yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Extraneous solutions of radical equations (example 2) | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re asked which value for D we see D in this equation here makes x = -3 an extraneous solution for this radical equation. √(3x + 25) is equal to D + 2x, and I encourage you to pause the video and try to think about it on your own before we work through …
The Gateway to Secret Underwater Worlds | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
We’re in the middle of winter, so the water is very cold, and the sky was gray and the sea was gray as well, with no limit. You know, when you see the sky and the sea, the sea was very flat, and there is no limit between the sea and the sky. That’s Lauren…
Could Your Phone Hurt You? Electromagnetic Pollution
Electricity is all around us all the time. It makes our lives easier, safer, more fun, and most of us never think about it. But is there such a thing as too much electricity? Could the thing that is the foundation of the modern world slowly be killing us?…
Inside The Most Powerful Startup Community In The World
In 2005, four people came together to make something new. They thought if we bring together smart technologists and give them a little bit of money and a really good community, it would give founders a huge advantage. Out of that first Y Combinator batch …
The Urge To Jump
Have you ever stood near the edge of a cliff, with only a short fence separating you from the chasm below? As you held on tightly to that fence, did you feel a sudden urge to throw yourself off the cliff? Have you ever been driving and imagined what it wo…
Subject and object pronouns | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
All right, so grammarians, I want to talk to you about the difference between subject and object pronouns. But before we do that, let’s start off with a little primer on what subjects and objects actually are—um, just generally, for our grammatical purpos…