yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Are You a Psychopath? Take the Test! | Kevin Dutton | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

We all know about the psychopath’s enhanced killer instinct, their finely tuned vulnerability antennae. But it may surprise you to know that there are some situations in which psychopaths are actually more adept at saving lives than they are at taking them. So let me give you an example of what I mean by that, okay?

Imagine you’ve got a train and it’s hurtling down a track. In its path, five people are trapped on the line and cannot escape. Fortunately, you can flick a switch, which diverts the train down a fork in that track, away from those five people, but at a price. There is another person trapped down that fork and the train will kill them instead.

Question: Should you flick the switch? Now, most people have little trouble deciding what to do under those circumstances; though, the thought of flicking the switch isn’t exactly a nice one, the utilitarian choice as it were, killing just the one person instead of the five represents the least worst option, okay.

But now let me give you a variation. You’ve got a train speeding out of control down a track and it’s gonna plow into five people on the line. But this time you are standing behind a very large stranger on a footbridge above that track. The only way to save the people is to heave the stranger over. He will fall to a certain death, but his considerable bulk will block the train, saving five lives.

Question: Should you flick the switch? Now we’ve got what we might call a real dilemma on our hands, okay. While the score in lives is precisely the same as in the first scenario, five to one, one’s choice of action appears far trickier. Now why should that be?

Well, the reason it turns out, all boils down to temperature, okay? Case one represents what we might call an impersonal dilemma. It involved those areas of the brain, the prefrontal cortex, the posterior parietal cortex, in particular, the anterior paracingulate cortex, the temporal pole and the superior temporal sulcus - bit of neuroanatomy for you there - primarily responsible for what we call cold empathy, for reasoning and rational thought.

Case two, on the other hand, represents what we might call a personal dilemma. It involves the emotion center of the brain known as the amygdala, the circuitry of hot empathy. What we might call the feeling of feeling what another person is feeling.

Now, psychopaths, just like most normal members of the population, have no trouble at all with case one. They flick the switch and the train diverts accordingly, killing just the one person instead of the five. But, this is where the plot thickens. Quite unlike normal members of the population, psychopaths also experience little difficulty with case two. Psychopaths, without a moment’s hesitation, are perfectly willing to chuck the fat guy over the rails, if that’s what the doctor orders.

Now moreover, this difference in behavior has a distinct neural signature. The pattern of brain activation in both normal people and psychopaths is identical on the presentation of the impersonal moral dilemma, but radically different when things start to get a bit more personal.

Imagine that I were to hook you up to a brain scanner, a functional magnetic resonance imaging machine, and were to present you with those two dilemmas, okay. What would I observe as you went about trying to solve them? Well, at the precise moment that the nature of the dilemma switches from impersonal to personal, I would see the emotion center of your brain, your amygdala and related brain circuits, the medial orbital frontal cortex for example, light up like a pinball machine.

I would witness the moment, in other words, when emotion puts its money in the slot. But in psychopaths, I would see precisely nothing. And the passage from impersonal to personal would slip by unnoticed. Because that emotion neighborhood of their brains, that emotional zip code has a neural curfew. And that’s why they’re perfectly happy to chuck that fat guy over the side without even batting an eye.

Directed / Produced by Jonathan Fowler & Elizabeth Rodd.

More Articles

View All
How To Build The Future: Sam Altman
We said from the very beginning we were going to go after AGI at a time when in the field you weren’t allowed to say that because that just seemed impossibly crazy. I remember a rash of criticism for you guys at that moment. We really wanted to push on th…
The Last Days of the Romanovs | National Geographic
I think it’s a big tragedy, big tragedy for the country and for the world. For 300 years, the Romanovs ruled Russia as czars—loved, feared, revered, respected. But all too often, those who fly highest fall furthest. World War One brought Russia to revolut…
Interpreting a parabola in context | Quadratic functions & equations | Algebra I | Khan Academy
We’re told that Adam flew his remote controlled drone off of a platform. The function f models the height of the drone above the ground in meters as a function of time in seconds after takeoff. So, what they want us to do is plot the point on the graph of…
What is Beautiful Deleveraging?
A number of people asked me, “What is a beautiful deleveraging?” Well, first let me start with what is the deleveraging. Sometimes there’s too much debt burden, which also means that somebody’s holding too many debt assets and they’re not going to get pai…
Hedonism: The Pursuit of Happiness
In 2012, Drake made a song titled “The Motto,” but what most people remember from it is “YOLO.” YOLO tells you to live in the moment, enjoy life you have today, and not worry too much about tomorrow, because at the end of the day, you only live once. Whil…
A.I. Policy and Public Perception - Miles Brundage and Tim Hwang
Alright guys, I think the most important and pressing question is, now that cryptocurrency gets all the attention and AI is no longer the hottest thing of technology, how are you dealing with it? Yeah, Ben Hamner of Kaggle had a good line on this. He sai…