yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

2015 AP Biology free response 1 d e


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

All right, part D. To investigate the claim that exposure to light overrides the genetically controlled circadian rhythm, the researchers plan to repeat the experiment with mutant mice lacking a gene that controls the circadian rhythm. Predict the observed activity pattern of the mutant mice under L12:D12 conditions and under DD (continuous darkness) conditions that would support the claim that light overrides the genetically controlled circadian rhythm.

All right, so let me write this down. So, part D. So under mutant mice—mutant mice. Under—so let me make two columns: mutant mice under L12:D12 and then under continuous darkness. What would I expect? What would I expect? So they predict the observed activity pattern. So the mice, they don't have—they have some—they're lacking genes that control circadian rhythm. But under L12:D12, they don't need the genetic circadian patterns, genetically influenced ones, because they get the ones from their environment, the light and the darkness. They didn't get—this isn't a gene that somehow makes them not sensitive to light.

So, I would assume under the L12:D12, they would behave—they would have an activity pattern similar to non-mutant mice. Activity the same as non-mutant, as non-mutant mutant mice. Non-active during L12, activity during D12. That's what I would expect. That they still could react to the light and the darkness the same way that non-mutant mice would.

Now, what about continuous darkness? The non-mutant mice, we said that they went off of a 24-hour cycle, but they still had a cycle where they were inactive, active, inactive, active. And it was less than 12 hours for each cycle, but it was close to—it was maybe 9, 10, or 11 hours of activity, followed by 9, 10, or 11 hours of inactivity. I would guess that a mutant mouse that has no—that doesn’t have some of these genes for circadian rhythm—well, for them, it’s just going to be random. It's just going to be much more sporadic.

So, much, much more sporadic, sporadic activity. Fewer, fewer continuous periods. Or, I would say maybe less continuous periods or shorter continuous periods—shorter continuous periods of activity and inactivity.

All right, now let's look at part E now. So that was my predictions that I would see for mutant mice in either of these. So now let's go to part E. In nature, mice are potential prey for some predatory birds that hunt during the day. Describe two features of a model that represents how the predator-prey relationship between the birds and the mice may have resulted in the evolution of the observed activity pattern of mice.

Well, if the birds hunt during the day, if birds hunt during the day, the mouse is more likely to be eaten by a bird if it's active during the day. The mouse is more likely to be eaten if it is active during the day. And if it is, I guess you could say that's one feature of our model: that you're just more likely to be eaten if you're active when the birds are hunting.

And then the second one is, if you're more likely to be eaten, then you're less likely to reproduce. If actually, that should be a capital I—if the mouse is more likely to be eaten by being active during the day, then it is less likely to reproduce. Then it is less likely to reproduce.

And if I were taking the AP test here, I would try to put as much context as possible because you're not exactly sure how they're going to mark this thing, to grade this thing. So you could give more context: therefore, the mice that are active during—therefore, therefore, mice that are active during the night, they have to be active sometime—active during night and inactive during day will be selected for—will be selected for—less likely to be eaten, less likely to be hunted, I guess you could say, and more likely to reproduce—more likely to reproduce.

And we are done.

More Articles

View All
John Preskill on Quantum Computing
And what was the revelation that made scientists and physicists think that a quantum computer could exist? It’s not obvious, you know, a lot of people thought you couldn’t. Okay. The idea that a quantum computer would be powerful was emphasized over 30 ye…
Debunking the 'Pointless' Education Myth | StarTalk
People think that when they take math in school, there’s the common response like, “I will never need to use this for the rest of my life,” as they learn trig identities or the Pythagorean theorem or whatever it is that we all remember learning, feeling p…
Remapping A Place: How One Tribe's Art Reconnects Them To Their Land | Short Film Showcase
We live in a world with many ways of knowing, with many different systems of knowledge. Knowledge that Zuni people have about the landscape has been underestimated, hasn’t been clearly understood. It’s time to assert that we have the knowledge of place an…
Pro Boxer Inspires Girls to Fight for Their Futures | National Geographic
[Music] Klam area in Niri, Kenya, there are so many people living around and there’s so much violence going around here in this area. Most of the girls, all the women have here in this community the fear of being robbed or being attacked. Women fear to ev…
How Do Chameleons Change Color?
There is a misconception about chameleons that they change their color in order to blend in with their environment. That is actually not the case. When a chameleon is calm, it is green, and so it naturally blends in with its leafy surroundings. But male c…
Neil and Seth on the Science of Family Guy | StarTalk
Seth, I called you into my office. Yes, I got to talk to you. Want me to help you clean up? Clean up the office? At some point, I had to find you and talk to you about the science in Family Guy. Yeah, yeah, and I said to myself before I even met you, the…