yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The mathematics of history - Jean-Baptiste Michel


3m read
·Nov 9, 2024

[Music] [Applause]

So it turns out that mathematics is a very powerful language. It has generated considerable insight in physics, in biology, and in economics, but not that much in the humanities and in history. I think there's the belief that it is just impossible, that you cannot measure the doings of mankind, that you cannot measure history, but I don't think that's right. I want to show you a couple of examples why.

So my collaborator Aras and I were considering the following fact: that two kings, separated by centuries, will speak a very different language. That's a powerful historical force. So the king of England, Alfred the Great, will use a vocabulary and a grammar that is quite different from the king of Hip Hop, Jay-Z. Now, it's just the way it is—language changes over time, and it's a powerful force.

So Aras and I wanted to know more about that. We paid attention to a particular grammatical rule: past tense conjugation. So you just add "ed" to a verb at the end to signify the past. Today I walk; yesterday I walked. But some verbs are irregular—yesterday I thought.

Now, what's interesting about that is irregular verbs between Alfred and Jay-Z have become more regular. Like the verb "to wed" that you see here has become regular. So Aras and I followed the fate of over 100 irregular verbs through 12 centuries of the English language, and we saw that there's actually a very simple mathematical pattern that captures this complex historical change. Namely, if a verb is 100 times more frequent than another, it regularizes 10 times slower. That's a piece of history, but it comes in a mathematical wrapping.

Now, in some cases, math can even help explain or propose explanations for historical forces. So here, Steve Pinker and I were considering the magnitude of wars during the last two centuries. There's actually a well-known regularity to them: where the number of wars that are 100 times deadlier is 10 times smaller. So there are 30 wars that are about as deadly as the Six Days War, but there's only four wars that are 100 times deadlier, like World War I.

So what kind of historical mechanism can produce that? What's the origin of this? So Steve and I, through mathematical analysis, proposed that there's actually a very simple phenomenon at the root of this, which lies in our brains. This is a very well-known feature which we perceive quantities in relative ways. The quantities like the intensity of light or the loudness of a sound, for instance.

Committing 10,000 soldiers to the next battle sounds like a lot—it's relatively enormous if you've already committed 1,000 soldiers previously. But it doesn't sound so much; it's not relatively enough. It won't make a difference if you've already committed 100,000 soldiers previously. So you see that because of the way we perceive quantities, as the war drags on, the number of soldiers committed to it and the casualties will increase not linearly, like 10,000, 11,000, 12,000, but exponentially—10,000 later, 20,000 later, 40,000. And so that explains this pattern that we've seen before.

So here, mathematics is able to link a well-known feature of the individual mind with a long-term pattern—a historical pattern that unfolds over centuries and across continents. So these types of examples, today, they are just a few of them, but I think that in the next decade, they will become commonplace.

The reason for that is that the historical record is becoming digitized at a very fast pace. So there's about 130 million books that have been written since the dawn of time. Companies like Google have digitized many of them—about 20 million actually. And when the stuff of history is available in digital form, it makes it possible for mathematical analysis to very quickly and very conveniently reveal trends in our history and our culture.

So I think as in the next decade, the sciences and the humanities will come closer together to be able to address deep questions about mankind, and I think that mathematics will be a very powerful language to do that. It will be able to reveal new trends in our history, sometimes to explain them, and maybe even in the future to predict what's going to happen.

Thank you very much. [Music]

More Articles

View All
What’s It Like to Photograph the Pope? | Exposure
I’ve never had an assignment that was so frightening in that I had no idea what I was going to shoot. The biggest challenge to photographing the Vatican that I found was simply getting in there. It’s like a gigantic curtain. Just to get behind this curtai…
Warren Buffett Bought $31.3 Billion of This Stock
Warren Buffett, he’s the chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, and he’s considered by many to be hands down the greatest investor of all time. It should come as no surprise that he runs one of the most closely filed investment portfolios in the entire w…
Khanmigo chat history demo | Introducing Khanmigo | Khanmigo for students | Khan Academy
Hey everybody, it’s Dan from the Con Academy team, and today I’ll be showing you all a brief introduction to our chat history feature. So, what is chat history? Well, if you’ve ever been using Kigo, and for whatever reason, maybe you’ve navigated to anot…
unedited super honest Q&A
Hi guys, it’s me Ruri. I’m back with another video! Today, we’re doing a very interesting type of video, which is an unedited Q&A video. So why am I doing this? This is actually a homework of part-time YouTuber Academy to answer questions unedited, et…
how to learn anything FAST and outsmart the competition
Imagine being able to dive into any subject, quickly grasp it, and master it like a pro. This kind of ultra-efficient learning might sound like a superpower, but there are people out there who seem to have cracked the code on how to absorb new information…
Jamie Dimon: The $35 Trillion Dollar Storm Brewing in the US Economy
What you should worry about is the deficit. Today it is 7% of GDP. When Volcker was around and we had very high inflation, it was 3 and a half percent. The debt to GDP is 35% back then, 1982. It’s 100% today. The deficit is the biggest peacetime deficit w…