yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Interpret a quadratic graph | Quadratic functions & equations | Algebra 1 | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Katie throws a ball in the air for her dog to chase. The function f models the height of the ball in meters as a function of time in seconds after Katie threw it. We could see that right over here this is our function f.

So at time t equals zero, the height looks like it's a couple of meters. Then, as we go forward in time to a little under two and a half seconds, the ball is going up. After a little under two and a half seconds, the ball starts going down. By the time you get to five seconds, or close to five seconds, it looks like the ball is on the ground; its height is zero meters.

Then they ask us which of these statements are true; choose all that apply. So pause this video and see if you can work it out.

All right, now let's look through the choices. The first one says Katie threw the ball from a height of five meters. So let's see if that bears fruit or if that is true. If she threw it from a height of five meters, that means that the y-intercept would have been at five meters. At time t equals zero, it would have been at a height of five meters. Clearly, that is not the y-intercept; it looks like she threw it from a height of maybe one and a half or two meters.

So I'm assuming that Katie is not five meters tall; she wasn't on a ladder or anything. She just threw it from her regular height, and so we can rule out this first choice.

The second one says at its highest point, the ball was about 31 meters above the ground. Let's see if that is true. So the highest point is right over here, and yeah, that looks about 31 meters. So I like that choice, so I will select that one.

The ball was in the air for about two and a half seconds. So we can clearly see that that is not the case. The ball was going up for about two and a half seconds, but then it was going down for roughly another two and a half seconds. So it was actually in the air for almost five seconds, so I would rule this one out.

The ball reached its highest point in the air about two and a half seconds after Katie threw it. So let's see. After Katie threw it, two and a half seconds after she threw the ball, it's right over there. It looks like it reached its highest point a little bit before that, but they said "about," so they're speaking in rough terms.

I think that statement can be true; it's about two and a half seconds. If they said exactly two and a half seconds, I wouldn't have selected it because it seems like it happened at like 2.45 seconds or something like that. But there you go; those are the ones that seem true.

More Articles

View All
Graphs of indefinite integrals
Find the general indefinite integral. So we have the integral of 2x dx. Which of the graphs shown below, which of the graphs below shows several members of the family? So if we’re talking about, so if we’re taking the integral of, [Music] 2x dx, we’re …
Underwater on Bermuda’s Montana Shipwreck – 180 | National Geographic
I’m Dr. Fleet Max Rouge. I work for the Bermuda government overseeing the shipwrecks that surround this island. Every one of them has an incredible story to tell. Now, I’ve been the custodian of historic wrecks for the islands of Bermuda for about just ov…
The Future of Driving | Years of Living Dangerously
TY BURRELL: Now that I’ve learned self-driving cars aren’t that far off, what about ride sharing? Are companies like Lyft and Uber going to be part of the solution? How you doing? All right? What are the odds? You are John Zimmer, President of Lyft. You g…
Cathie Wood: The Top ‘Wealth Destroyer’ of the Decade
So, I love looking into the world’s best investors, right? It’s kind of my thing here on the channel. But one of the most requested videos I get is to take a look into Kathy Wood and Arc Invest. This is a really interesting case because Kathy Wood was onc…
Q&A With Grey: Favorites Edition
“Challenge: can you post another Q&A within six months?” No. I cannot. “What are your favorite and least favorite kinds of questions to answer?” A long time ago, in a state far away, I did an event with some friends where my job was to pick questio…
Michael Seibel: How do you decide what to build next?
So the question is basically how do we figure out what to build next? Here’s my answer: the reason why you have a part development cycle is that you can work on multiple things. Usually, there isn’t a right answer. Usually, all of the things that you want…