yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Justification with the mean value theorem: equation | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let g of x equal one over x. Can we use the mean value theorem to say that the equation g prime of x is equal to one half has a solution where negative one is less than x is less than two? If so, write a justification.

All right, pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

So the key to using the mean value theorem, even before you even think about using it, you have to make sure that you are continuous over the closed interval and differentiable over the open interval. So this is the open interval here, and then the closed interval would include the endpoints. But you might immediately realize that both of these intervals contain x equals 0, and at x equals 0 the function is undefined. And if it's undefined there, well, it's not going to be continuous or differentiable at that point.

And so no, not continuous or differentiable over the interval.

All right, let's do the second part. Can we use the mean value theorem to say that there is a value c such that g prime of c is equal to negative one half and one is less than c is less than two? If so, write a justification.

So pause the video again.

All right, so in this situation between 1 and 2 on both the open and the closed intervals, well, this is a rational function, and a rational function is going to be continuous and differentiable at every point in its domain. And its domain completely contains this open and closed interval. Or another way to think about it: every point on this open interval and on the closed interval is in the domain.

So we can write g of x is a rational function, which lets us know that it is continuous and differentiable at every point in this domain, at every point in its domain. The closed interval from 1 to 2 is in domain.

And so now let's see what the average rate of change is from 1 to 2.

And so we get g of two minus g of one over two minus one is equal to one half minus one over one, which is equal to negative one half.

Therefore, by the mean value theorem, there must be a c where one is less than c is less than two, and g prime of c is equal to the average rate of change between the endpoints, negative one half.

And we're done. So we could put a big yes right over there, and then this is our justification.

More Articles

View All
Hint to Adults - Kids Are Curious | StarTalk
I don’t know why people continue to concern themselves with getting kids interested in STEM fields. That’s a mystery to me because all kids are interested in STEM fields. It’s the adults that are the problem. The adults who run things, who wield resources…
The Probability of Human Existence Is Infinitesimally Small
Here’s another way to think about it that is mathematically frightening for the people who think that the aliens are out there and they’re going to visit us at some time in the future. We were talking earlier about trillions of planets that exist througho…
How To Financally Plan Before Marriage | Jason Tartick & Kaitlyn Bristowe
It’s a crazy thought process to leave 10 years of NBA grinding all over the country in corporate America to go on reality TV, but it was that thought process that actually changed my life. Somebody in your family, either side, comes to you and says, “Loo…
Why Is Your BOTTOM in the MIDDLE?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. A human, running like a quadruped, is creepy. Artist Rui Martins created this animation about a year ago. 127 years ago, Eadweard Muybridge shot these real images of a child with infantile paralysis walking on all fours. Walking…
Why Warren Buffett Doesn't Invest in Gold
If you will reach in your pocket, I don’t like to do this, but, uh, and pull out your wallet, this is you’re watching a historic event. If you look at this, and I might point out this is a one Charlie carries. On the back of it, it says, “In God we trust…
End behavior of rational functions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
So we’re given this function ( f(x) ) and it equals this rational expression over here. We’re asked what does ( f(x) ) approach as ( x ) approaches negative infinity? So as ( x ) becomes more and more and more and more negative, what does ( f(x) ) approac…