yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Sun is NOT Yellow! #shorts
The sun is yellow, or is it? You’re used to seeing a happy yellow circle floating in a blue sky, but that’s fake news. If you placed a prism in a sunbeam in space, you’d see that the sun radiates light in every color of the visible spectrum. If these colo…
Multiplying and dividing decimals by 10, 100, 1000
In this video, we’re gonna get a little bit of practice multiplying and dividing decimals by ten, hundred, and a thousand. So let’s just start with a little bit of a warm-up. If I were to say, “What is two point zero five times ten?” Pause this video and …
The 5 BEST Credit Cards For Beginners in 2020
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here! So, a little over a year ago, I made a video going over the best beginner credit cards to get in 2019. But now, I realized there’s a bit of a problem, and that is that it’s not 2019 anymore. It’s the future—it’s now 2020.…
Shepard Tone Illusion .... and more!
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And today I released a brand new Vsauce Leanback. A playlist of educational videos from all over YouTube that I think are cool and I host sort of like a Vsauce TV show. You can start that by clicking the box up in the corner or…
Vector form of the multivariable chain rule
So, in the last couple of videos, I talked about the multi-variable chain rule, which I have written up here. If you haven’t seen those, go take a look. Here, I want to write it out in vector notation, and this helps us generalize it a little bit when the…
My Awesome Australia Adventure! - Smarter Every Day 99
Hey, it’s me Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I apologize up front. My left eardrum has exploded. I have no idea how loud I’m talking. My feedback loop is broken. Anyway, the purpose of this video is to inform you what I did in Australia for two…