Four principles for the open world - Don Tapscott

[Music] [Music] Openness, it's a word that, uh, denotes opportunity and possibilities. Open-ended, open harsh, open source, open door policy, open bar, and everywhere the world is opening up, and it's a good thing. Why is this happening? A technology revolution is opening the world.

Yesterday's internet was a platform for the presentation of content. The internet of today is a platform for computation. The internet is becoming a giant global computer, and every time you go on it, you upload a video, you do a Google search, you remix something; you're programming this big global computer that we all share. Humanity is building a machine, and this enables us to collaborate in new ways. Collaboration can occur on an astronomical basis now.

A new generation is opening up the world as well. I started studying kids about 15 years ago, so actually, 20 years ago now, and I noticed how my own children were effortlessly able to use all this sophisticated technology. At first, I thought my children were prodigies, and uh, but then I noticed all the friends were like them, so that was a bad theory.

So I started working with a few hundred uh kids, and I came to the conclusion that this is the first generation to come of age in the digital age, to be bathed in bits. I called them the net generation. I said these kids are different; they have no fear of technology because it's not there. It's like the air; sort of like I have no fear of a refrigerator.

There’s no more powerful force to change every institution than the first generation of digital natives. I'm a digital immigrant; I had to learn the language. The global economic crisis is opening up the world as well. Our opaque institutions from the industrial age, everything from old models of the corporation, government, media, Wall Street, are in various stages of being stalled or frozen, or in atrophy, or even failing.

And this is now creating a burning platform in the world. I mean, think about Wall Street; the core modus operandi of Wall Street almost brought down global capitalism. Now, you know the idea of a burning platform, that you're somewhere where the costs of staying where you are become greater than the cost of moving to something different, perhaps something radically different.

And we need to change and open up all of our institutions, so this technology push, a demographic kick from a new generation, and a demand pull from a new economic global environment is causing the world to open up. Now I think, in fact, we're at a turning point in human history where we can finally now rebuild many of the institutions of the Industrial Age around a new set of principles.

Now, what is openness? Well, as it turns out, openness has a number of different meanings, and for each there's a corresponding principle for the transformation of civilization. The first is collaboration. Now, this is openness in the sense of the boundaries of organizations becoming more porous and fluid and open.

The guy in the picture here—I'll tell you a story—his name is Rob McHugh. I'd like to say I have this think tank; we scour the world for amazing case studies. The reason I know this story is because he's my neighbor. Um, he actually moved across the street from us, and he held a cocktail party to meet the neighbors.

He says, "You're Don Tapscott; I read some of your books." I said, "Great! What do you do?" And he says, "Well, I used to be a banker, and now I'm a gold miner." And he tells me this amazing story; he takes over this gold mine, and his geologist can't tell him where the gold is. He gives him more money for geological data; they come back, and they can't tell him where to go into production.

After a few years, he's so frustrated he's ready to give up, but he has an epiphany one day. He wonders, "If my geologists don't know where the gold is, maybe somebody else does." So he does a radical thing; he takes his geological data, he publishes it, and he holds a contest on the internet called the Goldcorp Challenge.

It's basically uh half a million dollars in prize money for anyone who can tell him, "Do I have any gold? And if so, where is it?" He gets submissions from all around the world. They use techniques that he's never heard of, and for his half a million dollars in prize money, Rob McHugh finds 3.4 billion dollars worth of gold. The market value of his company goes from 90 million to 10 billion dollars.

And I can tell you, because he's my neighbor, he's a happy camper. You know, conventional wisdom says talent is inside, right? Your most precious asset goes out the elevator every night. He viewed talent differently; he wondered, "Who are their peers?" He should have fired his geology department, but he didn't.

You know, some of the best submissions didn't come from uh geologists; they came from computer scientists and engineers. The winner was a computer graphics company that built a three-dimensional model of the mine where you can helicopter underground and see where the gold is. He helped us understand that social media is becoming social production.

