yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Example identifying the center of dilation
We are told the triangle N prime is the image of triangle N under a dilation. So this is N prime in this red color, and then N is the original; N is in this blue color. What is the center of dilation? And they give us some choices here: choice A, B, C, or…
Getting Fired | Why 20% Of Workers Could Lose Their Job
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So are you ready to make a lot of money? Because we’ve got some incredible news: unemployment is officially at its lowest level since prior to the pandemic. Wages are rising at the fastest pace in a decade, and wait, …
_-substitution: defining _ | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is give ourselves some practice in the first step of u substitution, which is often the most difficult for those who are first learning it. That’s recognizing when u substitution is appropriate and then defining an app…
Homeroom with Sal & Pedro Noguera - Wednesday, October 21
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here. Welcome to the Homeroom live stream. We have a really exciting guest today, Pedro Noguera, who is the Dean of the Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern California. So start thinking of your questions, puttin…
How to Get Rich
Hey, this is Nivi. You’re listening to the Navall Podcast. This is one giant mega sowed that collects every episode we’ve done on getting rich. All of it is based on his tweet storm of how to get rich without getting lucky. I’ve collected them all here be…
How Confidence Is Holding You Back
Hello Alexa, welcome back. Let’s be real here for a moment. Everything that is worth doing and everything that is worth getting needs a healthy dose of something that today’s society doesn’t really have anymore. And that thing is courage. The courage to …