yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Justification with the mean value theorem: equation | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let g of x equal one over x. Can we use the mean value theorem to say that the equation g prime of x is equal to one half has a solution where negative one is less than x is less than two? If so, write a justification.

All right, pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

So the key to using the mean value theorem, even before you even think about using it, you have to make sure that you are continuous over the closed interval and differentiable over the open interval. So this is the open interval here, and then the closed interval would include the endpoints. But you might immediately realize that both of these intervals contain x equals 0, and at x equals 0 the function is undefined. And if it's undefined there, well, it's not going to be continuous or differentiable at that point.

And so no, not continuous or differentiable over the interval.

All right, let's do the second part. Can we use the mean value theorem to say that there is a value c such that g prime of c is equal to negative one half and one is less than c is less than two? If so, write a justification.

So pause the video again.

All right, so in this situation between 1 and 2 on both the open and the closed intervals, well, this is a rational function, and a rational function is going to be continuous and differentiable at every point in its domain. And its domain completely contains this open and closed interval. Or another way to think about it: every point on this open interval and on the closed interval is in the domain.

So we can write g of x is a rational function, which lets us know that it is continuous and differentiable at every point in this domain, at every point in its domain. The closed interval from 1 to 2 is in domain.

And so now let's see what the average rate of change is from 1 to 2.

And so we get g of two minus g of one over two minus one is equal to one half minus one over one, which is equal to negative one half.

Therefore, by the mean value theorem, there must be a c where one is less than c is less than two, and g prime of c is equal to the average rate of change between the endpoints, negative one half.

And we're done. So we could put a big yes right over there, and then this is our justification.

More Articles

View All
Jeremey Grantham: “A Storm Is Brewing” in the Global Real Estate Market
Real estate is a global bubble. It has driven house prices provably to multiples of family income all over the world. No one can afford to buy a house now. No young kids coming out can buy a house. House prices will come down everywhere. Jeremy Grantham …
How Caleb Hammer Met His Girlfriend
How did you meet your girlfriend? Fish shop. Fish shop? Yeah, she was shopping for some shrimp. I was there looking for some puffer fish. She was very attractive, and I went up to her. I was like, “I like your glasses. Can I have your number?” You wen…
Multiplication on the number line
What we’re going to do in this video is think about different ways to represent multiplication, and especially connect it to the notions of skip counting and the number line. So, if we were to think about what 4 times 2 means, we’ve already seen in other…
Don’t Worry, Everything is Out of Control | Taoist Antidotes to Worry
Our busy lives often lead to feelings of stress, exhaustion, and even burnout. Stress is one of the major causes of illness and can also lead to depression and anxiety. Luckily, the writings of ancient Taoist sages offer plenty of philosophical ideas that…
Mind-Blowing Theories on Nothingness You Need to Know | Documentary
Have you ever found yourself lost in deep thoughts about what nothingness truly is? Today, we are going to explore mind-blowing questions about nothingness and seek all the answers. Does ‘nothing’ exist, or is there only ‘quantum foam’? Does “The Schwinge…
Americapox: The Missing Plague
Between the first Europeans arriving in 1492 and the Victorian age, the indigenous population of the New World dropped by at least 90%. The cause? Not the conquistadors and company – they killed lots of people, but their death count is nothing compared to…