This is not about hooking up online; this is a new means of production in the making. And this idea aora that he created an open market aora for uniquely qualified minds was part of a change, a profound change in the deep structure and architecture of our organizations and how we sort of orchestrate capability to innovate, to create goods and services, to engage with the rest of the world in terms of government; how we create public value, openness is about collaboration.

Now, secondly, openness is about transparency. This is different; here we're talking about the communication of pertinent information to stakeholders of organizations: employees, customers, business partners, shareholders, and so on. Everywhere our institutions are becoming naked. People are all bent out of shape about WikiLeaks, but that's just the tip of the iceberg.

You see, people at their fingertips now—everybody, not just Julian Assange—have these powerful tools for finding out what's going on, scrutinizing, informing others, and even organizing collective responses. Institutions are becoming naked, and if you're going to be naked, well, uh, there are some ground rules that flow from that. I mean, one is fitness is no longer optional.

You know, or if you're going to be naked, you better get buff. Now by buff I mean you need to have good value because value is evidence like never before. You say you have good products; they better be good, but you also need to have values. You need to have integrity as part of your bones and your DNA as an organization because if you don't, you'll be unable to build trust, and trust is a sign of clout in this new networked world.

So this is good; it’s not bad. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and we need a lot of sunlight in this troubled world. Now the third meaning and corresponding principle of openness is about sharing. Now this is different than transparency; transparency is about the communication of information. Sharing is about giving up assets, intellectual property.

There are all kinds of famous stories about this. IBM gave away 400 million dollars of software to the Linux movement, and that gave them a multi-billion dollar payoff. Now conventional wisdom says, "Well, hey, our intellectual property belongs to us, and if someone tries to infringe it, we're going to get out our lawyers, and we're going to sue them."

Well, it didn't work so well for the record labels, did it? I mean, they took—they had a technology disruption, and rather than taking a business model innovation to correspond to that, they took and sought a legal solution, and the industry that brought you Elvis and The Beatles is now suing children and is in danger of collapse.

So we need to think differently about intellectual property. I'll give you an example: the pharmaceutical industry is in deep trouble. First of all, there aren't a lot of big inventions in the pipeline, and this is a big problem for human health. The pharmaceutical industry has got a bigger problem that they're about to fall off something called the patent cliff.

Do you know about this? They're going to lose 20 to 35 percent of their revenue in the next 12 months. Now what are you going to do, like cut back on paper clips or something? No, we need to reinvent the whole model of scientific research. The pharmaceutical industry needs to place assets in a commons; they need to start sharing pre-competitive research.

They need to start sharing clinical trial data, and in doing so, create a rising tide that could lift all boats—not just for the industry but for humanity. Now the fourth meaning of openness and corresponding principle is about empowerment. I'm not talking about the motherhood sense here; knowledge and intelligence is power, and as it becomes more distributed, there's a concomitant distribution and decentralization and disaggregation of power that's underway in the world today.

The open world is bringing freedom. Now take the Arab Spring; the debate about the role of social media and social change has been settled. You know one word: Tunisia. And then it ended up having a whole bunch of other words too. But in the Tunisian revolution, the new media didn't cause the revolution; it was caused by injustice.

Social media didn't create the revolution; it was created by a new generation of young people who wanted jobs and hope and who didn't want to be treated as subjects anymore. But just as the internet drops transaction and collaboration costs in business and government, it also drops the cost of dissent, of rebellion, and even insurrection in ways that people didn't understand.

You know, during the Tunisian revolution, snipers associated with the regime were killing unarmed students in the street. So the students would take their mobile devices, take a picture, triangulate the location, send that picture to friendly military units who'd come in and take out the snipers. You think that social media is about hooking up online? For these kids, it was a military tool to defend unarmed people from murderers, as a tool of self-defense.

You know, as we speak today, young people are being killed in Syria. And up until three months ago, if you were injured on the street, an ambulance would pick you up, take you to the hospital, you'd go in, say, with a broken leg, and you come out with a bullet in your head. So these twenty-somethings create an alternative healthcare system where what they did is they used Twitter and basic publicly available tools that when someone’s injured, a car would show up, pick them up, take them to a makeshift medical clinic where they'd get medical treatment as opposed to being executed.

