yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Area of an isosceles triangle
Pause this video and see if you can find the area of this triangle. I’ll give you two hints: recognize this is an isosceles triangle, and another hint is that the Pythagorean theorem might be useful. All right, now let’s work through this together. So we…
Weekend Wednesday
The way the work week works is the worst. Waking up on Monday, you’ve got five days in a row of work or school. It’s too much. For, by Wednesday, withered is your soul with two more days, nay three more days, until the weekend. But, alas. The weekend is a…
Chef Wonderful - How To Make Crepe Recipe | So Yummy Inspired Desserts
Okay, chef wonderful, here we’re starting the crepes Nambe, the amazing flambe. Now look, if you have to, every bite him. This is not an easy dish, but if you really want to get into the most incredible dessert on earth, everything has to be fresh. I like…
Gideon v Wainwright
[Instructor] Now we’re gonna talk about an important Supreme Court case that reinforced the idea that states have to provide the same rights when people are arrested and accused of a crime, as are guaranteed in the United States Constitution. And that c…
The 7 Money Traps That Keep You Poor
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, no surprise, investing throughout this last year has been one of the most eye-opening experiences for so many people in a very long time. In a span of 365 days, we’ve seen some of the worst single-day point drops …
PURPOSE of WEALTH (Pt1): FREEDOM
There are some pretty big differences between the terms wealth, money, and your position in the social hierarchy. Out of all three of them, wealth is the one you should go after. The fundamental reason why most people want to build wealth in life is freed…