yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Definite integral involving natural log | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Let's now take the definite integral from 2 to 4 of (6 + x^2) over (x^3) dx. At first, this might seem pretty daunting. I have this rational expression, but if we just rewrite this, it might jump out at you how this could be a little bit simpler.

So, this is equal to the integral from 2 to 4 of (\frac{6}{x^3} + \frac{x^2}{x^3}) dx. I just separated this numerator out; I just divided each of those terms by (x^3). This I could rewrite this as equal to the integral from 2 to 4 of (6x^{-3}), that's that first term there, and (\frac{x^2}{x^3}), well that is going to be (\frac{1}{x}), so plus (\frac{1}{x}) dx.

Now, this is going to be equal to, let's take the anti-derivative of the different parts, and we're going to evaluate that at four and we're going to evaluate that at two. We're going to find the difference between this express the anti-derivative evaluated at four and at two.

Now, what is the anti-derivative of (6x^{-3})? Well, here once again we can just use, we could use the power rule for taking the anti-derivative, or it's the reverse of the derivative power rule. We know that if we're taking the integral of (x^n) dx, the anti-derivative of that is going to be (\frac{x^{n+1}}{n+1}), and if we were just taking an indefinite integral, there would be some plus C.

The reason why we don't put the plus C's here is when you evaluated both bounds of integration, the C would cancel out regardless of what it is. So, we don't really think about the C much when we're taking definite integrals. But let's apply that to (6x^{-3}).

So, it's going to be, we're going to take (x^{-3 + 1}) so it's (x^{-2}), and so we're going to divide by -2 as well. And, of course, we had that six out front from the get-go, so that's the anti-derivative of (6x^{-3}).

And what's the anti-derivative of (\frac{1}{x})? You might be tempted to use the same idea right over here. You might be tempted to say, "All right, well the anti-derivative of (x^1), which is the same thing as (\frac{1}{x}), would be equal to (\frac{x^{-1 + 1}}{-1 + 1})." But what is (1 + 1)? It is zero, so this doesn't fit this property right over here. But lucky for us, there is another property.

We went the other way when we were first taking derivatives of natural log functions. The anti-derivative of (\frac{1}{x}) or (x^1) is equal to sometimes you'll see it written as (\ln(x) + C), and sometimes, and I actually prefer this one because you could actually evaluate it for negative values, is to say the absolute value of (\ln(\lvert x \rvert)).

This is useful because this is defined for negative values, not just positive values. The natural log of (x) is only defined for positive values of (x), but when you take the absolute value, now it could be negative or positive values of (x) and it works; the derivative of this is indeed (\frac{1}{x}).

Now, it's not so relevant here because our bounds of integration are both positive, but if both of our bounds of integration were negative, you could still do this by just reminding yourself that this is a natural log of the absolute value of (x). So this we could say is plus the natural log of the absolute value of (x).

It's not a bad habit to do it, and if everything's positive, well, the absolute value of (x) is equal to (x). And so what is this going to be equal to? This is equal to, let's evaluate everything at four.

And actually, before I even evaluate at four, what's (6 \cdot (-2))? That's (-3). So if we evaluated at 4, it's going to be (-\frac{3}{4^2}); (4^{-2}) is (\frac{1}{4^2}) and then plus the natural log of, we could say the absolute value of four, but the absolute value of four is just four, so the natural log of four.

And from that, we're going to subtract everything evaluated at two. So let's do that. If we evaluated at two, it's going to be (-\frac{3}{2^2}); (2^{-2}) is (\frac{1}{2^2}), plus the natural log of the absolute value of positive two is once again just two.

And so what does this give us? So let's try to simplify it a little bit. So this is (-\frac{3}{16}), doing that same color. So this is going to be equal to (-\frac{3}{16}) plus natural log of (4), and then this right over here is (-\frac{3}{4}); (-\frac{3}{4}), do that same color, this right over here is (-\frac{3}{4}), but we have this negative sign out front that we're going to have to distribute.

So the negative of (-\frac{3}{4}) is (+\frac{3}{4}) plus (\frac{3}{4}), and then we're going to subtract, remember we're distributing this negative sign to the natural log; the natural log of (2).

And what is this equal to? Alright, so this is going to be equal to, and I'm now going to switch to a neutral color. So let's add these two terms that don't involve the natural log and let's see if we have a common number.

(-\frac{3}{16}) is the same thing as, we multiply the numerator and denominator by 4, that is (-\frac{12}{16}). So, you have (-\frac{12}{16} - \frac{3}{16} + \frac{12}{16}) will give you (-\frac{3}{16}). And then we're going to have the ones that do involve the natural log, (\ln(4) - \ln(2)).

So we could write this as plus the natural log of (4 - 2). You might remember from your logarithm properties that this, over here, is the same thing as the natural log of (\frac{4}{2}). This comes straight out of your logarithm properties, and so this is going to be the natural log of (2).

So we deserve a little bit of a drum roll now. This is all going to be equal to, this is going to be equal to (-\frac{3}{16} + \ln(2)). And we are done.

More Articles

View All
How to WORRY LESS in Hard Times | STOICISM
[Music] We need to embrace the mystery of life, not try to control it. We often think that we can predict the outcome of events and label them as good or bad, but this is a mistake. We don’t know what the future holds or what the purpose of our experience…
Talking Investing, Business and YouTube with @NateOBrien
[Music] Well, welcome back to the channel, everybody! We are continuing on with our big new money advent calendar. I’ve got a pretty awesome video coming today because I’m sitting down with the man, the myth, the legend, Mr. Nate O’Brien. How you going, m…
Introduction to the semicolon | The Colon and semicolon | Punctuation | Khan Academy
Hello, Garans. In this video, I’m going to tell you about a piece of punctuation called the semicolon, which basically looks like a comma with a period on top of it. The semicolon has a few uses, but the basic sort of standard use is to link two closely r…
Are There Really Stocks You Can Hold FOREVER? (3 Long-term Stocks I Own)
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we’re going to discuss whether it’s possible to buy some stocks now and be able to hold these stocks for the rest of your life and still do quite well in the process. So, we’re gonna have a look at a l…
Organization of multicellular organisms | High school biology | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to take a journey in life and we’re going to start with the smallest scale of life that is indisputably life, and that is the cell. Now, the reason why I qualified that a little bit is some people debate whether viruses are livi…
Shape properties after a sequence of transformations
In past videos, we’ve thought about whether segment lengths or angle measures are preserved with a transformation. What we’re now going to think about is what is preserved with a sequence of transformations, and in particular, we’re going to think about a…