yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Bankrupt by 28: Why Dave Ramsey lost MILLIONS in Real Estate
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So here’s a very familiar sounding story about someone who got his real estate license at the age of eighteen, began investing in real estate in his early 20s, amassed a four million dollar real estate portfolio with …
Indoor air pollutants| Atmospheric pollution| AP Environmental science| Khan Academy
Let’s talk about indoor air pollution. I remember when I first heard about indoor air pollution in my AP Environmental Science class, I was a little confused. When I used to think of pollution, I would think of images like this or this. But pollution is o…
The Future of Weather Forecasting | Breakthrough
JOE SIENKIEWICZ: So I started out 28 years ago. Just imagine, forecast information came in the form of paper, piles of paper. It limited the amount of information that we could look at. We see things now in the models that we’re actually, in some ways, le…
9 CRUCIAL MOMENTS TO ADOPT SILENCE LOCK YOUR MOUTH | STOICISM INSIGHTS
Imagine a world where your silence can speak louder than words, where your calm can overpower the chaos around you. Today we’re diving deep into the art of silence, a concept so powerful yet so underrated in our noisy, hectic world. I want you to think ab…
Khan Academy Ed Talks with Adam Green, PhD - Wednesday, August 18
Hello and welcome to Ed Talks with Khan Academy, where we talk education with a variety of experts in the field. Today, I am excited to talk to my own teammate Dr. Adam Green about new content that we have just released on Khan Academy for the start of th…
Interpreting trigonometric graphs in context | Trigonometry | Algebra || | Khan Academy
We’re told Alexa is riding on a Ferris wheel. Her height above the ground in meters is modeled by ( h(t) ), where ( t ) is the time in seconds, and we can see that right over here. Now, what I want to focus on in this video is some features of this graph.…