yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Hungry for meaning: Why there is no conflict between science and spirituality | Rob Bell | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Ah, yes. That word: “spiritual.” I think the reason why many people run away from it is because lots of what has been done in the name of spiritual or spirituality has been completely crazy. So the problem with that word is it’s easy for a lot of really bizarre unfounded—sometimes even destructive and toxic—ideas can hang out under this word spiritual because you’re talking essentially about that which isn’t accessed through the five senses.

When somebody says, “Well, I just had a spiritual feeling.” Well, you can’t really put that on a spreadsheet. You can’t really take a picture of that. My understanding of spirituality is that this life that we’ve each been given, the very breath that we took and we’re about to take, is a gift. That life is a gift and how you respond to it, what you do with it matters.

So you’ll find in a business people working very hard and making lots of money and yet at some point asking these questions like, what is the point of what we’re doing? Why are we here? Why are we giving this kind of energy to this? Which is fundamentally a spiritual question, because the answer to that question won’t show up in the second quarter financials, and yet why people get up in the morning and come work here is the driving question behind the question behind the question.

So I begin with life is a gift and what you do with it, how you respond to it matters. And when we talk about it mattering we are talking about something that’s true but can’t be accessed in the ways that we normally access things. And I think a lot of scientists have run from the word spiritual because a scientist deals with hard facts.

And when you get into language of the heart, language of the soul, when you start talking about transcendence you are talking about more than literal truth. So like if somebody asks me why I fell in love with my wife and I said, “Well because she’s five seven, she’s from Arizona and she drives a Honda,” that’s kind of a weird answer. But if you say to me “Why’d you fall in love with your wife?” and I said, “I fell in love with Kristen because when we got together it was like I found my other half.”

Something within you is like okay, now that’s an answer that I get. I understand that answer. And yet it’s not like I was limping. It’s not like suddenly I actually literally found my other half. I shifted to a different kind of language to describe a different kind of reality. And so oftentimes in my experience the scientist is fine with spirituality when we understand the terms that we’re working with.

This idea somehow that faith and science are at opposition I’ve always found to be complete insanity. Both are searching for the truth. Both have a sense of wonder and an expectation and exploration. They’re each simply naming different aspects of the human experience. One thrives in naming exteriors – height, weight, gravitational pull, electromagnetic force. The other is about naming interiors – compassion, kindness, suffering, loss, heartache. They’re both simply different ways of exploring different dimensions of the human experience.

Well if you think about the past like let’s say 300-400 years of human history, especially the history of the Western world we’ve had this explosion. Some call it the age of certainty, the explosion of scientific rationalism. I mean we have 10,000 songs in our pockets. We have airports and hospitals. We don’t have polio anymore. I mean we have had this explosion of rational, stand-at-a-distance and study and analyze it with a clipboard and a lab coat—I guess now it would be an iPad—But we’ve had this explosion of knowledge about how the world actually works.

And so for many people this rational, linear, scientific thinking has done so much that it sort of stepped on and crowded out other ways of knowing things. Because I was doing this event recently and a woman came up afterwards and she had a child in one of those little packs that you carry a child around. And it was a Saturday, and she said, ...

More Articles

View All
Hydrogen bonding | Intermolecular forces and properties | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s talk about hydrogen bonds. Depicted here, I have three different types of molecules. On the left, I have ammonia; each ammonia molecule has one nitrogen bonded to three hydrogens. In the middle, I have something you’re probably very familiar with. I…
How Black Climbers Are Closing the Adventure Gap | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
Earlier this year, James Edward Mills did something I’ve always wanted to do. He flew to Nepal and directed the base of Mount Everest. I did uh travel with the team, um from Kathmandu to Lukla. Then we basically walked from Lukla to Everest Base Camp. Wow…
The Hidden Science of Fireworks
This is the biggest… hottest… and most explosive— Oh my god. Video on fireworks ever, covering everything from the invention of gunpowder to how fire can burn underwater, how fireworks are made, the colors, shapes, fuses. To how they’re launched. We’l…
Questions about Sex That Women and Men Google the Most | Seth Stephens-Davidowitz
There are a couple of things that Google search has revealed about sex. One is the lack of sex. So, the number one complaint in a marriage is that it’s a sexless marriage. A much more common search than “loveless marriage” or “unhappy marriage.” The numbe…
Why Machines That Bend Are Better
What do this satellite thruster, plastic tool, and micro mechanical switch have in common? Well, they all contain components that bend, so-called compliant mechanisms. This episode was sponsored by SimpliSafe. More about them at the end of the show. Now …
Subtracting with place value blocks (regrouping)
What we want to do in this video is figure out what 438 minus 272 is. To help us think about that, we have these place value blocks right over here. You can see 438: we have four hundreds (100, 200, 300, 400), we have three tens (one, two, three), and th…