yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How One Community Saved Its Fish | National Geographic
When I was a kid walking down the beach, I could see so many fish along the seashore, the beach… My name is Juan Castro Montaño. I am 71 years old and I’ve always lived here, in Cabo Pulmo. Fishing was very important for this community because that was ou…
Politics in the Animal Kingdom: Single Transferable Vote
Queen Lion is looking to make the elections in her animal kingdom more fair. Currently, she divides her citizens into ranges, each of which selects one representative to go to the jungle council, which makes laws for the kingdom. But her citizens are unha…
Strategies for dividing by tenths
Let’s do a few more examples of thinking of strategies for dividing decimals. In the future, we’re going to come up with a more systematic way of doing it, but it’s really important to come up with some of these strategies because it gives you an intuitio…
The Story of Us with Morgan Freeman | National Geographic
This is the story of mankind: our beliefs, our struggles, our traditions, and our inspirations. This is the story of us. Once again, my journeys take me around the world, meeting inspiring individuals from all walks of life. As always, I’ve got a lot of …
The Human Body in Space
When you think about the true cost of space exploration, what do you think of? Maybe you think about the Challenger accident or maybe you think about the Columbia disaster. Anything with the space shuttle blowing up, really. Perhaps the numerous failed te…
Taoism: The Philosophy of Flow
Your alarm rings, waking you up from an unrestful sleep. You stretch across the bed and tap your phone to silence the disturbing noise. You’re tempted to pick it up and see what’s going on in the world, but you try really hard to stay away from it. Remind…