yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Conditions for inference for difference of means | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A food scientist wants to estimate the difference between the mean weights of eggs classified as jumbo and large. They plan on taking a sample of each type of egg to construct a two-sample t-interval. Which of the following are conditions for this type of…
From $0 To Millionaire | Investing For Beginners
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here! So, as many of you know, I have this thing for talking about investments. For some reason, it’s what I’ve been obsessed with doing over the last decade. Like, I wake up early in the morning, I make myself some 20-cent…
7 Anti-Stoic Habits To Remove From Your Life Now! (A MUST WATCH STOICISM GUIDE)
Marcus Aelius, a famous Stoic philosopher, once said: “The happiness of your life depends upon the quality of your thoughts.” This quote reminds us of how our thoughts affect our reality and our health. Just as the people we hang out with can have a big e…
Generating Power on Mars | MARS: How to Get to Mars
So, power on Mars is going to be very important, and it will have to have the ability to run the microwave oven, along with the oxygenator and everything else that we’re going to need to survive. You need power; every civilization needs power. It’s what w…
NASA's Urgent Message | Years of Living Dangerously
I think the future of agriculture in California is really at risk today. Don Cheadle was here, and we were talking about issues of satellite observations of groundwater depletion and how it’s happening in California. Over the last few years, California’s …
How can an atheist call Hitler evil?
Andrew made a video, uh, in which he asks the question to atheists, was Hitler evil? Um, I think the gist of his question is the idea—uh, the idea behind it is that, uh, because atheists don’t have a universal sense of right and wrong, can they condemn Hi…