yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Society and religion in the New England colonies | AP US History | Khan Academy


6m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Depending on where you grow up in the United States, you might hear a different story about the founding of this country. Now, I grew up in Pennsylvania, and the story that I heard was about the Pilgrims landing at Plymouth Rock. They were a group of deeply religious people who had been persecuted in England and were looking for a new world where they could practice their religion freely.

But many of my friends grew up in Virginia, and the story they heard was about the founding of Jamestown, where a group of men from England who were adventurers looking for gold and glory landed in the new world hoping to make a profit. I think both of these stories tell us a little bit about the founding mythology of the United States. Were the original settlers here looking for religious freedom, or were they here looking to make a quick buck?

Well, in this video, I'd like to take some time to explore the New England colonies, the story of the people who landed at Plymouth Rock, and then later at Boston to begin the colony of Massachusetts Bay. We'll see, as we go along, just how different the settlers in Massachusetts Bay were from those at Jamestown and also some of the ways in which they were quite similar.

Now, there's no question about who got here first. As you can see, Jamestown was founded in 1607, but it wasn't too much later that the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock in 1620, and then they were followed by a much larger group of Puritans who landed at Boston and founded Massachusetts Bay in 1630.

So, let's talk about Puritans. Who or what was a Puritan? This is an image of Cotton Mather. He was a prominent Puritan minister. In fact, the Mather family will go on to be one of the great theological families of Massachusetts. Puritans started in England, and their main concern was that they believed the Church of England, the Anglican Church, was too much like the Catholic Church.

This is a fairly legitimate criticism because, in many ways, the Anglican Church was very similar to the Catholic Church, except that instead of being headed by the Pope, the Church of England was led by the King. So, Puritans hoped that they could purify the Church of England from its many Catholic influences. That's where "Puritan" comes from—purify. By this, they meant that there were too many rituals, too much pomp and circumstance, and not enough focus on the Bible itself.

So, they kind of wanted to strip away a lot of the fanciness of the Church of England. In the 1620s, the Puritans began to face more persecution in England. Now, why did the English government care about a group of religious folks who were not big fans of the Church of England? Well, the answer is that there was no separation of church and state.

As the King was the head of the Church, if you're casting doubt on the Church, you are then casting doubt on the King. The Puritans did not make themselves very popular in England. Sensing that they might be in trouble, many Puritans began to emigrate to the New World. They'd seen lots of tracts about Virginia and how one could make a new life there, and they thought that perhaps if they went to Virginia—and they were originally aiming to go to Virginia—they ended up landing a bit north of there, that they could set an example of what a righteous church and a righteous society would look like.

Because they believed that the Church and the society of England were becoming much too corrupt, much too divorced from the principles of the Bible. So, in 1620, one group of Puritans set out for the New World and landed at Plymouth Rock, and we call them the Pilgrims. Then, in 1630, a second group set out, and they were just Puritans more broadly. Over the course of the 1630s, about 14,000 Puritans emigrated from England to New England, Massachusetts Bay, in what's called the Great Migration.

So, what was the difference between these two groups—the Pilgrims and the Puritans? Well, the Pilgrims who arrived in 1620 were separatists. What that means is that they thought that the Church of England was so corrupt that there was just no chance that they were going to be able to save it. So, they wanted to separate from that church altogether and live a completely separate life.

At Plymouth, they had a pretty small settlement—about 100 people crossed over on the Mayflower, the ship that brought them to the New World. But the group that came over in 1630, the Puritans, did not want to separate from the Church of England altogether. They wanted to purify it, and they hoped that by setting an example of a righteous society, they would actually convince people back in England to adopt their ways, invite them back, and that all of England could become like New England.

This man here is John Winthrop. He was a lawyer who became a leader of the Puritans. He was elected governor pretty much for his entire life, and he wrote that he wanted Massachusetts Bay to be like a city upon a hill and be a kind of a beacon of light, showing the world what a good society could be like.

Now, obviously, the New England Puritans did not get their way. They were not invited back to England to become the model of English society, but they did become the model of society in Massachusetts Bay and New England more generally. I think a strong influence on American culture writ large.

