yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How Einstein, Heisenberg and Gödel Used Constraints to Rethink the Universe, with Janna Levin


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

I became interested in this phenomenon of constraints inspiring creative outbursts. And if you look at the last century, there were three really profound examples of that.

I would say the earliest that I found incredibly interesting was the limit of the speed of light leading Einstein to the theory of relativity. Where a lot of other scientists wanted to remove the limit, they wanted to say there is no limit to the speed of light. That doesn't make any sense. That's impossible.

Einstein actually, despite the word relativity, adhered to a very strict absolute. And that absolute was the speed of light. He took that to be his guiding constraint. And by sticking to it rigidly, he said I'll give up anything else but the speed of light, the constancy of the speed of light. And by doing so, he gave up on the absolute nature of space and time.

I mean, that's just much harder to let go of intuitively and a much greater violation of our common sense, but it was right. And so, this was an example where this tight constraint led to a creative outburst. From this one constraint, you could trace the line, not only to the relativity of space and time but the expansion of the universe; the existence of black holes; the ideal that the entire space has a shape, all of these things burgeoned from this really tight constraint.

Another great example is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. So, Heisenberg begins to believe that we can't precisely know the location of a particle and its motion and its momentum. And this seems to violate what we believe that things objectively exist, that there should be no such limit, but he takes it very seriously.

He doesn't just say oh, it's often cast in this way; oh, disturb a particle when we observe it, therefore we can't also know its momentum once we've located it because, in the process of measuring it, we've somehow disturbed it. That's not really true. That's much deeper than that.

Heisenberg took very seriously that this was profound, that in some sense, the particle doesn't have a location or a momentum, that in some sense the particle doesn't really exist in the old-fashioned way we used to think it existed, like a marble exists. So, by taking it that much more seriously, it leads to the discovery of the deeper phenomenon of quantum mechanics and that incredibly strange world that, even though we don't actually understand it, even today, we verify experimentally over and over again it's the most well tested paradigm in all of physics, and yet it's the one we understand the least.

My third example would be Gödel's limit theorem. So, the great mashing notation Hilbert sent out a call to all mathematicians just to confirm that all mathematical facts could indeed be proven within the context of mathematics. It wasn't the case that he wanted every infinite proof; that's obviously impossible, he just wanted to prove that the proofs existed.

It seems like a sort of meta-level question. It is, it's a meta-level question, can we prove that all facts are knowable? Is a simpler way of saying it? And Gödel comes along in the 1930s and proves that even in the context of something as basic as arithmetic, that there are facts among the members that can never be proven to be true or false.

There are literally facts we can never know in the context of mathematics. And that was a real blow to this idea of a mathematical theory of everything. We've recovered from that blow, and it turned out to have profound consequences, and the profound consequence was the invention of the computer and AI.

So, you can trace Turing's creation of the idea of a machine that can think directly to his work on the limit theorems and the fact that there are certain things we could never know. And that limit is severe. And from that thinking about that limit, he was able to imagine how to mechanize thought, begin to think about making machines that think, and to begin to think that we're just machines that think, and therefore there could be an artificial intelligence just like there's a biological intelligence.

More Articles

View All
Biggest Money Myths (Debunked)
Not everything you’ve heard about money is true. Actually, most of the mainstream narrative around money has been disproven by modern developed society time and time again. Watch this video until the end, and you’ll be smarter than all your friends who re…
Khanmigo for Districts
[Music] Introducing Con Migo for districts. Khan Academy’s AI-powered student tutor and teaching assistant is paving the way for a new era of learning in the classroom. I could see it as a teacher virtual assistant. I could see it as a virtual assistant …
Two Chapters From Our New Book – Exclusive Preview!
Hello everybody! Today we’re doing something different: an exclusive preview. We’ll listen to the introduction and a chapter from the KTZ Gazar book Immune: A Journey into the Mysterious System that Keeps You Alive, written by KTZ Gazar founder and headwr…
Bitbutter, guest on Decline to State podcast
Hello and welcome to the Decline to State Internet radio stream, the show where we get together to discuss the ups and downs of life outside the matrix. Decline to State is proud to bring you a surprisingly few net casts in which the hosts do not support …
JUST BOUGHT MY 6TH PROPERTY - HOUSE TOUR!!
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here! So, really exciting news! As of a few hours ago, I am now the official owner of this new duplex here in Los Angeles. I actually just got the keys, so I have not seen it since the owners moved out. I’m hoping the condi…
Compound interest: How to turn $1 into $10
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. Since today, I’m going to be telling you guys how to trim $1 into $10. And it’s not some stupid [ __ ] sales pitch. I’m not trying to get you to invest in some [ __ ] mother; I hate those people. So I’m not trying to …