yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Identifying an element from successive ionization energies | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told that the first five ionization energies for a third period element are shown below. What is the identity of the element? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own, and it'll probably be handy to have a periodic table of elements.

So before I even look at a periodic table of elements, let's make sure we understand what this table is telling us. This is telling us that if we start with a neutral atom of this mystery element, it would take 578 kilojoules per mole to remove that first electron to turn that atom into an ion with a plus one positive charge.

Then it would take another 1817 kilojoules per mole to remove a second electron, so to make that ion even more positive. After that, it would take another 2745 kilojoules per mole to remove the third electron. Then, to remove the fourth electron, it takes a way larger amount of energy. It takes 11,000 kilojoules per mole, and then the fifth electron takes even more: 14,842 kilojoules per mole.

For the first, second, and third, you do have an increase in ionization energy, but when you go to the fourth, the energy required to remove those is way higher. So to me, these look like you're removing valence electrons, and these look like you're removing core electrons.

One way to think about it is let's look at our periodic table of elements and look for a third period element that has three valence electrons. So we have our periodic table of elements. We want a third period element, so it's going to be in this third row. Which of these has three valence electrons?

Well, sodium has one valence electron, magnesium has two valence electrons, aluminum has three valence electrons. So one way to think about it is that first electron: it's a reasonable ionization energy. Then the second one, a little higher; then the third, a little bit higher than after that. But then the fourth, you're starting to go into the core. You're going to have to take an electron out of that full second energy shell, which takes a lot of energy.

So this is pretty clearly aluminum that is being described.

More Articles

View All
Comparing fractions with same numerator | Math | 3rd grade | Khan Academy
Let’s compare 5⁄6 and 5⁄8. Let’s think about what they mean. 5⁄6 means five out of six pieces. If you have a whole, let’s say a whole cake, and you cut it into six pieces, 5⁄6 is five of those six pieces. 5⁄8 again is five pieces. That’s something that’s…
... and why!
The reason this trick works every single time is elegantly simple. It has everything to do with the fact that their chosen card will always be in a pack that is third from the top. That’s because we had them take the pack containing their card, see? Ther…
The Illusion of Truth
Research has shown that, if you’re repeatedly exposed to the phrase: “The body temperature of a chicken.” That’s right. “The body temperature of a chicken.” Even if no useful information is given about the body temperature of a chicken, you are more likel…
The Learners Fund - The Khan Academy story
Hi everyone, Salan here from Khan Academy. First of all, let me just thank you for either considering becoming part of the Learners Fund or especially if you are already a member, because the Learners Fund really is the backbone of our philanthropy here a…
TRAIN YOUR MIND TO RESPOND, NOT REACT | STOIC PHILOSOPHY
Imagine that you have the power right now to turn the hardest things in your life into the biggest wins. You might ask, but how? Today we’ll go right to the heart of stoicism, an old philosophy that has helped people get through hard times and find peace …
You're Either An Entrepreneur or You're WASTING MONEY | Randall Kaplan pt. 2
What is an entrepreneur, and can you learn to be one, or does it have to be in your DNA? When I was a young kid, I always knew I was going to start companies, but can you learn it if you’re not born with that gene? This is the age-old question you’ve rai…