yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Why Are Turkeys Running Wild in These Neighborhoods? | National Geographic
[Music] Don’t get close to them. Wild turkeys are not considered native to California, most of the state. Really, turkeys are not a problem, but they are certainly a local problem, particularly in some residential areas that have high-quality turkey habit…
Binomial variables | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about a special class of random variables known as binomial variables. As we will see as we build up our understanding of them, not only are they interesting in their own right, but there’s a lot of very powerf…
Making $1,000 Per Day Washing Windows | Undercover Millionaire
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, a few months ago my security system caught this guy showing up at the house. At first, I had no idea what he was doing. He honestly looked to be up to no good. But the next day, my neighbor told me that he was go…
Why become a product engineer? -- with Volley (YC W18) & Luminai (YC S20)
[Music] foreign [Music] Thanks for joining! For those of you who don’t know, I’m Paige from Y Combinator, where I work on our work at a startup team. Essentially, the team is helping all of our Founders hire great people like you. So, this is why I becom…
Primary Elections Explained
Primary elections are how political parties in the United States pick their strongest candidate to run for president. The parties do this by holding mini-elections in each of the states, and the candidates with the most votes from these elections become t…
Writing equilibrium constant and reaction quotient expressions | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
The equilibrium constant is symbolized by the letter K, and the equilibrium constant tells us about the relative concentrations of reactants and products at equilibrium. Let’s say we have a hypothetical reaction where reactants A and B turn into products…