yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Creating a Food Forest | Farm Dreams
[Music] Oh, there’s baby chicks! Yep, two weeks old. I’ve gotta hold them. Hi, little friend! I sent Bob some photos and a description of Jill and Craig’s seven-acre plot, hoping he can offer advice on the best way to actualize their vision. Okay, this …
The Apple Vision Pro is Terrifying for Humanity's Future
I hate being bored, don’t you? My mind starts to wander. I stress about work, friends, and what I’ll be doing with my life in 5, 10, 20 years. I feel fidgety and uncomfortable. A study by the National Institute of Health showed that boredom can disrupt mo…
The Economic Collapse of 2020 | What You MUST Know
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So if you watch my videos for a while, you’ll know that every now and then I love to scour through the headlines and pick the ones that really stand out the most and lead to some really interesting discoveries. Today…
Developing strategies for multiplying decimals
So right over here, we want to compute what three times 0.25, or 3 times 25 hundredths, is. I encourage you to pause the video and see if you can figure this out. All right, now let’s work through this together. In this video, we’re going to explore mult…
Better models, better startups.
Um, this can just basically supercharge that and, you know, have one person do the work of 10. Yeah, we call this episode “Better Models, Better Startups.” I think that is literally true for B2B companies, where it’s like the underlying models—like B2B s…
Worked example: estimating sin(0.4) using Lagrange error bound | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Estimating the sign of 0.4 using a McLaurin polynomial, what is the least degree of the polynomial that assures an error smaller than 0.001? So, what are we talking about here? Well, we could take some function and estimate it with an Nth degree McLaurin…