yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett: 90 Years of Wisdom Summed up in 16 Minutes
And yeah, Ben Franklin did this and my old boss Ben Graham did this at early ages in their young teens. They just—Ben Graham looked around and he said, “Who do I admire?” You know, and he wanted to be admired himself. He said, “You know, why do I admire t…
Ides of March spark a civil war | World History | Khan Academy
We finished the last video with the assassination of Julius Caesar on the Ides of March, March 15, 44 BCE. You might remember it was done by factions opposed to Julius Caesar who thought that, one, he had gotten too much power, but even more, he was using…
Upturning Tornadoes | Explorers in the Field
Okay, 23:33, 21 coming straight for us. Oh my gosh! As a longtime storm researcher and storm chaser, I’m very interested in the dynamics of the formation of some of the strongest storms on earth. [Music] [Music] My name is Anton Simon. I’m an atmospheri…
Rockhopper Penguins, Up Close: On Location | Hostile Planet
Ever wondered how wildlife crews managed to capture the perfect shot right in the heart of the action? Check out the behind the scenes to see the great lengths that the crew went to to film “Hostile Planet.” MATT RICHARDS: Rock copper penguins live in co…
Second Persian Invasion
The last videos we saw a dominant Persia have to put down a rebellion by the Ionians in the Anatolian Peninsula, and they were really, really mad that these Ionians were helped by the Athenians and the Eritreans. So, Darius, the King of Kings, goes off to…
LC natural response derivation 1
In this video, we’re going to begin the derivation of the LC natural response, the response of an inductor capacitor circuit. This is a difficult derivation, but it really pays off in the end. There’s a real fun surprise at the end, and that is this is wh…