yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Understanding factor pairs


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is talk about factors and factor pairs. Now when we talk about factors, these are really numbers that can be multiplied together to make some number. So for example, if I were to talk about factors of 6, I could multiply 2 times 3 to get 6, and so we would say that 2 and 3 are factors of 6.

In fact, we would also say that 2 and 3 is a factor pair for 6 because when I multiply those two, I can get 6. Now to think about all of the different factor pairs for a number, we could think about it in terms of area. How can we make a rectangle with area 6? Well, you could do it if it's 2 units by 3 units, so it could look something like this. I'll just hand draw it.

So let's say a rectangle looks like this. So it has 2 rows and then three columns, and let's say these all have equal area. It's hand drawn, but you can see that the area here would be two times three, which would be equal to six square units. Now, what if what are other ways to get to an area of six? Well, you could have something that is one row, but then it has six columns. So maybe it looks something like this. It looks like this.

So it's one row, and then you have one, two, three, four, five, and I want them all to be roughly the same size. So one times six would be also an area of six. So that would be another factor pair. We know that two times three is equal to six, and we know that one times six is equal to six, and these are actually the two factor pairs for six. We can do it with larger numbers.

We could think about what about all the factor pairs for something like 16? Pause this video and see if you can think about that. Well, I'll set up a little table here to think about that, and so in this column, I'll put the first factor, and in this column, I'll put the second factor. The way I like to do it is I start at 1 and I keep working up, up to the number, to try to figure out all of the factors. So let's start with 1.

So 1 is definitely divisible into 16, and as long as you put a whole number here, it's going to be divisible by 1. What do I have to multiply by 1 to get to 16? Well, I'll have to multiply it by 16. So that's a factor pair right there: 1 and 16. Now, what about 2? Does 2 go into 16? Well sure, 2 times 8 is 16. So that's another factor pair: 2 times 8. We found another factor pair.

Now, what about 3? Does 3 go evenly into 16? Well, no. 3 times 5 is 15, and 3 times 6 is 18. So 3 doesn't go into 16, so 3 would not be a factor of 16. What about 4? Well, 4 times 4 is 16. So that's a factor pair there: 4 and 4. What about 5? Well, no. 5 times 2 is 10, 5 times 3 is 15, and 5 times 4 is 20. 5 does not go evenly into 16.

Same thing for 6. 6 times 2 is 12, and 6 times 3 is 18. It does not go evenly into 16. What about 7? 7 does not evenly go into 16. 7 times 2 is 14, and 7 times 3 is 21. What about 8? Well, we already know that 8 goes evenly into 16. You might be tempted to say, "Oh, there's another factor pair of 8 times 2."

But we already wrote that down. We just happened to say that 2 is the first factor and 8 is the second factor. But you could say it the other way around, so we don't have to then go to 8 times 2. Once you've gone halfway, you could be confident that you've already found all the factor pairs because then you could go to 9. 9 doesn't go into it. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, but then 16, of course, is divisible by 16, but we've already written that here in this factor pair.

So we have these three factor pairs: 1 and 16, 2 and 8, and 4 and 4.

More Articles

View All
Comparative advantage - output approach | Basic economic concepts | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
In this, in the next video, we’re going to learn how to calculate opportunity costs and determine who has the comparative advantage in a goods production using data from both an output table and an input table. If we look at our PPCs in the graph on the l…
The scale of formality | Style | Grammar
Hello Grimarians! Hello Rosie! Hi David! So, we’re going to be talking about what we call the spectrum of formality today, in the context of language style. Balancing your style between formal and informal language when it’s appropriate is just a general…
Similar shapes & transformations
[Instructor] We are told that Shui concluded the quadrilaterals, these two over here, have four pairs of congruent corresponding angles. We can see these right over there. And so, based on that, she concludes that the figures are similar. What error, if a…
Magic Tricks with Larry Wilmore | StarTalk
Anytime I interview somebody, no matter who they are, I want to know if they have some hidden geek credentials. Almost everybody does; they just don’t admit to it in any other interview because they don’t get any street cred for doing so. But on Star Talk…
CEO Salaries Have Gone Too Far...
So if you’ve been paying attention to CNBC lately, you probably would have noticed this article: Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai’s compensation topped 200 million dollars in 2022. In total, it was actually 226 million, consisting of a 2 million dollar base sal…
Scaling Product | Fireside with Joe Gebbia and Reid Hoffman
It is my uh privilege and honor to be on stage with Joe, who um actually in fact um I have learned a bunch of different interesting uh product and design things from. Among other things, I haven’t done this yet—Is your furniture stuff out yet or no? Next …