yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Private jet expert reacts!
Why would I go to an unknown plane owner compared to a corporation? Because here’s the thing: plane owners are notorious for skimping on maintenance. Okay, I’m sorry, Kev, this is just not true. You really can’t—you cannot skimp on maintenance that’s req…
All Shower Thoughts I Had This Year
have you ever paused to think about how one of the most famous sentences of all time doesn’t make grammatical sense? Well, because we all apparently heard it wrong and continue to say it wrong. According to the man himself, Neil Armstrong, what he did say…
Ancient Maya 101 | National Geographic
The Maya, they’re considered one of the most advanced civilizations to have existed in the Americas before the Spanish conquest. But who exactly were the ancient Maya people, and what led to the collapse of their civilization? As early as 1800 BC, the Ma…
FEELING THE FORCES OF A FIGHTER JET - Smarter Every Day 159
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! I used to wear glasses; I don’t know if you knew that about me, but I was a nearsighted guy until I got the surgery. This is what kept me from being a fighter pilot in the Air Force. I had the schol…
Dopamine Detox: Become Invincible
What if I told you that you’re an addict and you don’t even know it? Don’t worry, you’re not alone. We all are, or most of us at least. And here’s a little experiment to prove it: once this video ends, turn off your phone and leave it in a drawer for the…
Death Along the Ganges River | The Story of God
Bodies have been cremated on the banks of the River Ganges for hundreds of years, bathed in the waters of their holy river, wrapped in linen, and placed on a wooden pyre. The dead are consumed by flame. Swami Barista, a monk and a doctor, is my guide to d…