yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Writing a quadratic function from solutions | Algebra 1 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told a quadratic function ( f ) has two real solutions ( x = -3 ) and ( x = 5 ) that make ( f(x) = 0 ). Select the equations that could define ( f ) in standard form. So, pause this video and have a go at that before we do this together.

All right, so there's a bunch of ways you could approach this, but the way that I think about it is we can express this quadratic in terms of its two solutions. So, you could have ( x - ) the first solution, and the first solution here is when ( x ) is equal to -3, and then times ( x ) us the second solution when ( x ) is equal to 5.

Now, why does this work? Well, think about it. If ( x ) is equal to -3 right here, and if I were to subtract another -3, well then this is going to be equal to 0. ( 0 \times ) anything is zero, and then ( f(-3) ) would be zero. Similarly, if ( x ) were equal to five here, well then this whole thing would be equal to zero; ( 0 \times ) anything is 0, so ( f(5) ) is zero.

Now, this is a definition of the quadratic, but it is not in standard form. Standard form, as a reminder, would be some constant times ( x^2 ) plus some other constant times ( x ) plus some other constant. So, to get there, we have to multiply this out.

And actually, before we do that, let me just simplify a little bit. This is going to be equal to ( x ) when I subtract a -3. That's the same thing as adding three, and then times ( x - 5 ). So, ( x + 3 \times x - 5 ).

And now we can expand this out so we get it to standard form. So, this is going to be equal to ( x \times x ), which is ( x^2 ). We have ( x \times -5 ), which is -5x. We have 3 times ( x ), which is 3x, and then we have 3 times -5, which is -15.

So, last but not least, we have ( x^2 ), and if I am subtracting 5x and then I add 3x, that is -2x minus 15. So, this is ( f(x) ) in standard form.

Now, let's see which of these choices gets me this. So when I look over here, well, what's interesting is all of these have a coefficient of either 2 or -2. I don't see that over here. So what is happening here is I can multiply this whole thing by 2 or -2, and it's not going to change where my zeros are.

Why is that? Well, think about it. If I had a 2 over here, when ( x ) is equal to 5, this is going to be ( 0 \times ) something (\times 2); it's still going to be equal to zero. Similarly, if that were a negative -2, so I'm going to have the same zeros if I multiply it by really any number that is not zero.

So let's do that. If I were to multiply this equation by positive 2, I need to multiply all of them by two. I'm running out of space, so I'll do it up here. We would get ( f(x) ) is equal to ( 2 \times x^2 ), which is ( 2x^2 ); ( 2 \times -2x ) is -4x; ( 2 \times -15 ) is -30. That's one way we could think about it.

Another way we could say maybe ( f(x) ) is going to be equal to, and to be clear, these are not the same functions. When I multiply it by 2 or -2, it does fundamentally change the function, but they would have the same zeros; they would have the same two real solutions ( x = -3 ) and ( x = 5 ).

So if I were to say, “Well, maybe instead of this, ( f(x) ) could be this times -2,” once again, it's a different ( f(x) ); it's a different function. In these situations, I'm just trying to find out all the possibilities, and there could be many more. I could multiply it by 3 or -3 or anything else.

But if I were to multiply this by -2, I would get ( -2x^2 ); ( -2 \times -2x ) is ( +4x ); ( -2 \times -15 ) is ( +30 ). So I’m going to say it one more time, the three things that I’m boxing off here, these three possible functions, these are all different functions. If I were to graph it, they would all look different, but they all have the same two real solutions ( x = -3 ) and ( x = 5 ).

So now, let's see which choices match up: ( 2x^2 - 4x - 30 ), ( 2x^2 - 4x - 30 ). I like this one right here and then ( -2x^2 + 4x + 30 ), ( -2x^2 + 4x + 30 ). I like this one here as well, so I'm done.

More Articles

View All
Overstimulation is Ruining Your Life
The year is 1665, and Isaac Newton is looking out his window at an apple tree standing tall in his orchard in Lincolnshire, England. All of a sudden, a ripe and lonely apple falls from the tree and makes its way to the ground. While most people would cons…
Mapping shapes | Performing transformations | High school geometry | Khan Academy
We’re told that triangles. Let’s see, we have triangle PQR and triangle ABC are congruent. The side length of each square on the grid is one unit, so each of these is one unit. Which of the following sequences of transformations maps triangle PQR onto tri…
Some Say This Goliath Fish, Once Overfished, Is Now a Nuisance | National Geographic
They are fish that can range from a tasty 30-pounder to something the size of a Volkswagen. You’ll see spots where this, you know, multiples like 14, 15, 20 Goliath Grouper swimming around. The Goliath Grouper population is getting out of hand. They were …
Why I Love The 'Comfort Zone'
We hear this one all the time: get out of your comfort zone. People tell us that success can be found in the places that we fear and that we should leave familiar territories to explore the unknown. Not getting out of your comfort zone leads to an unsucce…
Periodic trends and Coulomb's law | Atomic structure and properties | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re gonna look at trends for the periodic table of elements for dimensions like ionization energy, atomic and ionic radii, electron affinity, and electronegativity. To do so, we’re going to start with a very fundamental idea in chemistry …
Photographing the Strength and Beauty of Rescued Horses | National Geographic
[Katie] These are the horses that don’t fit in in any other place. All of these abandoned animals were getting sent to slaughter. They would have been killed. I think what they’re doing here is incredible. I’m born and raised in New York City. I still l…