yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Anti-Natalism: The Argument To Stop Giving Birth


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Suppose there is a couple, the Joneses, who just gave birth to a baby boy named Sammy. As they stand together in the hospital gazing down at their newborn, they share an awareness that the life ahead of Sammy will be filled with an indeterminable amount of both pleasure and suffering, happiness and heartbreak, miracle and tragedy. Then, in an instant, the harsh reality of their baby's future hits them, and for a fleeting second, they look into each other's eyes and think, “If we hadn't given birth to him in the first place, he wouldn't suffer anything.” Right there, they both make the decision to give Sammy the best life they can and to prevent him from experiencing as much suffering as is humanly possible.

The Joneses are great parents for thinking this, but in the words of David Benatar, it is curious that while good people go to great lengths to spare their children from suffering, a few of them seem to notice that the one and only guaranteed way to prevent all the suffering of their children is to not bring those children into existence in the first place. This is the philosophy of antenatalism; it's the thought that human procreation is unethical, the belief that any action with suffering as its byproduct should not be encouraged, no matter how much pleasure will follow.

Although the roots of antenatalism can be traced all the way back to ancient Greece, the philosophy has experienced a particular spike in popularity over the last decade or so. This recent resurgence can be accredited by and large to the South African philosopher David Benatar, who authored what may be the most widely known literature on the subject. In his book "Better Never to Have Been," Benatar argues that his anti-natalist views come from a place of compassion, stating that the only way to truly prevent the suffering that comes with existence is to not exist in the first place.

And he isn't the first person to have this thought. The Greek tragedian Sophocles once said, “Never to have been born is best.” Heinrich, the 19th-century German poet, wrote, “Sleep is good, death is better; but of course, the best thing would have been to never have been born at all.” In "Ecclesiastes," the preacher said, “Praised are the dead that are already dead more than the living that are yet alive; but better than both of them is he who has not yet been, who has not seen the evil work that is done under the sun.”

So, as you can see, the school of thought that non-existence is inherently better than existence isn't a new one. In recent years, though, these ideas have given rise to the anti-natalist belief that seeks to end human procreation. There are two different schools of thought under the antenatalistic argument. The first is the one David Benatar makes when he says we should spare the unborn from suffering that is life. This argument centers around the harm in which existence poses on the baby being born.

On the other hand of the spectrum, the misanthropic arguments for antenatalism center more around the harm that babies being born will go on to afflict upon one another, other animals, and the environment as a whole. To put it into context, consider this: The average carbon footprint for a single person in the United States has been estimated to be around 16 to 20 tons per year, meaning that just fulfilling daily necessities such as driving, showering, eating, and using electricity has unimaginably damaging consequences towards the environment we live in.

So, to anti-natalists, the most ethical way to solve this problem is to prevent it from happening in the first place. Both antenatalist arguments, whether philanthropic or misanthropic, are centered around one core problem: suffering, and one proposed solution: to stop giving birth. And you might say, “Well, what about all the good things in life? Why would you not want a child to experience all of that?” Well, Anthony believed that in human life, there is an inherent imbalance or asymmetry between pleasure and suffering.

Let's take Sammy, for instance. Because Sammy has been born, he would experience pain, which is bad, and pleasure, which is good. However, if Sammy was never born, then he would…

More Articles

View All
Sea Turtles Nesting in Costa Rica - 360 | National Geographic
Sometime around the last quarter moon, we typically see these large groups of turtles forming offshore and essentially wait for some cue. It’s like they’re all out there kind of wait for it, wait for it. At some point, hundreds of thousands of turtles sta…
Adorable Lemurs Roam Free on This Ancient Island | Short Film Showcase
Nita Terrace Helen Mirren Gandhi, I reckon if Allah to a new litter one potato atlatl. [Music] Kylie, the hero and the Monocacy lying in a field known lon Kenan rotten Atlanta kinds of top Caselli. They would do to flank the chopper; that’ll do it in th…
THIS IS THE STOIC SECRET FOR EVERYTHING YOU DESIRE TO HAPPEN | STOICISM
[Music] Have you ever dreamed of a world where all the things you want come true? A place where your goals, your dreams, and your aspirations are not just possibilities but palpable realities? Well, you are in the right place! Today we are going to talk …
Curvature formula, part 1
So, in the last video, I talked about curvature and the radius of curvature. I described it purely geometrically, where I’m saying you imagine driving along a certain road. Your steering wheel locks, and you’re wondering what the radius of the circle that…
Valence electrons | Atomic structure and properties | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We are now going to talk about valence electrons and non-valence electrons, which are known as core electrons. One question that you might have been asking yourself this whole time that we’ve been looking at electron configurations is: what is the point? …
Fossils 101 | National Geographic
(gentle music) [Narrator] Like buried treasure, they lie hidden from sight. Echoes of an ancient past, they whisper secrets and tell tales once lost to time. Fossils are remnants or impressions of ancient organisms that are naturally preserved in stone. …