yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Deep concealment: searching for hidden narcotics in cars | To Catch a Smuggler
WELLE: Can you pull all the way to the front, sir? MAN: Sure. WELLE: Thank you. Right there is good. And then everybody step out and, uh, just sit over by that table over there please. Thank you. If you can think of putting something in something, you’…
How to Stop Procrastinating Homework - The Secret Force That's Stopping You
So I just finished watching Budweiser’s new Superbowl ad called “Born the Hard Way,” and while a lot of people are using it as a means to get into a political flame war, another one, my first reaction when I saw it was that it reminded me of a concept tha…
Why Capitalism is the BEST System | Kevin O'Leary
Last week, Kevin, I discussed an Oxfam report that contained a startling statistic: that the world’s richest 85 people hold precisely the same wealth as the three and a half billion poorest people. Now, if you saw the show, you won’t be surprised to hear …
Models of citizenship | Citizenship | High school civics | Khan Academy
What do you think it means to be a good citizen? What does a good citizen do? Take a minute to imagine your idea of a good citizen. What characteristics does that person have? What actions does that person take that contribute to their status as an active…
What You Might Not Know About Twitter | Squawkbox
[Music] Said wow. With Jack departing, the Twitter board collectively owns almost no shares. Objectively, their economic interests are simply not in line with shareholders. Joining us to talk about the takeover battle and Musk’s stance on free speech, Kev…
PEACH GOES GAGA! Super Mario Bromance -- Black Nerd Comedy
Hey Vsauce, it’s Lacy and today I’m here with some great news. We’ve introduced a new member to our Vsauce family. Although would you really call us a family? I think we’re more of a collection, like a team, like those people that don’t get chosen for Dod…