yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Meet Warriors on a Mission to Help Lions and Humans Coexist | Expedition Raw
We have never seen the river dry at this time of the year. There’s not much grass and is no enough. What a state! A foreign world. The water is underground, and this is how we get water for both whirling, powerless stuff and also for people. This is how w…
The U.S. Faces a Major Debt Problem
I just got off the phone with the president. I talked to him twice today, and after weeks of negotiations, we have come to an agreement in principle. This is House Speaker Kevin McCarthy explaining to the media that finally the Republicans and the Democra…
The Most-Photographed Toilet In New Zealand
Come with me as I poop in New Zealand’s most photographed public toilet, located in Kawakawa, near the top of the North Island. The Hundertwasser toilets are the final and only Southern Hemisphere project from reclusive artist Friedensreich Hundertwasser.…
Guided meditation to help with test anxiety
Welcome to this meditation. I’ll assume that if you are listening, that you have some type of major test or exam coming up, because that’s what the title of this meditation is about. Now, the word meditation can conjure up different ideas to different fol…
Khan Academy Live: SAT Writing
Hello and welcome back to Khan Academy live SAT. I’m Eric, I’m an SAT tutor and one of the SAT experts here at Khan Academy. Today is our third and final class as a part of this series. We’ve covered SAT Math two weeks ago, last week we covered SAT Readin…
Stoicism: Become Undefeatable
In the city of Cyprus in 300 BC, there lived a very wealthy trader called Zeno. While on a voyage from Phoenicia to Piraeus, his boat sank, along with all of his cargo. Because of that single event, an event that was entirely out of Zeno’s or anyone’s con…