yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
How Finding This Human Ancestor Is Making Us Rethink Our Origins | Nat Geo Live
MARINA ELLIOT: Homo Naledi’s story is changing our story, the story of human origins. And, in fact, this discovery is changing how paleoanthropologists and scientists think about and craft the story of our past. (audience applause) All of you have actuall…
How Eating Out Keeps You Poor!
I just love this place, don’t you? I know it’s kinda expensive, but everything’s so top notch! Hey folks. Know what you want? Yes! I’d like to eat the Down Payment on a House, with a side of flambeed Emergency Fund. Excellent choice. And for you, sir? …
How To Work On A Long Term Plan (Without Having One)
There are many people who want to work toward a long-term goal, but they just don’t have one. They don’t know what they’ll be doing in the next five or ten years. They don’t know what life has in store for them. Maybe they’ll be in a different town with a…
Why Do We Dream?
Why do we dream? This is one of life’s great unanswered questions. Given that we spend around six years of our lives in a dream state, it’s no wonder people want to understand why we do it. Sure, there are theories, and I’ll get to them, but there’s no cl…
Sun 101 | National Geographic
While billions of stars are scattered throughout the universe, the one at the center of our solar system plays a special role for us here on Earth. Our Sun formed about 4.5 billion years ago in the Milky Way galaxy’s Orion’s fur. It was born when a cloud …
Impress Her With Nanodiamonds
Want to spoil your girlfriend with diamonds while impressing her with your scientific knowledge. Here’s how: “Baby, we’ve been together a long time and I’ve picked up on your hints – I know that you want a diamond, but I was thinking you’re too special t…