yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Avoiding common mistakes in historical essays | US History | Khan Academy
I want to talk about how to avoid some common mistakes when you’re writing a historical paper. This could apply to a term paper, to a blue book essay, even really to your master’s thesis if you wanted to. I want to talk about three phrases that you might …
How Many Photos Have Been Taken?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. In 1826, this became the very first photograph ever taken. And in 1992, this became the very first image ever uploaded to the web. But how many photographs have we all taken, altogether, throughout all of history? Well, 1000memo…
Conservation of momentum | Physics | Khan Academy
When we shoot a cannon, not only does the ball go forward, but the cannon itself goes backward. This means when we shot it, the ball gained a forward momentum, and the cannon itself also gained a backward momentum. The big question is: if we know what the…
Sums and products of irrational numbers
Let’s say that we have some number A and to that we are going to add some number B, and that sum is going to be equal to C. Let’s say that we’re also told that both A and B are irrational. So based on the information that I’ve given you, A and B are both…
Measuring area with partial unit squares | Math | 3rd grade | Khan Academy
Each square in the grid is a unit square with an area of 1 square cm. So, each of these squares is 1 square cm. This is 1 square cm, and this is 1 square cm, and so on. Now we’re asked, what is the area of the figure? By figure, I’m sure they mean this bl…
Alkane with isopropyl group | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s try to name this molecule right over here. The first thing we want to do is identify the longest chain of carbons. So let’s see; it could be one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, or let’s see, maybe it’s one, two, three, four, five, six, s…