yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Nostalgia Effect
You look out the window into the empty streets. No sounds of kids running around, no noise of busy streets littered with both cars and pedestrians. The city is silent, the pigeons don’t even group up anymore because there’s no one to feed them. Your alarm…
Dividing fractions and whole number word problems
We are told that Billy has one fourth of a pound of trail mix. He wants to share it equally between himself and his brother. How much trail mix would they each get? So pause this video and try to figure that out. All right, now let’s work through this to…
Stringless Yo-Yo!
Can you just like … Yo-Yo like a basic Yo-Yo? Yeah, like this. But this is not a basic Yo-Yo. No! That is awesome! Nicely done! This is Ben Conde, he’s got a brand new channel on YouTube which is about Yo-Yoing like a crazy person. But, I’m going t…
Sea Turtles Nesting in Costa Rica - 360 | National Geographic
Sometime around the last quarter moon, we typically see these large groups of turtles forming offshore and essentially wait for some cue. It’s like they’re all out there kind of wait for it, wait for it. At some point, hundreds of thousands of turtles sta…
The Housing Market Just Went Negative
[Music] What’s up, real estate? It’s BlackRock here, and in the last few days, I have been overwhelmed with non-stop requests to talk about what appears to be one of the biggest and most controversial real estate stories of the entire year. It’s the claim…
Charlie Munger: The Investment Opportunity of a Lifetime
And I think more inflation over the next 100 years is inevitable. It’s not every day a year, given how rare it is for Munger to sit down and share his thoughts. What we are in for is a rare treat. Munger recently did a two and a half hour long interview w…