yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett Keeps Buying These 3 Stocks...
Well, as of the time of recording, we’ve now ticked 45 days past the end of Q2, and that means the 13F filings are out. These are regulatory filings that portfolio managers with at least 100 million in assets under management must submit to the SEC every …
Satya Nadella on the journey to becoming Microsoft's CEO & reimagining technology's impact
YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU YOUR TIME, AND WE’LL SEE YOU NEXT TIME. NEXT TIME.
The Disappearance of Flight 19 | Atlas of Cursed Places
This is actually the lead ship of Flight 19. Wow! The exact same plane as this is Flight 19. Yes. The final word to the men on Flight 19 have been studied and pored over. Every sentence and word analyzed, in depth, by the Navy’s after action report. And t…
Comparing the effects of the Civil War on American national identity | US history | Khan Academy
It’s hard to imagine anything more transformative in American history than the Civil War. Before the Civil War, the United States was a largely rural, barely unified collection of states, not making much of a blip on the world stage. After the Civil War, …
UGLY DANCE -- DONG
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. I’m still in San Francisco. I was hanging out with Jake from the Key of Awesome, but he just left to go to the Big Sur, so yeah, I’m alone hanging out with some art and uhm, well, doing my laundry. But it’s okay, because I did s…
This 1960s Group Empowered Black Youth in Brooklyn | National Geographic
Bed-Stuy youth in action with a youth organization that was established in the ‘60s. They would have these activities that would provide young people with a sense of empowerment, and they were engaged with their community. That was the other thing—there w…