yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Have you ever tried drugs?-200k special Q&A
Hi guys, it’s me Ruri! Today I am back with another Q&A video. We hit 200k, and in order to celebrate that, I’m gonna answer your guys’s questions. So let’s get started! So alright, the first question is: “Is the good girl Ruri actually a good girl?”…
TIL: That's No Moon. It's Aliens. (Maybe.) | Today I Learned
Recently, there’s been a lot of excitement about this mysterious star and the K2 data from the Kepler space telescope. This star has a bizarre dip in the amount of light that reaches Earth. There is a chance that maybe the dip in the light is caused by an…
No Flag Northern Ireland
Poor no-flag Northern Ireland. While England, Scotland, and Wales all have flags as countries in the United Kingdom, not her. But rather than a transparent skirt of technical correctness, which would be weird, BAM! These videos use this flag that’s often …
Starbucks predatory practices, and 'the will of the people'
Lawton, you made a video about the predatory business practices of Starbucks and asked how this will be dealt with in a free market or how we dealt with in the absence of government regulation. Specifically, I think that in a free market, some businesses…
SOAP FOR ADULTS ... LÜT #16
Go to sleep in a chocolate bar or a can of sardines and an infectious disease stress ball that you can squish. It’s episode 16 of LÜT. Are you tired of wimpy straws that make you look like a loser? Well, grab ThinkGeek’s food grade Titanium straw. It tea…
Closing Remarks at Startup School NY 2014
Wow, it is a good thing we closed the show with Chase and Watsi. I am so proud that Y Combinator started accepting non-profit applications, and we could not have had a better inaugural non-profit than Watsi. If any of you are starting a non-profit, or hav…