yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
RC step response 3 of 3 example
In the last video, we worked out the step response of an RC circuit, and now we’re going to look at a real example. So, this is our answer. This is the step response, the total response to our circuit to a step input. What does this look like? So, I’m go…
Linking verbs | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! Today we’re talking about verbs and bears. So, we had previously established at least one thing about the verb, and that was that it can show actions. Um, but today I’d like to introduce the idea that the verb can link ideas to one anot…
HIDDEN RAGE FACE? ... and more! IMG! #35
Wrap a hot dog in a burger and share one with the girl who looks like Taylor Lautner. It’s episode 35 of IMG! Okay, see this picture of Albert Einstein? Well, squint your eyes to see a wizard. Last week a volcano erupted in Iceland and it was captured fr…
Suing Robinhood
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So as most of you know, I really like to keep this channel centered around personal finance and investing. But every now and then, something comes up that I think is worth talking about further, and today, it’s impor…
Why Stupidity is Power | Priceless Benefits of Being Stupid
People generally fear being perceived as stupid. Often, stupid people are looked down upon and laughed at. Society perceives stupid people as useless, as a burden rather than an asset. Hence, most of us try to prevent ourselves from appearing stupid in fr…
Can We Fix Climate Change? | Explorer
We can’t really fix climate change. We can mitigate it. We can get to work on it. We can spread it out. We can make things better. What we got to do is stop burning fossil fuels immediately, as soon as we possibly can. Then there’s a strange effect that …