yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Identifying an element from successive ionization energies | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told that the first five ionization energies for a third period element are shown below. What is the identity of the element? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own, and it'll probably be handy to have a periodic table of elements.

So before I even look at a periodic table of elements, let's make sure we understand what this table is telling us. This is telling us that if we start with a neutral atom of this mystery element, it would take 578 kilojoules per mole to remove that first electron to turn that atom into an ion with a plus one positive charge.

Then it would take another 1817 kilojoules per mole to remove a second electron, so to make that ion even more positive. After that, it would take another 2745 kilojoules per mole to remove the third electron. Then, to remove the fourth electron, it takes a way larger amount of energy. It takes 11,000 kilojoules per mole, and then the fifth electron takes even more: 14,842 kilojoules per mole.

For the first, second, and third, you do have an increase in ionization energy, but when you go to the fourth, the energy required to remove those is way higher. So to me, these look like you're removing valence electrons, and these look like you're removing core electrons.

One way to think about it is let's look at our periodic table of elements and look for a third period element that has three valence electrons. So we have our periodic table of elements. We want a third period element, so it's going to be in this third row. Which of these has three valence electrons?

Well, sodium has one valence electron, magnesium has two valence electrons, aluminum has three valence electrons. So one way to think about it is that first electron: it's a reasonable ionization energy. Then the second one, a little higher; then the third, a little bit higher than after that. But then the fourth, you're starting to go into the core. You're going to have to take an electron out of that full second energy shell, which takes a lot of energy.

So this is pretty clearly aluminum that is being described.

More Articles

View All
Comparing rates example
We’re told that a conservationist has the hypothesis that when squirrels are more crowded together, they have higher rates of aggression. The table below shows the area of three parks and the number of squirrels in each; that’s given right over here. Orde…
Free live tutoring at schoolhouse.world
Hi everyone, Sal here from Khan Academy, and I just wanted to make an announcement of something that I think many of you will find useful. I have a little bit of a side project going on called schoolhouse.world. It isn’t an official Khan Academy project, …
Kevin O'Leary Investment RuckPack featured on Bloomberg TV
There tell people first of all about Ruckpack. What is this? This company and product? Ruckpack is a peak performance nutrition shot, pure and simple. It’s good ingredients; it’s the things you need that your body needs to stay on top, to stay in peak per…
David Friedman. Private Rights Enforcement.
I imagine a society where there is no government. Where each individual is the customer of a firm that sells him the service of protecting his rights and settling his disputes. And this raises an obvious problem, which is if I have a dispute with you and …
Inverting and unity-gain op-amp with virtual ground
All right, so now I’m going to do the analysis of this op-amp configuration again, and I’m going to do it using the idea of a virtual ground. The idea of a virtual ground actually makes really short work of analyzing a circuit like this. To review the vi…
Will CORONAVIRUS Cause the Next RECESSION | Ask Mr. Wonderful #20 Kevin O'Leary and Mark Cuban
Okay, soft the studio. But before I go, I’m starting to really get into these enemy sunglasses. Yeah, this is Alpha M Steel. Two choices for today: diggin’ these, but also like these—not bad. Hmm, I look spectacular! I’m going with these today. Anyways, …