yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How Long Will You Live?
10,000 years ago, the average human life lasted just over 30 years, and then a hundred years ago that number was up to 50. If you were born in the last few decades in the developed world, then your life expectancy is 80 years. But that is, of course, assu…
Hedonism: The Pursuit of Happiness
In 2012, Drake made a song titled “The Motto,” but what most people remember from it is “YOLO.” YOLO tells you to live in the moment, enjoy life you have today, and not worry too much about tomorrow, because at the end of the day, you only live once. Whil…
Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person
I’ve been asked to talk to you today about an essay that I wrote, uh, for the New York Times, um, last year, which went under a rather dramatic, uh, heading. Uh, it was called “Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person.” And perhaps we can just begin, um, we’re…
Jacobian prerequisite knowledge
Hello everyone. So, in these next few videos, I’m going to be talking about something called the Jacobian and more specifically, it’s the Jacobian matrix or sometimes the associated determinant. Here, I just want to talk about some of the background know…
The CRAZIEST stories of a Real Estate Agent (Featuring Meet Kevin)
We googled this guy’s name and we found out that this guy ended up being a romance scam artist. He would try to guilt people into having the other person put a deposit into the escrow to get past the contingency periods. So now the deposit was at risk. Th…
TIL: That's No Moon. It's Aliens. (Maybe.) | Today I Learned
Recently, there’s been a lot of excitement about this mysterious star and the K2 data from the Kepler space telescope. This star has a bizarre dip in the amount of light that reaches Earth. There is a chance that maybe the dip in the light is caused by an…