yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
BitConnect is the $900,000,000 Crypto Ponzi Scheme
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, as you can see in the background, I just started furnishing the duplex and it’s looking pretty dope right now. I promised you guys another update video in the next like week or so as I get a little bit more work d…
Dostoevsky - Walk Your Own Path, Face Your Errors
In Crime and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoevsky wrote, “That’s man’s one privilege over all creation. Through error you come to the truth! I am a man because I err! You never reach any truth without making fourteen mistakes and very likely a hundred and fourte…
AK’s and Alcohol | Explorer
Check, check. Here we are. We have arrived, and, uh, waiting for the commander. Just in time! It’s, uh, just turning out, which isn’t exactly ideal. The air is thick with ganja smoke. I’m 3 hours walk from the nearest town, and I’m completely at their mer…
What Credit Card Companies Don’t Tell You
What’s up guys? It’s Graham here. So it’s that time again, and that’s time for another credit card video. Now even though most of us by now know how to properly use a credit card, we understand the concepts. We know to pay off our bill in full every singl…
Introducing Khanmigo for teachers
This is Conmigo, an AI-powered guide designed to help all students learn when subjects are giving them trouble. Conmigo can help. Kamika was fun and can transform learning into an adventure. Kanmigo is not just for students; teachers can use it too by tog…
Akiva Goldsman on the Creative Process | Breakthrough
I think the creative process is actually very similar whether it be math, science, music, or art. I’m more familiar with the dredging of the ether for a sentence or two, and I like it, but it is an act of sheer faith. It is an act of propulsion into some …