yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Factoring completely with a common factor | Algebra 1 | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So let's see if we can try to factor the following expression completely. So factor this completely. Pause the video and have a go at that.

All right, now let's work through this together. The way that I like to think about it is I first try to see if there is any common factor to all the terms, and I try to find the greatest common factor possible. Common factors to all the terms, so let's see, they're all divisible by 2, so 2 would be a common factor. But let's see, they're also all divisible by 4.

4 is divisible by 4, 8 is divisible by 4, 12 is divisible by 4, and that looks like the greatest common factor. They're not all divisible by x, so I can't throw an x in there. What I want to do is factor out a 4.

So I could rewrite this as four times… now what would it be? Four times what? Well, if I factor a four out of 4x squared, I'm just going to be left with an x squared. If I factor a four out of negative 8x, negative 8x divided by 4 is negative 2, so I'm going to have negative 2x. If I factor a 4 out of negative 12, negative 12 divided by 4 is negative 3.

Now am I done factoring? Well, it looks like I could factor this thing a little bit more. Can I think of two numbers that add up to negative 2 and when I multiply, I get negative 3? Since when I multiply, I get a negative value, one of them is going to be positive and one of them is going to be negative. I could think about it this way: a plus b is equal to negative 2 and a times b needs to be equal to negative 3.

So let's see, a could be equal to negative 3 and b could be equal to 1 because negative 3 plus 1 is negative 2 and negative 3 times 1 is negative 3. So I could rewrite all of this as 4 times (x + negative 3), or I could just write that as (x - 3)(x + 1). And now I have actually factored this completely.

Let's do another example. So let's say that we had the expression negative 3x squared plus 21x minus 30. Pause the video and see if you can factor this completely.

All right, now let's do this together. So what would be the greatest common factor? So let's see, they're all divisible by 3, so you could factor out a 3. But let's see what happens if you factor out a 3. This is the same thing as 3 times… well, negative 3x squared divided by 3 is negative x squared, 21x divided by 3 is 7x, so plus 7x, and then negative 30 divided by 3 is negative 10.

You could do it this way, but having this negative out on the x squared term still makes it a little bit confusing on how you would factor this further. You can do it, but it still takes a little bit more of a mental load. So instead of just factoring out a 3, let's factor out a negative 3.

So we could write it this way: if we factor out a negative 3, what does that become? Well then, if you factor out a negative 3 out of this term, you're just left with an x squared. If you factor out a negative 3 from this term, 21 divided by negative 3 is negative 7x, and if you factor out a negative 3 out of negative 30, you're left with a positive 10.

And now let's see if we can factor this thing a little bit more. Can I think of two numbers where if I were to add them, I get to negative 7, and if I were to multiply them, I get 10? And let's see, they'd have to have the same sign because their product is positive.

So, see, a could be equal to negative 5 and then b is equal to negative 2. So I can rewrite this whole thing as equal to negative 3 times (x + negative 5), which is the same thing as (x - 5)(x + negative 2), which is the same thing as (x - 2). And now we have factored completely.

More Articles

View All
10 Luxury Watch Brands That Are More Expensive Than ROLEX
Hello again! Alex Aires here. It’s great to have you back with us in a video in which we’ll be helping you build your knowledge of watches. And not just any old watches; we’re talking about ones at the seriously high end of the scale. Ask most people toda…
Office Hours at Startup School 2013 with Paul Graham and Sam Altman
We have to sit up straight. We have lower, since this is not right. Admiral Rickover would not stand for this. Um, okay. Uh, George, Nick, what are you working on? So we are building a multiplayer programming game for teaching people how to code. So lik…
Jungle Search | Explorer
In 2012, they are finally ready to start looking. We went down to Honduras and we brought down a plane with this million dollar gear in it and the crew. Every morning we get up, go to the airport, get in the airplane. I didn’t go in the plane; there was o…
Is Iron Man’s Arc Reactor Possible? | StarTalk
This first question is from Mr. Awesome via Twitter. He says, “Ma, your hair looks great!” Thank you! Um, he says, “Is something like Tony Stark’s Arc Reactor possible?” Arc Reactor M, this is the thing in his chest. Here’s my take on it: If you’re produ…
Safari Live - Day 170 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Well, good afternoon everybody once again and welcome aboard on the sunset Safari. My name is Ralph Kirsten and on the bush…
Implicit differentiation, product and chain rules at once
Let’s say Y is equal to the natural log of x to the X power. What we want to do is we want to find the derivative of Y with respect to X. So I encourage you to pause this video and see if you could do it. So when you first try to tackle this, this is a l…