yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Formal and informal powers of the US president | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about the powers of the President of the United States, and we’re going to broadly divide them into two categories. Formal powers are those that are explicitly listed in the United States Constitution, and we’…
Unlocking the Eyes | Explorer
[Music] What boggles my mind about the eye is everything. But I’m really, really excited by the advances in technology made possible by research, not just into the eye, but into how natural selection caused it to be what it is. The next few decades are go…
Top 3 Tips for a Million-Dollar Pitch
[Music] So how long I think the audience might be interested to hear? Obviously, each one of the pitches is heavily edited down to the best parts. Yes, and it’s edited down for narrative, it’s edited down for conflict and collision of ideas. How much tim…
Warren Buffett: The Big Problem with Dividend Investing
Why won’t you pay a dividend to your shareholders? Well, we think our shareholders 5 years from now will be wealthier counting what they would get from the reinvestment of the dividend. We think they’ll be wealthier if we hold on to the money now. We may…
Most Startups Are Undercharging - Dalton Caldwell
Most of the time, people are way undercharging for their product. For some reason, there are ideas out there that you should either not charge for your product or you charge such a tiny fraction of what you could be charging that you’re not set up for suc…
How to Simplify Your Life | Minimalist Philosophy
Transcendentalist philosopher Henry David Thoreau argued that, for humans, simplicity is the law of nature. We thrive in simplicity: it’s an optimal state free of clutter and without unnecessary weight. When our lives are simple, it’s easier to see where …