yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How To Invest In 2024 (The BEST Way To Get Rich)
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, CNBC recently found that 63% of Americans would be unable to pay for a $500 emergency. When I first read this, my initial thought was that this is unacceptable and it has to change. After all, the unfortunate rea…
Why Do We Love Sports?
Imagine you’ve been living in the trenches for weeks, maybe months. Corpses of your allies, friends, brothers surround you. The smell of their rot, revolting; the pain of your loss, excruciating. Rain water has made the ground where you stand thick with m…
Dark Web: The Unseen Side of The Internet
The Internet has changed everything, from the way we work to the way we play to the way we live. It seems that there’s a corner of the internet for everyone; despite what interests you have, despite what your beliefs are, there’s someone or something out …
Diffraction and interference of light | Physics | Khan Academy
Take a look at these beautiful pictures from the Hubble Space Telescope. One of the reasons why it’s beautiful is because of these nice streaks that you get for all the stars. But why do you get them? Now, if you’re thinking that this effect happens beca…
Turning Gravity Into Light - Smarter Every Day 146
Hey, it’s me Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. If you’ve ever watched Smarter Every Day, you know that I spend a lot of time off the grid. Right now I’m in the Amazon rainforest, and I don’t really know what this thing is. I think it’s some kind …
Don't Worry, Everything is Out of Control | Stoic Antidotes to Worry
Even though we can’t control the future, we’re worrying ourselves sick because of it. This could be because we don’t control the future. And this lack of control is the reason it frightens us. Or, we think we can control it by ‘thinking about it’ or perha…