yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Financial Minimalist Home Tour | How I Live For Free
What’s up guys? It’s Graham here. So one week ago, I made a video explaining why I’m a financial minimalist. In that video, I explained that despite how much money I make, I still live in the same one-bedroom, 850 square-foot duplex as I have been for qui…
What Is The Coastline Paradox?
I’ve been driving along Australia’s famous Great Ocean Road. And I’m stopped here near the Twelve Apostles, which are these big sandstone bluffs. Actually, there’s only eight of them left because the others have eroded over time. And erosion is really wha…
Antietam part 2
So, in the last video, Sal and I were talking about the Civil War Battle of Antietam. Antietam took place in Maryland on September 17th, 1862. Just to briefly recap, Antietam was the single bloodiest day in American history; over 4,000 people died. Antiet…
Extremophiles 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] Intense heat, freezing cold, high acidity, and radioactivity. These harsh environments don’t seem hospitable for life, but some organisms not only survive but thrive under such extreme conditions. The name extremophile means extreme lover. Th…
Triangle missing side example
The triangle shown below has an area of 75 square units. Find the missing side, so pause the video and see if you can find the length of this missing side. All right, now let’s work through this together. They give us the area; they give us this side rig…
Discovering Homo Naledi: Journey to Find a Human Ancestor, Part 1 | Nat Geo Live
Lee: I’d come to South Africa. I’d launched myself into exploration. And out I went looking to combine these technologies: satellite imagery and handheld GPS. I started mapping sites. I saw that cave sites formed in linear lines. I saw fossil sites cluste…