yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Slope and y intercept from equation
What I’d like to do in this video is a few more examples recognizing the slope and y-intercept given an equation. So let’s start with something that we might already recognize: let’s say we have something of the form (y = 5x + 3). What is the slope and …
How to change your life in a year
As I spend some time at home with my family this Christmas season, I’m reminded yet again how quickly time flies. It’s the end of the year again. Not really sure how that happened, but naturally, it gets me thinking about the year I just had and whether o…
Lytic and lysogenic cycles | Viruses | High school biology | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about two of the ways that a virus can leverage a cell to replicate the virus’s DNA. So the first is the lytic cycle, and this is what people often associate viruses doing. Let’s imagine a cell. It’s going to …
Confidence interval for hypothesis test for difference in proportions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A university offers a certain course that students can take in person or in an online setting. Teachers of the course were curious if there was a difference in the passing rate between the two settings. Data from a recent semester showed that 80 percent o…
Shark Tank Star's Secret Identity EXPOSED | Ask Mr. Wonderful #23 Kevin O'Leary & Daymond John
[Music] Oh [Music] [Music] Throughout that far [Music] Damon, we’ve been together on Shark Tank forever. What have you learned now after spending ten years on the show? What’s different now? What’s changed for you? The quality of the deals are much diffe…
Appositives | Punctuation | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians and hello Paige. Hi David! So today we’re going to be talking about the appositive, which is just a monster of a word, right? Uh, I can tell you that from my limited study of Latin, right? It comes from “ad positio,” which is like putti…