yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Why 80% of New Years Resolutions FAIL by today
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, how sad is this? 80% of New Year’s resolutions fail by the second week of February. And if you haven’t noticed, today is February 14th, the second week of February. Now, I know it’s also Valentine’s Day, but for t…
Kevin O'Leary - Music, Style, Money - Harry Rosen
Hi, I’m Kevin O’Leary from Dragon’s Den and Shark Tank, and I’m wearing a crisp Tom Ford from Harry Rosen. Oh yeah, baby! Business is so disciplined and scientific; it’s black and white. Either you make money or you lose it. Music is chaos. You need both …
15 Ways to Buy Back Your Freedom
Freedom is more than money, but money definitely contributes to you buying your freedom. The truth is, most people get it twisted: money doesn’t buy happiness, but neither does being broke. If you know how to use it, money buys freedom, and freedom gives …
The NEW GameStop Infinite Money Glitch
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, you know the saying that lightning never strikes the same place twice? Well, the lie detector test determined that was a lie. And in the last week, GameStop did it again! The infinite money printer is back on, strong…
Exploring scale copies
We are told drag the sliders, and then they say which slider creates a scale copy of the shape, or which slider creates scale copies of the shape. So, let’s just see, explore this a little bit. Okay, that’s pretty neat! These sliders seem to change the s…
No Truth Can Be Justified
The initial guesses at what knowledge was all about amounted to what is known as the justified true belief vision of knowledge, and it’s still the most prevalent idea today. Anyone who calls themselves a Bayesian is a justified true believer, and that’s t…