yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Jack Black Meets a Young Climate Activist | Years of Living Dangerously
[Music] I want you to meet my protege, Delaney. Hello Delany! I’ve heard so much about you. Have a seat. Delany Reynolds, 16-year-old budding scientist. Somebody who found out about climate change and sea level rise, and she’s really engaged and she’s …
The Emotional Journey of Photos | National Geographic
There have been moments when I’ve been out shooting landscapes where I’ve cried because there’s things in front of me that I just can’t believe are even real. So this competition stands out for me because I think it’s just so important to love what you do…
MACAWS in SlowMotion! Rainforest Research! Smarter Every Day 60
Hey, it’s me, Dtin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! So let’s pretend for a second that you’re a macaw, and you live in the Amazon rainforest. Life is pretty good; you have all the fruit you want. But there’s one problem: you don’t get all the nutrient…
Top 5 WTF "Dances" in Video Games: V-LIST #5
Hey B saucers, how you doing? Michael here. First things first, did you see the story about Xbox banning a guy for having offensive language in his profile, only to learn later that he actually did live in Fort Gay, West Virginia? Well, you can read more …
How Is Warren Buffett Spending His $80B Net Worth?
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel. In this video, we’re going to be discussing exactly how Warren Buffett spends his billions. Warren Buffett, the Oracle of Omaha as he’s referred to, he’s currently the fourth richest person in the world with a net wo…
Is Regulation A Threat To Bitcoin? | Bitcoin Magazine
It’s not what I want or you want; it’s what the institutions want. Institutions that are just stepping in or considering getting involved in allocating to crypto want one thing: Bitcoin. We’re not gonna print two trillion dollars worth of paper; that curr…