yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Equations with rational expressions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So we have a nice little equation here dealing with rational expressions, and I encourage you to pause the video and see if you can figure out what values of x satisfy this equation.

All right, let's work through this together. The first thing I'd like to do is just see if I can simplify this at all, and maybe by finding some common factors between numerators and denominators or common factors on either side of the equal sign.

So let's factor all of these. All of the numerators and denominators, all the ones on the right-hand side are already done. So this thing up here I could rewrite as, let's see, what product is 21? What two numbers, when I take their product, is 21? Positive 21. So, they're going to have the same sign, and when I add them, I get -10.

Well, 7 and -3. So this could be written as (x - 7)(x - 3). This over here, both are divisible by three; I could rewrite this as 3(x - 4), and these are already factored.

So, the one thing that jumps out to me is I have (x - 4) in the denominator on the left-hand side and on the right-hand side. So if I were to multiply both sides by (x + 4)...actually, let me just—let me formally replace this with that.

And up here, it's not so obvious that it's going to be valuable for me to keep this factored form, so I'm just going to keep it in this yellow form, in the expanded out form. So let me just scratch that out for now because once I—well let me multiply by (x - 4).

So if we multiply both sides by (x - 4)—and once again, why am I doing this? It's so I get rid of the (x - 4) in the denominator. (x - 4) and then (x - 4) that and that cancels. That cancels.

And then we are left with, in the numerator, we are left with our (x^2 - 10x + 21) divided by 3 is equal to (x - 5).

Let's see now what we could do, and actually, I could have done it in the last step. I could multiply both sides by three. Multiply both sides—do that in another color just so it sticks out a little bit more.

So I can multiply both sides by three. So, multiply both sides by three on the left-hand side. That and that cancels, and I'll just be left with (x^2 - 10x + 21).

And I don't have a denominator anymore; my denominator is one, so I don't need to write it. It is going to be equal to (3(x - 5)). Let's distribute the three: (3 * x = 3x) and (3 * -5 = -15).

Now I can get this in standard quadratic form by getting all of these terms under the left side. The best way to do that, let's subtract (3x) from the right, but I can't just do it from the right; otherwise, the equality won't hold.

I have to do it from both sides if I want the equality to hold, and I want to get rid of this -5, so I can add 15 to both sides. So let's do that, and what we are left with—scroll down a little bit so we have a little more space.

What we are going to be left with is (x^2 - 13x + 36 = 0). All right, now let's see. We have this quadratic in standard form. How can we solve this?

So first thing, can we factor this? The product of two numbers 36, if I add them, I get -13. They're both going to be negative since they have to have the same sign to get their product to be positive.

And let's see, -9 and -4 seem to do the trick. So, ((x - 9)(x - 4) = 0). Well, that's going to happen if either (x - 9 = 0) or (x - 4 = 0).

Well, add 9 to both sides of this; this happens when (x = 9). Add 4 to both sides of this; this happens when (x = 4). So we could say that the solutions are (x = 4) or (x = 9).

So (x) is equal to 4 or (x) is equal to 9. But we need to be careful because we have to remember in our original expression (x - 4) was a factor of both denominators.

And so if we actually tried to test (x = 4) in the original equation—not one of these intermediary steps—in the original equation, I would end up dividing by zero right over here, and actually, to end up dividing by zero right over there as well.

So the original equations, if I tried to substitute 4, they don't make sense. So this is actually an extraneous solution; it's not going to be a solution to the original equation. The only solution is (x = 9).

More Articles

View All
3 habits that boost mental clarity
I don’t know about you guys, but every once in a while, I’ll just have a day where my brain is actually working well. The gears of my mind are fully lubricated, fully torqued. When I’m in a conversation with somebody, I don’t have to search for the right …
Diver Discovers a Strange Vehicle in the Detroit River | Drain the Oceans
I’ve lived in this area my entire life. Right on the United States border. Just a half a mile across the river from Detroit. I’ve been a scuba diver and a diving instructor for over 25 years. I was a broke university student and it was the only place I co…
Revealing My Entire $6 Million Investment Portfolio | 29 Years Old
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So, a few months ago, I made a video breaking down in graphic detail each of my seven income sources: how I built them up, what’s involved in running them, and then most importantly, the question everyone wants to kno…
IPFS, CoinList, and the Filecoin ICO with Juan Benet and Dalton Caldwell
Hey, this is Craig Cannon, and you’re listening to Y Combinator’s podcast. Today’s episode is with Dalton Caldwell, who’s a partner at YC and Wamba Net, who’s the founder of Protocol Labs, a YC company that’s working on IPFS, Filecoin, and CoinList. If y…
Four factors of production | AP Microeconomics | Khan Academy
An idea that will keep coming up as you study economics is the idea of the four factors of production, which are usually listed as land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship. The idea here is if you want to produce anything, so let’s just say this circle …
Molecules Bumping Into One Another | Genius
Should I brew more? Still warm, and it’s been awhile. But the Law of Cooling is a decaying exponential. But you need a measurement on the liquid to get the heat transfer coefficient. Don’t worry about the measurement for now. We’ll find a new way to thin…