yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The mathematics of history - Jean-Baptiste Michel


3m read
·Nov 9, 2024

[Music] [Applause]

So it turns out that mathematics is a very powerful language. It has generated considerable insight in physics, in biology, and in economics, but not that much in the humanities and in history. I think there's the belief that it is just impossible, that you cannot measure the doings of mankind, that you cannot measure history, but I don't think that's right. I want to show you a couple of examples why.

So my collaborator Aras and I were considering the following fact: that two kings, separated by centuries, will speak a very different language. That's a powerful historical force. So the king of England, Alfred the Great, will use a vocabulary and a grammar that is quite different from the king of Hip Hop, Jay-Z. Now, it's just the way it is—language changes over time, and it's a powerful force.

So Aras and I wanted to know more about that. We paid attention to a particular grammatical rule: past tense conjugation. So you just add "ed" to a verb at the end to signify the past. Today I walk; yesterday I walked. But some verbs are irregular—yesterday I thought.

Now, what's interesting about that is irregular verbs between Alfred and Jay-Z have become more regular. Like the verb "to wed" that you see here has become regular. So Aras and I followed the fate of over 100 irregular verbs through 12 centuries of the English language, and we saw that there's actually a very simple mathematical pattern that captures this complex historical change. Namely, if a verb is 100 times more frequent than another, it regularizes 10 times slower. That's a piece of history, but it comes in a mathematical wrapping.

Now, in some cases, math can even help explain or propose explanations for historical forces. So here, Steve Pinker and I were considering the magnitude of wars during the last two centuries. There's actually a well-known regularity to them: where the number of wars that are 100 times deadlier is 10 times smaller. So there are 30 wars that are about as deadly as the Six Days War, but there's only four wars that are 100 times deadlier, like World War I.

So what kind of historical mechanism can produce that? What's the origin of this? So Steve and I, through mathematical analysis, proposed that there's actually a very simple phenomenon at the root of this, which lies in our brains. This is a very well-known feature which we perceive quantities in relative ways. The quantities like the intensity of light or the loudness of a sound, for instance.

Committing 10,000 soldiers to the next battle sounds like a lot—it's relatively enormous if you've already committed 1,000 soldiers previously. But it doesn't sound so much; it's not relatively enough. It won't make a difference if you've already committed 100,000 soldiers previously. So you see that because of the way we perceive quantities, as the war drags on, the number of soldiers committed to it and the casualties will increase not linearly, like 10,000, 11,000, 12,000, but exponentially—10,000 later, 20,000 later, 40,000. And so that explains this pattern that we've seen before.

So here, mathematics is able to link a well-known feature of the individual mind with a long-term pattern—a historical pattern that unfolds over centuries and across continents. So these types of examples, today, they are just a few of them, but I think that in the next decade, they will become commonplace.

The reason for that is that the historical record is becoming digitized at a very fast pace. So there's about 130 million books that have been written since the dawn of time. Companies like Google have digitized many of them—about 20 million actually. And when the stuff of history is available in digital form, it makes it possible for mathematical analysis to very quickly and very conveniently reveal trends in our history and our culture.

So I think as in the next decade, the sciences and the humanities will come closer together to be able to address deep questions about mankind, and I think that mathematics will be a very powerful language to do that. It will be able to reveal new trends in our history, sometimes to explain them, and maybe even in the future to predict what's going to happen.

Thank you very much. [Music]

More Articles

View All
Paul Buchheit
I’m very very excited to introduce our next speaker. Paul Buchheit is one of my partners at Y Combinator. He also was one of the very early employees at Google, where he’s known as the inventor of Gmail and the creator of the “don’t be evil” motto. He als…
Trying out “ANIMEDORO”study method-New study technique(?)
What’s up? It’s me, Durie. Welcome back to my channel! I’m a first-year medical student here in Turkey, and today we’re talking about a new study method from Josh Chan called Anime. As always, everything that I mentioned will be timestamped down in the de…
Don't Shoot a Blue Tongue Deer | The Boonies
You can see we’re on a deer trail. There’s probably one coming down this way. In Western Idaho, Bearclaw is on the hunt for white-tailed deer. He and his good friend Conan have decided to cover more ground. But over the past 4 hours, there are no signs o…
Warren Buffett: The Big Problem with Dividend Investing
Why won’t you pay a dividend to your shareholders? Well, we think our shareholders 5 years from now will be wealthier counting what they would get from the reinvestment of the dividend. We think they’ll be wealthier if we hold on to the money now. We may…
Kevin O'Leary: Harvard's Most Controversial Case Study?
At Harvard, why this is Kevin O’Leary building a brand in shark-infested waters? It’s a Harvard case about Mr. Wonderful. I can’t believe it; it’s surreal. Of course, I’m honored, no question about it. The whole story is in here, the whole Mr. Wonderful s…
Why more White Sharks are pushing north into Canadian waters | Shark Below Zero
NARRATOR: Heading back to shore, the team review the footage from cameras mounted on the bait lines. MEGAN: Chh chh chh chh chh. Oh, that’s such a good one! HEATHER: So that’s when the buoy went down. You on to that, Meg? GREG: Look at that. MEGAN: Oh…