yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Justification with the mean value theorem: equation | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let g of x equal one over x. Can we use the mean value theorem to say that the equation g prime of x is equal to one half has a solution where negative one is less than x is less than two? If so, write a justification.

All right, pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

So the key to using the mean value theorem, even before you even think about using it, you have to make sure that you are continuous over the closed interval and differentiable over the open interval. So this is the open interval here, and then the closed interval would include the endpoints. But you might immediately realize that both of these intervals contain x equals 0, and at x equals 0 the function is undefined. And if it's undefined there, well, it's not going to be continuous or differentiable at that point.

And so no, not continuous or differentiable over the interval.

All right, let's do the second part. Can we use the mean value theorem to say that there is a value c such that g prime of c is equal to negative one half and one is less than c is less than two? If so, write a justification.

So pause the video again.

All right, so in this situation between 1 and 2 on both the open and the closed intervals, well, this is a rational function, and a rational function is going to be continuous and differentiable at every point in its domain. And its domain completely contains this open and closed interval. Or another way to think about it: every point on this open interval and on the closed interval is in the domain.

So we can write g of x is a rational function, which lets us know that it is continuous and differentiable at every point in this domain, at every point in its domain. The closed interval from 1 to 2 is in domain.

And so now let's see what the average rate of change is from 1 to 2.

And so we get g of two minus g of one over two minus one is equal to one half minus one over one, which is equal to negative one half.

Therefore, by the mean value theorem, there must be a c where one is less than c is less than two, and g prime of c is equal to the average rate of change between the endpoints, negative one half.

And we're done. So we could put a big yes right over there, and then this is our justification.

More Articles

View All
Indestructible Coating?!
From the top of this forty-five meter drop tower, my friends from the “How Ridiculous” YouTube channel are about to release a watermelon. Here we are. In free fall for a full three seconds, the watermelon accelerates to over 100 kilometers per hour before…
Big Changes at Y Combinator? An Inside Look with S22 Founders
Foreign expecting a full online kind of experience, and instead we got this. You mean the first annual Sonoma badge kickoff? I love just meeting everyone at the start of the batch, surrounded by really smart people from all over the world. Before I was in…
Early Medieval Trade | World History | Khan Academy
In this video, I want to start to answer the question of how did the environment and how did political factors impact trade. That is a really big question that we’re not going to answer in one video, but I want to use a specific example to illustrate the …
Saving and investing | Investments and retirement | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
Let’s talk a little bit about saving and investing. One thing that you’ll hear me talk a lot about is how important it is to save. One, it’s a sign that you’re living sustainably; that you’re spending less money than you’re bringing in. It also allows yo…
Factoring higher degree polynomials | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
There are many videos on Khan Academy where we talk about factoring polynomials, but what we’re going to do in this video is do a few more examples of factoring higher degree polynomials. So let’s start with a little bit of a warm-up. Let’s say that we wa…
Partial derivative of a parametric surface, part 2
Hello, hello again! So in the last video, I started talking about how you interpret the partial derivative of a parametric surface function, right? Of a function that has a two-variable input and a three-variable vector-valued output. We typically visual…