yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Camo Sharks: Breaching Test | SharkFest | National Geographic
RYAN JOHNSON: One of the most important tests that we’re going to do is the breaching test. GIBBS KUGURU: Breaching is sort of this ambush attack. They need speed, power, stealth. RYAN JOHNSON: This is when we’re going to be able to measure the color of…
Climate Change Efforts Must Be Practical and the Time is NOW
How do we develop climate-oriented investments that are both going to move the needle in a significant way and also generate a significant enough return for investors? Yes, well think about it. It’s your pension fund, and now because it’s your pension fu…
The Saltwater Croc Threat | Primal Survivor
I’m traveling along the Araund River in Papua New Guinea, and I’m now over halfway to my destination—a village that a generation ago practiced one of the darkest customs of all: cannibalism. A place where young men would be sent out to bring back the head…
Horizontal & vertical lines | Mathematics I | High School Math | Khan Academy
What is the equation of the horizontal line through the point (-4, 6)? So, let’s just visualize this. Once you get the hang of it, you might not have to draw a graph, but for explanatory purposes, it might be useful. So, (-4, 6), so that’s going to be i…
$1 vs $500,000 Experiences!
I’m about to show you what a half $1 million experience looks like. I promise this is going to blow your mind. In this video, you will find out why it cost a quarter of $1 million to simulate going to space. Why it costs $50,000 to explore the depths of o…
How Eating Out Keeps You Poor!
I just love this place, don’t you? I know it’s kinda expensive, but everything’s so top notch! Hey folks. Know what you want? Yes! I’d like to eat the Down Payment on a House, with a side of flambeed Emergency Fund. Excellent choice. And for you, sir? …