yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Paradoxes of Life
As kids, we believed a lot of different things: from thinking that the gifts under the Christmas tree were kept there by Santa to imagining a tiny fairy that came in at the dead of night to steal the loose tooth from underneath our pillows. Most of the th…
Gyroscopic Precession
Hey everyone, it’s me, Derek from the channel Veritasium. I’ve been following this series by Destin on Smarter Every Day about helicopters, and gyroscopic precession is just one of those things that still blows my mind, as it did Destin. So, I’m here at t…
Introduction to the possessive | The Apostrophe | Punctuation | Khan Academy
Hello Garans, hello Paige, hi David in the driver’s seat. So Paige, today, uh, it is my understanding that we are going to talk about the possessive. That’s right. Um, what even is the possessive in English? What does that mean? When we say that, like, w…
Why Isn't the Stock Market Crashing?
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we’re going to be talking about, we’re going to be trying to answer the question: why isn’t the stock market crashing now? For this video, we are going to look over in America. We’re going to be focusi…
Ponzi Factor | V-Log 4 | Tesla SEC Settlement
Hi, this is Tong. Thanks for joining me again. It’s Saturday, and I needed to touch on this for you all. Long story short, the SEC settled with Elon after they said they were gonna go after him on Thursday. I’m not exactly happy about this because this s…
AC analysis intro 2
So in the last video, we started working on the analysis of an RLC circuit that had a forcing function. The math for doing that gets really hard, and so what we decided to do was see what happens if we limit ourselves to using just sinusoidal inputs that …