yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Lesson Planning with Khanmigo Webinar
Welcome, welcome everybody! We are here today to talk about lesson planning and how at KH Academy and with Con Migo we can support you with lesson planning. We know we are all teachers; we have been in the classroom. We have gone through lesson planning.…
Absurdism: Life is Meaningless
Sisyphus was a great king of Greek mythology. So clever, he was able to outwit the gods themselves. Twice he cheated death; first by capturing Thanatos, the god of death, then by tricking the goddess of the underworld, Persephone, into releasing him back …
LearnStorm at Wewahitchka High School
We will hitch high schools. Have a great little school here. It’s a rural area, about 350 kids, 7 through 12. A great school, though our kids are interested in bettering themselves. Miss Camden Topman is a reading ELA teacher here, English Language Arts…
Why I Evicted My Tenant
Have you ever dealt with tenants? Mine was the first tenant I ever rented to. Though he explained to me that his wife was the one who worked, so all the income ran through her bank account. His credit was really bad; her credit was bad. But I just figured…
Everything About Irrigation Pivots (Farmers are Geniuses) - Smarter Every Day 278
If you’ve ever been flying in an airplane and you look out the window and you see these big green circles in the middle of a field, what is that? Today, we’re going to build the thing that makes this happen. This is my buddy Trey; he’s a farmer. Farmers a…
NERD WARS: Thor vs. Kratos -- Who Would Win?
Hey everybody! It’s the wacky Gamers. Okay, Adam’s lame but it’s us! It’s Jeff and Adam. I’m Adam and we’re here to do another versus video. Yes, we are! A lot of people seem to like them, so we’re going to keep going. But this time, it’s another user sug…