yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Think on it | Barkskins
Mathilde: One only has to say the word “English,” and they come running like sick black dogs at low tide. Captain: Well, I heard about your selfless heroics with the Iroquois and the tragedy with the priests. Well, I suppose there’s nothing more that nee…
Safari Live - Day 360 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Hello everybody and good afternoon! How awesome is this? We’re kicking off our sunset safari with awesome animals! Well, we…
Eulers formula magnitude
In this video, we’re going to talk a bunch about this fantastic number e to the J Omega T. One of the coolest things that’s going to happen here, we’re going to bring together what we know about complex numbers and this exponential form of complex numbers…
Analyzing concavity (algebraic) | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So I have the function G here; it’s expressed as a fourth degree polynomial. I want to think about the intervals over which G is either concave upwards or concave downwards. Let’s just remind ourselves what these things look like. Concave upwards is an i…
Align | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hey there, wordsmiths! This video is about the word “align.” A line, this word has two definitions. The first is to support, ally, or associate with someone, and the second definition is to put things in a straight line. That’s its literal definition; it …
15 Biggest Vulnerabilities Other People Exploit
Family, friends, partners, your colleagues, your boss; it can be hard to believe that any of these people would exploit your vulnerabilities, but they do. Sometimes it’s intentional and they want to gain something from you; sometimes it’s unintentional an…