yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
My Life Story
A question I get asked surprisingly often is, is Veritasium a real element? Nope, I made it up. Having fun When I was a kid, about 10 or 11 years old, I went to this Genghis Khan exhibit at a museum, and I didn’t know much about Genghis Khan except he was…
Vote or STFU?
Um, beware the lizards. Uh, your video urged people to vote or shut the up. It made sense if you were addressing only those who already see democracy as a positive thing, and of course, not everyone does. Um, if there are three people on an island, it doe…
New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu On Why Confederate Monuments Were Taken Down | National Geographic
I went and said to me one morning, “I want you to think about something.” I said, “What about these statues, man? We need to do something special. That statue of Li, there’s no reason for them never to have a statue in the waters even win anything.” I th…
A Defense of Comic Sans
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. Text. The printed word. Vitally important, but never naked. When words and letters are printed, they have to wear the clothing of a typeface. A font family. We don’t always think of it this way, but you cannot type without using…
Startup Experts Share Their Investor Horror Stories
Raising money is a game that you sort of have to figure out. Oftentimes, these meetings can go terribly awry. The worst sort of investor meeting is one that makes you question why you’re even doing a company anymore. Today, we’re talking about our worst i…
How we make Slow Motion Sounds (Part 2) - Smarter Every Day 185
All right, I’m Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. This is part 2 in our slow motion sound series. We’re recording stuff with the Phantom, and we’re going to just play it back and show you how to create those sounds. There’s something just inherent…