yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Can you solve the magical maze riddle? - Alex Rosenthal


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Today is the annual Sly Wizard Tournament featuring competitors from the wizarding world’s three greatest schools, and you’ve been entrusted with an enormous responsibility. You are to administer the tournament. First, you and you alone will determine how many events there will be and their scoring system. Then the three wizards will enter your maze and compete in your chosen events in utmost secrecy; only you and they will see what happens.

The competition begins and... Wow, that was one for the record books. The winner was... wait, you have no idea. The last thing you remember was a dark wizard showing up and casting a forgetting curse. The competitors seem even more confused— each is convinced they won. This is bad. There can be no do-overs, and the last failure to declare a winner set off the first Great Wizarding War. You’ve got to figure this out— and fast. But for the life of you, you can’t remember a thing.

You know you had to follow a few rules: there had to be three or more events, each with a single winner and loser. Every event used the same scoring system, where first place received more points than second, and second more than third. All points were positive integers. Maybe there’s a record somewhere... oh, of course, your scorecard. Well, that leaves something to be desired. All that you wrote down was that in Calchemy, Newt-niz won, Leib-ton took second, and that was the only time Magnificent Marigold’s Magical Macademy got third all day.

Oh, and some final scores: one school got 22 points, and both of the others got 9. Why are you so bad at taking notes?! No time for self-recrimination. The wizarding world is waiting. Who won the tournament?

Pause here to figure it out yourself.

Answer in 3

Answer in 2

Answer in 1

At first, it may seem like there are an overwhelming number of possible scoring systems, so let's see if we can narrow our options. We can start by looking for clues in the total scores. Every event was scored the same way, so the sum of all points in the entire tournament must be a multiple of one event’s total. In other words, if there were three events that scored 3, 2, 1, which adds up to 6, the total points for the day would be 18, which is three events times 6 points. Our total is 40.

So we can make a table of possibilities: one event totaling 40 points, two totaling 20, four totaling 10, and so on. We know there were at least three events, which eliminates these options, and we can also get rid of events with fewer than 6 points, because the smallest possible total is 3 plus 2 plus 1. That leaves two prospects.

Let’s try to narrow those further by breaking down the possible points earned in each event: if first place received 7 points, the teams that had totals of 9 couldn’t have won an event because their total score would be 10 or more. That means the team with 22 would have to have won all four. But then their total would be 28, so we can eliminate that option. And with four events, these numbers can't be made to add up to 22.

Finally, if first place got 5 points, the highest possible score with four events would be 20, getting rid of these two as well. In fact, five events scoring 4 each could only reach 20 as well. That leaves us with just one possibility: five events each scored 5, 2, 1. There’s exactly one way to make those scores add up to 22: the winner finished first four times and second once.

The scores of 9 mean one team won once and lost four times, and the other lost once and took second four times. That must be Marigold’s Macademy, whose only third place finish was Calchemy based on your note. And Leib-ton’s second place finish in Calchemy means they scored 22 and won the Sly Wizard Tournament.

You have just enough evidence to prove it, keep your job, and avert war. Phew!

More Articles

View All
Homeroom with Sal & Margaret Spellings - Wednesday, November 3
Hi everyone, welcome to the homeroom live stream. Sal here from Khan Academy. Uh, we have a very exciting guest today, Margaret Spellings, former Secretary of Education of the United States and CEO of Texas 2036. But before we get to that, I will give my…
When Life Disappoints You, Don’t Disappoint Life
For many, the disappointments of life justify destructive behaviors towards oneself and others. Entitlement to what they feel they deserve, or what others have and they have not, leads to disappointment if reality doesn’t provide them with what they expec…
Transit of Venus! Sydney 2012 Contacts, Contracts and Parallax
[Applause] Now there are very few things that will get me out of bed in the morning before 8:00, but the transit of Venus is one of them. Because this is the last time it’s going to happen in my lifetime, so I don’t have to worry about this becoming a reg…
The James Webb Space Telescope and What It Means for Humanity
In the year 1609, Galileo pointed one of the first telescopes ever created up at the heavens, and what he observed sparked a revolution of curiosity that has been central to every single human generation since. Galileo saw mountains and craters on the sur…
Motion along a curve: finding rate of change | Advanced derivatives | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
We’re told that a particle moves along the curve (x^2 y^2 = 16), so that the x-coordinate is changing at a constant rate of -2 units per minute. What is the rate of change, in units per minute, of the particle’s y-coordinate when the particle is at the po…
Le Chȃtelier’s principle: Changing concentration | Equilibrium | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Le Chatelier’s principle says if a stress is applied to a reaction mixture at equilibrium, the net reaction goes in the direction that relieves the stress. Changing the concentration of a reactant or product is one way to place a stress on a reaction at e…