yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Writing a quadratic function from solutions | Algebra 1 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told a quadratic function ( f ) has two real solutions ( x = -3 ) and ( x = 5 ) that make ( f(x) = 0 ). Select the equations that could define ( f ) in standard form. So, pause this video and have a go at that before we do this together.

All right, so there's a bunch of ways you could approach this, but the way that I think about it is we can express this quadratic in terms of its two solutions. So, you could have ( x - ) the first solution, and the first solution here is when ( x ) is equal to -3, and then times ( x ) us the second solution when ( x ) is equal to 5.

Now, why does this work? Well, think about it. If ( x ) is equal to -3 right here, and if I were to subtract another -3, well then this is going to be equal to 0. ( 0 \times ) anything is zero, and then ( f(-3) ) would be zero. Similarly, if ( x ) were equal to five here, well then this whole thing would be equal to zero; ( 0 \times ) anything is 0, so ( f(5) ) is zero.

Now, this is a definition of the quadratic, but it is not in standard form. Standard form, as a reminder, would be some constant times ( x^2 ) plus some other constant times ( x ) plus some other constant. So, to get there, we have to multiply this out.

And actually, before we do that, let me just simplify a little bit. This is going to be equal to ( x ) when I subtract a -3. That's the same thing as adding three, and then times ( x - 5 ). So, ( x + 3 \times x - 5 ).

And now we can expand this out so we get it to standard form. So, this is going to be equal to ( x \times x ), which is ( x^2 ). We have ( x \times -5 ), which is -5x. We have 3 times ( x ), which is 3x, and then we have 3 times -5, which is -15.

So, last but not least, we have ( x^2 ), and if I am subtracting 5x and then I add 3x, that is -2x minus 15. So, this is ( f(x) ) in standard form.

Now, let's see which of these choices gets me this. So when I look over here, well, what's interesting is all of these have a coefficient of either 2 or -2. I don't see that over here. So what is happening here is I can multiply this whole thing by 2 or -2, and it's not going to change where my zeros are.

Why is that? Well, think about it. If I had a 2 over here, when ( x ) is equal to 5, this is going to be ( 0 \times ) something (\times 2); it's still going to be equal to zero. Similarly, if that were a negative -2, so I'm going to have the same zeros if I multiply it by really any number that is not zero.

So let's do that. If I were to multiply this equation by positive 2, I need to multiply all of them by two. I'm running out of space, so I'll do it up here. We would get ( f(x) ) is equal to ( 2 \times x^2 ), which is ( 2x^2 ); ( 2 \times -2x ) is -4x; ( 2 \times -15 ) is -30. That's one way we could think about it.

Another way we could say maybe ( f(x) ) is going to be equal to, and to be clear, these are not the same functions. When I multiply it by 2 or -2, it does fundamentally change the function, but they would have the same zeros; they would have the same two real solutions ( x = -3 ) and ( x = 5 ).

So if I were to say, “Well, maybe instead of this, ( f(x) ) could be this times -2,” once again, it's a different ( f(x) ); it's a different function. In these situations, I'm just trying to find out all the possibilities, and there could be many more. I could multiply it by 3 or -3 or anything else.

But if I were to multiply this by -2, I would get ( -2x^2 ); ( -2 \times -2x ) is ( +4x ); ( -2 \times -15 ) is ( +30 ). So I’m going to say it one more time, the three things that I’m boxing off here, these three possible functions, these are all different functions. If I were to graph it, they would all look different, but they all have the same two real solutions ( x = -3 ) and ( x = 5 ).

So now, let's see which choices match up: ( 2x^2 - 4x - 30 ), ( 2x^2 - 4x - 30 ). I like this one right here and then ( -2x^2 + 4x + 30 ), ( -2x^2 + 4x + 30 ). I like this one here as well, so I'm done.

More Articles

View All
Derivative as a concept | Derivatives introduction | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
You are likely already familiar with the idea of a slope of a line. If you’re not, I encourage you to review it on Khan Academy. But all it is, it’s describing the rate of change of a vertical variable with respect to a horizontal variable. So, for examp…
RC natural response derivation (2 of 3)
Now what I want to do for the RC circuit is a formal derivation of exactly what these two curves look like, and then we’ll have a precise definition of the natural response. Okay, what I want to do now is real quick draw our circuit again. There’s R, the…
15 Things To Do If You Get Rich All Of A Sudden
Although it is incredibly rare, sometimes it happens that people get a massive influx of capital. The most common way is by inheriting a fortune from a deceased relative. The others are often different forms of gambling, like winning the lottery or someth…
Solving the Water Problem | Breakthrough
Our lifestyles are very thirsty, and it’s not just the water that comes out of the tap at home. You know, if we think about our daily lifestyle, everything we use, and where and buy and eat takes water to make, and sometimes really a surprising amount. It…
The Theme System Journal
Hello internet! If you didn’t already know, I’m a big fan of the yearly theme: a broad rainbow above your goals to help direct you on part of your journey through this life. And yes, I know exactly how that sounds. But if you’re intrigued and/or wondering…
Correlative conjunctions | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hey Garans! Today we’re going to be talking about correlative conjunctions, and I know this looks like a pretty ugly word—correlative. Like it’s kind of complicated looking, but let’s break it down. This co-art comes from a Latin “comm,” meaning “with” o…