yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Internet Has Massively Broadened Career Possibilities
Let’s look at this next
Climbing Gym Heroes | Free Solo
I mean, how do you know when you’re ready is sort of a big question with free selling. And I think ultimately you just, you just know. [Music] I found out about it last night. My girlfriend called me around 10 o’clock, so I left work immediately. If any…
Valuation Modeling: Excel as a tool
Hi, welcome back! In this session, I’m going to break the mold; not talk about big ideas or companies, but about how to use an Excel spreadsheet I’ve created on valuation. Before I go further, though, there’s nothing magical about the spreadsheet. There a…
Property insurance | Insurance | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
Let’s talk a little bit about property insurance. The first question is, why would you want to insure property? Well, for a lot of folks, their property is a lot of, uh, the most expensive things they have that would be very hard to replace if something b…
Techno Optimism, Explained
I cannot wait for the day where my daughter and son say, “Oh, 45 minutes to Tokyo? That’s so slow!” I can’t wait. Hello, this is Dalton, post-Michael, and today we’re going to talk about why we are optimistic about the future. So, to be clear, at YC, we…
Sad, Bored, Anxious? Maybe You've Got Weltschmerz
Watching Disney movies when we’re young teaches us that good always prevails and that we all live happily ever after. But when we’re confronted with the real world, we see that this mechanism isn’t always in effect. Looking at all the suffering, the injus…