yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How Khan Academy is Here to Help During COVID-19
Hi everyone, Sal here from Khan Academy. Uh, as I’m sure you’re aware, we are finding ourselves collectively, our planet, in a very interesting situation right now. A lot of unfortunate things are happening, and one of those unfortunate things is the pot…
Bullet Block Explained!
In my last video, we performed an experiment in which two identical wood blocks were shot with the same rifle, one through the center of mass and the other one slightly off to one side. Now, if you haven’t seen that video yet, then click here now and go a…
Taking a break from stocks
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, I think it’s really important that we talk about a concerning new trend that’s just started to surface in the stock market over the last few weeks. And listen, I get it. These last few months have been rather eventf…
How Much Money You Should SPEND (By EVERY AGE)
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here! So, about a month ago, I made a video going over exactly how much money you should have saved up by every age and each milestone you should aim to hit by every decade. In that video, quite a few of you were very hap…
15 Ways to Get Your Act Together For a New Chapter
7 years from now, it’s going to be 2031, almost 2032. And if you’re coming from the future, hello! Nice to have you here. But for now though, when this video is being made, it’s 2024, and you’re either in the middle of your long-term goals, at the end of …
The world's cheapest house? (Only $1.00)
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here! So we did it! Big news here, we finally did it! Even with the stock market losing value, with crypto prices just going to what people are claiming, they can’t save up enough money to put a down payment in on real esta…