yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Eventually You Will Get What You Deserve
We’re still talking about working for the long term. The next tweet on that topic is: apply specific knowledge with leverage, and eventually you will get what you deserve. I would also add to that: apply judgment, apply accountability, and apply the skill…
B2B Startup Metrics | Startup School
[Music] Hi there, my name is Tom Blumfield. I’m a group partner at Y Combinator, and today we’re going to be talking about one of my favorite topics: metrics and why they’re so useful for startups. So why are metrics important? First of all, it’s pretty …
15 One time Purchases That Have the Best ROI
Did you know that 90% of luxury purchases depreciate the moment you walk out of that store? But what if we told you there are some exceptions where spending big today could actually mean earning big tomorrow? When it comes to living the high life, every s…
The Power of the Night Sky | StarTalk
The night sky can inspire you on many, many levels. Most people’s concept of God has their God residing in the sky, not under their feet in the dirt. There’s a deep sense that what’s above us is greater than us, bigger than us, more powerful than us; seem…
How Was Video Invented?
[Click] [High-pitched CRT TV noise] Film is a very straightforward technology. It just involves taking a two-dimensional image and focusing it onto a two-dimensional piece of film, and there you have a photo. But video, and by that, I mean moving electron…
If Life Has No Meaning, Why Live? | Albert Camus & The Absurd Man
According to French-Algerian philosopher Albert Camus, our world has no ultimate meaning, but if it had, it would be impossible to know it. It’s all pretty pointless, as if the universe is nothing more than a cosmic coincidence, born without any specific …