yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Factoring completely with a common factor | Algebra 1 | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So let's see if we can try to factor the following expression completely. So factor this completely. Pause the video and have a go at that.

All right, now let's work through this together. The way that I like to think about it is I first try to see if there is any common factor to all the terms, and I try to find the greatest common factor possible. Common factors to all the terms, so let's see, they're all divisible by 2, so 2 would be a common factor. But let's see, they're also all divisible by 4.

4 is divisible by 4, 8 is divisible by 4, 12 is divisible by 4, and that looks like the greatest common factor. They're not all divisible by x, so I can't throw an x in there. What I want to do is factor out a 4.

So I could rewrite this as four times… now what would it be? Four times what? Well, if I factor a four out of 4x squared, I'm just going to be left with an x squared. If I factor a four out of negative 8x, negative 8x divided by 4 is negative 2, so I'm going to have negative 2x. If I factor a 4 out of negative 12, negative 12 divided by 4 is negative 3.

Now am I done factoring? Well, it looks like I could factor this thing a little bit more. Can I think of two numbers that add up to negative 2 and when I multiply, I get negative 3? Since when I multiply, I get a negative value, one of them is going to be positive and one of them is going to be negative. I could think about it this way: a plus b is equal to negative 2 and a times b needs to be equal to negative 3.

So let's see, a could be equal to negative 3 and b could be equal to 1 because negative 3 plus 1 is negative 2 and negative 3 times 1 is negative 3. So I could rewrite all of this as 4 times (x + negative 3), or I could just write that as (x - 3)(x + 1). And now I have actually factored this completely.

Let's do another example. So let's say that we had the expression negative 3x squared plus 21x minus 30. Pause the video and see if you can factor this completely.

All right, now let's do this together. So what would be the greatest common factor? So let's see, they're all divisible by 3, so you could factor out a 3. But let's see what happens if you factor out a 3. This is the same thing as 3 times… well, negative 3x squared divided by 3 is negative x squared, 21x divided by 3 is 7x, so plus 7x, and then negative 30 divided by 3 is negative 10.

You could do it this way, but having this negative out on the x squared term still makes it a little bit confusing on how you would factor this further. You can do it, but it still takes a little bit more of a mental load. So instead of just factoring out a 3, let's factor out a negative 3.

So we could write it this way: if we factor out a negative 3, what does that become? Well then, if you factor out a negative 3 out of this term, you're just left with an x squared. If you factor out a negative 3 from this term, 21 divided by negative 3 is negative 7x, and if you factor out a negative 3 out of negative 30, you're left with a positive 10.

And now let's see if we can factor this thing a little bit more. Can I think of two numbers where if I were to add them, I get to negative 7, and if I were to multiply them, I get 10? And let's see, they'd have to have the same sign because their product is positive.

So, see, a could be equal to negative 5 and then b is equal to negative 2. So I can rewrite this whole thing as equal to negative 3 times (x + negative 5), which is the same thing as (x - 5)(x + negative 2), which is the same thing as (x - 2). And now we have factored completely.

More Articles

View All
Verifying inverse functions from tables | Precalculus | Khan Academy
We’re told the following tables give all of the input-output pairs for the functions s and t. So we see this first table here, we have some x’s, and then they tell us what the corresponding s of x is. Then, in this table, we have some x’s, and they tell u…
Michael Burry CALLS OUT The Fed's Inflation Metrics
Well, just when you thought I was done talking about inflation, heck, even when I thought I was done talking about inflation, guess who pops back into the frame? Yes, that guy right there, Michael Burry. So, I can’t let this one slide past. Honestly, I wa…
Creating Objects That Build Themselves | Nat Geo Live
Skylar Tibbits: We focus on designing physical components that can build themselves. So, this project proposes that you can have self-assembly at very large scales. This is interesting for construction scenarios where it’s hard to get to; it’s dangerous. …
The Search for Intelligent Life on Earth | Cosmos: Possible Worlds
[bees buzzing] NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON: For thousands of years, bees have been symbols of mindless industry. We always think of them as being something like biological robots, doomed to live out their lives in lockstep, shackled to the dreary roles assigned …
Lessons From The Founders Scaling Their Startup In A War Zone
2 AM, we have an alarm system. We’re screaming like hell. This sound in the middle of the night signified a Russian missile had struck close by. It was February 28th, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had started four days earlier. I woke up; we went to th…
Which is Cheaper: BUYING or RENTING a house? (DEBUNKED)
What’s up you guys! It’s Graham here. So let’s answer the age-old debate: is it cheaper to buy a house or rent a house? Now, I think there’s a common misconception out there that renting is just automatically throwing money out the window, but you can’t d…