yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Deutsch Files IV


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I can only start with what understanding I want, right? And I know I've asked you this before, but I want to be pedantically exhaustive about connecting the four theories of the fabric of reality. The reason I bring that up is because I think most people still view what you've written as being four separate things. It's hard enough to grasp these four separate things because they're actually fairly deep and wide-ranging theories. But I think in your mind, they connect together into one thing. Knowledge is a crystal, and nature has no boundaries, right? These are just phrases, but these things all connect together.

So we've talked in the past, for example, how epistemology and evolution connect; they're both forms of knowledge creation. We've talked about quantum physics and computation connecting to create quantum computation. I just love to get as many examples. How does physics connect to evolution? How does evolution connect to computation? For example, things that may be less obvious where people might view things as different theories, but to you, they're fundamentally the same.

Yeah, evolution and epistemology. People find both of those, the connection between both of those and physics, very counterintuitive. Most people think of physics in a very bottom-up way, and I think for completely independent reasons such as Constructor Theory, that's a mistake. Ever since that idea caught on, like sometime after Newton, physicists have tried to shoehorn other physical theories into that mold. That gives rise to, for example, problems in the foundations of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics.

How can you have an exact second law when the fundamental theories of physics are all time-reversible, and the second law is time-irreversible? How can you have that? The prevailing view is, yeah, thermodynamics and epistemology are both emergent theories and therefore not fundamental from the physics point of view. Therefore, if we want to understand the universe at a fundamental level, we needn’t bother with those. Those are just like the theories of washing machines or gardening.

I think that's artificial. Especially when they have to get very embarrassed when they exclude thermodynamics from physics in that way. I think that a theory that is going to go deeper than the current paradigm of physics is going to have to put emergent phenomena and emergent theories on the same level as microscopic theories. People talk about reductionism and holism, and some people are reductionists and some people are holists. I think I want to put them both in a sack and tie it up, and let them come out with a resolution.

There cannot be a criterion for excluding a set of theories from the body of knowledge other than whether they're good explanations. Yes, abandon them if they're not good explanations, but if they are, why make a class distinction between them? It's just going to lead to error, and I think it has led to error in thinking about the world.

So that's the connection between physics and those two. What you just said, for example, is that reductionist theories are the only theories there are because they don't form good explanations at the level where you need them. Especially when you have emergence, then you have very unpredictable things. You're not going to calculate all the particle collisions from the Big Bang till now to figure out how humans evolve, yes, or how species evolve. At every level of emergence, there is a possibility for an explanation that explains that level, and you need that explanation.

Yes, exactly. So I think that's very helpful. In your thermodynamics example, if you're trying to figure out how a steam engine works, you're not going to do statistical mechanics and trace every collision. You're going to actually probably start at thermodynamics, yes. And so that's a tie between, I guess, evolution in physics? No, osmology and physics. Much more so, thermodynamics is emergent physics, right? And it is, in terms of those four, it is epistemology. But that just shows that the terminology is misleading. The term...

More Articles

View All
The Student's Guide To Becoming A Successful Startup Founder
Your job is to be an optimist. Your job is to believe amazing things about what you can do with your life and what you do in the world when you’re young. That’s the point. That’s the point. That’s why the world needs young people. [Music] This is Michae…
These Faces Are The Same Color!
Akiyoshi Kok’s newest illusion is blowing my mind. You’ve got a white face and a black face. Psych! They are both the exact same gray. The face on top appears to be illuminated by a dimmer light source than the one below. So before putting anything into …
Why Are there Holes in the James Webb Sunshield? (Explained by My Dad) - Smarter Every Day 270
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. We are on the way to my dad’s work, and everything about this is weird. I have been trying to interview my own father for two years now at his work. The reason it’s so difficult is because he has a …
Free response example: Significance test for a mean | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Regulations require that product labels on containers of food that are available for sale to the public accurately state the amount of food in those containers. Specifically, if milk containers are labeled to have 128 fluid ounces and the mean number of f…
Chicken Powered Steadicam vs Kid cam
All right, let’s start. Your camera is now recording. Let’s start the chicken’s camera. Say hello to the chicken. Hello, chicken. Say hello, chicken. Hello, chicken. All right, a couple years ago, I made a video called “Chicken Head Tracking.” Well, tod…
Representing dilations algebraically, k less than 1 | Grade 8 (TX) | Khan Academy
We are told quadrilateral WXYZ was dilated with the origin as the center of dilation to create quadrilateral W’ X’ Y’ Z’. So, we started off with this black quadrilateral, and then it looks like it was dilated down. One way to think about it, centered at…