yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Kevin O’Leary: I invested in FTX. Here’s the big problem with crypto.


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.
  • FTX was a startup, no different than any other startup.
  • "Investors keep pouring money into the industry. It boosts their total valuation to $25 billion."
  • A big startup with a lot of promise and potential in a nascent, new industry called crypto, but nothing more than a startup. And so those who invested in it, including me, they knew exactly what they were getting into: a probability of wild success or utter catastrophe. And I think we now know the outcome.
  • "The collapse of FTX has sent shockwaves across the cryptocurrency industry."
  • I'm watching like everybody else to find out what the facts are. This story will play out for years and years and years. But I tell everybody, "Remember, think about Lehman Brothers or Bear Stearns or Enron," they changed nothing long term, and FTX will come and go and it won't make a difference to the potential of what crypto could be. There was so much optimism only three years ago.

Hi there, I'm Kevin O'Leary, A.K.A. Mr. Wonderful. I'm the chairman of O'Leary Ventures. I'm an investor.

So, let's divide crypto into two universes: One, speculative assets—Bitcoin being the granddaddy of all of them. Bitcoin, I don't consider a currency. Bitcoin is a speculative asset, no different than gold. I've watched it go down as low as 17,000 and obviously past 60,000. That's speculation, that's what it is. And you're speculating down the road, it will be worth more than it's worth today.

And then let's talk about Stablecoins, which are essentially payment systems. Now, let's keep it real simple: I'm a watch collector. Let's say, as I have recently found, a young watchmaker in Switzerland. He's gonna make 12 watches next year. One of those 12 is going to be mine. Now, how do you get Swiss Francs to that watchmaker? Well, you start with the American dollars sitting in a bank account in New York, and then you have to wire transfer it to a bank in Zurich; that takes sometimes four days. And it's really expensive, because when you get there, you have to convert it from U.S. dollars into Swiss Francs, then you have to transfer that from that bank account in Zurich to this watchmaker's bank account in Geneva. What a total pain in the ass.

The ACH transfer system, The Fedwire, the SWIFT wire, these were all developed 50, 60 years ago by the private sector and regulated by regulators. But they're old, crappy, expensive technologies today. We need to replace them. What could do that? Well, a digitized dollar.

So, while we've had all of this chaos going on in crypto, the only bill that's surviving scrutiny still moving forward in Congress, on the Hill, is a bill around Stablecoins. You know, I was having this wonderful dialogue with one of my CEOs last week about the promise of crypto and decentralization and not trusting financial institutions, not trusting the government. And then Silicon Valley Bank blew up.

  • "This is the biggest bank failure since 2008. And this evening, so many customers demanding to know: Where is our money?"
  • And she called me up and said, "Oh my goodness, we have all our money there. I hope the government's gonna take care of this and give us back our cash in our account."

So there's the dichotomy of, "I hate the government," and now, "I love the government." Well, the thing about money, if you think about the 11 sectors of the S&P, the financial services sector is the only sector that services every other sector, because you can't run commerce or have an economy without financial services. This idea of a different planet operating, and everybody's gonna be running around with decentralized wallets and they're not even gonna bother paying taxes to the government—well, who regulates it? Who backs it up? Who do you call when there's no money in your bank account?

Money's a funny thing; people have a unique relationship with it. When it comes to just owning cash, they don't want to take any risk at all. And so, it's great to talk the talk, but no sovereign wealth is gonna put a lot of money into any government that has volatility and instability. And where do you find the grea...

More Articles

View All
Safari Live - Day 65 | Nat Geo WILD
Welcome back everyone! Sorry about the gremlins that have beset us here in the Morrow for the last little while, but it seems like we’re back and we’re still with this incredible scene playing out in this lagoon. We’ve got some more hyenas that arrived. …
YC Alumni Lightning Round
All right, guys. We uh, we got a break coming up but just a few words in closing, okay? Before we hear from some amazing alumni and then head to our um, happy hour on the roof. Today, we were lucky enough to hear from some of the very best VCs in the val…
Dividing line segments according to ratio
We’re told point A is at negative one, four and point C is at four, negative six. Find the coordinates of point B on segment line segment AC such that the ratio of AB to AC is three to five. So, pause this video and see if you can figure that out. All ri…
Density curve worked example | Modeling data distributions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Consider the density curve below. It’s depicted right over here; it’s a little unusual looking. It looks more like a triangle than our standard density curves, but it’s valid. Which of the following statements are true? Choose all answers that apply: Th…
Graphs of rational functions: zeros | High School Math | Khan Academy
So we’re told let ( F(x) = \frac{2x^2 - 18}{G(x)} ), where ( G(x) ) is a polynomial. Then they tell us which of the following is a possible graph of ( y = F(x) ). They give us four choices here, and like always, I encourage you to pause the video and see …
Analyzing functions for discontinuities (discontinuity example) | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we’ve got this function ( f(x) ) that is piecewise continuous. It’s defined over several intervals. Here for ( 0 < x \leq 2 ), ( f(x) ) is ( \ln(x) ). For any ( x > 2 ), well then ( f(x) ) is going to be ( x^2 \cdot \ln(x) ). What we want to do …