yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Amazing Engineering of Rescue Helicopters - Smarter Every Day 289
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. You’re smart; you know how this works by now. We’re in the middle of a deep dive series into the US Coast Guard, and they’re amazing. We’ve talked about how they rescue people. We’ve talked about th…
Chase Adam at Startup School NY 2014
Chase Adams, the founder of Watsi. Watsi is the crowdfunding platform for healthcare that lets anyone donate as little as $5 to fund medical care for people in need. So before starting Watsi, Chase traveled, worked, and studied in more than 20 countries. …
A Simulated Mars Tour | StarTalk
Hi Neil, welcome to Hi Seeds and Hawaii Space Exploration Animal Looking Simulation! I’m really excited to give you guys a tour, so come on, let’s go. This is the biology lab, and this is our astrobiologist Cyprian. So, most of the experiments we’re doin…
10 Luxuries You Can Only Give Yourself
You know there’s a multi-billion dollar industry that caters specifically to the 1%. It’s designed for people with deep pockets, and most of the time, it’s a bit over the top just because it can be. But some of the best luxuries in life are only those you…
Is The Universe A Simulation?
In 1970, a British mathematician named John Conway created a project known as the Game of Life. Even though it’s a game, it isn’t one that you necessarily play. The Game of Life is a zero-player game, which doesn’t make much sense when you hear it. The wa…
NERD WARS: Thor vs. Kratos -- Who Would Win?
Hey everybody! It’s the wacky Gamers. Okay, Adam’s lame but it’s us! It’s Jeff and Adam. I’m Adam and we’re here to do another versus video. Yes, we are! A lot of people seem to like them, so we’re going to keep going. But this time, it’s another user sug…