yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Fake machine guns found at JFK mail facility | To Catch a Smuggler
[♪ suspenseful music plays] [Officer Cisneros] A suit machine gun. Okay, I can see by the mechanism that this isn’t a toy. Has a magazine. It’s an airsoft magazine. Shoots pellets. The problem that we have with this, it must have an orange tip that is at…
Fossils | Evolution | Middle school biology | Khan Academy
[Narrator] When I was 12 years old, I went on vacation to Alaska with my family. While walking down one of the cold stone covered beaches, I spotted a large pile of rocks that seemed to have slid off the side of one of the hills that connected to the shor…
How Small Is An Atom? Spoiler: Very Small.
Atoms are ridiculous and unbelievably small. A single human hair is about as thick as 500,000 carbon atoms stacked over each other. Look at your fist; it contains trillions and trillions of atoms. If one atom in it were about as big as a marble, how big w…
Your Top Questions Answered: Part 1
What should you do if you want to be very successful and have a very, very big impact on the world? Make your work and your passion the same thing. Don’t forget about the money part, but do it in a way that you’re going to, uh, produce enough money that y…
Guided meditation for procrastination
Welcome to the meditation on procrastination. And somewhat ironically, I’ve been procrastinating making this meditation, so we’re all in the same boat together. So, as with all meditations, posture and breathing makes a big difference. I really encoura…
Simple redox reactions | Chemistry | Khan Academy
You have probably heard about this word: oxidation, oxidizing, or antioxidants, and stuff like that. But what exactly does it mean, and what can you do knowing about it? Well, let’s find out. Oxidation has the word oxygen in it; you can see that, right? …