yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Solve by completing the square: Integer solutions | Algebra I | Khan Academy
So we’re given this equation here. What I want you to do is pause this video and see if you can solve it. What x values satisfy the equation? All right, now let’s work through this together. One technique could be just let’s just try to complete the squa…
Charlie Munger SELLS 50% of Alibaba Stock!
Well, big news, guys! I just got back from Melbourne. I’m extremely tired, but Charlie Munger just halved his position in Alibaba. He’s always very quick to release the 13F filings right after the quarter ends, and he has done so once again. So, it showe…
Look Inside Warren Buffett’s Latest Stock Moves!
Well, in the last video, we covered Michael Burry’s 13F filing. Now, next on the list is, of course, you guessed it, Mr. Warren Buffett. Without a doubt, you know Warren Buffett is the super investor that I follow personally the closest. I mean, for me, e…
How Much Money Would It Take? | Brain Games
To find out what it would take to get someone to change their beliefs, we’ve asked several people of various backgrounds to take part in a little experiment. “Hey, hi, welcome to bringing, as my friend.” “Thank you!” “So I’m gonna ask you a series of q…
The 'Great Rotation' is Here.
For more than two years, the primary theme that we’ve seen in the stock market has been a small selection of large cap technology names leveraged to AI and semiconductors driving the stock market forward: Apple, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, Google, Microsoft, Te…
Keeping the Inuit Way of Life Alive in a Changing World | Short Film Showcase
Inuit were born to be outside. My earliest memories of growing up with my family were connected to the land, using dog-teams, skin tents. Hi ox he lived on the land. You took what you needed. We didn’t have electric power; we didn’t have modern convenien…