yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Frankish women in the Carolingian Dynasty primary source | World History | Khan Academy
In this video, I want to talk about the lives of Frankish women who lived during the Carolingian Dynasty in the 8th and 9th century. So you can see here in blue the Carolingian Dynasty, and the Carolingian Dynasty ruled over much of the former territory o…
I got a CUSTOMIZED Credit Card from ZHC
Do you know about how much every single month you would just spend just on yourself? [Applause] Whatever we make, we spend. What’s the most you’ve spent for a video? Like anywhere from 300,000 to—Wow! What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So if you’ve sp…
m͏̺͓̲̥̪í͇͔̠ś̷͎̹̲̻̻̘̝t̞̖͍͚̤k̥̞à̸͕̮͍͉̹̰͚̰ẹ̶̢̪s͏̨͈̙̹̜͚̲ ̛̬͓͟
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. The title of this video is misspelled in honour of mistakes. Mistakes are everywhere; they surround us like air. To err is human. Faults, flaws, faux pas, fumbles and fallacies are as much a part of who we are today as the stuff…
How to buy a private jet in 6 hours
I said, “Hey, you guys have a Gulf Stream 550 or 650 for sale? I’m interested in a jet. I got to take delivery by the end of the year.” And they’re like, that was a phone call he made to me. “Actually, we don’t keep jets around; we can’t deliver a plane t…
Khan Academy Ed Talks with Benjamin Riley - Wednesday, January 5, 2022
Hello and welcome to Ed Talks, where we at Khan Academy talk to folks who are influential in the field of education. I’m Kristen Deserver, the Chief Learning Officer here at Khan Academy, and I am happy today to welcome Ben Riley, who is with Deans for Im…
Three types of sentence | Syntax | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! Hello Paige! Hi David! So, we have three different sentence varieties that we’re going to talk about today. All right, um here are their three flavors: Flavor number one, declarative sentences; flavor number two, interrogative sentence…