yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Inside Chichén Itzá - 360 | National Geographic
Janeshia was an amazing city of the Maya. What we see now is the civic and religious part of it, so we can tell these buildings were sacred. El Castillo, or Temple of Kukulkan, is an amazing building based on astronomical and mathematical science. I’ve be…
Homeroom with Sal and Wendy Kopp - Wednesday, September 15
Hi everyone! Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to the Homeroom live stream! It’s been a while since we did one, but we’re back and we have an amazing guest, Wendy Kopp, CEO of Teach For All, also the founder of Teach For America. We’re going to ta…
Arizona: Meet Khan Academy & Khanmigo
Hi everyone! Welcome to our webinar to discuss the good news. We officially have a partnership with Con Migo for this school year to fund Con Migo for students, um, and it’s broadly across the State of Arizona. So if you are a member of a public school di…
Lead Lag
In this video, we’re going to introduce a couple of words to help talk about the relationship between sine and cosine, or different sinusoids that have the same frequency but a different timing relationship. So what I’ve shown here is a plot of a cosine …
3d curl computation example
So let’s go ahead and work through an actual curl computation. Let’s say our vector-valued function V, which is a function of x, y, and z, this is going to be three-dimensional, is defined by the functions, uh, and I don’t know, let’s say the first compo…
Vsauce Live Stream!
[Music] [Applause] [Music] Hey, Vsauce! Michael, Cameron, Jake here and we are very glad that you are here. What’s going on? Well, it’s our very first Vsauce YouTube livestream! They said it couldn’t be done, but actually, the technology has been possible…