yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How the Economic Machine Works: Part 1
How the economic machine works in 30 minutes. The economy works like a simple machine, but many people don’t understand it, or they don’t agree on how it works, and this has led to a lot of needless economic suffering. I feel a deep sense of responsibili…
Symmetry of second partial derivatives
So in the last couple videos I talked about partial derivatives of multivariable functions, and here I want to talk about second partial derivatives. So, I’m going to write some kind of multivariable function. Let’s say it’s, um, I don’t know, sin of x * …
Reading tables 2
The table below shows the number of chickens sold by four friends from January to March. Except one entry is missing. What number should go in the empty cell? So, let’s see. This is the empty cell right over here they haven’t filled out. How many? Let’s …
Graphs of rational functions: zeros | High School Math | Khan Academy
So we’re told let ( F(x) = \frac{2x^2 - 18}{G(x)} ), where ( G(x) ) is a polynomial. Then they tell us which of the following is a possible graph of ( y = F(x) ). They give us four choices here, and like always, I encourage you to pause the video and see …
Why Millennials Aren’t Buying Homes
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, as many of you know, I spend way too much time on the internet reading all about money-related topics and studies. Today, all of that research has finally paid off, and this is because my favorite video topics ju…
How to Get Your Finances Together in 2022.
Well team, welcome! Firstly to the new office, and also welcome to 2022. Isn’t that ridiculous? 2022. Here we are! Anyway, with the start of a new year comes obviously a really good time to hit the old reset button, start fresh, and also set some goals fo…