yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Justification with the mean value theorem: equation | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let g of x equal one over x. Can we use the mean value theorem to say that the equation g prime of x is equal to one half has a solution where negative one is less than x is less than two? If so, write a justification.

All right, pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

So the key to using the mean value theorem, even before you even think about using it, you have to make sure that you are continuous over the closed interval and differentiable over the open interval. So this is the open interval here, and then the closed interval would include the endpoints. But you might immediately realize that both of these intervals contain x equals 0, and at x equals 0 the function is undefined. And if it's undefined there, well, it's not going to be continuous or differentiable at that point.

And so no, not continuous or differentiable over the interval.

All right, let's do the second part. Can we use the mean value theorem to say that there is a value c such that g prime of c is equal to negative one half and one is less than c is less than two? If so, write a justification.

So pause the video again.

All right, so in this situation between 1 and 2 on both the open and the closed intervals, well, this is a rational function, and a rational function is going to be continuous and differentiable at every point in its domain. And its domain completely contains this open and closed interval. Or another way to think about it: every point on this open interval and on the closed interval is in the domain.

So we can write g of x is a rational function, which lets us know that it is continuous and differentiable at every point in this domain, at every point in its domain. The closed interval from 1 to 2 is in domain.

And so now let's see what the average rate of change is from 1 to 2.

And so we get g of two minus g of one over two minus one is equal to one half minus one over one, which is equal to negative one half.

Therefore, by the mean value theorem, there must be a c where one is less than c is less than two, and g prime of c is equal to the average rate of change between the endpoints, negative one half.

And we're done. So we could put a big yes right over there, and then this is our justification.

More Articles

View All
Inside the Epic World of Bertie Gregory | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
We’ve got something new this week! Our colleague and National Geographic Channel’s executive producer, Drew Jones, is going to take us behind the scenes of Epic Adventures with Bertie Gregory. I’ll let him and Bertie take it from here. You ready? I’m Bets…
Why Women Are Stripey
[Applause] Inside each one of your cells, there is six feet of DNA made up of six billion letters of genetic code. Now, your DNA is split into 46 pieces, each 3 to 4 cm long, called chromosomes. Now, normally we think of chromosomes as looking like this, …
Better models, better startups.
Um, this can just basically supercharge that and, you know, have one person do the work of 10. Yeah, we call this episode “Better Models, Better Startups.” I think that is literally true for B2B companies, where it’s like the underlying models—like B2B s…
Animal behavior and offspring success | Middle school biology | Khan Academy
Let’s talk a little bit about reproductive success, which is related to the number of surviving offspring that an animal has during its lifetime. An animal that has more surviving offspring has a higher reproductive success. Now, there’s two broad categ…
Profit maximization | APⓇ Microeconomics | Khan Academy
We’ve spent several videos talking about the costs of a firm, and in particular, we’ve thought about how marginal cost is driven by quantity and how average total cost is driven by quantity. We think about other average costs as well. Now in this video, …
The Most Powerful Way to Think | First Principles
In the previous video, we discussed the idea of power and created a framework for thinking about it. I claimed that someone needed two fundamental ingredients to be powerful: a true understanding of the world and the resources to shape it. As promised, we…