yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Direction of reversible reactions | Equilibrium | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
As an example of a reversible reaction, let’s look at the hypothetical reaction where diatomic gas X₂ turns into its individual atoms, X. It would turn into two of them, so X₂ goes to 2X. The forward reaction is X₂ turning into 2X, and the reverse reactio…
Crisis | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Wordsmiths, we’re in it now, you and I. The situation has become very serious. You might even say it’s a crisis. Yes, crisis is the word we’re going to be looking at in this video. Crisis, it’s a noun. It means a tipping point, a very dangerous period or …
Still Human | Nobel Peace Prize Shorts
[Music] Don’t you talk about it. [Music] Ahem, of Kundalini. Yeah, near question item cool. Alexander returneth to cool. Remove a new drama for their which my basket. Could you rather lag in the belief that it would man build over be our mother the way an…
Multiplying and dividing by powers of 10
In another video, we introduce ourselves to the idea of powers of 10. We saw that if I were to just say 10 to the first power, that means that we’re just really just going to take 1. If we have 10 to the second power, that means that we’re going to take …
Curvature formula, part 5
So let’s sum up where we are so far. We’re looking at this formula and trying to understand why it corresponds to curvature, why it tells you how much a curve actually curves. The first thing we did is we noticed that this numerator corresponds to a cert…
Compound interest: How to turn $1 into $10
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. Since today, I’m going to be telling you guys how to trim $1 into $10. And it’s not some stupid [ __ ] sales pitch. I’m not trying to get you to invest in some [ __ ] mother; I hate those people. So I’m not trying to …