yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Waste Not, Want Not | The Great Human Race
Whoa! What is that? Look at the bottom of that slope. I see it! Is that an animal? Huh! It’s a baby bushbuck! Look, something attacked this. Oh, look at these marks! It definitely was! Definitely something bit it. It’s bloated. It is bloated. We might no…
Y Combinator Is Back In Person
We have a grand nefarious strategy of giving founders what we wish we had when we were a founder. Yeah, it’s like, what would I have wanted? Yeah, like, that’s certainly how I think about this. This is Michael Seibel with Dalton Caldwell. Today, we actual…
Feudal system during the Middle Ages | World History | Khan Academy
Talk about in other videos. The Middle Ages refers to that roughly 1,000 year period of time in Europe, from the end of the Western Roman Empire in 476 until we get to about a thousand years later, with the emergence of the Renaissance and the Age of Expl…
Advice for Young Entrepreneurs
When young entrepreneurs ask me for advice, I generally tell them to optimize for their alumni network. Your future determinant of success will be most determined by who you are surrounded with. These people will force you to up your game. They’ll be your…
Multi-step unit conversion examples
Brooklyn purchased three pounds of pasta and 12 ounces of cheese to make macaroni and cheese. What is the total weight in ounces of the pasta and cheese combined? So they give us the weight of the pasta in pounds and they give us the weight of the cheese…
Watermelon vs Potato in Slow Motion - Smarter Every Day 155
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I have built a potato gun out of clear pipe, which is amazing because you can see what’s going on on the inside of the potato gun. Today’s experiment is going to be pretty fun. Please excuse my scra…