yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Why Bitcoin Is Property To Financial Institutions | FT. Anthony Pompliano
I’ve got two of my brothers here. I don’t think you’ve ever met them before, so be careful because they’re way smarter and better looking than me. But they got questions for you as well. I’ll go first. Kevin, thanks for doing this. And, uh, now that we’v…
Naming ions and ionic compounds | Atoms, compounds, and ions | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s get some practice now thinking about how ions typically form, how they might form compounds, and how we name those compounds. So, let’s start with something in group one, in this first column. This first column is often known as alkali metals, and …
My morning routine
So I’ve really avoided making a morning routine video, specifically because I feel like there’s just so many of them on YouTube, and I feel like morning routines are generally overrated. You know, everyone’s seen thumbnails on YouTube of like, “The One Mo…
5 Philosophical Questions Without Satisfying Answers
Some questions have been keeping humanity busy since the dawn of time. Moreover, complete civilizations and religions have been built around these questions. No matter how much we have debated, researched, and observed, there just doesn’t seem to be a sat…
How I sell private jets to billionaires!
This is a day in the life of a private jet broker. I get into the office at six a.m., three hours before my team. I like getting in early to catch up on work and establish my plan of action for the rest of the day. I then call my clients in Asia, do email…
Khan Academy request for donations
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. As you might notice, I am back in the walk-in closet where, uh, Khan Academy first started. I am socially distanced like I’m sure many of you all are. I just wanted to give you a quick message because I know …