yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Weak base–strong acid titrations | Acids and bases | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Ammonia is an example of a weak base, and hydrochloric acid is an example of a strong acid. If we’re doing a weak base-strong acid titration, that means that ammonia is the analyte, the substance we’re analyzing, and we’re titrating ammonia with hydrochlo…
Looking at trends in inflation adjusted income since 1980 | Khan Academy
What we’re looking at is a graphic that’s put together by the New York Times, and it’s a way of thinking about how incomes have grown since 1980. So before we even look at the various percentiles of income, this black line is interesting to look at becau…
Comparing prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells | High school biology | Khan Academy
In other videos, we talk about how cells are the basic building block of life. In this video, we’re now going to talk about the two main categories of cells: prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells. So, what I’m going to do here is I’m going to diagram ou…
Why I'm Finally Spending Money
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, a little over a year ago, I made a video breaking down exactly how much money I spend every month, where it all goes, and my philosophy is when it comes to saving money, investing, and trying to get the best value…
When is the Right Time to Apply to Y Combinator? - Jared Friedman
Hi, I’m Jared. I’m a partner at YC. Before I joined YC, I was a founder of a company called Scribd, which was in the Summer 2006 batch of Y Combinator. The right time to apply to YC is when you have two key ingredients. The first ingredient is you need …
Stuffed GIRL'S HEAD? -- Mind Blow #14
A water-powered jetpack and step right up! Get just stuff, girl! Heads Vsauce! Kevin here. This is my flow. This super Jen and Tory blew everyone away in 2000, made by combining an Atari 2600, Genesis, NES, and Super NES into one sexy package. But let’s …