yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Dark Web is Killing Thousands Every Year
In 2010, around 40,000 people died from drug overdoses in the United States. Quantifying the importance and meaning of individual human life in a single statistic is impossible, but that number might already seem high, especially if you knew one of those …
The Overuse of Energy Resources | Breakthrough
We live in a time where it is readily apparent that if we proceed at the pace we are proceeding, continuing to overuse the resources available to us in the way we are overusing them, we’re going to run out. I don’t think people really understand what “run…
Homeroom with Sal & Jeffrey Rosen - Thursday, September 17
Hi everyone, welcome to the homeroom live stream! Sal here from Khan Academy. A happy National Constitution Day for all of y’all from the United States. We’ll be digging deep into the U.S. Constitution with one of the world’s leading experts on it. So, st…
Safari Live - Day 304 | National Geographic
[Music] This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and caucuses. Viewer discretion is advised. Hello everyone, and a very warm welcome to a sunset drive. We are in the Mara Triangle in Kenya, and we have that be…
The Black Hole That Kills Galaxies - Quasars
The universe looks like a vast empty ocean sprinkled with the rare islands of galaxies. But this is an illusion. Just a small fraction of all atoms are found in galaxies, while the rest is thought to be drifting in between, in the intergalactic medium. Li…
The truth behind jet lag...
The thing that everybody thinks is jet lag. People think it’s because of the time zone change; it really is not the time zone change. It’s the cabin altitude of the plane. If you ever go skiing and you go to a place that’s at 2500 or 3,000 M, and the fir…