yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Eighth Amendment | National Constitution Center | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today I’m learning about the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the government from imposing excessive fines and bail, or inflicting cruel and unusual punishment on individuals accused or convicte…
15 Experiences That Will Change Your Life & Make You Mentally Stronger
Hey there, Aluer. Now, there are experiences in your life that will pass you by unnoticed at the time, but they go on to define you. One day, you’ll look back and wonder how you ended up here, and you’ll think back to these moments. Sometimes they’re smal…
Conclusion for a two-sample t test using a confidence interval | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Yuna grows two varieties of pears: bosk and anju. She took a sample of each variety to test if their average caloric contents were significantly different. Here is a summary of her results, or here is a summary of her results, and so they give the same da…
Growth Hacks Rich People Use All The Time
Everyone’s got access to growth opportunities, but not everyone takes them. The main reason they fail to do so is because they’re just not aware of them. It’s really easy to miss something you’re not actually looking for. By the end of this video, you’ll …
Drew Houston : How to Build the Future
Hi, I’m Sam Alden. This is “How to Build the Future.” Our guest today is Drew Houston. Thank you for taking the time. Thanks for having me! So, you were in Y Combinator with Dropbox in the summer of 2007? That’s right. How did you come up with the ide…
Flight at the Edge of the Ozone Layer | One Strange Rock
NARRATOR: 30 years ago, we discovered man-made chemicals had punched a hole in the ozone layer. Is that hole here to stay, waiting around to kill us? Today, we’re trying hard to find out. Morgan Sandercock is about to test an experimental plane, perfect f…