yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Deutsch Files IV


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I can only start with what understanding I want, right? And I know I've asked you this before, but I want to be pedantically exhaustive about connecting the four theories of the fabric of reality. The reason I bring that up is because I think most people still view what you've written as being four separate things. It's hard enough to grasp these four separate things because they're actually fairly deep and wide-ranging theories. But I think in your mind, they connect together into one thing. Knowledge is a crystal, and nature has no boundaries, right? These are just phrases, but these things all connect together.

So we've talked in the past, for example, how epistemology and evolution connect; they're both forms of knowledge creation. We've talked about quantum physics and computation connecting to create quantum computation. I just love to get as many examples. How does physics connect to evolution? How does evolution connect to computation? For example, things that may be less obvious where people might view things as different theories, but to you, they're fundamentally the same.

Yeah, evolution and epistemology. People find both of those, the connection between both of those and physics, very counterintuitive. Most people think of physics in a very bottom-up way, and I think for completely independent reasons such as Constructor Theory, that's a mistake. Ever since that idea caught on, like sometime after Newton, physicists have tried to shoehorn other physical theories into that mold. That gives rise to, for example, problems in the foundations of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics.

How can you have an exact second law when the fundamental theories of physics are all time-reversible, and the second law is time-irreversible? How can you have that? The prevailing view is, yeah, thermodynamics and epistemology are both emergent theories and therefore not fundamental from the physics point of view. Therefore, if we want to understand the universe at a fundamental level, we needn’t bother with those. Those are just like the theories of washing machines or gardening.

I think that's artificial. Especially when they have to get very embarrassed when they exclude thermodynamics from physics in that way. I think that a theory that is going to go deeper than the current paradigm of physics is going to have to put emergent phenomena and emergent theories on the same level as microscopic theories. People talk about reductionism and holism, and some people are reductionists and some people are holists. I think I want to put them both in a sack and tie it up, and let them come out with a resolution.

There cannot be a criterion for excluding a set of theories from the body of knowledge other than whether they're good explanations. Yes, abandon them if they're not good explanations, but if they are, why make a class distinction between them? It's just going to lead to error, and I think it has led to error in thinking about the world.

So that's the connection between physics and those two. What you just said, for example, is that reductionist theories are the only theories there are because they don't form good explanations at the level where you need them. Especially when you have emergence, then you have very unpredictable things. You're not going to calculate all the particle collisions from the Big Bang till now to figure out how humans evolve, yes, or how species evolve. At every level of emergence, there is a possibility for an explanation that explains that level, and you need that explanation.

Yes, exactly. So I think that's very helpful. In your thermodynamics example, if you're trying to figure out how a steam engine works, you're not going to do statistical mechanics and trace every collision. You're going to actually probably start at thermodynamics, yes. And so that's a tie between, I guess, evolution in physics? No, osmology and physics. Much more so, thermodynamics is emergent physics, right? And it is, in terms of those four, it is epistemology. But that just shows that the terminology is misleading. The term...

More Articles

View All
What Motivated Soldiers to Be the First to Climb the Siege Ladder?
Being the first on the wall in a siege often meant certain death. It involved battling through to the wall, climbing an exposed ladder or siege tower through a hail of projectiles, only to meet a superior force of defenders upon reaching the top. Neverthe…
Lesson Planning with Khanmigo
This is Conmigo, an AI-powered guide designed to help all students learn. Kanmigo is not just for students; teachers can use Conmigo too by toggling from student mode to teacher mode. Once in teacher mode, Conmigo transforms into the teaching assistant yo…
Mapping the Green Book | National Geographic
[Music] Most of us have good hearts, and most people want everybody to just have a fair and equal life in this country. But there was always kind of a disconnect, and there still is, in terms of understanding how our history is so close to us. It’s so imp…
Why NASA's Cassini Mission Was Important
What you’re looking at is the newest and currently last picture that humanity has of the gas giant Saturn. September 15, 2017, marked the end of an era for NASA and space exploration as a whole. At 7:55 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on that morning, the Cass…
The 7 BEST Purchases to make in your 20s
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we’re going to be talking about seven smart purchases that I think you should make when you’re still in your 20s. So I went down a bit of a YouTube rabbit hole and I saw a lot of people making differen…
Death of King George VI | Being The Queen
[Music] And we had a day out there to adjust and rest and do things. Prince Philip went; I went to sleep in a little room that was off to one side. The Queen was at a desk writing letters. The phone rang. My colleague said, “Mike, there’s a ghastly rumor…