yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Problem With the Elwha Dam | DamNation
I made a statement about taking out the Elwha dam in my first months in office. Well, it costs a lot of trouble. The president took me aside. “Tsipras, what’s all this talk about removing dams?” When I first moved to the state of Washington in 1991, I wa…
Should You Go To University?
I would just say that if you are self-aware enough to realize that you’re sort of middle of the road and you’re not that good, then sure, go to university, get your stamp, try not to be brainwashed, and use it to at least get your first job. But if you’r…
Should Warren Buffett Buy Tesla Stock?
[Music] Uh no, I think electric cars are very much in America’s future. Well Warren, if you think that, would you consider potentially buying some Tesla stock? No, there has been a lot of speculation recently that Warren Buffett is in fact investing in…
This Mistake Cost Me $1 Million!
There you are with your opportunity. You’ve beat the odds, and you don’t know your numbers. Set goals you can achieve, and watch things happen, because people want to work in a winning. It’s like playing for Brady; nobody wants to leave the team. There i…
Emotional Manipulation: A Masked Reality
Manipulation is everywhere. The social influence aimed at changing the behavior or belief of a person through emotional coercion. Emotional manipulation has always been prevalent in human interaction. It’s in all of our relationships. Companies use it on …
15 Things That Make You IRREPLACEABLE
In a world of constant change and competition, standing out and becoming irreplaceable is a goal many of us look for. Whether it’s at our workplace, within our personal relationships, or in broader social circles, certain qualities and behaviors can help …