yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Why Die?
When do you want to die? The Reaper is busy, but he can fit you in right now. Too soon? Later, perhaps? Future you will keep the appointment? Old and with a life fully lived, perhaps ever so slightly bored and ready? Now you might think that, but when th…
Identifying tenths on a number line | Math | 4th grade | Khan Academy
Where is the point on the number line? Well, here it is; here’s the point! But I’m guessing that they’re asking not literally just to find it and look at it, but what number is this point graphed at? Where is this on the number line? So, one thing we kno…
It Started: The Housing Market Is Collapsing
Home prices are starting to fall. Buyers haven’t been this pessimistic in a decade. The housing recession will probably end up being more severe. What’s up, Graham? It’s Guys here. So as much as we joke about how Millennials are patiently waiting for the…
Underwater Explosions (Science with Alan Sailer!) - Smarter Every Day 63
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! So today, I’m in California, and I have the great privilege of introducing the man, Alan Sailer. Hello, Alan! Sailer is, if you don’t know, one of the best high-speed photographers that currently do…
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka | US government and civics | Khan Academy
[Kim] Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy, and today we’re learning more about Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Decided in 1954, Brown v. Board was a landmark case that opened the door for desegregation and the Modern Civil Rights Movement. In Brown, …
Porn Star Agent | Drugs, Inc.
Down in the San Fernando Valley, top porn agent Mark Spiegler is on his way to make sure a new client doesn’t make the same mistake with her career. With us, the girls have three basic jobs: there’s the sex part, and then there’s the, you know, “don’t mak…