yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Birth of the Vibrator | Original Sin: Sex
[Music] From the turn of the 20th century, sex has been literally electrified by technology. One of the first five electric gadgets, besides the sewing machine, fan, toaster, and tea kettle, was a plug-in sexual stimulator. The vibrator was a cure-all for…
Metaverse: Beyond Human
Imagine a world where you wake up, head to the office in the morning, to a party with friends in the evening, and then a live concert at midnight, all while sitting in the warmth of your home or from the comfort of your bed. That might just be part of hum…
Games and modularity | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
So you want to build a game, but how would you even get started? Most games we play have thousands of lines of code; some even have millions. Try and imagine a program with thousands of lines of code all in a single file. Sounds like a nightmare to naviga…
Stupid Simple Money Rules
Here’s a fact you might not be aware of: the moment you walk out of the door of your apartment, everybody is looking for one thing: to sell you something and take away your money. And make no mistake, if you don’t take great care of your money and make an…
Analyzing concavity (algebraic) | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So I have the function G here; it’s expressed as a fourth degree polynomial. I want to think about the intervals over which G is either concave upwards or concave downwards. Let’s just remind ourselves what these things look like. Concave upwards is an i…
Don't Make These Hiring Mistakes
I’ve been trying to hire our first engineer for a year, and like, I can’t like find anyone. And it’s not because there’s literally no one with the word engineer on their resume that they can hire, right? [Music] Hello, this is Michael with Harj and Brad…