yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Designing the Costumes | Saints & Strangers
[Music] It’s always fun sitting on sets, watching everybody in costumes. CU of course, it’s the nearest thing to time travel you can kind of get, you know? Everyone disappears if the crews are in a certain way. You just look around, you see these people, …
Meet the $250,000,000 man
As many of you know, I’m an avid YouTube connoisseur. Now, even though I’ve only been making videos here on YouTube for about 24 months, I have been on here as a loyal viewer since about 2010. Every now and then, someone comes across your screen that gets…
Beware: The Inverted Yield Curve
Once of you guys, it’s Graham here. So every now and then, I like to deviate a bit from real estate and personal finance to discuss some other topics of importance, and this is one of them. That would be the inverted yield curve, and this is a topic that’…
Percent from fraction models
So we’re told the square below represents one whole. So, this entire square is a whole. Then they ask us, what percent is represented by the shaded area? So why don’t you pause this video and see if you can figure that out? So, let’s see. The whole is di…
Exploring Pristine Seas | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
Foreign filming this colony of rockhopper penguins and then all of a sudden we see the water boiling offshore. Wow! What’s that? Explorer Enrique Salah found himself in the southern tip of Argentina on a remote island called Isla de Los Estados. It’s been…
HOT SPIDER COSPLAY .... AND MORE! IMG! #25
In Taiwan, the Subways don’t require pants, and a boy in love—wait, it’s episode 25 of IMG. There is nothing better than sniffing hippo butt, except a jar full of kitty. Put things in front of your face to get a kiss, or a fish face, or just dress up in S…