yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Inches and feet
In this video, I’m going to introduce you to two units of measuring length. The first is the inch, which you might have heard about. You’re probably thinking, “How long is an inch?” Well, if you’re familiar with a quarter, a quarter looks something like t…
Can You Build a House With Hemp? | National Geographic
[Music] Some of the most practical uses of industrial hemp in the modern day, of course, are the same as they ever were: building materials, paper, textiles, seed oil, nutrition. Hempcrete, of all the 50,000 known products that we can make with industrial…
Introducing Khanmigo Teacher Mode
This right over here is an exercise about the Spanish-American War and AP American history on Khan Academy. We start off in student mode and notice if the student asks for an explanation, it doesn’t just give the answer. It does what a good tutor would do…
Introduction to sampling distributions
So let’s say I have a bag of colored balls here, and we know that 40 of the balls are orange. Now imagine defining a random variable X, and X is based on a trial where we stick our hand in this bag, we don’t look around, and we randomly pick a ball, look …
What Motivated Soldiers to Be the First to Climb the Siege Ladder?
Being the first on the wall in a siege often meant certain death. It involved battling through to the wall, climbing an exposed ladder or siege tower through a hail of projectiles, only to meet a superior force of defenders upon reaching the top. Neverthe…
Shopping For Affordable Watches With Teddy Baldassarre
Teddy’s learning he’s the grasshopper; he’s learning from the master. That’s the way I look at it. [Laughter] Garbage! You know, when you’re a fashionista like me, you can pick style out five yards away already. I’m kicking Teddy’s ass here; this is amazi…