yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Angular motion variables
Things in the universe don’t just shift around; they also rotate. And so what we’re going to do in this video is start to think about rotations and rotational motion. I’m intentionally continuing to spin this because I find it hypnotic. But the question i…
Marriage Advice - Smarter Every Day 181
Okay, story time. About 15 years ago, I was just about to get married, and like in the tux is the whole bit. My dad looks at me, and he says, “Son, no matter what your wife makes to eat, you eat it, and you ask for seconds, no questions asked.” Well, a s…
How The Stock Exchange Works (For Dummies)
What is the Stock Exchange and how does it work? The Stock Exchange is nothing more than a giant globally network tend to organize the market place where every day huge sums of money are moved back and forth. In total over sixty trillion (60,000,000,000,0…
What is mastery learning?
[Narrator] Have you ever really tried to learn something and you just couldn’t? It can make you feel like you’re not so smart, right? Well, it’s not your fault and it’s not your teacher’s fault, it’s just our traditional approach to learning. We go thro…
Snatoms! The Magnetic Molecular Modeling Kit
Imagine this is a hydrogen atom. This is another one, and then this is H2, the hydrogen molecule. You can break it apart, add an oxygen atom and make H2O—water. A carbon with four hydrogens, that is methane. And you can actually combine it with water to m…
Tariff and imports worked example | APⓇ Microeconomics | Khan Academy
We’re told sugar is freely traded in the world market. Assume that a country, Lorryland, is a price taker in the world market for sugar. Some of the sugar consumed in Lorryland is produced domestically, while the rest is imported. The world price of sugar…