yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Ask me anything with Sal Khan: March 30 | Homeroom with Sal
Welcome everyone to the daily homeroom! I hope you all had a good weekend. I know, or as good a weekend as you could have, given the circumstances. For those of you all who are new to our daily homeroom, this is really a way for us to stay connected as we…
Confidence interval for the slope of a regression line | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Musa is interested in the relationship between hours spent studying and caffeine consumption among students at his school. He randomly selects 20 students at his school and records their caffeine intake in milligrams and the amount of time studying in a g…
Drugs for a Fine (Clip) | To Catch a Smuggler | National Geographic
You said this was what, again? Okay, just give me a second to positive for ketamine hydrochloride, which is a DEA controlled substance. It’s illegal to transport into the U.S. It’s illegal to have in the U.S. without a prescription. I honestly didn’t kno…
Worked example: finding relative extrema | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have G of X being equal to X to the fourth minus X to the fifth. What we want to do, without having to graph G, is figure out what X values G has a relative maximum. Just to remind us what’s going on in a relative maximum, let me draw a hypothetica…
You Are Not Where You Think You Are
Look around you. Where are you? Where is this place you are occupying? Somewhere in a room, maybe in a city on a continent on a planet orbiting a star in a galaxy among billions. But… where is all of that? While this may feel like a daft question, it turn…
The Mani Tribe's Blowgun | Primal Survivor
[music playing] HAZEN AUDEL: The Mani have an unrivaled knowledge of the local plants and trees, relying on them for almost everything they need. [non-english speech] Huh? [non-english speech] [non-english speech] That one right there. [non-english speec…