yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Debunking the 'Pointless' Education Myth | StarTalk
People think that when they take math in school, there’s the common response like, “I will never need to use this for the rest of my life,” as they learn trig identities or the Pythagorean theorem or whatever it is that we all remember learning, feeling p…
How to Terraform Mars - WITH LASERS
Mars is a disappointing hellhole lacking practically everything we need to stay alive. It looks like we’ll only ever have small crews spend a miserable time hidden underground. Except, we could terraform it into a green new world. But to solve the planet’…
Virus structure and replication | Viruses | High school biology | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about viruses, which I think are maybe one of the most fascinating things in biology because they have some aspects of living organisms, but we don’t consider them living. But before we go into the details of it, I want…
Living Embodiment of Hindu God | The Story of God
[dramatic music] MORGAN FREEMAN (VOICEOVER): I’m about to have an audience with a living embodiment of the Hindu god, Taleju. My hope is that their Kumari remains expressionless. Even the hint of a smile is said to bring misfortune. [mystical music] MORG…
States of Matter
So I wanted to talk to people about the different states of matter: solid, liquid, and gas, using water as an example. But I thought first I better be sure that we’re all on the same page about what water is made of. What’s water made of? Water? Yeah, wha…
World's First Electric Generator
[Applause] I have a pipe. Yeah, do you want to hold it? Do you know what it’s made of? Metal. Is it brass? Copper? Coer? Is copper magnetic? No? Uh-oh. I’m going to go. No, I didn’t think it was. Go, yes! I’m going to go. Yes! Well, why don’t we check? Th…