yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The science of shared consciousness | Lisa Miller


4m read
·Nov 3, 2024

In the 20th century, there was a radically materialist view that the brain was like a little factory. It produced thoughts, much like packages, on an assembly line. And while that was certainly an okay thought in its time, more and more scientists are turning to a consciousness-based view of reality, post-materialism, in which the brain does not only produce thoughts, but rather it's seen as something more like an antenna that can send and receive consciousness.

Consciousness holds information, and there is a valence. There is love, there is an intelligence. Consciousness can take the form of matter, and consciousness can exist independently of matter. And this notion is not alien to young adults who have grown up with cell phones that can pull information out of thin air. We have moved beyond radical materialism to the point where materialism, the brain in the box, is really a subset of the functionality of the brain.

It is very much to our benefit that we discover the full range of the brain's capacity. When we can heal people, when we can know of others suffering and help them renew—whether or not they happen to be in our physical presence through a shared sacred consciousness—then we have reached the point at which we really are one humanity. Scientists are designing experiments to show that we can have one plane of consciousness in two places. An example is if you and someone you love enter two different rooms completely sealed, impervious to energy, and the person you love receives a bit of shock, you flinch, and the person you love sees a bright beam of light, you see it too and hit a bar at that same moment.

There is material evidence of manifestation at the level of the brain and at the level of our reactions, that when two people are bonded, there's a sharing of consciousness and that what enters your life also enters theirs. This is not surprising. We've heard for decades that a mother wakes up in the middle of the night when she feels her son is injured in war. We know that twins, being even more bonded than most siblings, have a particularly strong concomitance of knowing. And sometimes when one twin is injured, another twin will even show symptoms at a great distance of that injury.

The more bonded we are, the more intensified is the sharing of consciousness. But as we all emanate from one source, we all share consciousness, and we can be ever mindful that how we treat one another, and how we treat ourselves, and how we treat our Earth is not just a flash moment of good behavior or bad behavior. It's an indelible mark in the consciousness field. There is really only a we, de facto, increasingly documented by science.

We are built to know in many forms. We are built as inherently spiritual beings to be in dialogue with the sacred consciousness in us, through us, and around us. But what would the skeptics say? The skeptic would say, "You know what? That's great that you feel loved, held, and guided, but that doesn't mean you really are. That just means you think that inside your head."

But in truth, the skeptic propels deeper inquiry. The skeptic asks the logical question that then might be answered by a synchronicity or an intuition. In fact, about 70% of scientists, to make major breakthroughs, say that the question that changed their field came through intuition, a mystical experience—the proverbial Newtonian apple on the head. And then the method, of course, was more straightforward, the logical, empirical method of science.

Now that we cross into the 21st century of science, a great number of people have noted the times in which the brain appears not to have created thoughts, but through elegant design, it seems to be receiving thoughts or perceiving information beyond what could be transmitted by the senses. Perhaps the brain might even come to be seen as a materialization, a reification of consciousness as we see synaptogenesis, the making of new neurons in people who are devoted meditators.

What the brain is we have yet to fully grasp, but we can say with certainty that there are neural correlates, patterns, circuits in the brain that go hand in hand with profound transcendent awareness. And that in that transcendent awareness, there is predictive power, precognition, there is simultaneity of knowing, there is consciousness in two places, or even more places, and could it be we're reaching a point as a human community where, when we are well aware that we share consciousness, we are ever more mindful of what we put into this sacred field of life.

More Articles

View All
Elizabeth Iorns on Biotech Companies in YC
So welcome to the podcast! How about we just start with your just quick background? Sure! So I’m Elizabeth Lyons. I’m the founder and CEO of Science Exchange, and I’m a cancer biologist by training. I did my PhD at the Institute of Cancer Research in Lon…
Why Do Goat Eyes Rotate? | Explorer
To understand how some prey animals see differently than we do, let’s play a game. Tilt your head and body to the side. What happens? Everything looks, uh, sideways. Kind of obvious. Well, for one scientist, it turns out that this little problem of our e…
Sample size for a given margin of error for a mean | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Nadia wants to create a confidence interval to estimate the mean driving range for her company’s new electric vehicle. She wants the margin of error to be no more than 10 kilometers at a 90 percent level of confidence. A pilot study suggests that the driv…
The REAL cost of owning a Cirrus Vision Jet
The Cirrus Vision Jet is a really impressive aircraft… on paper. It’s got a range of 1,275 nautical miles; that’s the equivalent of Melbourne to Ali Springs, London to Greece, even New York to Dallas. It can cruise over 310 knots. It’s got state-of-the-ar…
Iron triangles and issue networks | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Now, a related idea to just what a bureaucracy is in our federal government: another question is how do they get influenced? Now, one idea that you might see in many American government courses is the idea of an iron triangle. So, an iron triangle describ…
Constructing hypotheses for two proportions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Derek is a political pollster tracking the approval rating of the prime minister in his country. At the end of each month, he obtains data from a random sample of adults on whether or not they currently approve of the prime minister’s performance. Using a…