yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Surviving Black Hawk Down | No Man Left Behind
You know, the survivor aspect is a hard one to pin down. I think some of us have it in our DNA. I don’t think we’re all the same. I don’t think we all react the same to stress. I don’t think we all react the same to adversity. I don’t think we all react t…
Matter and energy in food webs | Middle school biology | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about food webs, which is really just a way of picturing how all of the matter and how all of the energy flows inside of an ecosystem. Now, when I talk about matter, I’m talking about the atoms in an ecosystem, the molec…
The rise of industrial capitalism | AP US History | Khan Academy
[Instructor] The period from the end of the Civil War to the start of the 20th Century was one of incredible economic transformation in the United States. In 1865, the United States was the 4th largest industrial economy in the world. By the 1890s, it had…
The mindset that's changing my life
I feel like everybody at some point in their life has met somebody who was truly inspiring. You know, they seem to have their life figured out. They are determined; they can carve out their own destiny. They create their own luck. On the flip side, a lot…
Do Chairs Exist?
Hey Vsauce! Michael here. And here. Michael here! Hey, Vsauce! What is here?…. What is there? What is there? What REALLY exists? Do waves exist, or are there just things that are wavy? When does a piece of food I’ve eaten stop being food and become me? Do…
2015 AP Calculus AB 6a | AP Calculus AB solved exams | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Consider the curve given by the equation (y^3 - xy = 2). It can be shown that the derivative of (y) with respect to (x) is equal to (\frac{y}{3y^2 - x}). All right, write an equation for the line tangent to the curve at the point ((-1, 1)). So, we could…