yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How to become a strong negotiator!
Best place to learn your negotiating skills is with your boyfriend, girlfriend, husband, wife, your kids, your parents. That’s the place you fight like hell, and then you make up right after that. But at least, hopefully, you’ve learned something about it…
Supreme Court BANS Faithless Electors…………?
Hello Internet. Time for a quick update regarding everyone’s favorite voting system: The Electoral College. America’s… idiosyncratic method of picking her president. It’s been unchanged (mostly) for centuries, but this video exists because, in July 2020, …
How I started my business. 📈
How did you end up in London and why London? I read originally you’re from New York. Yeah, I am from New York. I left the business for a while. I was in private equity, working with guys doing some corporate takeovers. And then I decided to get back into…
Analyzing unbounded limits: mixed function | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So, we’re told that ( f(x) ) is equal to ( \frac{x}{1 - \cos(e^x) - 2} ), and they ask us to select the correct description of the one-sided limits of ( f ) at ( x = 2 ). We see that right at ( x = 2 ), if we try to evaluate ( f(2) ), we get ( \frac{2}{1…
Dependent & independent variables | 6th grade | Khan Academy
Let’s say that you love to eat apples, and you are going to buy apples. So, A is the number of apples. But you also have a budget, so you have to care about cost. Let’s say C is equal to the total cost, and let’s say that the price of an apple is two doll…
Impact of mass on orbital speed | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
A satellite of mass lowercase m orbits Earth at a radius capital R and speed v naught, as shown below. So, this has mass lowercase m. An aerospace engineer decides to launch a second satellite that is double the mass into the same orbit. So, the same orbi…