yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Urska Srsen
Next up, we have Kka Sersen, who is the co-founder of Bella Beat. Bella Beat helps pregnant women have a healthy pregnancy using the Quantified Self Technologies, and Bella Beat has recently been recognized by Fast Company as one of the most innovative pr…
Thomas Hunt Morgan and fruit flies
Where we left off in the last video, we were in 1902-1903, and Mendelian genetics had been rediscovered at the turn of the century. Bovary and Sutton independently had proposed the chromosome theory, that the chromosomes were the location for where these …
The Rise of Pong | Generation X
On loop, bloop-bloop! It was the coolest thing you’ve ever seen in your life, dude. It’s a square ball that’s moving at like the slowest pace ever. It’s like so beautiful to watch. Pong, it’s like this form of meditation. Pong was the first successfully …
The Moon
When you look at the Moon in the night sky, it might seem reasonably close, but it’s actually incredibly far away. Right over here is a scaled picture of the distance between the Earth and the Moon. Earth has a diameter of approximately 8,000 miles, while…
Nature's Grand Show: Exploring a Season of Wonder in Canada | National Geographic
In a world that often feels consumed by the rush of daily life, there’s something profound about standing before nature’s grand show, experiencing landscapes that leave us with this humbling sense of scale. It nurtures our souls and heightens our senses. …
Donald Trump's Tour of His Manhattan Office
This office right now is all you, and it’s a little bit junky. Yeah, this I just got a few weeks ago. Houses from the Marine Corps, that’s the chair for the apprentice. Those are different things. Tom Brady’s Super Bowl helmet. Wow, this is Mike Tyson’s b…