yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Top 3 Tips for a Million-Dollar Pitch
[Music] So how long I think the audience might be interested to hear? Obviously, each one of the pitches is heavily edited down to the best parts. Yes, and it’s edited down for narrative, it’s edited down for conflict and collision of ideas. How much tim…
AP US history long essay example 2 | US History | Khan Academy
So we’re talking about the long essay section on the AP U.S. History exam. In the first video on this essay, we talked about kind of general strategy for how to approach the essay. You’ve got 35 minutes to write it, so I recommend you spend five to ten mi…
Mr. Freeman, part 57
I invite you to play the game. Let us not give a damn about your IQ for a minute and go to the depths of imagination. Look closer. Assume that there’s some kind of time shift, and you’re suddenly went thousands of years back in time. What you got with you…
6 Millionaire Habits I Wish I Knew At 20
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So I know a lot of people say your 20s are the most transformative and influential years of your entire life, and I have to say it, but that is absolutely a load of truth. Because looking back over my last 10 years, I…
Life of Muhammad and beginnings of Islam part 1 | World History | Khan Academy
Now going to give an overview on the beginnings of Islam. Regardless of whether you are part of an Islamic culture, you are a practicing Muslim, or you believe in the Islamic Traditions, it’s valuable to learn about the beginnings of Islam because today n…
The Internet Has Massively Broadened Career Possibilities
Let’s look at this next