yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Ordering fractions | Math | 4th grade | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Order the fractions from least to greatest.

So we have three fractions and we want to decide which one is the smallest, which one's in the middle, and which is the greatest.

One thing we could do is look at the fractions, think about what they mean, and then estimate.

7/10, let's say maybe that could represent seven of your 10 friends are wearing blue jeans. Well, that's most. Most of your friends are wearing blue jeans.

Then for 1/3, we could say one of your three teachers wears glasses. Well, that's not most. If only one of the three wears glasses, that's not most of the group.

So here's a fraction that represents most of the group; here's one that doesn't. So the most is probably greater.

These two we could compare by estimating and see that this one, 7/10, is probably greater than 1/3.

But then we get over here to 5/6. Well, again, that's most of the group, but is this most of the group greater than the 7/10's most of the group? That gets a lot trickier.

So what we can do is we can try to change these fractions to make them easier to compare. We don't have to compare 10ths to thirds to sixths because those are all different sizes, different size groups, different size pieces. That's tricky to compare.

So we want to change these to be the same size. We need some number, a multiple of 10, 3, and 6. Something we can multiply 10, 3, and 6 by to get a new denominator that will work for all of the fractions.

One way I like to figure this out is I look at the biggest denominator, which is 10, and I think of its multiples. The first multiple is 10; 10 * 1 is 10.

Can we change thirds and sixths to have 10 as a denominator? Is there any whole number you can multiply 3 times to get 10? There's not, so we need to keep going. 10 doesn't work.

The next multiple of 10 is 10 * 2, which is 20. Again, 3 and 6. Is there a whole number we can multiply them by to get 20? Again, no, so 20 doesn't work.

How about 30? Let's see, for 3, we can multiply 3 * 10 to get 30, so 30 works for 3. How about 6? 6 * 5 = 30, so yes, 30 can work to be our common denominator.

30ths. 30 is a multiple of 10, 3, and 6, so let's start converting our fractions to have denominators of 30.

We'll start with 7/10, and we want it to have a denominator of 30. So what do we need to multiply? 10 * 3 is 30.

We always multiply the numerator and denominator by the same number, so 7 * 3 is 21. So, 7/10 is equal to 21/30.

These are equal. We've just changed the size of the group. We've changed the denominator so that they will be easier to compare, but we've not changed what portion of the group we're representing.

7 out of 10 is the same portion as 21 out of 30.

And then let's keep going with 1/3. Again, we want a denominator of 30, so this time we'll multiply 3 * 10 to get 30. Again, numerator also times 10; 1 * 10 is 10.

10 out of 30 is the same as 1/3. If you have 10 of the 30 people, again we'll use the wear glasses example, or 1/3; that is the same size of the group, the same portion.

Finally, 5/6. What do we need to multiply here to get 30? 6 * 5 is 30, so we multiply the numerator by 5, and 5 * 5 is 25.

So now instead of these original fractions that were tricky to compare, we have much easier numbers to compare. We have 21/30, 10/30, and 25/30.

So in this case, the pieces are all 30ths; they're all groups of 30. So this is much easier to compare.

We can simply look at the numerators to see what portion of those 30 the fraction represents.

So the first, 7/10, is the same as 21 out of 30, whereas 1/3 is 10 out of 30.

Well, clearly, 21 out of 30 is a larger portion of the group than 10 out of 30, so we were right when we estimated up here that 7/10 is larger than 1/3.

But then the trickier one over here, now we can see much more clearly: 25 out of 30 is the greatest portion of the group. 25 is more than the 10 or the 21.

So we can list these now from least to greatest. The least, the smallest, is 10/30, which again remember is equal to 1/3, so we can put 1/3 as least and we can cross that off.

Next, it's either 21 out of 30 or 25. 21 is less; that represented 7/10, so we can say 7/10 because 21/30 equals 7/10.

And finally, that leaves us with 25/30, which is equivalent to 5/6.

So from least to greatest, our fractions are 1/3, 7/10, and then 5/6.

More Articles

View All
Solving square-root equations: two solutions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have the equation ( 6 + 3w = \sqrt{2w + 12} + 2w ). See if you can pause the video and solve for ( w ), and it might have more than one solution, so keep that in mind. All right, now let’s work through this together. The first thing I’…
Bill Belichick & Ray Dalio on Toughness: Part 2
Um, there’s a toughness to run into, you know, two or three guys that outweighing by a hundred pounds or so. At the line of scrimmage, knowing that they got to fight for that extra yard, half yard, whatever it is to get a first down. So, um, then there’s…
Safari Live - Day 272 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Good afternoon everybody and welcome to a stormy, blustery, windy Masai Mara. We’ve had a massive storm that has just blown…
Identifying quadratic patterns | Polynomial factorization | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
We’re told that we want to factor the following expression, and they ask us which pattern can we use to factor the expression. U and V are either constant integers or single variable expressions. So we’ll do this one together, and then we’ll have a few mo…
Start Your Watch Collection | What You Should Consider Before Purchasing
I guess we should start with Dubai Watch Week. I just watched your panel discussion, and I think a lot of people would be surprised to see high tech being matched with watchmaking. Do you think people are surprised by that? Well, I think it’s high time c…
Gilded Age versus Silicon Valley | GDP: Measuring national income | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
Let’s give ourselves a little bit more food for thought on this labor versus capital question. So, like we’ve mentioned many, many, many times, in order to produce anything, you need a little bit of both. Or you maybe need a lot of both. You need labor, a…