yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Explaining the “Eureka Effect” | StarTalk


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

No one can imagine anybody else playing that role but you. So what were you doing? What's your secret? Come on!

I love the whole concept of scientists who deal with, uh, insoluble, uh, problems. I love the story of a noted scientist who was trying to find the solution to some problem and just didn't come. He worked on for months and then one day, he's not thinking about anything. He's getting on the bus and it comes to him, you know?

And Doc Brown, uh, is trying to figure out how to do, uh, time travel, and he falls down in the bathroom and hits his head against the sink, and he suddenly envisions the flux capacitor, you know? So I, I, I love that kind of connection because it's kind of the way it works.

Well, so it's, that's basically the Eureka Effect. Yeah, you get hit in the head or something happens to you abruptly and then the idea pops in. But I'm a fan of the way Isaac Asimov interprets the Eureka Effect, which is—

Which is?

Go ahead, okay, you ready? The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the most discoveries, okay, is not "Eureka" but rather, "that's funny."

That—well, that makes sense. Yeah.

So, Meo, do you agree with this?

Yes, I had exactly that moment. I first was working on string theory in the 1960s, and it consisted of hundreds of random formulas that we had to memorize in a book. But Einstein wanted an equation one inch long that would allow him to, quote, read the mind of God.

So I said to myself, "Hm, that's funny. How come this theory has so many random equations? There should be this one H equation." One day I found it; it's called Stringfield Theory. That's my equation. I'm the co-founder of string field theory, and it summarizes a theory beyond Einstein in one inch long.

But—but was that a Eureka moment or did you just sort of—was that funny moment that no one was looking for it? No one was looking for this one-inch equation, right? Because people were so busy memorizing and using all these little hundreds of little formulas that they would memorize. No one was looking for that one H equation.

More Articles

View All
How to Transform Yourself in Solitude | Useful Ways to Spend Time Alone
The Zhongnan mountains - located in the Shaanxi Province in China - have been a dwelling place for Taoist hermits for at least more than two thousand years. For centuries, they’ve been seeking refuge from society, and for different reasons. Some pursued a…
Big Bend's New Bear Cubs | America's National Parks | National Geographic
NARRATOR: Nearly 6,000 feet up in the mountains, another mom has a huge challenge. A female black bear has spent the winter in a high mountain cave. She needs to teach her cubs to survive in the park. With little to no food or water for months, the stakes…
Ponzi Factor | V-Log 2 | Apple $1 Trillion Joke
Hey, this is time. It’s Saturday night, so that’s one a little more casual - it’s actually Saturday, whoo, Sunday morning now, 1 a.m. Clearly, I go out and party on Saturdays, and I said last time I’m gonna try to stay away from current events. But this t…
Confronting Kevin O’Leary | How He Spends $400 Million Dollars
By the end of the year, I’m writing off millions of dollars. That’s a mistake. I make money selling potatoes with people’s pictures on them. It’s a huge hit. You’re dead to me, and you are because I’m out. What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, as so…
Origins of the Dragon | StarTalk
How good could be unless it’s got dragons? It’s no fantasy unless you have a dragon. Yeah, you need the dragon. Yeah. You need the dragons. And in my home institution, the American Museum of Natural History, we had an exhibit a few years ago that was al…
Estimating with decimal multiplication
We are asked to estimate what is 2.7 times 4 roughly equal to. Pause this video and see if you can answer that. All right, so we could think of 2.7 times 4 as being roughly equal to, or some people might say as approximately equal to. Let’s see, 2.7, tha…