yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Bill Ackman: How to Get RICH During Inflation (RARE New Interview)
Again, my view is inflation, or kind of the house view, is inflation is going to be persistently higher. That can happen in the very short term, like literally weeks. I think the structural forces have changed. Billionaire investor Bill Amman just issued …
Worked example: Calculating mass percent | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
So right over here, I have the molecular formula for glucose. And so let’s just say that I had a sample of pure glucose right over here. This is my little pile of glucose. I’m not even going to tell you its mass, but based on the molecular formula, can yo…
Introduction to Ratios
We’ve got some apples here, and we’ve got some oranges, and what I want to think about is what is the ratio? What is the ratio of apples to oranges? To clarify what we’re even talking about, a ratio is giving us the relationship between quantities of two…
Catch of the Week - $11K Beast | Wicked Tuna
We really need to get Junah on the deck. It’s been slow here on Jeff all week. Run, run, run, run. Re, re, re! Get it tight, get it tight, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah! He’s there! Yeah! On! He’s screaming line by the mar! Go like a big one, that just ch…
Supersized Slow-Mo Slinky Drop
[Applause] You know what’s been popular, Rod? What’s that? Our Slinky Drop video! That is popular, isn’t it? Yeah. Do you want to do another Slinky drop? That’s not a slinky. This is a slinky. That is an excellent slinky. We should drop that one…
Acoustic Levitation in ULTRA SLOW MOTION - Smarter Every Day 134
Hey, it’s me Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. I am in Chicago. Anthony picked me up in his awesome Mustang and told me to come to this building because we’re gonna film acoustic levitation. What is this? This is an acoustic levitator. It’s si…