yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Deutsch Files IV


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I can only start with what understanding I want, right? And I know I've asked you this before, but I want to be pedantically exhaustive about connecting the four theories of the fabric of reality. The reason I bring that up is because I think most people still view what you've written as being four separate things. It's hard enough to grasp these four separate things because they're actually fairly deep and wide-ranging theories. But I think in your mind, they connect together into one thing. Knowledge is a crystal, and nature has no boundaries, right? These are just phrases, but these things all connect together.

So we've talked in the past, for example, how epistemology and evolution connect; they're both forms of knowledge creation. We've talked about quantum physics and computation connecting to create quantum computation. I just love to get as many examples. How does physics connect to evolution? How does evolution connect to computation? For example, things that may be less obvious where people might view things as different theories, but to you, they're fundamentally the same.

Yeah, evolution and epistemology. People find both of those, the connection between both of those and physics, very counterintuitive. Most people think of physics in a very bottom-up way, and I think for completely independent reasons such as Constructor Theory, that's a mistake. Ever since that idea caught on, like sometime after Newton, physicists have tried to shoehorn other physical theories into that mold. That gives rise to, for example, problems in the foundations of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics.

How can you have an exact second law when the fundamental theories of physics are all time-reversible, and the second law is time-irreversible? How can you have that? The prevailing view is, yeah, thermodynamics and epistemology are both emergent theories and therefore not fundamental from the physics point of view. Therefore, if we want to understand the universe at a fundamental level, we needn’t bother with those. Those are just like the theories of washing machines or gardening.

I think that's artificial. Especially when they have to get very embarrassed when they exclude thermodynamics from physics in that way. I think that a theory that is going to go deeper than the current paradigm of physics is going to have to put emergent phenomena and emergent theories on the same level as microscopic theories. People talk about reductionism and holism, and some people are reductionists and some people are holists. I think I want to put them both in a sack and tie it up, and let them come out with a resolution.

There cannot be a criterion for excluding a set of theories from the body of knowledge other than whether they're good explanations. Yes, abandon them if they're not good explanations, but if they are, why make a class distinction between them? It's just going to lead to error, and I think it has led to error in thinking about the world.

So that's the connection between physics and those two. What you just said, for example, is that reductionist theories are the only theories there are because they don't form good explanations at the level where you need them. Especially when you have emergence, then you have very unpredictable things. You're not going to calculate all the particle collisions from the Big Bang till now to figure out how humans evolve, yes, or how species evolve. At every level of emergence, there is a possibility for an explanation that explains that level, and you need that explanation.

Yes, exactly. So I think that's very helpful. In your thermodynamics example, if you're trying to figure out how a steam engine works, you're not going to do statistical mechanics and trace every collision. You're going to actually probably start at thermodynamics, yes. And so that's a tie between, I guess, evolution in physics? No, osmology and physics. Much more so, thermodynamics is emergent physics, right? And it is, in terms of those four, it is epistemology. But that just shows that the terminology is misleading. The term...

More Articles

View All
Divergence intuition, part 2
Hey everyone! So, in the last video, I was talking about Divergence and kind of laying down the intuition that we need for it. You’re imagining a vector field as representing some kind of fluid flow where particles move according to the vector that they’r…
Photography as Meditation | National Geographic
(serene music) [Kris] I always have a camera because I know that there’s going to be something there to photograph. The perfect shot for me, it comes out of nowhere. I want to see something that I haven’t seen before. That tree hasn’t been photographed t…
Calculating the equation of a regression line | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
In previous videos, we took this by variant data and we calculated the correlation coefficient. Just as a bit of a review, we have the formula here, and it looks a bit intimidating. But in that video, we saw all it is, is an average of the product of the …
Charlie Munger: Be a Survivor, Not a Victim
Of course, feeling like it’s rather interesting to make change. Some people are victimized by other people, and if it weren’t for the indignation that that causes, we wouldn’t have the reforms that we need. But that truth is mixed with another. It’s very…
TRUE Limits Of Humanity – The Final Border We Will Never Cross
Is there a border we will never cross? Are there places we will never reach no matter how hard we try? It turns out there are. Even with sci-fi technology, we are trapped in a limited pocket of the universe and the finite stuff within it. How much univers…
Generalizabilty of survey results example | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Niketi took a random sample of 10 countries to study fertility rate and life expectancy. She noticed a strong negative linear relationship between those variables in the sample data. Here is computer output from a least squares regression analysis for usi…