yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How To Be A Financial Minimalist
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here! So this is a term I really want to make more popular and bring more mainstream, and that would be financial minimalism. It’s a term I thought of last week while trying to find a catchy title for my video where I went …
The Bizarre Behavior of Rotating Bodies
I want to thank the sponsor of this episode, LastPass, which remembers your passwords so you don’t have to. More about them at the end of the show. What you are looking at is known as the Dzhanibekov effect, or the tennis racket theorem, or the intermedi…
Safari Live - Day 360 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Hello everybody and good afternoon! How awesome is this? We’re kicking off our sunset safari with awesome animals! Well, we…
Finding derivative with fundamental theorem of calculus | AP®︎ Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have the function g of x, and it is equal to the definite integral from 19 to x of the cube root of t dt. What I’m curious about finding, or trying to figure out, is what is g prime of 27? What is that equal to? Pause this video and try …
BREAKING: The Federal Reserve Rate Hike (Major Changes Explained)
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, we’ve just had a major announcement from the Federal Reserve that changes everything. With their 10th rate hike now going into effect, you’re going to want to hear this. After all, higher interest rates have already …
Writing whole numbers as fractions
We’re told that each rectangle is a hole, so this is a hole right over there. That’s one hole, and so this is two holes. Which expressions describe the shaded part of the picture? They’ve shaded in everything and they say, “Choose to answer.” So pause th…