yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Molecular polarity | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Here’s a pretty cool video! If you pour oil in water, you find that the oil does not mix with water. You can see that it’s not mixing. Why not? Well, to answer that question, we need to explore something called molecular polarity, and that’s what we’ll do…
Lunch On Board The Hot Tuna | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
We’re bite chasers today. The strategy today is going to be tackle the guy with the ball. If we hear someone’s marking or someone’s getting bit, we’re beelining right for them. Right now, the clock is ticking. Whoever’s on the meat is getting mugged today…
Writing arithmetic series in sigma notation
What I want to do in this video is get some practice writing Series in Sigma notation, and I have a series in front of us right over here. We have seven plus nine plus eleven, and we keep on adding all the way up to four hundred five. So first, let’s jus…
Example of vector magnitude from initial and terminal points
What we have depicted here we could call vector w, and you can see from this diagram that its initial point is right over here. It’s the point negative seven, comma, positive three, and its terminal point is this point right over here, which is the point …
Traveling Back in Time? | StarTalk
If I had a time machine, I think I’d go back to when a Mars-sized protoplanet sideswiped Earth in the early solar system, sideswiping our crust, casting billions of tons of rock into orbit around the Earth, which then coalesced to form our Moon. I want, I…
Bullets HITTING Bullets in Slow Motion - THE IMPOSSIBLE SHOT - Smarter Every Day 287
Three, two, one. Fire (BANG!) Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I am at the American Museum of Natural History. It’s a Smithsonian Museum. And this is something that I saw ten years ago, and it changed the way I think about bullets …