yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Gustaf Alströmer - Growth for Startups
My name is Gustav. I’m gonna give a talk on growth for startups. This is gonna be for some of you guys, not super relevant right now because you might not have launched and thinking too much about growth when you’re having a launch isn’t that relevant. Bu…
Policy | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hello wordsmiths! The word we’re featuring in this video is policy, which means an official rule or set of rules. It’s a noun. It comes from the Greek word polis, which means city. As a root, it has to do with cities and government. I live in Washington,…
Free live tutoring at schoolhouse.world
Hi everyone, Sal here from Khan Academy, and I just wanted to make an announcement of something that I think many of you will find useful. I have a little bit of a side project going on called schoolhouse.world. It isn’t an official Khan Academy project, …
Surviving a Pathet Lao Prison | No Man Left Behind
Unassisted, Vietnam cannot produce the military formations essential to it. News is just breaking: a United States plane has been shot down over [Music] La. When they caught me, I took everything [Music] away, but you’ve got something that they can’t get…
Is Reality Real? The Simulation Argument
We humans are unable to experience the true nature of the universe, unfiltered. Our senses and brains can only process a fraction of the world. So we have to use concepts and tools to learn about the true nature of reality. Technological progress not only…
15 Daily Rituals for Cultivating a Growth Mindset
Many people ask themselves what they should do to improve their mindset and reach a point where they can be productive, get things done, and be the best version of themselves. But few of them actually focus on what it takes to improve their mindset. And w…