yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Kevin O'Leary V2
Actually, I was born Terrence Thomas Kevin O’Leary. My dad was Irish and he loved long names, but when they got me home, everybody realized it was going to be total confusion because dad was named Terry too. So the next thing I knew, I was Kevin. Two year…
Aretha Franklin Finds Her Sound | Genius: Aretha
[music playing] That was a wonderful performance. I wish I could stay. I think I sang really well. You always sing well. But we haven’t found it yet, have we? Not for lack of trying. So let’s get you back into the studio and put our heads together. Ham…
Dividing fractions and whole number word problems
We are told that Billy has one fourth of a pound of trail mix. He wants to share it equally between himself and his brother. How much trail mix would they each get? So pause this video and try to figure that out. All right, now let’s work through this to…
Reasons Not to Have Sex
In most modern-day societies, the idea of not having sex may sound preposterous. After all, isn’t physical intimacy one of the key ingredients of a healthy and fulfilling life? Well, if that’s the case, then we stumble upon a problem: as the visibility of…
Why Banks Are Collapsing (DO THIS ASAP)
Bank Regulators have seen Silicon Valley Bank in the largest bank failure since the Great Recession. Customers were rushing to take their money out. There are recent developments that concern a few Banks. “What’s up guys, it’s Graham here, and in the las…
Second Persian Invasion
The last videos we saw a dominant Persia have to put down a rebellion by the Ionians in the Anatolian Peninsula, and they were really, really mad that these Ionians were helped by the Athenians and the Eritreans. So, Darius, the King of Kings, goes off to…