yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Homeroom with Sal & Melinda Gates - Tuesday, January 12
Hi everyone, Sal here from Khan Academy. Welcome to the Homeroom live stream! Actually, I think this is the first of the year. Hopefully, everyone had a good New Year’s considering the circumstances and is enjoying 2021. Given the circumstances, we have a…
The Rich Culture of Nelson Tasman | National Geographic
New Zealand’s Nelson Tasman region is the home of sunny beaches, outrageous landscapes and Nelson, a small city that boasts a thriving art scene, craft breweries and wineries, and a farmer’s market famed for its local specialties. National Geographic sent…
Why The Middle Class Is Financially Ruined - AGAIN
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, even though this channel focuses around investing, building wealth, and personal finance, every now and then, I come across an article that we have to talk about because it’s becoming more and more apparent that the …
Stupid Simple Life Rules
Life is simple, but most people insist on making it complicated. The more you complicate it, the harder and more stressful it becomes. Living that good and unbothered lifestyle shouldn’t only be a dream; it can become your reality. And that’s what this vi…
The Stock Market Just Flipped
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So hold on one second, I’m going to invest some money really quick. [Applause] Oops! Well, that’s basically what investing felt like this week after the inflation data came out. That’s right, in the last week we’ve …
Getting Swarmy | Live Free or Die
It’s a good-sized swarm. God, here they go! Jesus, look at them all! They’re still coming out of the entrance; that’s crazy! It’s honey season in the mountains of North Carolina. Homesteaders Tony and Amelia are banking on a major harvest this year. “I c…