yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
I Looked Inside A Live Egg .... Smarter Every Day 254
Okay. I’m at the Exploratorium in San Francisco, and this is one of the most amazing exhibits I’ve ever seen. It’s very simple, but it’s mindblowing. These are live chicken embryos, right? They’ve got them laid out here. It’s basically an egg without the …
Armies of the Future | StarTalk
[Music] Rise of the robots. I. This is a story that’s never ending, heavily treated in science fiction platforms. Uh, for all, for in all frontiers: servant robots, military robots, sex robots. And maybe that’s inevitable, given the direction technolog…
Encounter | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hello wordsmiths! I hope luck is with us today because on the high seas of vocabulary, there’s no telling what word we’ll encounter. Encounter. It’s a verb, a noun too. The verb means to unexpectedly meet with someone or something, to come face to face w…
How to Surface a Submarine in the Arctic Ocean - Smarter Every Day 260
[Man] Seven zero, six up, point four up. Standby for impact! - Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I’ve made a really long journey to an ice floe in the Arctic Ocean to board the USS Toledo, a U.S. Navy fast attack nuclear submarine, which has punched its …
Are You Lightest In The Morning?
[Applause] So recently a friend of mine says to me, “Derek, you know you’re heaviest at night before you go to bed and lightest in the morning when you wake up.” Okay, but that doesn’t really seem to make sense. “Of course it does. Overnight, you’re not…
Refraction and frequency | Waves | Middle school physics | Khan Academy
When light is going through a uniform medium like the air, or as we know, light can go through vacuum, so nothing at all, we imagine it going in a straight line. But we see something really interesting happening here when it hits this glass prism. I know …