yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Half-life | Physics | Khan Academy
This is a Neanderthal skull. Neanderthals are an extinct species of humans, and we believe they went extinct about 35 to 40,000 years ago. This is Earth, and we believe Earth to be about 4.5 billion years old. But my question was always, how do we know th…
Mark Wiens Goes Night Fishing and Jungle Foraging in Remote Thailand | Epic Food Journeys | Nat Geo
Nat Geo challenged me to fish and forage for a meal. So I’m in one of the most remote regions of Thailand with the Karen people, where I’ll be taking part in a special ceremony. My friend Mook will prepare a traditional Karen meal, and I can’t wait to t…
The Problem With Financial Minimalism
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So lately, I’ve noticed a big push towards the concept of financial minimalism. For those of you that are not aware, this is the concept in which you cut out every expense in your life that does not add to your overall e…
The Wonders of Urban Wildlife | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
So I’m a solo hiker. I prefer to hike alone, and I’m a meanderer, so I have no idea where I’m going. It’s July 2021, and I’m meandering with Danielle Lee, a biology professor at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. We are in our neighborhood in Nort…
Rounding to nearest ten, hundred and thousand
At a barbecue to celebrate the end of the soccer season, 1,354 hot dogs were served. Round the number of hot dogs to the nearest 10. All right, let me just rewrite the number: 1,354. Now let’s just remember our places. This is the ones, this is the tens,…
Comparing unit fractions
So which of the following numbers is a greater: one third or one fifth? Pause this video and try to answer that all right. Now let’s think about this together, and the way that I can best think about it is by visualizing them. So let’s imagine a hole. So…