yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How insurance works | Insurance | Financial literacy | Khan Academy
Let’s say that you have a car that right now is worth about ten thousand dollars. You don’t have ten thousand dollars as a cushion if, by chance, your car were to get totaled, or if it were to get stolen, or something were to happen. You don’t have an ext…
Why This Is The Perfect Time To Start A Startup
Okay, so we’re going to be doing the light cone podcast on stage at Start School East. What do you guys want to talk about? I’m just kind of imagining what these Founders want. Like they traveled here on a bus for hours. The headline topic is why this is …
How to Make the Maximum Amount of Money Possible
So if you want to make the maximum amount of money possible, like, if you just, if you just want to get rich over your life, and you want to do it in a deterministic, predictable way, what you would do is you would basically stay on the bleeding edge of t…
My Passive Income Story ($0 - $3000/month by age 24)
So today, guys, we’re gonna be talking about passive income, a topic that’s very near and dear to my heart. Essentially, passive income is the model of income where you can earn money around the clock, wherever you are in the world and regardless of wheth…
Kayaking Alaska’s Newly Discovered River Canyon | Best Job Ever
The thing that really drives me the most is exploratory kayaking, paddling down these rivers that have never been paddled before. Our goal here is to paddle the headwaters canyon of the Chitina River, this unrung section. So, the headwaters canyon of the …
Worked example: Determining an empirical formula from combustion data | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We are told that a sample of a compound containing only carbon and hydrogen atoms is completely combusted, producing 5.65 grams of carbon dioxide and 3.47 grams of H2O, or water. What is the empirical formula of the compound? So pause this video and see i…