yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Answering Presuppositionalism: Basic


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Theists who subscribe to the presuppositionalist school of thought say that atheists can't account for inductive reasoning. They claim that, in fact, whenever an atheist uses inductive reasoning, she is borrowing from the Christian worldview, because according to them, it's the only worldview that can account for the uniformity of nature, which is needed for inductive reasoning to work.

But even if the Christian is correct in his claim that an atheist can't account for a given facet of nature that she nevertheless depends upon, this is not that urgent deal-breaking problem that the presuppositionalist tends to paint for us.

Imagine a primitive society where most people believe that spirit ancestors reward the ritual act of watering a plant by causing that plant to grow. A person in this society who didn't believe in the existence of spirit ancestors would still go ahead and water his plants, because otherwise they would die.

The skeptics' peers might ask him, "How can you account for the fact that applying water causes the plant to grow in your worldview?" The skeptic, ignorant of plant biology, would have no answer. His peers might then say, "Every time you water your plants, you're borrowing from our worldview, because ours is the only system that can account for the connection between applying water to a plant and that plant's growth."

I hope the points I wanted to illustrate with this analogy are already clear, but I'll spell them out:

One, having an explanation does not make your position superior to that of those who may lack one.

Two, not being able to explain a phenomenon doesn't preclude you from legitimately assuming the reliability of that phenomenon.

Three, assuming the reliability of a phenomenon without being able to account for it does not mean that you implicitly accept the worldview of people claiming that theirs is the only explanation of that phenomenon.

Four, the failure of a person to explain a phenomenon doesn't invalidate their worldview or render it inconsistent.

Five, acknowledging that you don't have an answer is better than making things up.

More Articles

View All
Why Science Says It's Good for Kids to Lie | National Geographic
[Music] My name is Ellen. I’m a research assistant at Kong Leaf Development Lab. This is where we do our deception studies, and here we play three games with the kids. You’ve been doing such a good job, and we got off to such a good start that I kind of w…
Curvature formula, part 5
So let’s sum up where we are so far. We’re looking at this formula and trying to understand why it corresponds to curvature, why it tells you how much a curve actually curves. The first thing we did is we noticed that this numerator corresponds to a cert…
Steve Varsano shows us the art around his office
Hey Steve, I’ve noticed a load of art around the showroom. Can you tell me more about it? Yeah, sure! This is one of my most favorite industry photos: Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin back in about 1970. Really, back in the early days of Las Vegas and the f…
How I sell private jets to billionaires!
My name is Steve Varsano and I have a company called The Jet Business, and we’re involved with the buying and selling of corporate jets. I live in the UK; I work in the UK. I set up my business in the UK, but my business is global. The final purchase pric…
Standard normal table for proportion below | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A set of middle school students’ heights are normally distributed with a mean of 150 cm and a standard deviation of 20 cm. Darnell is a middle school student with a height of 161.405, so it would have a shape that looks something like that. That’s my hand…
The Worst Global Recession Is Here
Everybody’s talking about global recession. The World Bank, the IMF, there are a lot of questions in these reports and in this review that they issued today. The United States plans to impose fresh sanctions against Russia and China. What’s up, guys? It’…