yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Can Texas Secede from the Union?
Can Texas secede from the Union? America’s second most populated and second largest state is always first to remind you that it was once an independent nation: The Republic of Texas. Unlike California’s three-week, almost accidental flirt with independenc…
How can I review the security of my account?
So Guemmy, you’ve given us a lot of tips and things to think about. Is there a way to just see where we are in terms of our account security? Yeah. One thing I love that’s evolved in the industry over the last few years is a lot of the tech providers hav…
Chris Dixon at Startup School 2013
So today I’m going to talk about good ideas that look like bad ideas. There’s a great, my clicker is not working, sorry, technical problems there. Okay, thanks, oops. So there’s a great PG blog post where he talks about Peter Thiel came to talk and said …
How Metric Paper Works & The Whole of the Universe
This is not just a sheet of paper; it is an invitation to everything that exists. For this paper is metric, which has a special property other pages don’t—dividing into each twain is half the whole. Uh, obviously, I guess, but each half is also the same s…
When to walk away
Most people don’t want to be cowards. Generally, we want to stand our ground, not give up what we have, and hang in there until things get better. For example, we don’t want to be quitters, so we keep working at our jobs, even though the environment is to…
NERD WARS! Punisher Vs Riddick (Vin Diesel)
Nerd Wars: Vin Diesel versus Marvel characters take two. So this week we’re doing, uh, Vin Diesel from Ric, yes? Or Ric as Vin Diesel, or ridiculous, ha! That movie you like, that you like that. Versus The Punisher. The Punisher being one of the baddest…