yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How to STOP Wasting Your Life
You won’t walk around all day knowing that you could, but you didn’t. Have you ever felt like your life is out of control? Almost as if it’s slipping away from your grasp, and you can’t do anything about it? Do you feel stuck, hopeless, tired, and unmotiv…
Military Father | No Man Left Behind
My task was to take out one of the most high-value strategic command and control targets in Belgrade, the capital city of the former Republic of Yugoslavia. I felt absolutely totally confident that I was as well trained and well prepared as possible for a…
Thank you for an amazing year!
That’s, that’s, I started selling jets over 40 years ago, and a lot has changed since those early days. But one thing I really didn’t see coming is this: me sharing my life to millions across the world and you guys tuning in week in and week out. It was …
How to Analyze a Cash Flow Statement Like a Hedge Fund Analyst
There’s an old saying: cash is king. However, when it comes to investing, cash flow is king. In this video, we are going to go over how to analyze a company’s cash flow statement. I’m going to draw upon my experience as an investment analyst at a large in…
Jeff Bezos 1997 Interview
Rather, who are you? I’m Jeff Bezos. And what was your claim to fame? I am the founder of Amazon.com. Where did you get an idea for Amazon.com? Well, three years ago, I was in New York City working for a quantitative hedge fund when I came across the…
My Tenant Horror Story.
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So chances are, if you ask any real estate investor about their experience as a landlord, it’s pretty much inevitable that a large percentage of them will open up and tell you about at least one of their tenant horro…