yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Perfect progressive aspect | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello, grammarians! Previously, I had covered three of the basic aspects of English, and that’s simple, perfect, and progressive. So, there’s just one more, and it’s a combination of the last two, and it’s called the perfect progressive. To recap what t…
15 Signs You Have A Rich Life
Are you living the life you’ve always dreamed of? Do you wake up each morning feeling grateful and fulfilled? If not, it’s time to assess if you’re truly living a rich life. But what exactly is a rich life? Is it measured by wealth and material possession…
Using matrices to represent data: Payoffs | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
We’re told Violet and Lennox play an elaborated version of rock-paper-scissors, where each combination of shape choices earns a different number of points for the winner. So, rock-paper-scissors, the game, of course, where rock beats scissors, scissors b…
Multiplying mixed numbers
Let’s see if we can figure out what 2 and 1⁄4 times 3 is. Pause this video and see if you can work that out. All right, now there’s different ways that we could approach this. One way to approach this is to recognize that if I multiply anything times thr…
Finding inverses of rational functions | Equations | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
All right, let’s say that we have the function f of x and it’s equal to 2x plus 5 over 4 minus 3x. What we want to do is figure out what is the inverse of our function. Pause this video and try to figure that out before we work on that together. All righ…
How to Lucid Dream
Imagine you’re flying, feeling the cold air on your skin, flooded by light. You look down and see a sandy beach peppered with palm trees, and you decide to go there. Suddenly, you’re on the beach, drinking a piña colada, but you’re alone. Wouldn’t it be n…