yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Hunting Caribou | Life Below Zero
We had a really tough year this year. The Yukon River is kind of our life blood here, and we no longer have it as an option for getting food. So we’re relying on getting moose, bears, and caribou. We had no luck getting the moose this year. The caribou ha…
2015 AP Biology free response 6
In an attempt to rescue a small, isolated population of snakes from decline, a few male snakes from several larger populations of the same species were introduced into the population. In 1992, the snakes reproduce sexually, and there are abundant resource…
3 Minute Breather for Teachers
Welcome, teachers, for this short guided meditation. Remind yourself that meditation, there’s no right way to do it. It’s just an opportunity to still your mind, take a break from all the thoughts that you normally have—the planning, the to-do’s of the f…
Galileo the Scientific Parrot
Okay, so we’re at the University of Sydney to experiment with Dr. Phil’s dead bird. He’s a famous scientist, this guy. He helped us out back in, uh, the 16th century, I think. Uh, the 17th century, isn’t it? 17th century, 1600s. Thank you! Galileo was, u…
15 Things Broke People Always Have Money For
You personally know that they don’t have any money yet. They’re still spending like they didn’t just ignore that third eviction notice. From a financial perspective, some people are just built different, but not in a good way. They spend their money on du…
Coral Reefs 101 | National Geographic
(Gentle music) - [Narrator] Coral reefs, their bright, vivid colors can be seen in tropical ocean waters around the globe. Beyond their brilliant appearance lies a hidden significance. Coral are animals. Though they may look like colorful plants, coral a…