cave Walls | Origins: The Journey of Humankind
Early humans communicated with pictures and markings painted on cave walls and began to gradually work out symbols. As these markings spread and were understood and accepted, then you had the widespread transmission of ideas. We can see the very early day…