yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Big Bang explained in under 4 minutes | Michelle Thaller | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

  • I know every scientist understands that we cannot see the entire universe right now. And that's because there's such a thing that we quantify as the observable universe. The universe has existed, we think, since the Big Bang, about, say, 13.8 billion years.

So as you look farther and farther out into space, you necessarily have to look back in time. If something is a million light years away from you, like the Andromeda galaxy is about two million light years away, the light that you see through binoculars tonight, as you look up at the Andromeda galaxy, left two million years ago. We now have instruments that see so far; we can actually look back to about 400,000 years after the Big Bang. We can see so far out into space that the light has taken that long to get to us.

The whole idea of the Big Bang has been given, I think, a real disservice. There are so many misconceptions, and certainly, one of the biggest misconceptions is that people think that scientists feel that the Big Bang came out of nothing. I mean, how did all of this energy and all of this matter that made up the universe, you're saying it just came out of nothing? No, I don't think any scientist actually believes that.

The problem is when you think about the condition the universe was in at that point. I mean, take our observable universe, right? I mean, you can look from one side of the universe to the other, you'll back 13.5 billion light years or more. All of the stuff that we see was actually compressed into a space smaller than an atom, a volume smaller than an atom. We don't have the physics that describes how that would work.

That is so much mass, so much energy and so little volume; at this point, there wasn't even mass, just basically pure energy, that right now, our physics doesn't go there. As we get a better idea about how gravity works under very extreme circumstances, huge energy densities, we may have some idea what set off the Big Bang and possibly what came before the Big Bang.

So today, we actually have telescopes that are so powerful, they can see back to a time about 400,000 years after the Big Bang. That's amazing; we can see so far away in space that the light has taken that long to get to us, nearly 13.8 billion years. And when we look back to that time, the universe looks very different. For one thing, it's very hot. (chuckles) It's actually about as hot as the surface of the sun.

And it's so dense and hot that we actually can't see any farther. Literally, in any direction you look around the sky, anywhere you look, if you look to that distance, you see the universe as it was at that time, 400,000 years after the Big Bang, and everything becomes just hot hydrogen gas. That's incredible.

But what that means is that there's a limit. There's a bubble around us that we can see just because there's been time for light to come to us from those areas. Think about my arm being the universe before the Big Bang, in some kind of state that we can't even describe through modern physics. The entire observable universe that we can see now used to be a tiny volume of it, maybe an atom in my arm.

One atom expanded and became the entire observable universe that we see. But that's not the whole universe. There are trillions of atoms in my arm. Each one of those could expand to actually be its own entirely observable universe.

So we can't tell yet how big the universe was before the Big Bang, or even what shape the universe is, because all we're seeing is a tiny little bit of it that expanded to become everything that we see, but that's not the whole universe. That's our observable universe. There's far more out there than what we can see.

  • Get smarter faster with videos from the world's biggest thinkers. And to learn even more from the world's biggest thinkers, get Big Think+ for your business.

More Articles

View All
Creativity break: how have you used creative communication to solve a problem? | Khan Academy
[Music] I’ve used creative communication to solve problems related to especially people learning different science. For example, in chemistry, people sometimes have a hard time understanding subatomic particles and molecules and atoms, and making those co…
Example: Analyzing distribution of sum of two normally distributed random variables | Khan Academy
Shinji commutes to work, and he worries about running out of fuel. The amount of fuel he uses follows a normal distribution for each part of his commute, but the amount of fuel he uses on the way home varies more. The amounts of fuel he uses for each part…
Inside a Civil War Most People Have Never Heard of | National Geographic
This family was luckier than most. After nine days as hostages, these men returned to their loved ones. It was an incredible moment to witness. So in a I too, kind of fear, anger, and hope is present every day in the Central African Republic. Since 2013,…
15 Daily Habits to Boost Your Intelligence
Everybody wants to be more intelligent, right? There’s no denying that. So where do people get stuck? Some may try to debate this, but here are the facts: Although genetics do play a part in cognitive development, or intelligence as most of us call it, fo…
Reprogramming Perception - Tech+Art | Genius: Picasso
I like to challenge my audience with sensory experiences that can almost feel threatening. I use hair, spit, semen, blood. Why do you find it disgusting? Why is that normal? Why are things so sanitized? I think, as an artist, I’m really interested in all …
Virality and network effects drive organic growth.
The best consumer companies incorporate both virality and network effect, which are different concepts but very closely related, in order to grow their user base organically. Virality is the idea that one user using your product introduces it to other us…