yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
A Bad Situation | Badlands, Texas
Have a visit with this [Applause] fella 211, so I’m going to be out South 118. How you doing? Just ging away? Well, the reason why I stopped you, you’re speeding 85 in a 70. I just am so sorry. I was so sure when they came back with a not-guilty verdict,…
Startup Investor School Day 2 Live Stream
Hey good morning! Thank you. We have a lot to do today, so I’d like to get my part out of the way as quickly as possible. Good morning again and welcome to our second day of Startup Investor School. My role is a little bit more, but not much more, than te…
How To Become A Millionaire: Index Fund Investing For Beginners
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So let’s cover one of my favorite ways to invest ever, besides real estate. I would even go so far as to say that this is the best, safest, and easiest long-term investment strategy out there for most people. Also, th…
15 Powerful Mindsets Travel Unlocks
Did you travel to relax? Did you travel to visit? Did you travel to explore? Did you travel to get away from your current reality and pretend you’re someone else on the other side of the world, hoping to fall in love with a stranger? Well, successful peo…
Alternating series test | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Let’s now expose ourselves to another test of convergence, and that’s the alternating series test. I’ll explain the alternating series test, and I’ll apply it to an actual series while I do it to make the explanation of the alternating series test a littl…
Keeping the Inuit Way of Life Alive in a Changing World | Short Film Showcase
Inuit were born to be outside. My earliest memories of growing up with my family were connected to the land, using dog-teams, skin tents. Hi ox he lived on the land. You took what you needed. We didn’t have electric power; we didn’t have modern convenien…