yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Beautiful and Elusive: This Bird Is Losing Its Home | National Geographic
[Music] My name is Roger Factor. I’m a conservationist working for the Wildlife Conservation Society. Most of my weekend, actually, when I’m not busy doing some other thing on conservation, I’m out bird-watching. We are inside the Colloforus today, just…
There Is No End of Science
That’s an excellent example of what’s called a crucial test, which is sort of the pinnacle of what science is all about. If we do a test and it doesn’t agree with a particular theory that we have, that’s problematic. But that doesn’t mean that it refutes …
Why India is a Rising Power
If you were to look at China and India, and those two countries specifically, um, and you were to handicap them, as you are uniquely qualified to do, maybe you could just broadly handicap India versus China for us. This is a topic we’ve been talking about…
Fishing Tips: Radio Etiquette | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
Hey guys, I’m Captain Tammy Gray on the Real Action, and I’m gonna give you a little marine etiquette today about your marine radios. Everybody has at least one; somebody’s having multiple. We have three through marine radio, and this one fret. For insta…
How We Make Money on YouTube with 20M Subs
In 2023, Kurzgesagt has existed for 10 years, insanely long in internet years. We are among the largest sciency channels on Youtube and still a bit of a black box to people. So let us talk about ourselves a bit in three parts: our backstory, how we financ…
What IS THIS???? Mind Blow #13
This blinky dude is an Android, and this strange-looking orange is actually the Sun. Eat it! Vsauce, Kevin here. This is Milo. The fact that this graffiti-themed commercial for the Super Game Boy was banned isn’t nearly as cool as who did the voiceovers.…