yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Alex Honnold Rappels The Moulin | Arctic Ascent with Alex Honnold | National Geographic
[Alex] Deep enough that it just turns black. [Heidi] Yeah. [Alex] Yeah, it’s pretty far. [Heidi] This huge hole is called a moulin. It acts like a drain, funneling meltwater to the base of the glacier. This is the abyss; it’s all pretty big and pretty int…
Predicting the Apocalypse? | The Story of God
But is it possible to predict the end? A few years back, many people thought they had. According to popular legend, the ancient Maya thought the apocalypse would arrive on a specific date: December 21st, 2012. I want to know if this is really true, so I’v…
What I Wish I Knew When I Was Younger
Welcome to beautiful Vancouver, British Columbia. This is actually where I grew up, just across that water. And I remember when I was a teenager here I wanted to be a film maker. And so what did I do? Well, I found a film director with a strange name who …
Satya Nadella on the journey to becoming Microsoft's CEO & reimagining technology's impact
YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU NEXT TIME. NEXT TIME.
Discover Ancient Wonders on the Coast of Newfoundland and Labrador | National Geographic
[Music] Mistaken Point around us, missed underfoot, petrified. Deep time rises, and Wealth’s to prod our souls here and there, breaking into sudden vow relief. 88% of Earth’s history is called the Precambrian age. Mistaken Point is the only World Heritage…
First Look: The Long Road Home | The Long Road Home
♪♪ KELLY: Memory is a powerful thing. ♪♪ There are some events that stick in the mind… forever defining the difference between before and after, and instantly redefining everything that matters. For the soldiers and families of the Army’s 1st Cavalry Divi…