yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Slowly into Secret Scotland | National Geographic
I believe that to truly slow down, you have to change the way you travel. Cycling allows me to travel more fluidly, to connect more deeply with my surroundings and, I hope, with the people who call this place home. I’m Michael George and I’m a National Ge…
Beware: The Inverted Yield Curve
Once of you guys, it’s Graham here. So every now and then, I like to deviate a bit from real estate and personal finance to discuss some other topics of importance, and this is one of them. That would be the inverted yield curve, and this is a topic that’…
How To Supercharge Your Execution Skill
The world belongs to those who act. If everyone would do what they say they would, we’d have flying cars by now. But we don’t. The average individual has very poor execution skills. They’re blocked by a lack of discipline, a mountain of procrastination, a…
Behind the Scenes with Ron Howard | MARS
Presented by Acura Precision Crafted Performance. Hello, I’m Ron Howard. I’m one of the executive producers of Mars, and in fact, I’m talking to you today from the set of Mars, the mini-series. Any story, buddy, name any true life adventure, is a story o…
We Can’t Prove Most Theorems with Known Physics
The overwhelming majority of theorems in mathematics are theorems that we cannot possibly prove. This is Girdle’s theorem, and it also comes out of Turing’s proof of what is and is not computable. These things that are not computable vastly outnumber the …
Glee! Hot Dogs! IMG! 9
This is where astronauts go to get a drink. Get it? And catch that hot dog! It’s episode 9 of [Music]. Do you like girls but also like Legos? Well, you’re in luck! Last week, damage.com showed me Lego sculptures for [Music] adults, and BuzzFeed collected…