yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
BlackRock: the Company That Controls* the World's Governments
You wake up to the sound of the alarm on your iPhone, and annoyed that you couldn’t get more sleep, you grudgingly unlock your phone to see what’s going on in the world. There’s an email from Amazon telling you that your package has been delivered, so you…
This Teen Boxer Wants A Chance to Compete Wearing Her Hijab | National Geographic
There’s a prayer that we do that says, “If this is good for me, give it to me, and if it’s not good for me, then keep it away from me.” Every time I make that prayer, I’m like, “But what if God takes it from me?” My name is Amaya Zafar. I’m 16 years old …
Fields | Forces at a distance | Middle school physics | Khan Academy
If you hold a ball up in the air and let it go, you know it’s going to fall, but why? Nothing is touching it once you let it go. How can there be a force on it? Well, this is because Earth’s gravitational force is pulling the ball, and gravity is a non-co…
Satya Nadella on the journey to becoming Microsoft's CEO & reimagining technology's impact
YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU NEXT TIME. NEXT TIME.
Using associate property to simplify multiplication
In this video, we’re going to think about how we can use our knowledge of multiplying single-digit numbers to multiply things that might involve two digits. So, for example, let’s start with what is 5 times 18. You can pause the video and see how you mig…
A private jet for $500,000?
Steve: “I’ve heard about these jets called Haers. Yeah, what about them? I didn’t even know they exist. Could you tell me a little bit more about them?” Sure, of course! Come over here. These are the airplanes. They’re really inexpensive from the standpo…