yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Harder You Try, The Worse It Gets | Law of Reversed Effort
Have you ever tried petting a cat, but every time you come closer, the cat runs away and keeps watching you from a distance? Then, you walk towards the cat in a second attempt, but it runs away again. When you approach the cat a third time, it flees and d…
Diver Discovers a Strange Vehicle in the Detroit River | Drain the Oceans
I’ve lived in this area my entire life. Right on the United States border. Just a half a mile across the river from Detroit. I’ve been a scuba diver and a diving instructor for over 25 years. I was a broke university student and it was the only place I co…
Computing a Jacobian matrix
So just as a reminder of where we are, we’ve got this very nonlinear transformation. We showed that if you zoom in on a specific point while that transformation is happening, it looks a lot like something linear. We reasoned that you can figure out what l…
The FED Just Ruined Savings Accounts
What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here. So, unfortunately, in the last few weeks, you may have noticed a very significant change to your high interest savings account, and that would be a lack of high interest being paid in your savings account. That’s right.…
Finding derivative with fundamental theorem of calculus | AP®︎ Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have the function g of x, and it is equal to the definite integral from 19 to x of the cube root of t dt. What I’m curious about finding, or trying to figure out, is what is g prime of 27? What is that equal to? Pause this video and try …
Finding function from power series by integrating | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
We know that for (x) in the open interval from (-\frac{1}{2}) to (\frac{1}{2}), that (-\frac{2}{1-2x}) is equal to this series, and I say using this fact, find the function that corresponds to the following series. And like always, pause this video and se…