yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Zero-order reactions | Kinetics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's say we have a hypothetical reaction where reactant A turns into products. Let's say the reaction is zero order with respect to A. If it's zero order with respect to A, we can write that the rate of the reaction is equal to the rate constant k times the concentration of A to the zero power. Since any number to the zero power is equal to one, then the rate of the reaction would just be equal to the rate constant k.

We can also write that the rate of the reaction is equal to the negative change in the concentration of A over the change in time. If we set these two ways of writing the rate of reaction equal to each other and we use some calculus, including the concept of integration, we will arrive at the integrated rate law for a zero order reaction. This law states that the concentration of A at time t is equal to the negative of the rate constant k times the time plus the initial concentration of A.

Notice that the integrated rate law is in the form of y = mx + b, which is the equation for a straight line. So, if we graph the concentration of A on the y-axis and the time on the x-axis, we will get a straight line if the reaction is zero order. The slope of that line is equal to the negative of the rate constant k. Therefore, the slope is equal to negative k, and the y-intercept of that line—right where the line intersects with the y-axis—this point is the initial concentration of A.

So, everything we've talked about assumes that there's a coefficient of one in front of the concentration of A. However, let's say we have a coefficient of 2 in front of A in our balanced equation. That means we need a stoichiometric coefficient of one-half, which changes the math. Now, instead of getting negative kt, we would get negative 2kt after we integrate, which means that the slope of the line when we graph the concentration of A versus time would be equal to negative 2k.

It's important to note that textbooks often just assume the coefficient in front of A is a 1, which would give the slope as equal to negative k. However, if the coefficient in front of A is a 2, then technically the slope of the line should be equal to negative 2k.

As an example of a zero order reaction, let's look at the decomposition of ammonia on a hot platinum surface to form nitrogen gas and hydrogen gas. In our diagram, we have four ammonia molecules on the surface of our platinum catalyst, and then we have another four that are above the surface of the catalyst. Only the ammonia molecules on the surface of the catalyst can react and turn into nitrogen and hydrogen.

The ammonia molecules above the surface can't react, and even if we were to add in some more ammonia molecules—so let's just add in some more here—those molecules still can't react. Therefore, the rate of the reaction doesn't change as we increase the concentration of ammonia.

So, we can write that the rate of the reaction is equal to the rate constant k times the concentration of ammonia. But since increasing the concentration of ammonia has no effect on the rate, that's why this is equal; that's why this is raised to the zero power, resulting in the rate of the reaction being just equal to the rate constant k.

Normally, increasing the concentration of a reactant increases the rate of the reaction. However, for this reaction, since we're limited by the surface area of the catalyst, if the catalyst is covered with ammonia molecules, increasing the concentration of ammonia molecules will have no effect on the rate of the reaction. Therefore, this reaction—the decomposition of ammonia on a hot platinum surface—is an example of a zero-order reaction.

More Articles

View All
Alzheimer's and the Brain
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. If you have a watch or a clock nearby, take a look at its hour hand. It moves, completing a trip all the way around twice a day. Its motion is too slow to see, but try really look at it right now. Watch how far it travels in on…
How I Bought A Ford GT For $0
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So, a year ago, Kevin O’Leary reviewed my investment portfolio and told me that I should diversify, and I took that advice to heart. So, I bought a 2005 Ford GT. Now I get it, I know what you’re thinking, but let’s r…
a day full of eating in Tokyo,Japan 🍣~ spend the day with me🇯🇵
Hey fam! To welcome you to a day in my life in Tokyo. This day is full of adventures, and today I’m excited to share with you some of my favorite activities. First up, we have Ginson. The restaurant is hidden away from the street, but once you enter the r…
Revealing My ENTIRE $13 Million Investment Portfolio | 30 Years Old
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, a little over a year ago, I made a video breaking down in extreme detail every single one of my investments: how I started, how I built them up, how much money they make, and the lessons I’ve learned along the way…
Why AI Hasn’t Blown Our Minds…Yet
Hypothetically, if AI is a bust in a bunch of different ways but it works extremely well fixing customer service, that’s still massive. It’s going to change our world; massive impact. Hello, this is Dalton plus Michael and today we’re going to talk about…
How the Economic Machine Works: Part 1
How the economic machine works in 30 minutes. The economy works like a simple machine, but many people don’t understand it, or they don’t agree on how it works, and this has led to a lot of needless economic suffering. I feel a deep sense of responsibili…