yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Mario vs. Link: Who Would Win?? NERD WARS
Nerd wars time! It’s Friday again! We’re gonna do some old-school action today. Oh, nerd wars! Someone suggested this on the YouTube channel comment, you know that thing down here? And I was too lazy to figure out who it was. I forgot, but here it is: Lin…
Homeroom with Sal & David Siegel - Wednesday, July 14
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to the Homeroom live stream! It’s been a little while since we last saw each other, so it’s so good to see you again. We have an exciting conversation today with David Siegel, who’s a co-chair, co-foun…
Meet the $250,000,000 man
As many of you know, I’m an avid YouTube connoisseur. Now, even though I’ve only been making videos here on YouTube for about 24 months, I have been on here as a loyal viewer since about 2010. Every now and then, someone comes across your screen that gets…
Breathing Coal | Years of Living Dangerously
What is this community like? 70% are Latino and African-American. It’s a working-class community. How hard is it to get people in a town like this motivated to take on something this big? There are amazing people that I have met here that maybe have not e…
The Secrets To Setting Smarter Goals
Did you learn calculus and then get GA, or did you cheat and get the A? Like, it’s like you know the answer to that question. Yeah, like the A isn’t the goal; it’s the representation of your knowledge and your mastery. This is Michael Seibel with Dalton …
Safari Live - Day 218 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and caucuses. Viewer discretion is advised. There’s why the inclusion of the pride is such a firm favorite. [Music] How insane was that, everybody? And welcome to the 1…