yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Upcoming 2021 Real Estate Collapse Explained
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So today we’re literally going to be talking about my favorite topic in the entire world. And I know you think this might be a setup for me to say, “And that topic is asking you to smash that like button for the YouTu…
4th of July Fireworks Chemistry - Smarter Every Day 14
[Music] Hey, it’s me, Destin. So, uh, welcome to my 4th of July tradition. It’s something I do every year. I’m out here on the Bickering Nag, alone this year. Everybody else had something they had to do because the firework show is late. But anyway, I’m …
Explorers Festival, Saturday June 17 | National Geographic
From a distance, it always seems impossible. But impossible is a place we haven’t been to yet. Impossible is what beckons us to go further, to explore. It calls us from the wild, lures us into the unknown, asks us to dig deeper, to look at things from new…
Batten Down | Life Below Zero
Like we’re stuck at home late. Red-flag! I know for three days I should go get firewood, and we should go get a couple days’ worth of something to eat here: caribou or a few ducks. The Hailstone family spends their summer living in Kowalik, away from the…
6 Quick Mood Enhancers
A bad mood often goes together with ruminating about the past or worrying about the future. In many cases, a mental problem has a physical solution. In other cases, the solution lies in changing the way you think. In this video, I’ll show you six quick mo…
15 Things That Make Rich People Dislike You
In your life, there are going to be a handful of times when you’re around rich people. This is your opportunity to make powerful connections with people who are affluent and influential. Their insights, network input, or sometimes even financial backing w…