yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Molecular solids | Intermolecular forces and properties | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
So let’s talk a little bit about molecular solids. So just as a little bit of review, we’ve talked about ionic solids, where ions form these lattices. So those might be the positive ions right over there, and then you have your negative ions, and the nega…
What Can We Learn From History? - Little Kids, Big Questions | America Inside Out
It is important to learn the history of the United States because you can learn new things about what happened then and how it is now, and how you can change the world. We learn about history so we do not repeat the mistakes that people have made in histo…
Determining congruent triangles example
We have four triangles depicted here, and they’ve told us that the triangles are not drawn to scale. We are asked which two triangles must be congruent. So, pause this video and see if you can work this out on your own before we work through this together…
15 Things That Make Life Worth Living
Nobody can buy a home these days. The rich keep getting richer and the poor poorer. World War Three is buffering on the horizon while the ice caps are melting, and everyone you ask tells you how they just want to get through this week because they’re hold…
The Stock Market is a Ponzi Scheme. Fully explained.
When we think about the stock market, we think about money, the finance industry, businesses, and making money from investing in successful businesses. The belief is investing in successful businesses is what leads to investment profits, and there’s a dir…
Private jet expert destroys noobs
Why did you have a private jet? Yet, because it’s the stupidest investment in history, you’re going to spend $25 million on something that is going to cost you almost $10 million a year. It’s okay; the guy completely doesn’t know what he’s talking about.…