yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Writing fraction division story problems
We’re told that Daryl spent 24 and one-fourth hours writing a chapter of a novel. Then they asked us, what are some things that 24 and one-fourth divided by three-fourths could represent in this context? So, my understanding of this is they really just w…
Dominoes - HARDCORE Mode - Smarter Every Day 182
Okay, let’s just get this out there right now. I know this is weird. You probably watch this channel because you want to see slow motion phenomenon of like bullets hitting stuff, and fracture mechanics, and water drops bouncing, and animals squirting thin…
Phototropism | Plant Biology | Khan Academy
You’ve probably seen plants either in your house or, if you go for a walk, you’ve seen parts of the plants twist and turn in all sorts of directions. If you observe closely, you’ll see that oftentimes it looks like the plant is twisting or turning towards…
The Future of the Channel, and You
Good morning, internet. I came out here to write and to research, and to think about the channel and its evolution. The Staten Island video, for example, started life as part of the background reading for the Statue of Liberty video. Originally planned to…
Homeroom with Sal & Dan Roth - Wednesday, November 11
Hi everyone! Welcome to the homeroom live stream. Sal here from Khan Academy. I’m excited about our conversation today with Dan Roth, editor-in-chief of LinkedIn. A lot to talk about on both the future of work and a lot on just the future of media too. I …
LICK DOOR KNOBS! ... IMG! #36
The best way to play horseshoes and Rihanna’s butt sings a song. It’s episode 36 of IMG! Mankind has come a long way, but this concept for an alarm clock that slowly shreds money until you wake up and stop it is genius. Less genius is this guy. Kid, kid, …