yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How have Reagan's policies affected the government? | US Government and Civics | Khan Academy
How have President Reagan’s policies affected the government since he left office? What Ronald Reagan did was set up a titanic debate, really, between those who believed in the New Deal view of government—which was that it was there to help those who cou…
Valence electrons | Atomic structure and properties | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We are now going to talk about valence electrons and non-valence electrons, which are known as core electrons. One question that you might have been asking yourself this whole time that we’ve been looking at electron configurations is: what is the point? …
Safari Live - Day 174 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. A very good afternoon everybody and everyone, and a very warm welcome also to our sunset safari drive all the way from the K…
15 AWESOME YouTube Tricks
Vsauce. Today we’re gonna be covering a topic that is very close to my heart. Clever uses of YouTube’s technologies. Now, I’ve always had a lot of fun messing around with stuff like the loading c… circle and annotations. But, let’s take a safari today th…
Heating curve for water | Thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s look at the heating curve for water. A heating curve has temperature on the y-axis, in this case, we have it in degrees Celsius, and heat added on the x-axis; let’s say it’s in kilojoules. Let’s say we have 18.0 grams of ice, and our goal is to cal…
Ways to manage financial risk | Insurance | Financial literacy | Khan Academy
So, let’s talk a little bit about the different ways that you can manage risk. It’s generally going to fall into a few categories. You can obviously try to avoid the risk altogether or reduce it. You could say, “Alright, that risk is there, but I’m going …