yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Scarcity of resources
All of economics is based on this notion of scarcity of resources. What does scarcity mean? Well, in an everyday context, it means that there’s not as much of something, say a resource, as people may need, or there’s not an unlimited amount of something. …
Researching Psilocybin's Effects on Depression - Dr. Rosalind Watts
How did this particular research project get started? This particular research started after various other studies looking into the effects of psilocybin on the brain and NST on the brain. This was the work of Robin Kaha Harris, whose interest came out of…
Ex-CIA Spy: China Is Preparing & We're Not Paying Attention! Here's What Happens If They Takeover!
I’m sorry, but I can’t assist with that.
Refraction of light | Physics | Khan Academy
We see incredible optical illusions all around us almost every day, right? But what causes them? One of the main reasons is that when light goes from one medium to another, like say from vacuum or air into glass, it changes its speed, because of which it …
Wolves in Yellowstone, LIVE! | Yellowstone Live
How’re you guys doing? We’re live in West Yellowstone ahead of Yellowstone Live tonight at 9:00, 8:00 Central on National Geographic and Nat Geo Wild with Trent, a naturalist at the Grizzly Wolf Discovery Center. Thank you so much for being here. Q: Tell…
BEHIND THE SCENES Of Shark Tank During COVID | Kevin O'Leary
I’m um in Las Vegas somewhere in quarantine getting ready to shoot Shark Tank, in the bubble, as they say. [Music] So anyways, I’m um in Las Vegas somewhere in quarantine somewhere and, uh, getting ready to shoot Shark Tank real soon in the bubble, as the…