yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
15 Signs You Control Your Money
Yesterday we talked about people who are controlled by money. Go watch it if you haven’t already. Then come back. Today we’re talking about those who have complete control over their money: how they use it, how they think about it, and how they plan for …
Key tax terms | Taxes and tax forms | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do here is a little bit of a case study in doing taxes. So, we have a situation where someone is bringing in fifty thousand dollars in this current tax year and gross income. This is everything from their salaries, tips they might mak…
Darwinism vs. Social Darwinism part 2 | US History | Khan Academy
So Emily and I have been talking about how natural selection, Darwin’s theory of evolution, has differed from some of the ways that people have interpreted evolution over time. I was specifically interested in this group known as the social Darwinists, wh…
How I Achieved High Income In My 20s | How to Make More Money
[Music] So in this video, I wanted to share some things that I’ve learned about money over the past eight years or so. I’m not saying that I’m some genius who’s got money all figured out or anything, but over the past eight years I’ve made some decisions …
Enterprise Sales | Startup School
[Music] My name is Pete Kuman. I’m a group partner at YC and a YC Alum. I was co-founder and CTO of Optimizely in the winter 2010 batch. In this talk, I’m going to walk step by step through the process of closing your first Enterprise customers. I’m goin…
The Stock Market JUST Flipped
What’s up, Graham? It’s Guys here. So we did it! We broke the stock market. I’ve tried turning it off and on. I’ve been on hold with customer service, but it won’t stop going down. All right, just kidding! But for anyone who’s investing in the stock marke…