yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Seven Years' War part 1


6m read
·Nov 11, 2024

When we're talking about major wars in colonial North America, we tend to think about the American Revolution, not its earlier iteration, the Seven Years War. I think that's a shame because the Seven Years War was incredibly influential, not only on the American Revolution but on the complexion of the world. Thanks to the Seven Years War, Canada became a British country, not a French country. The Acadians moved down to Louisiana and became known as the Cajuns. Most importantly, England became the world's pre-eminent empire.

So, if you've been following along this far, you may have noticed two things: one, that the people who named this war seemed to be very bad at math because 1754 to 1763 is nine years, not seven; and two, that this war seems to have two names—both the Seven Years War and the French and Indian War, which is a name you perhaps have heard before. Well, let me tackle those two oddities in reverse order.

Not only does the Seven Years War have two names, it has a whole number of names. It's called the Seven Years War, the French and Indian War, the War of the Conquest, the Pomeranian War, the Third Silesian War, and the Third Carnatic War. This is a war with a whole bunch of names, and the reason that it has a whole bunch of names is that it was fought in a whole bunch of places. The Seven Years War was really the first global war, and we're talking a hundred and fifty years before World War One. As you can kind of see from this map, aspects of the Seven Years War were fought in Europe, in South America, on the coast of Africa, in India, the Philippines, and of course, in North America.

The many different names come from the many different fronts of this war, and I would say that French and Indian War is actually the name for the North American front of this war, or theater of this war. There are two reasons why I think Seven Years War is a better name than French and Indian War. One is that Seven Years War gets at the idea that it was not just happening in North America; it was happening all over the world. So, it shows that it was a global war.

But I also think Seven Years War is a better name than French and Indian War because I think French and Indian War is kind of confusing. You would think that it means that the principal parties in this war were the English versus the French and the Indians, when in fact it was the English and their Indian allies versus the French and their Indian allies. Native Americans fought on both sides of this conflict. So, rather than the English and Indian versus French and Indian War, let's go with a shorter Seven Years War.

This brings us back to our awkward date range. The reason that it's called the Seven Years War is because the English didn't actually declare war on the French until 1756. So, even though fighting started a little bit earlier in North America, the true range of dates, at least in legal terms, is from 1756 to 1763—or seven years. It's a complicated name for a complicated war, but really what it came down to was England and France duking it out over who was going to be the supreme imperial power in the world. They were concerned about who was going to have the most territory in the world, therefore their concern over who was going to control North America in their competing claims here and also access to trade.

So, who was going to be able to trade with North Americans? Who was going to be able to trade with the lucrative Indian subcontinent? And who would be the leading power in Europe? Let's dial in a little closer on the North American theater of this war, which will have the most effect on the future United States.

Alright, so here is a map of territorial claims by European powers in North America before the Seven Years War. Now you can see that there are some places where they overlap, which is really going to be the heart of the problem in this conflict. England, shown here in red, was, as you know from your early American history, here along the eastern seaboard of what's today the United States and also up into Canada. France claimed this interior region of Canada and today the territorial United States, and Spain was in the mix here. Remember, Spain has still been a fairly influential colonial power in Florida, in contemporary Mexico, and also down here in Cuba and South America.

Alright, so we've got three major European powers in the mix here in North America: England, France, and Spain. But what this map doesn't show is the American Indian powers who are also in this area. Most of this region, really west of the Appalachian Mountains, is Indian country, and the majority of inhabitants were Native Americans. They really held the power in this region as well.

So, major Native American groups that are in play in this conflict are the Iroquois Confederacy, the Cherokees, the Herranz, Algonquin, Abenaki, Z--, and Micmacs, and that's just a small sampling. You can see that there are a number of important Native American tribes who are specifically in this area of Canada, which is disputed, and also living in the greater Appalachian region.

So, what does each of these groups want? Well, England definitely wants territory. They want to make sure that their English settlers along the eastern seaboard, whom we'll soon be calling Americans, have room to expand. The French want to make sure that they still have access to trade with Native Americans because their main concern is fur, which is a very valuable commodity in Europe. Spain wants to make sure that they have access to their sugar islands and also their precious metals in the Caribbean and in South America.

Now, it's worth noting, because I think this is really interesting to students of American history, that all of this territory— all of North America—was way less valuable than all of this territory. Because we're not talking about just valuing land; we're talking about value in commodities. What the Caribbean had was sugar, and sugar is the most valuable crop in this time period. So, a tiny island down here in the Bahamas is probably worth more to a European power than the entire interior of North America.

And what do these Native American groups want? Well, some of them want help with revenge on each other. Many other smaller Native American groups have been displaced by the Iroquois, who are here in upstate New York, kind of Quebec region. The Iroquois is actually expanding and really defending their claim as the largest Native American Empire. But the other thing that they want is to make sure that their territory is no longer encroached upon by English settlers in particular.

Now, one mistake I see early students of US history making is thinking that all Native Americans kind of shared a cultural and political bond—that they saw themselves as one larger people who had to unite against the encroachment of Europeans. That was definitely not the case. Native Americans had been living in this territory for thousands of years, and they had enemies and beef with other groups that went back way longer than the arrival of Europeans in North America.

So, when nations like England and France arrived with their weapons and their trade goods, the American Indians didn't look at each other and say, "Oh wait, now we're all one race! We need to join together against the encroachment of whites." They saw England and France and Spain as possible avenues to getting one up on their older enemies. So, when an English trader sold a gun to say a Heron, he was way more likely to go after say the Iroquois with that gun than he was to go after a French trader.

Another reason why the Seven Years War is a better name for the French and Indian War than French and Indian War is because these Native American groups did not ally all with France. In fact, the Iroquois and Cherokee ended up allied with England, and most of the other Native American groups ended up allied with France, but they were fighting each other in addition to fighting England.

Alright, so the stage is set for this conflict with all of these competing groups in this unclear territory, and how this turns into a war, we'll get to you in the next video.

More Articles

View All
Ponzi Factor | V-Log 2 | Apple $1 Trillion Joke
Hey, this is time. It’s Saturday night, so that’s one a little more casual - it’s actually Saturday, whoo, Sunday morning now, 1 a.m. Clearly, I go out and party on Saturdays, and I said last time I’m gonna try to stay away from current events. But this t…
THE GAME OF LIFE and other DONGs!
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here with some things you can do online now, guys. Let’s start the DONGs off in the right hands with misternicehands.com. You can pull his finger. Wordle.net analyzes text, like on a web site, and generates a free word cloud with fun…
Caught in an Underwater Avalanche | Expedition Raw
We’re heading down to explore an underwater cave. We always run a guideline, and you place it very carefully because you have to assume that you’re going to come out in no visibility. Without that line, you have low odds of getting out. Then all of a sud…
How to Perform a Donut | Science of Stupid: Ridiculous Fails
There are three kinds of donuts: sugary ring donuts, sugary jelly-filled donuts, and then there are the ones that are really bad for your health. These ones. Well, I can see why people pay money to watch this. But take any friction fighting hijinks to the…
Ranger Mentality | No Man Left Behind
Part of the Ranger creed is: I will never leave a fallen comrade. To follow it to the end of an enemy, that’s just one part of the Ranger creed. The Ranger creed has six stanzas to it, and we would say it every morning. Every morning before we started wor…
Worked example: Using formal charges to evaluate nonequivalent resonance structures | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We’re told that three possible resonance structures for the thiocyanate ion are shown below. All right, there we have them. Based on formal charges, which of the three structures contributes most to the resonance hybrid of thiocyanate? And …