yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Make Abundance for the World


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Yeah, I think there's this notion that making money is evil, right? It's like rooted all the way back down to money's the root of all evil. People think that the bankers steal our money, and you know, it's somewhat true in that in a lot of the world, there's a lot of theft going on all the time. The history of the world, in some sense, is this predator-prey relationship between makers and takers.

There are people who go out and create things, and build things, and work hard on things, and then there are people who come along and plead with a sword or a gun or taxes or crony capitalism or communism or what have you. There are all these different methods to steal. Even in nature, there are more parasites than there are non-parasitical organisms. You have tons of parasites in you who are living off of you, and they better whether symbiotic and giving something back, but there are a lot that are just taking.

That's just the nature of how any complex system is built. But what I am basically focused on is true wealth creation. It's not about taking money; it's not about taking something from somebody else, but it's when creating abundance. Obviously, there's not a finite number of jobs or a finite amount of wealth; otherwise, we would still be sitting around in caves figuring out how to divide a piece of firewood and, you know, the occasional dead deer.

So, most of the wealth and civilization, in fact— not most, basically all of it— has been created, and it got created from somewhere. It got created from people. It got created from technology. Critical productivity got created from hard work. So, this idea that it's stolen is, I think, this horrible zero-sum game that people who are trying to gain status play.

But the reality is everyone can be rich. We can see that by seeing that in the first world, everyone is basically richer than almost anyone who was alive 200 years ago. 200 years ago, nobody had any biotics. Nobody had cars. Nobody had electricity. Nobody had the iPhone. So, all of these things are inventions that had made us wealthier as a species.

Today, I would rather be a poor person in a first world country than be a rich person in Louis 14th France. I'd rather be a poor person today than an aristocrat back then, and that's just because of wealth creation—the engine of technologies, science that is applied for the purpose of creating abundance. So, I think fundamentally, everybody can be wealthy.

The thought experiment I want you to think through is: imagine if everybody had the knowledge of a good software engineer and a good hardware engineer. If you could go out there and you could build robots, and computers, and bridges, and program them. Let's say every human knew how to do that. What do you think society would look like in 20 years?

My guess is what would happen is we would build robots, machines, software, and hardware to do everything, and we would all be living in massive abundance. We would essentially be retired in the sense that none of us would have to work for any of the basics. We'd even have robotic nurses. We’d have machine-driven hospitals. We’d have self-driving cars. We’d have farms that are a hundred percent automated. We’d have clean energy.

So, at that point, we could use the technology breakthroughs to get everything that we wanted. And if anyone is still working at that point, they're working as a form of expressing their creativity. They're working because it's in them to contribute and to build and design things.

So, I don't think capitalism is evil. Capitalism is actually good. It's just that it gets hijacked. It gets hijacked by improper pricing of externalities. It gets hijacked by improper deals where you basically have corruption or you have monopolies...

More Articles

View All
Worked example: Analyzing the purity of a mixture | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We’re told you have a solid that you know is mostly sodium chloride. You suspect that it might have, or it may have, some sodium iodide, potassium chloride, or lithium chloride as well. When you analyze a sample, you see that it contains 73% chlorine by m…
Employment unit overview | Teacher resources | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
Hi teachers, Welcome to the unit on employment. So, what’s covered here? Well, I think many of us, I don’t know if you fall into this category, but I remember the first time that I had a job, and they made me fill out all of these forms when I took that …
DON'T SHOOT THE PUPPY!! .... and more: DONG #23
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And the Internet is a big place. So, let’s take a safari through the World Wide Web and find some cool things to do online now, guys. Size it up with iruler.net. This website detects your monitor size and resolution and render…
How I sell private jets to billionaires!
My name is Steve Varsano and I have a company called The Jet Business, and we’re involved with the buying and selling of corporate jets. I live in the UK; I work in the UK. I set up my business in the UK, but my business is global. The final purchase pric…
Schelling Point: Cooperating Without Communicating
Let’s talk about the shelling point. Shelling point is a game theory concept made famous by Thomas Schelling in the book called “Strategy of Conflict,” which I do recommend reading. It’s about multiplayer games where other people are responding based on w…
Critical value (z*) for a given confidence level | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
We’re told that Elena wants to build a one sample z interval to estimate what proportion of computers produced at a factory have a certain defect. She chooses a confidence level of 94%. A random sample of 200 computers shows that 12 computers have the def…