yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Deutsch Files IV


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I can only start with what understanding I want, right? And I know I've asked you this before, but I want to be pedantically exhaustive about connecting the four theories of the fabric of reality. The reason I bring that up is because I think most people still view what you've written as being four separate things. It's hard enough to grasp these four separate things because they're actually fairly deep and wide-ranging theories. But I think in your mind, they connect together into one thing. Knowledge is a crystal, and nature has no boundaries, right? These are just phrases, but these things all connect together.

So we've talked in the past, for example, how epistemology and evolution connect; they're both forms of knowledge creation. We've talked about quantum physics and computation connecting to create quantum computation. I just love to get as many examples. How does physics connect to evolution? How does evolution connect to computation? For example, things that may be less obvious where people might view things as different theories, but to you, they're fundamentally the same.

Yeah, evolution and epistemology. People find both of those, the connection between both of those and physics, very counterintuitive. Most people think of physics in a very bottom-up way, and I think for completely independent reasons such as Constructor Theory, that's a mistake. Ever since that idea caught on, like sometime after Newton, physicists have tried to shoehorn other physical theories into that mold. That gives rise to, for example, problems in the foundations of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics.

How can you have an exact second law when the fundamental theories of physics are all time-reversible, and the second law is time-irreversible? How can you have that? The prevailing view is, yeah, thermodynamics and epistemology are both emergent theories and therefore not fundamental from the physics point of view. Therefore, if we want to understand the universe at a fundamental level, we needn’t bother with those. Those are just like the theories of washing machines or gardening.

I think that's artificial. Especially when they have to get very embarrassed when they exclude thermodynamics from physics in that way. I think that a theory that is going to go deeper than the current paradigm of physics is going to have to put emergent phenomena and emergent theories on the same level as microscopic theories. People talk about reductionism and holism, and some people are reductionists and some people are holists. I think I want to put them both in a sack and tie it up, and let them come out with a resolution.

There cannot be a criterion for excluding a set of theories from the body of knowledge other than whether they're good explanations. Yes, abandon them if they're not good explanations, but if they are, why make a class distinction between them? It's just going to lead to error, and I think it has led to error in thinking about the world.

So that's the connection between physics and those two. What you just said, for example, is that reductionist theories are the only theories there are because they don't form good explanations at the level where you need them. Especially when you have emergence, then you have very unpredictable things. You're not going to calculate all the particle collisions from the Big Bang till now to figure out how humans evolve, yes, or how species evolve. At every level of emergence, there is a possibility for an explanation that explains that level, and you need that explanation.

Yes, exactly. So I think that's very helpful. In your thermodynamics example, if you're trying to figure out how a steam engine works, you're not going to do statistical mechanics and trace every collision. You're going to actually probably start at thermodynamics, yes. And so that's a tie between, I guess, evolution in physics? No, osmology and physics. Much more so, thermodynamics is emergent physics, right? And it is, in terms of those four, it is epistemology. But that just shows that the terminology is misleading. The term...

More Articles

View All
Video from Jeff Bezos about Amazon and Zappos
Hello, my name is Jeff Bezos. Uh, I started Amazon.com about 15 years ago. Uh, tons of stories from the early days. So we started the company in my house. Um, we didn’t have enough electric power in the house at a certain point. We only had about four em…
2018 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting (Full Version)
[Applause] Hmm, good morning. [Applause] I’m Warren, he’s Charlie. Charlie does most things better than I do, but, well, this one’s a little tough. Charlie, maybe you can chew on that a while. Okay, at the formal meeting that will begin at 3:45, we will…
Why Are Astronauts Weightless?
[Applause] [Music] Have you wondered what it would be like to be an astronaut floating around in the space station? But why are the astronauts floating? I’m here at the PowerHouse Museum in Sydney to find out if anyone knows the answer. Why are they floa…
Peru Orphanage Update - Smarter Every Day 163
Hey it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. Every December, here at Smarter Every Day, we help an orphanage in Peru, and a million people are new to Smarter Every Day this year, so you might not know about this. So if you want to learn how we …
3 tips for finding a job on YC's Work at a Startup
[Music] [Applause] [Music] [Applause] Thanks for joining Y Combinator’s Work at a Startup and welcome to the YSE network. I’m Ryan and I’m here to help you find your dream job. Y Combinator is an accelerator that has invested in companies like Coinbase, …
Voting rights | Political participation | US government and civics | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to do a brief overview of how amendments to the Constitution and federal legislation have increased voting rights over time. Now, why does this matter? Apart from just the innate value of voting rights in a democracy, it matter…