yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Hillary’s Pragmatic, Capable, and Competent. So Why Doesn't America Trust Her? | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Hillary Clinton, given her Secretary of State record, has a very significant foreign policy record that we can actually look at. And I’d say as Secretary of State, she comes down fairly strongly as a moneyball America candidate. I mean, really focusing without sentimentality on where America gets value for investment. It’s not about values. It’s not about promoting democracy in the free market globally. It’s about focusing on those issues and those areas where the United States, by investing, by spending resources, by committing people, can really move the needle for America.

She talks about the pivot to Asia, economic statecraft. She was the principal architect of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. She did not want to get bogged down by the Middle East. She focused not at all on Israel-Palestine, unlike her successor John Kerry. She, in Libya, was reluctant to get involved militarily and only supported it when it was a relatively pinpoint series of military engagements with no American casualties during the military offensive. And no plans for state building or nation building afterwards.

Then, she launched the reset with Russia, which was really intended so that the Americans wouldn’t have to focus so much on the country that used to be our principal protagonist. Now, some of those things worked, some of those didn’t work, and some of those we’re going to wait and see. But the fact was that as a strategy, Hillary really did articulate moneyball. I remember when she even said on China, you know, it’s really hard to criticize your banker on human rights. That is a classic moneyball statement, right? It’s like, hey, you know, we’d like to talk to China about human rights, but it’s not really realistic. They’re too big. They hold all this cash. We can’t really push them that much. Very pragmatic.

Interestingly, Hillary the candidate, you know, is a little bit different. She’s tried to back away from the Iran deal. She’s backed away from the risk aversion on Syria. She’s backed away from the Russia reset. And she hasn’t even said that she supports the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which to me is a little ludicrous. Clearly she’s doing that for political reasons, not for policy reasons. It’s disappointing. I can’t say it’s surprising. Most people that run for president, if they’re credible, are inherently political and do things that disappoint us all as human beings. I wouldn’t necessarily only say that that’s Hillary. It’s certainly found on the Republican side too. She does more of it than many. She’s a Clinton. But she’s also a very effective politician.

I guess what’s interesting is that so far, of course, since she’s declared her candidacy over a month ago, we’ve actually heard very little from Hillary. She’s not taking many questions. Again, also a perfectly good strategy. If there’s no one credible running against you on the Democratic side, why would you want to tip your hand until you know who you think you’re going to run against on the Republican side and then shape your message accordingly to best be able to beat up on that person? It makes sense politically, doesn’t inspire as a leader, right?

So, I think the real point on Hillary is we know she’s competent. We know she’s quite capable. We actually know she’s got a lot of foreign policy experience. We don’t really trust her. And also, something a little aside, but I think it’s interesting. I think as a people, I think that Americans – I think we have a harder time with women being inauthentic than we do with men. I think like Bill Clinton, you know, if he were to pull off the same stuff, we’d be like, ah, it’s just Bill. So what? But I mean, with Hillary we’re like, wait a second. I think there’s a double standard here. I think it hurts her a little bit, and we haven’t quite gotten through it.

So, I mean for all those reasons, kind of interesting, but still very early days, and I wouldn’t dare to make any projections on the presidential race on the basis of what we’ve seen from Hillary so far...

More Articles

View All
The Secret War in Laos | No Man Left Behind
When I joined the CIA and had the opportunity, I was able to get into the Special Operations Division. I went through six months of intensive paramilitary training, and shortly thereafter, I was assigned to the operation in Laos. There was a war going on,…
Introduction to the possessive | The Apostrophe | Punctuation | Khan Academy
Hello Garans, hello Paige, hi David in the driver’s seat. So Paige, today, uh, it is my understanding that we are going to talk about the possessive. That’s right. Um, what even is the possessive in English? What does that mean? When we say that, like, w…
Radius comparison from velocity and angular velocity: Worked example | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We are told a red disc spins with angular velocity omega, and a point on the edge moves at velocity V. So they’re giving us angular velocity, and also you could view this as linear velocity, and they are both vectors, that’s why they are bold…
Second "Ask Sal anything" session focused on life advice
Let’s start with, uh, Christine. I believe, Christine, you had your hand very patiently raised last time, so let’s start with you now. A reminder, we are recording this session, as I put the last one on LinkedIn, so this could happen again. So, by partici…
Why Congress doesn't do anything about gun violence in America | Steve Israel | Big Think
Well, here’s why I wrote Big Guns: I had served in Congress for 16 years, and in those 16 years I witnessed a shooting at a university in Virginia, a shooting at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, a shooting at a nightclub in Orlando, a shooting at an e…
Hey Bill Nye, "What If We Were Intelligently Designed?" #tuesdayswithbill | Big Think
Hi Bill, I’m Matt from Mexico and I wanted to know what would a universal super intelligent designer be like? Thank you. Matthew, Buenos dias. I don’t know what a super intelligent overbeing would be like. People have speculated that there is an entity t…