yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Top Hats for CATS! LÜT #25
Star Wars splatter art and a t-shirt commemorating one of history’s most lapidary quotes. It’s episode 25 of LÜT. Navigate the web with a glow-in-the-dark mouse containing an actual spider. And you can use a straw to drink juice right out of a fruit, but …
Top 3 Online Businesses to Start in 2025 (Even if You’re Broke)
I’ve been in this online business world for 5 years and businesses I’ve made generated well over 500k US in profit. I’ve tried everything from service based work to digital products to content creation with this channel of 1.4 million subscribers and I ge…
I'm Atoms (Scientific Cover of Jason Mraz's I'm Yours)
Well, an atom’s made of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The first two in the nucleus, the third around it. It’s mostly empty space, but it feels solid in any case. The elements are all the different types of atoms; they differ by the number of protons i…
Kamala Harris Should've Apologized To America
There was a magic moment in that interview around the six minute mark. I was watching it with my daughter, who’s a Harris supporter, so you can imagine Thanksgiving dinner in my place. But, um, here was the moment: she was questioned about immigration for…
Peter Lynch: Buy These 5 Types of Stocks (Rare Clip)
When most people think about investing in stock market, they dream about investing in a fast grower. A company that is growing at over 25 percent a year—at 25 a year a company’s profits will double in three, they quadruple in six, and up eightfold in nine…
Examples identifying multiples
In this video, we’re going to start thinking about what it means for something to be a multiple of a number. So we’re asked which of the following numbers is a multiple of 9. So pause this video and see if you can figure that out. All right, now let’s do…