yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Identifying an element from successive ionization energies | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told that the first five ionization energies for a third period element are shown below. What is the identity of the element? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own, and it'll probably be handy to have a periodic table of elements.

So before I even look at a periodic table of elements, let's make sure we understand what this table is telling us. This is telling us that if we start with a neutral atom of this mystery element, it would take 578 kilojoules per mole to remove that first electron to turn that atom into an ion with a plus one positive charge.

Then it would take another 1817 kilojoules per mole to remove a second electron, so to make that ion even more positive. After that, it would take another 2745 kilojoules per mole to remove the third electron. Then, to remove the fourth electron, it takes a way larger amount of energy. It takes 11,000 kilojoules per mole, and then the fifth electron takes even more: 14,842 kilojoules per mole.

For the first, second, and third, you do have an increase in ionization energy, but when you go to the fourth, the energy required to remove those is way higher. So to me, these look like you're removing valence electrons, and these look like you're removing core electrons.

One way to think about it is let's look at our periodic table of elements and look for a third period element that has three valence electrons. So we have our periodic table of elements. We want a third period element, so it's going to be in this third row. Which of these has three valence electrons?

Well, sodium has one valence electron, magnesium has two valence electrons, aluminum has three valence electrons. So one way to think about it is that first electron: it's a reasonable ionization energy. Then the second one, a little higher; then the third, a little bit higher than after that. But then the fourth, you're starting to go into the core. You're going to have to take an electron out of that full second energy shell, which takes a lot of energy.

So this is pretty clearly aluminum that is being described.

More Articles

View All
Harvesting Barnacles in Portugal | Gordon Ramsay: Uncharted
[music playing] Man, those percebes were absolutely amazing. But super simple. Now according to Kiko, they’re not as simple to get. He’s arranged for me to meet a very talented local sea barnacle harvester who’ll show me how to really get these prized as…
After PMF: People, Customers, Sales by Mathilde Collin
Following on from Paul’s talk about some of the ways to think about becoming, or what it takes to become, or whether you might believe you might become a hundred billion dollar business, I am going to have a conversation with Mathilde, who is in the proce…
Equilibrium nominal interest rates in the money market | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
So we’ve spent a lot of time justifying why we have this downward sloping demand curve for money, but you’re probably asking, “Well, this is a market. What we need to think about an equilibrium point?” And to do that, we need to think about the supply of …
Homeroom with Sal & David Siegel - Wednesday, July 14
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to the Homeroom live stream! It’s been a little while since we last saw each other, so it’s so good to see you again. We have an exciting conversation today with David Siegel, who’s a co-chair, co-foun…
Worked example: Using the reaction quotient to find equilibrium partial pressures | Khan Academy
For the reaction of iron II oxide plus carbon monoxide goes to solid iron and carbon dioxide, the equilibrium constant Kp is equal to 0.26 at 1000 Kelvin. Our goal is to find the equilibrium partial pressures of our two gases, carbon monoxide and carbon d…
2000 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting (Full Version)
Good morning! The first thing I’d like to do is to thank everybody that’s helped us put this on. As you saw in the movie, I think at the time we may have had 45,000 or so people working with Berkshire with 12.8 at headquarters. We’re probably up to about …