yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
The Dilemma Of Loneliness
In the age of individualism (in Western countries at least), there is an increasing concern in regards to social isolation. We see this happening with the elderly, that are put away in retirement homes, deprived of interaction with children and grandchild…
Communicate with Users, Build Something They Want - Ryan Hoover of Product Hunt
All right, so maybe we could start with this question from Stuart Powell, and his question is, “What’s your advice for non-technical founders?” As you are a non-technical founder and solo founder, or a cofounder. Prabh is a solo founder but had a founding…
Has Technological Advancement Gone Too Far? #Shorts #Apple #VisionPro
VR can be an incredible experience. It can convince your body that a fake world is real. Anyone who has looked down into a canyon with their headset on will be very familiar with how it can trick the senses. But to get to that world, you must put on the …
YOU LIVE IN THE PAST
Hey, Vsauce, Michael here, and today we are going to be talking about the past. But not like history—in fact—we will be talking about what we call now. This very newest moment in time, and the fact that we can never really be aware of or live in what we c…
How To Talk To Users | Startup School
Foreign [Music] My name is Gustav, and I work here at Y Combinator as a group partner. I’ve been here since 2017. Before YC, I was a practically to Airbnb and actually a YC founder back in 2007. Today, I’m going to talk about how to talk to your users an…
Risk.
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. When will you die? I don’t mean you specifically, I mean the mean of you all - the average Vsauce viewer. By combining World Health Organization life tables with YouTube analytics for Vsauce viewers, we can calculate that the av…