yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The elements of a story | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! I’m going to draw you a map right now, and it’s going to look like I’ve drawn a mountain. But it’s not a map of a mountain; it’s a map of a story. What you’re saying: how do you map a story? What makes a story pointy? These are great quest…
Life Lessons From a 7-Thousand-Mile Bike Ride | Short Film Showcase
[Music] I’ve met a lot of older people: grandparents, teachers, who give me the spiel of, “My life went by so fast. Just yesterday I was 19 or 25, and now I don’t know where all that time went. I just blinked and I was 80.” And I think about that, and I…
Why Is the Ocean Salty and Rivers Are Not? #shorts #kurzgesagt
Why is the ocean salty and rivers aren’t? In fact, most of the salt in the sea comes from rivers. But how can that be? It all starts with ocean water heading out on the journey. Warm surface water evaporates, the water vapor then rises to condense into cl…
Where Is The Economy Going After The Pandemic? | Morning Joe
What is going on with the economy as prices seem to be going up everywhere? And you also just can’t seem to order anything. Things aren’t there. Yes, we have disruption to the supply chain, not just domestically but globally. But the reason that there is…
Why Luxury Watches Are More Expensive Than Regular Watches
Hello, a Luxor’s! In previous videos, we’ve spoken all about some of the most luxurious watch brands in the world and some of the most expensive timepieces they’ve produced. But what makes them so expensive? What drives up the cost of these wrist frosting…
Mark Zuckerberg on Taking Risks and Finding Talented People
And just to make this point, how far into Facebook did it actually become a company? Um, I don’t know. I think probably it