yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How NOT to Get Offended (Stoic Wisdom for a Thicker Skin)
It’s quite easy to offend someone these days. Even me stating this observation can rub someone up the wrong way. In the age of social media, we get bombarded with crude language, opinions we don’t like, and stuff that’s downright mean. That’s probably why…
Photo Walk in Napa Valley | National Geographic
Hi everybody! I’m Ashley Kalina. Thanks for joining us again. We’re here in beautiful Napa Valley for Get Outdoors Day, and we are here with National Geographic and our friends at Nature Valley. I’m joined by Ben Horton, the wonderful photographer. He’s g…
How to Slow Aging (and even reverse it)
Part of this video is sponsored by LastPass. More about LastPass at the end of the show. This is a video about research into slowing the rate of aging and extending the human lifespan. So, before I filmed this, I wanted to know: What do you guys generall…
My Tenant Horror Story.
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So chances are, if you ask any real estate investor about their experience as a landlord, it’s pretty much inevitable that a large percentage of them will open up and tell you about at least one of their tenant horro…
EXCLUSIVE: Fur Seals Are Back From the Brink on California Islands | National Geographic
The northern fur seal was a top predator in this area, and 150,000 of them were removed from the ecosystem. My name is Jim Teats, and I’m a biologist for Point Blue Conservation Science. I work on Southeast Farallon Island, which is 30 miles west of San F…
NYE Reflection on 2019 and ahead in 2020
Hello everyone! I want to take a moment to say Happy New Year to you all and reflect on what has happened in 2019 and what’s gonna happen in 2020. So first of all, it has been a very slow year. I have not done nearly as much as I wanted to. There were so…