So this is a time of great change. Now it's not without its problems. Up until two years ago, all revolutions in human history had a leadership, and when the old regime fell, the leadership, the organization would take power. Well, these wiki revolutions happen so fast they create a vacuum, and politics abhor vacuum, and unsavory forces can fill that—typically the old regime or extremists or fundamentalist forces.

You can see this playing out today in Egypt, but that doesn't matter because this is moving forward; the train has left the station, the cat is out of the bag, the horse is out of the barn, help me out here, okay? The toothpaste is out of the tube. I mean, we're not putting this one back. The open world is bringing empowerment and freedom.

I think at the end of these four days that you'll come to conclude that the arc of history is a positive one, and it's towards openness. If you go back a few hundred years, all around the world, it was a very closed society. It was agrarian, and the means of production and political system was called feudalism, and knowledge was concentrated in the church and the nobility.

People didn't know about things; there was no concept of progress. You were born, you lived your life, and you died. But then Johannes Gutenberg came along with his great invention, and over time the society opened up. People started to learn about things, and when they did, the institutions of feudal society appeared to be stalled or frozen or failing.

It didn't make sense for the church to be responsible for medicine when people had knowledge. So we saw the Protestant Reformation—Martin Luther called the printing press God's highest act of grace—the creation of a corporation, science, the university, eventually the Industrial Revolution, and it was all good, but it came with a cost.

And now once again the technology genie is out of the bottle, but this time it's different. The printing press gave us access to the written word; the internet enables each of us to be a producer. The printing press gave us access to recorded knowledge; the internet gives us access not just to information and knowledge but to the intelligence contained in the cranium of other people on a global basis.

To me, this is not an information age; it's an age of networked intelligence. It's an age of vast promise, an age of collaboration where the boundaries of our organizations are changing, of transparency where sunlight is disinfecting civilization, an age of sharing and understanding the new power of the commons, and it's an age of empowerment and of freedom.

Now what I'd like to do is uh, to close, to share with you uh some research that I've been doing. I've tried to study all kinds of organizations to understand what the future might look like, but I've been studying nature recently. You know, bees come in swarms and fish come in schools. Starlings in the area around Edinburgh in the Moors of England come in something called a murmuration, and the murmuration refers to the murmuring of the wings of the birds.

And throughout the day, the starlings are out over a 20-mile radius, sort of doing their starling thing, and at night they come together and they create one of the most spectacular things in all of nature, and it's called a murmuration. Um, and scientists that have studied this have said they'd never seen an accident. Now, this thing has a function; it protects the birds. You can see on the right here there's a predator being chased away by the collective power of the birds.

Apparently, this is a frightening thing if you're a predator of starlings, and there's leadership, but there's no one leader. Now, is this some kind of fanciful analogy, or could we actually learn something from this? Well, the murmuration functions according to a number of principles, and they're basically the principles that I describe to you today.

This is a huge collaboration; it's an openness. There’s a sharing of all kinds of information, not just about location and trajectory and danger and so on, but about food sources. And there's a real sense of interdependence: the individual birds somehow understand that their interests are in the interests of the collective. Perhaps like we should understand that the business can't succeed in a world that's failing.

Well, I look at this thing, and I get a lot of hope. Think about the kids today in the Arab Spring, and you see something like this that's underway. And imagine, just consider this idea, if you would: what if we could connect ourselves in this world through a vast network of air and glass?

Could we go beyond just sharing information and knowledge? Could we start to share our intelligence? Could we create some kind of collective intelligence that goes beyond an individual or a group or a team to create perhaps some kind of consciousness on a global basis? Well, if we could do this, we could tackle some big problems in the world.

And I look at this thing, and I don't know, I get a lot of hope that maybe this smaller, networked, open world that our kids inherit might be a better one, and that this new age of networked intelligence could be an age of promise fulfilled and of peril unrequited. Let's do this. Thank you!

[Applause] [Music]