yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Impact of mass on orbital speed | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

A satellite of mass lowercase m orbits Earth at a radius capital R and speed v naught, as shown below. So, this has mass lowercase m. An aerospace engineer decides to launch a second satellite that is double the mass into the same orbit. So, the same orbit, so this radius is still going to be capital R, and so this satellite, the second satellite, has a mass of 2m. The mass of Earth is capital M, so this is Earth right here.

What is the speed lowercase v of the heavier satellite in terms of v naught and speed? You can use the magnitude of velocity, and so that's why it's a lowercase v without a vector symbol on it. And so, what we're trying to figure out is the magnitude of its velocity in order to stay in orbit. What is lowercase v going to be equal to? So, pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own.

All right, so to tackle this, remember the whole reason why something stays in orbit instead of just going in a straight line through space is because there is going to be a constant magnitude centripetal acceleration towards the center of Earth. It keeps turning, I guess you could say, the satellite in this circular path.

We've seen from other videos that the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration is going to be equal to the magnitude of our velocity. I'll just use this first satellite. So, the magnitude of its velocity squared divided by our radius, which in this case is capital R.

But what determines our centripetal acceleration? Well, we can explore Newton's law of gravitation there. So, if we think about the magnitude of the force of gravity, well, that's going to be equal to G, which is the universal gravitational constant, times the product of the two masses that have the force between them.

So, the product of the mass of Earth, capital M, and the mass of this satellite—I’ll just focus on this satellite for now—divided by the distance between their center of masses squared. In this case, that is capital R squared.

If you wanted the centripetal acceleration, you would just divide force by mass. Remember, from Newton's second law, we know that f is equal to ma. And so, if we're talking about centripetal acceleration, it's the force of gravity that is causing it.

If we want to solve for centripetal acceleration, you just divide both sides of these by lowercase m, the mass of the satellite. Our centripetal acceleration here, if you divide our force of gravity by lowercase m, is going to be the universal gravitational constant times the mass of Earth divided by the radius squared.

We could then take this and substitute it back over here and solve for the magnitude of our velocity. So, what you're going to have is the universal gravitational constant times the mass of Earth divided by the radius squared is equal to the magnitude of our velocity, or the speed squared divided by capital R.

Now you can multiply both sides by R, and I'll swap sides as well. You're going to get v naught squared is going to be equal to capital G times capital M over R. Or, if you take the square root of both sides, you get v naught is equal to the square root of the universal gravitational constant times the mass of Earth divided by the distance between the center of masses.

Now, what's interesting here is we see the speed we need in order to maintain this orbit in no way is it a function of the mass of the satellite. I don't see a lowercase m anywhere in this expression on the right-hand side. Since this is independent of the mass of the thing that is in orbit, if you double the mass—if you go from lowercase m to 2 times lowercase m—it does not change the needed orbital speed.

So, what is the speed lowercase v of the heavier satellite in terms of v naught? It's going to be the same thing. We could write lowercase v is going to be equal to v naught. It doesn't matter what you do to the mass here; you're going to need the same orbital speed.

More Articles

View All
Vaping Is Too Good To Be True
What’s this? Oh, it’s only the best calendar we ever made. Vaping is kind of amazing – finally a less bad alternative to smoking. It delivers one of the most popular drugs in the world: Nicotine. It may improve your attention, concentration, memory, react…
Spooky Coincidences?
Hi, Vsauce. Michael here. You can practice speaking backwards, so when your words are reversed, they’re intelligible. But here’s something else that is weird. The digits in the speed of light are exactly the same as the latitude of the Great Pyramid of Gi…
This Empowering Memorial Honors the Legacies of Military Women | National Geographic
I remember vividly at the dedication 20 years ago of the memorial. There was a World War I veteran in her uniform who spoke. She said, “When I served in the Navy, women were not even allowed to vote.” I thought, what a brave woman! So in that hundred year…
Scouting for Wildlife in Big Bend National Park | National Geographic
So it looks like we got some animal activity already. Hold on. Don’t come down any further. We’re here at probably one of the most beautiful spots that you can see in Big Bend National Park, Santa Elena Canyon. I am scouting for National Geographic right …
A Mysterious Sinking | Lawless Oceans
[music playing] KARSTEN (VOICEOVER): I’ve asked my friend Lugs to help me take a look at the Ping Shin 101’s last journey. KARSTEN: Let’s just go through this together because there are a couple of things I need some verification on. Ready? KARSTEN (VO…
A Man of the World | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
Tell me about how did you come to dive under the North Pole. One day I’m sitting in my office so long about four o’clock, I’m bored, and the phone rings. In 1979, Gil Grosvenor was the editor of National Geographic magazine. In that job, you don’t stay bo…