yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Approximating asymptotic limit from table
Function f is defined over the real numbers. This table gives a few values of f. So when x is equal to -4.1, f of x is 5. f of -4.01 is 55. They give us a bunch of values for different x’s of what f of x would be. What is a reasonable estimate for the li…
Turning The Tide | Plastic on the Ganges
[Music] You take this incredible material that lasts for hundreds of years. We use it for a few seconds, a few minutes, and then we throw it away. [Music] [Music] I’m Heather Coldway. I’m a National Geographic fellow, and I’m the science co-lead for the …
Gini Coefficient and Lorenz Curve
In this video, we’re going to discuss income inequality, which is something that is often debated. Thinking about comparing countries, thinking about whether it’s an issue or not, and how to address it. To appreciate what income inequality is, let’s imagi…
Buddhist Wisdom For Inner Peace
Buddhism has evolved into one of the world’s major religions, with many schools and branches. But if we go back to the source, Gautama Buddha, who was born as a prince that later became enlightened and known as the Buddha, we find a collection of teaching…
Adding and subtracting on number line 2 | 2nd grade | Khan Academy
Which number line shows 361 + 544? Let’s see, in all of them we’re starting at 361, so now let’s add 544. This one starts with adding 400, and then 50, and then 4; it’s adding 454, not 544. Now this one adds 500, then 40, and then 4, so this is adding 5…
Worked example: Solving equations by completing the square | High School Math | Khan Academy
So let’s see if we can solve this quadratic equation right over here: (x^2 - 2x - 8 = 0). And actually, they’re cutting down some trees outside, so my apologies if you hear some chopping of trees. Well, I’ll try to ignore it myself. All right, so back, …