yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How Cicadas Become Flying Saltshakers of Death | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
What you’re hearing right now is a love song. Okay, you’re right, there’s cicadas—actually, male cicadas to be exact. But stay with me, because this isn’t an episode just about a really loud swarm of bugs. It’s actually a crazy tale about an ancient under…
2015 AP Biology free response 1 a c
Many species have circadian rhythms that exhibit an approximately 24-hour cycle. Circadian rhythms are controlled by both genetics and environmental conditions, including light. Researchers investigated the effect of light on mouse behavior by using a run…
Kevin O'Leary: Don't Vilify Capitalism - Fox and Friends
Our truth on men, women, and money: 50 common money mistakes and how to fix them. He joins us this morning, Kevin. Thanks for joining us; you’re a brave man. The look in that woman’s face—I think she was a stand-in for many who thought, “Huh, you’re defe…
You're Either An Entrepreneur or You're WASTING MONEY | Randall Kaplan pt. 2
What is an entrepreneur, and can you learn to be one, or does it have to be in your DNA? When I was a young kid, I always knew I was going to start companies, but can you learn it if you’re not born with that gene? This is the age-old question you’ve rai…
Linear velocity comparison from radius and angular velocity: Worked example | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have two pumpkin catapults. So let me just draw the ground here. And so the first pumpkin catapult, let me just draw it right over here. That’s its base, and then this is the part that actually catapults the pumpkin. So that’s what it l…
What Makes Kurzgesagt So Special?
We’d like to tell you a story about a kurzgesagt video that took us over 1000 hours to create. It all started with a simple idea. We stumbled upon something truly awe-inspiring. A piece of knowledge so important, we wanted to share it with as many people …