yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Are Microplastics in Our Water Becoming a Macroproblem? | National Geographic


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

[Music] It was completely legal to dump plastic in the ocean until the '90s, and a lot of that plastic is still there because plastic lasts out there for a very long time. It just breaks down into smaller and smaller [Music] pieces. We know that over 300 species of wildlife have ingested this material. It's been reported in animals, and so as it is eaten by animals, it actually can move up the food web.

As the scientific literature on this issue increases, literally almost every habitat they've gone to — sea mounts, Arctic Ice, coral reefs, deep sea — it's become ubiquitous. I don't think anybody would fight anyone on an argument that plastic debris has not become a contaminant of concern. We're collecting the samples by using a manta troll. It's basically a big metal box with wings; it looks like a manta with a very long, about 12T mesh net off the back.

1, 2, 3, Splat! At the end is a piece we can take off that has collected all of the solids. You rinse it all out, filter it through another strainer, and then put it into a jar. This caught a lot of other stuff. If you want to take a look at what we're rinsing out of the screen, it's more tiny [Music] plastic.

What we're concerned about ultimately is what are the implications of trash going into the water, getting into the food we harvest, and we're still connecting the dots there a bit. We know that lots of trash goes out into the water. We know that the sun and waves break it down into small pieces. We know that many, many, many species of animals eat it, and we also know that bigger animals eat smaller animals.

We also know that we eat those big trophy fish, and so what we're really trying to figure out is how big a vector plastic is for transporting chemicals into the tissues of the animals that we eat every day. That's a big problem, much bigger than big chunks floating out into the ocean. We don't know exactly what that plastic is; we don't know where exactly it's coming from.

If we're trying to find policy and educational solutions to it, we need to know what we're targeting. We can't just ban plastic; that's not going to work. What kind of plastic is it, and what's the best policy route to reduce it? Is it a ban? Is it a fee? Is it market change? Is it education and behavior change work? What's the best way to tackle it? Until we know exactly what we're dealing with, we're not going to be able to design the right programs to address it.

More Articles

View All
ALL MY ACCOUNTS WERE HACKED *How this happened*
So guys, this is some super like serious stuff. I mean, it’s really scary when you start to think about it, but all of my accounts have been hacked. Someone was able to get access to my YouTube channel, my social media accounts, all of my email accounts, …
IKIGAI | A Japanese Philosophy for Finding Purpose
Have you ever asked yourself this question: what is my purpose? With so many opportunities that life has to offer, and all these different jobs and careers, it’s quite difficult to decide what we want to do with our lives. Society demands us to make decis…
How to light multiple matches with a single bullet
Hey, it’s me Destin. About three years ago I did a YouTube video, but I tried to have a lot of matches with a bullet, and I never could do it. So, we’ve kind of up the ante here. We’ve taken that same rifle, that Ruger 10⁄22, and we’ve made a fully adjust…
Q&A With Grey: One Million Subscribers Edition
Hi. So I think this is the part where I’m supposed to have a dramatic opening, perhaps the 2001 theme song playing in the background as the number 1,000,000 fades into view, but obviously that’s not happening. Don’t get me wrong, I’m lucky that so many pe…
Why Top Investors are Warning of a 'Lost Decade' for Stocks
A few weeks ago, Goldman Sachs put out this note saying that they believe the S&P 500 during the next 10 years will deliver a real return of just 1% annually. It’s a bit of a dire prediction. As you may have seen in the news over the past few weeks, i…
2015 AP Chemistry free response 2c | Thermodynamics | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Because the dehydration reaction is not observed to occur at 298 Kelvin, the student claims that the reaction has an equilibrium constant less than 1.00 at 298 Kelvin. Do the thermodynamic data for the reaction support the student’s claim? Justify your an…