yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Misconceptions About Falling Objects


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's say Jack holds both balls above his head and then he drops them at exactly the same time. What do you expect to see? Well, they're going to hit the ground at the same time. I expect them to both land at the same time. The same time, same time!

This one to hit the ground first; however, they will actually both hit the ground at the same time. Why is that? Science! Yeah, science!

Now, the black one clearly feels a lot heavier, so the standard misconception is to believe that the black ball will accelerate at a greater rate and reach the ground first. This year, many people had an idea that both balls would land at the same time, but they didn't know exactly why. I found there were some different misconceptions. For example, many people seem to think that as an object falls towards the Earth, it falls with a constant speed from this height.

Yeah, pretty much just a constant speed all the way down. Speed? Yeah, I think it'll be the same constant speed. I think it's constant. I seem to remember it being constant. I did decently in physics, and I seem to remember that's the answer.

Whereas the truth is the speed of both balls is changing all the time. The balls are speeding up as they go towards the ground. That's what the force of gravity does on them; it makes them accelerate, it gets them to speed up.

Another misconception I discovered was that some people believe both balls should have the same gravitational force on them, even though the black ball is clearly much, much heavier. The reason I think they said this was because they knew both balls needed to reach the ground at the same time, so they reasoned that the force on them must be the same.

Tell me about how the gravitational force on this ball compares to the gravitational force on that ball. The force is the same. It's going to be very similar in terms of gravitational pull. They both have the same, and they'll fall at the same rate.

I'm not like Einstein, but same gravitational force around the whole world, right? 'Cause the gravitational pull on the Earth is the same on both objects. Are you saying that the force on them is the same? The pull is the same, but you felt the pull, and you've told me the pull is different.

No, I said the weight is different. I didn't say the pull is different. It is heavier and has more gravitational pull, but when I drop them, then they get equal gravitational pull.

Somehow, don’t you think it's going to be like five times as much? Yeah, you think, but it's not the way you're asking it. Yes, but scientifically speaking, no. The gravitational force on both these balls is the same.

Okay, the gravitational force on both of these balls is the same. Is that what you actually believe? No, but it is. Tell me, tell me what you believe. I believe it should be more on this simply for the fact that this is heavier, and just intuition tells me that it should be more.

But after learning physics, we learn that it is actually the same. I actually think the force on this ball is more than the force on this. I swear I'm not trying to mess with you!

So like, in real life, in real life, and in physics, I will tell you that the force on this ball is more.

All right, ready? Three, two, one. Yep! See? Same time, same time, same time!

I would say the force on the medicine ball is like a lot more because it's got a lot more weight. It's got a lot more mass, but it's got a lot more inertia.

Yeah, yeah! Oh, you guys remember that, right? It's got a lot of resistance to acceleration, so it takes more force to get it accelerating at the same rate as this ball, and that's why they accelerate at the same rate.

Thank you guys so much for playing along. I appreciate that. Sorry, it's all right.

More Articles

View All
Equilibrium nominal interest rates in the money market | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
So we’ve spent a lot of time justifying why we have this downward sloping demand curve for money, but you’re probably asking, “Well, this is a market. What we need to think about an equilibrium point?” And to do that, we need to think about the supply of …
If You Have These 7 Traits, You’re in Your LAST Life Cycle
Narrator: Have you ever felt out of place, like you’re here but not of here? You laugh, you love, you play the part, but deep down something feels off. You watch the world rush by—careers, relationships, the endless chase—but it all feels hollow, like a g…
Jared Friedman - Advice for Hard-tech and Biotech Founders
I am Jarrod. I am one of the partners at YC, and I’m gonna talk about starting hard tech and biotech companies set of curiosity in the colonies here today. Who is starting something like a hard tech or a biotech company? Okay, a handful of folks, nice. Ex…
Cruise Ship Propulsion | Making the Disney Wish | Mini Episode 2
Our Disney Wish has a new propulsion system. This is definitely a used Azipod, which is an electric motor-driven propeller under the water. It really allows for some amazing performance. We’ve made the step from going from a conventional shaft line prope…
Building Shelter | How to Survive on Mars
When we get to Mars, we need to solve our basic needs, in particular protection from radiation. The first crew that lands on Mars will live in their ship, but you can’t live there very long. The cosmic radiation and the solar radiation is going to penetra…
McDonald v. Chicago | Civil liberties and civil rights | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today we’re learning more about McDonald vs. Chicago, a 2010 Supreme Court case challenging a handgun ban in the city of Chicago. The question at issue was whether the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process or immunities cl…