yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Worst Year to Be Alive
2020 was probably one of the worst years that most of us have ever experienced. China has identified the cause of the mysterious new virus, Corona virus covid-19. A pandemic took the lives of millions, forced us to stay isolated indoors for months, shut d…
Anne Finucane talks about supporting communities through the Covid-19 crisis. | Homeroom with Sal
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to our daily homeroom live stream! For those of y’all who this is maybe the first time that you’re seeing this, you’re like, “What is this link on YouTube or Facebook?” This is our way of keeping every…
Why & How Capitalism Needs to Be Reformed
I see populism as people rising up to reject their leadership. Now, it’s a bad thing. Yes, that they’re not willing to accept the results. I agree with your definition. I agree with your definition. And then also at the same time that that’s happening, t…
Summarizing stories | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! Today I’ll make a video about summaries. A summary retells the main ideas of a passage, but in a much shorter version. Cool, great, done! You can learn anything. David out. Sorry, I made a goof. See, I summarized what was going to happen …
How Small Is An Atom? Spoiler: Very Small.
Atoms are ridiculous and unbelievably small. A single human hair is about as thick as 500,000 carbon atoms stacked over each other. Look at your fist; it contains trillions and trillions of atoms. If one atom in it were about as big as a marble, how big w…
2015 AP Physics 1 free response 3c
All right, now let’s tackle part C. Use quantitative reasoning, including equations as needed, to develop an expression for the new final position of the block. Express your answer in terms of D. All right, I’m going to set up a little table here for par…