yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Ray Dalio & Bill Belichick on Picking People: Part 1
So, picking people, that’s what we’re on. Tell me about it. Well, I think that’s the number one thing, is to try to get it right on the way in the door. Um, and you know, understanding what you need, um, and what you’re looking for. So, um, as we like to…
Controlling a plane in space
Hello everyone! So I’m talking about how to find the tangent plane to a graph, and I think the first step of that is to just figure out how we control planes in three dimensions in the first place. What I have pictured here is a red dot representing a po…
Milk. White Poison or Healthy Drink?
Over the last decade, milk has become a bit controversial. Some people say it’s a necessary and nutritious food, vital for healthy bones, but others say it can cause cancer and lead to an early death. So, who’s right? And why are we drinking it anyway? […
The Making of 'Genius' | National Geographic
Genius is the first scripted series on Matt Gio. The first season of Genius is the story of Albert Einstein, which we’re telling over the course of 10 episodes. We all know, uh, of his genius, his gifts, but Albert Einstein’s private life is far more comp…
Two Vortex Rings Colliding in SLOW MOTION - Smarter Every Day 195
[Gasps] Was it – that was it, wasn’t it? I think we’ve been doing it so long we don’t know what perfect looks like. [Laughs] What’s up, I’m Destin. I do not even know how to start this video. I’ll just try to explain it and – I mean, this is a huge deal. …
How to get ahead of 99% of people
If you want an extraordinary life, you can’t live like an ordinary person. Matt Graham said, “the people that criticize you for being exceptional are those that have already accepted the fact that they’re going to be mediocre.” A YouTuber with a million s…