yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Equations with rational expressions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So we have a nice little equation here dealing with rational expressions, and I encourage you to pause the video and see if you can figure out what values of x satisfy this equation.

All right, let's work through this together. The first thing I'd like to do is just see if I can simplify this at all, and maybe by finding some common factors between numerators and denominators or common factors on either side of the equal sign.

So let's factor all of these. All of the numerators and denominators, all the ones on the right-hand side are already done. So this thing up here I could rewrite as, let's see, what product is 21? What two numbers, when I take their product, is 21? Positive 21. So, they're going to have the same sign, and when I add them, I get -10.

Well, 7 and -3. So this could be written as (x - 7)(x - 3). This over here, both are divisible by three; I could rewrite this as 3(x - 4), and these are already factored.

So, the one thing that jumps out to me is I have (x - 4) in the denominator on the left-hand side and on the right-hand side. So if I were to multiply both sides by (x + 4)...actually, let me just—let me formally replace this with that.

And up here, it's not so obvious that it's going to be valuable for me to keep this factored form, so I'm just going to keep it in this yellow form, in the expanded out form. So let me just scratch that out for now because once I—well let me multiply by (x - 4).

So if we multiply both sides by (x - 4)—and once again, why am I doing this? It's so I get rid of the (x - 4) in the denominator. (x - 4) and then (x - 4) that and that cancels. That cancels.

And then we are left with, in the numerator, we are left with our (x^2 - 10x + 21) divided by 3 is equal to (x - 5).

Let's see now what we could do, and actually, I could have done it in the last step. I could multiply both sides by three. Multiply both sides—do that in another color just so it sticks out a little bit more.

So I can multiply both sides by three. So, multiply both sides by three on the left-hand side. That and that cancels, and I'll just be left with (x^2 - 10x + 21).

And I don't have a denominator anymore; my denominator is one, so I don't need to write it. It is going to be equal to (3(x - 5)). Let's distribute the three: (3 * x = 3x) and (3 * -5 = -15).

Now I can get this in standard quadratic form by getting all of these terms under the left side. The best way to do that, let's subtract (3x) from the right, but I can't just do it from the right; otherwise, the equality won't hold.

I have to do it from both sides if I want the equality to hold, and I want to get rid of this -5, so I can add 15 to both sides. So let's do that, and what we are left with—scroll down a little bit so we have a little more space.

What we are going to be left with is (x^2 - 13x + 36 = 0). All right, now let's see. We have this quadratic in standard form. How can we solve this?

So first thing, can we factor this? The product of two numbers 36, if I add them, I get -13. They're both going to be negative since they have to have the same sign to get their product to be positive.

And let's see, -9 and -4 seem to do the trick. So, ((x - 9)(x - 4) = 0). Well, that's going to happen if either (x - 9 = 0) or (x - 4 = 0).

Well, add 9 to both sides of this; this happens when (x = 9). Add 4 to both sides of this; this happens when (x = 4). So we could say that the solutions are (x = 4) or (x = 9).

So (x) is equal to 4 or (x) is equal to 9. But we need to be careful because we have to remember in our original expression (x - 4) was a factor of both denominators.

And so if we actually tried to test (x = 4) in the original equation—not one of these intermediary steps—in the original equation, I would end up dividing by zero right over here, and actually, to end up dividing by zero right over there as well.

So the original equations, if I tried to substitute 4, they don't make sense. So this is actually an extraneous solution; it's not going to be a solution to the original equation. The only solution is (x = 9).

More Articles

View All
My 3 Income Sources that Generate $30,845 per month
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we’re going to be doing a bit of an income update for me personally. So, every now and again, I will make an update video for my income because I find it kind of interesting to see how I’m progressing …
The Closer You Are to the Truth, the More Silent You Become Inside
One of the tweets that I put out a while back was: “The closer you get to the truth, the more silent you are inside.” We intuitively know this. When someone is blabbing too much, that person talks too much at the party—the court jester. You know they’re n…
Continuity and change in the Gilded Age | Period 6: 1865-1898 | AP US History | Khan Academy
The Second Industrial Revolution in the United States assured in new technologies and new ways of living and working during the Gilded Age. Steel, electricity, and the telephone allowed railroads to crisscross the country, skyscrapers to rise out of citie…
Descendents of Cahokia | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
Tucked away in St. Louis, Missouri, in a southern section of the city, just between the Mississippi River and Interstate 55, there’s a historic landmark, but you’d never know it. It’s on a road that’s easy to miss and, frankly, pretty beat up. There’s not…
The Mummification of Seti I | Ultimate Treasure Countdown
[music playing] NARRATOR: Seti the First was the father of our friend Ramesses the Great. Just like his son, he was a hugely successful pharaoh. But in father-son rivalry, there’s one category where he wins hands down: his mummy. Because Seti the First b…
The Inverse Leidenfrost Effect
Now you’ve probably heard of the Leidenfrost effect. That’s when a volatile droplet like water levitates over a hot surface because it’s floating on a little cushion of its own vapor. Here I’m gonna try to create the inverse Leidenfrost effect where we le…