yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The GameStop Infinite Money Glitch Explained
What’s up you, Graham? It’s guys here, and today we got to talk about one of the most requested, most mind-boggling topics of investing insanity that I have ever seen. That’s happening right now and causing some people to make millions of dollars in the p…
The Napkin Ring Problem
Hey, Vsauce! Michael here! If you core a sphere; that is, remove a cylinder from it, you’ll be left with a shape called a Napkin ring because, well, it looks like a napkin ring! It’s a bizarre shape because if two Napkin rings have the same height, well t…
The Parker Solar Probe - Smarter Every Day 198
Have you ever figured something else, and you tried to explain it to someone else and they just didn’t believe you? This is the story about a man named Eugene Parker who, in 1958, wrote a paper about solar winds. NASA has named about 20 spacecraft after d…
Reading inverse values from a graph
[Instructor] We’re told the following graph shows y is equal to f of x. All right. And then the first question they say is, “What appears to be the value of f inverse of two?” Pause the video and see if you can have a go at that. All right, now let’s wo…
What is artificial intelligence
In this video, we’re going to talk about what artificial intelligence even is. So to start with that, let’s just break down these words: artificial and intelligence. We could start with intelligence. What does that mean to you? Well, for most of us, we a…
See How Life Has Changed in the Middle East Over 58 Years | Short Film Showcase
That’s right across the Lebanese Syrian border. I stopped, pulled out my camera because I had resolved that the entire time I was in the Middle East, that I was going to keep a detailed photographic record of all my landscapes and have a real collection o…