yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Identifying an element from successive ionization energies | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told that the first five ionization energies for a third period element are shown below. What is the identity of the element? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own, and it'll probably be handy to have a periodic table of elements.

So before I even look at a periodic table of elements, let's make sure we understand what this table is telling us. This is telling us that if we start with a neutral atom of this mystery element, it would take 578 kilojoules per mole to remove that first electron to turn that atom into an ion with a plus one positive charge.

Then it would take another 1817 kilojoules per mole to remove a second electron, so to make that ion even more positive. After that, it would take another 2745 kilojoules per mole to remove the third electron. Then, to remove the fourth electron, it takes a way larger amount of energy. It takes 11,000 kilojoules per mole, and then the fifth electron takes even more: 14,842 kilojoules per mole.

For the first, second, and third, you do have an increase in ionization energy, but when you go to the fourth, the energy required to remove those is way higher. So to me, these look like you're removing valence electrons, and these look like you're removing core electrons.

One way to think about it is let's look at our periodic table of elements and look for a third period element that has three valence electrons. So we have our periodic table of elements. We want a third period element, so it's going to be in this third row. Which of these has three valence electrons?

Well, sodium has one valence electron, magnesium has two valence electrons, aluminum has three valence electrons. So one way to think about it is that first electron: it's a reasonable ionization energy. Then the second one, a little higher; then the third, a little bit higher than after that. But then the fourth, you're starting to go into the core. You're going to have to take an electron out of that full second energy shell, which takes a lot of energy.

So this is pretty clearly aluminum that is being described.

More Articles

View All
How I plan my day/week/month (realistic and flexible)
Have you experienced this before? You have so many things in your calendar, and also you want to do something, but you don’t know where to start. Because you don’t know where to start, you tend to procrastinate until the end of the day. At the end of the …
Using matrices to manipulate data: Game show | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
We’re told in the beginning of each episode of a certain game show. Each contestant picks a certain door out of three doors. Then the game show host randomly picks one of the two prize bundles. After each round, each contestant receives a prize based on t…
how to learn a language and never forget it
What was the word? I swear it’s on the top of my tongue. I studied this language for so long, for years, yet I can’t remember this word. If learning languages is a part of your life, I’m pretty sure that forgetting that language after a certain amount of …
HOW TO STAY CALM & POSITIVE IN LIFE | MARCUS AURELIUS | STOICISM INSIGHTS
It’s difficult to realize that nearly 2,000 years ago, a Roman emperor confronted many of the same issues that we do today. Marcus Aurelius, a Stoic philosopher and statesman, struggled with uncertainty, authority, and the enormous constraints of empire. …
2015 AP Calculus AB 6a | AP Calculus AB solved exams | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Consider the curve given by the equation (y^3 - xy = 2). It can be shown that the derivative of (y) with respect to (x) is equal to (\frac{y}{3y^2 - x}). All right, write an equation for the line tangent to the curve at the point ((-1, 1)). So, we could…
Explorers See Greenland's Glaciers Like Never Before | National Geographic
[Music] Lots of people who have tried before us had failed, and all of their aircraft are scattered across the ice cap. You ready? Oh yeah! When thinking about flying a tiny helicopter across the North Atlantic, the answer is no, way too dangerous, ab…