yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
ATP synthase | Cellular energetics | AP Biology | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about what is arguably my favorite enzyme, and that is ATP synthase. You might be able to predict from its name what it does: it synthesizes ATP. Now, you’ve probably seen it before. We saw it when we looked at respirat…
Why Apollo Astronauts Trained in Nuclear Bomb Craters
On July 20th, fifty years ago, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Lightyear first set foot on the moon. But before they went there, they came here. This is Sedan Crater, and it was excavated by a nuclear bomb in 1962. [bomb explodes] It’s part of the Nevada Test Sit…
The History of Magic | StarTalk
What’s this with Escape artists? I never was as enchanted by that as others have been. When you’re talking about a escape artist, you’re really talking about Houdini and then a lot of knockoffs after that. Houdini, in the early 20th century, a man born in…
Hasan Minhaj on finding your gifts, being authentic, & understanding yourself | Homeroom with Sal
Hi everyone! Welcome to the Homeroom live stream! Sal here from Khan Academy. Very excited about today’s guest, Hasan Minhaj. I encourage everyone watching on Facebook or YouTube, if you have questions for Husso or myself, feel free to start putting those…
Teaching Electives with Khanmigo
Hi, I’m Michelle, a professional learning specialist here at Khan Academy and a former classroom teacher just like you. Meet Kigo, your AI-driven companion who’s revolutionizing teaching for a more engaging and efficient experience. Kigo has many excitin…
Failure of Reconstruction | AP US History | Khan Academy
How do you define freedom? Stop for a minute and picture what it means to be free. What comes into your mind? Traveling wherever you please? Having enough money to do what you want? Or is freedom better defined by what it’s not: not having anyone telling …