So, how did life in New England compare to life in Virginia? Well, a lot depended on the different environment of the colony and the reasons that migrants came to New England. The environment of New England was colder, the land was rockier, and it was both a healthier place to live because tropical diseases couldn't flourish there the way that they could in the marshy areas of Virginia.

It was also an unsuitable place for large-scale plantation agriculture, so they couldn't grow the kinds of crops that Virginia grew, like tobacco or even sugar in the West Indies. So, that meant that in New England, most of the industry was either family farming and fishing and also some trading since they were on the coast.

Because most Puritans came over to help build this city upon a hill, they came in family units, not as single men like in Virginia. There was a much more even ratio of men to women. The families that came over tended to be well-off enough to pay their own passage across the Atlantic, tended to be kind of middle-class artisan types.

So, New England didn't have the kind of influx of indentured servants that Virginia had, nor did it have an influx of enslaved Africans as laborers because most New Englanders were farmers, and they were small farmers, so they relied on their own family as labor.

A major consequence of these motivations for emigrating and this environment was that New England society was relatively egalitarian. There were very few very wealthy landowners like there were in Virginia, and very few people who were completely at the bottom, like servants and enslaved people. People who lived in Virginia had a life expectancy of up to 70 years, which was one of the highest life expectancies in the world at this time.

Because reading the Bible was so important to the Puritans, New England also had one of the highest rates of literacy in the world at this time. But for all of these positives, there were plenty of reasons why living in New England wasn't so much fun. Most of them related to the strictness of the Congregational Church. Puritans canceled Christmas because they thought it was too much of a pagan ritual.

Though you would think that their own experience of religious intolerance in England would have led them to be more tolerant of dissidents, that was not the case. Anyone who disagreed with Puritan theology or leadership was given the option to go somewhere else or be executed. For example, Roger Williams, who questioned the Puritans' actions toward Native Americans, was expelled from Massachusetts Bay in 1636. He went on to found the colony of Rhode Island, where religious dissenters could find a place of refuge from Massachusetts Bay, just as the people of Massachusetts Bay had found refuge from England.

One of these was a woman named Anne Hutchinson, who in 1637 was expelled from Massachusetts Bay for daring to be a woman who preached the Bible. So, in this video, I've explored some of the backgrounds to Puritans and Pilgrims and aspects of New England society and religion. In the next video, we'll continue our exploration of New England's life through its politics and policies toward Native Americans.

More Articles

View All
Going 50% Bitcoin
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So get this: every six months, CNBC surveys 750 millionaires to find out how and where they’re investing their money. For the first time ever, they found a rather surprising trend among Millennials. Nearly half of them h…
Cumulative geometric probability (less than a value) | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Lilliana runs a cake decorating business for which 10% of her orders come over the telephone. Let’s see ( C ), the number of cake orders Lilliana receives in a month until she first gets an order over the telephone. Assumed a method of placing each cake …
Why You Should Value Your Mistakes, with High-Wire Artist Philippe Petit | Big Think
If I had a university to direct, and in some ways I hope that one day to have my own foundation where I will teach people things, there will be a course in mistakes. In the sense that I think we discard mistakes; we brush them aside. In a non-creative way…
The ABC's of gas: Avogadro, Boyle, Charles - Brian Bennett
Transcriber: Tom Carter Reviewer: Bedirhan Cinar In society, we have to follow laws that maintain order. Did you know all chemical matter follows certain laws as well? In fact, we can describe those laws by looking at relationships. Some easy laws to beg…
Introduction to currency exchange and trade | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
What I want to do in this video is think about how exchange rates can affect trade, and actually we can even think a little bit about how they might be able to affect each other, although we’ll go into a lot more depth in that in future videos. So let’s …
Eyes on the prize: Why optimists make superb leaders | Michio Kaku
Leadership is understanding the challenges of the future, to working on scenarios of the future. Now, President Eisenhower, when he was a general, he was asked about his attitude toward victory, toward fights, and toward war. And he basically said that pe…