yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Is It Possible to Run a Marathon in Under 2 Hours? | Breaking2
Ever since 490 BC, when Thea deputies ran the 26 miles from Marathon to Athens to declare victory over the Persians and promptly died, humans have been asking themselves, “How fast can we run this distance?” It’s a question that has motivated us for thou…
Warren Buffett: MAJOR Updates from the Berkshire Hathaway Shareholders Meeting 2023
Well, we made it everyone! I’m here in Omaha with Hamish, and just a few days ago we were lucky enough to go to the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting to get all the latest news from the man himself, Mr. Warren Buffett. And of course, the real…
It’s Rare to Have Competing, Viable, Scientific Theories
Edition that’s similar to Bayesianism, isn’t it? In both cases, they’re assuming that you can enumerate all the possible theories, but you can’t, because that’s the creativity coming in. It’s very rare in science to have more than one viable theory in phy…
How To Spot A LIAR
Everybody lies; the only variable is about what. This is not just a quote taken from Dr. House; it’s a fact that all of us must accept, whether we like it or not. The average human hears between 10 to 200 lies a day, depending on the number of social inte…
Limitless with Chris Hemsworth | Official Trailer | Disney+
(Wind blowing) - You’re probably asking yourself why I’m dangling off a rope a thousand feet off the ground. I’m asking the same question. Well, Disney wanted to make a show about longevity. Turns out this has something to do with it. Here we go. (Dramat…
Falling objects | Physics | Khan Academy
If you drop a bowling ball and a feather in a room, the bowling ball falls first. No surprise, the feather just keeps floating over there. But if you could somehow create a vacuum chamber where there’s absolutely no air in between and repeated the experim…