yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Zero-order reactions | Kinetics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's say we have a hypothetical reaction where reactant A turns into products. Let's say the reaction is zero order with respect to A. If it's zero order with respect to A, we can write that the rate of the reaction is equal to the rate constant k times the concentration of A to the zero power. Since any number to the zero power is equal to one, then the rate of the reaction would just be equal to the rate constant k.

We can also write that the rate of the reaction is equal to the negative change in the concentration of A over the change in time. If we set these two ways of writing the rate of reaction equal to each other and we use some calculus, including the concept of integration, we will arrive at the integrated rate law for a zero order reaction. This law states that the concentration of A at time t is equal to the negative of the rate constant k times the time plus the initial concentration of A.

Notice that the integrated rate law is in the form of y = mx + b, which is the equation for a straight line. So, if we graph the concentration of A on the y-axis and the time on the x-axis, we will get a straight line if the reaction is zero order. The slope of that line is equal to the negative of the rate constant k. Therefore, the slope is equal to negative k, and the y-intercept of that line—right where the line intersects with the y-axis—this point is the initial concentration of A.

So, everything we've talked about assumes that there's a coefficient of one in front of the concentration of A. However, let's say we have a coefficient of 2 in front of A in our balanced equation. That means we need a stoichiometric coefficient of one-half, which changes the math. Now, instead of getting negative kt, we would get negative 2kt after we integrate, which means that the slope of the line when we graph the concentration of A versus time would be equal to negative 2k.

It's important to note that textbooks often just assume the coefficient in front of A is a 1, which would give the slope as equal to negative k. However, if the coefficient in front of A is a 2, then technically the slope of the line should be equal to negative 2k.

As an example of a zero order reaction, let's look at the decomposition of ammonia on a hot platinum surface to form nitrogen gas and hydrogen gas. In our diagram, we have four ammonia molecules on the surface of our platinum catalyst, and then we have another four that are above the surface of the catalyst. Only the ammonia molecules on the surface of the catalyst can react and turn into nitrogen and hydrogen.

The ammonia molecules above the surface can't react, and even if we were to add in some more ammonia molecules—so let's just add in some more here—those molecules still can't react. Therefore, the rate of the reaction doesn't change as we increase the concentration of ammonia.

So, we can write that the rate of the reaction is equal to the rate constant k times the concentration of ammonia. But since increasing the concentration of ammonia has no effect on the rate, that's why this is equal; that's why this is raised to the zero power, resulting in the rate of the reaction being just equal to the rate constant k.

Normally, increasing the concentration of a reactant increases the rate of the reaction. However, for this reaction, since we're limited by the surface area of the catalyst, if the catalyst is covered with ammonia molecules, increasing the concentration of ammonia molecules will have no effect on the rate of the reaction. Therefore, this reaction—the decomposition of ammonia on a hot platinum surface—is an example of a zero-order reaction.

More Articles

View All
Finding an in-between frame of reference | Special relativity | Physics | Khan Academy
Let’s say I’m person A here in my ship, traveling through the universe at a constant velocity. So that is person A right over there. Let me write it a little bit bigger: person A. And let’s say that I have a friend, person B, and they are in another ship…
I Rented A Helicopter To Settle A Physics Debate
In 2014, the qualifying exam for the US Physics Team had this as question 19: A helicopter is flying horizontally at constant speed. A perfectly flexible uniform cable is suspended beneath the helicopter. Air friction on the cable is not negligible. So, w…
15 Ways to Get Your Act Together For a New Chapter
7 years from now, it’s going to be 2031, almost 2032. And if you’re coming from the future, hello! Nice to have you here. But for now though, when this video is being made, it’s 2024, and you’re either in the middle of your long-term goals, at the end of …
$25,000 vs. $25,000,000
This is what a $25 million a year salary looks like versus a $25,000 a year salary. About 20% of Americans live on this amount of money or less. I want to show you the lifestyles of people who make this much money versus this much money and everything in …
How Was Video Invented?
[Click] [High-pitched CRT TV noise] Film is a very straightforward technology. It just involves taking a two-dimensional image and focusing it onto a two-dimensional piece of film, and there you have a photo. But video, and by that, I mean moving electron…
15 Things That Scream “I’m pretending to be Upper Class”
Put your guest bag and your Gucci belt away and pay attention. All right? If you care if someone thinks you’re rich, you’re not that rich, so let’s be honest about this. Here are 15 things that scream, “I’m pretending to be upper class.” This is the third…