yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Converting a complex number from polar to rectangular form | Precalculus | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told to consider the complex number ( z ), which is equal to the square root of 17 times cosine of 346 degrees plus ( i ) sine of 346 degrees. They ask us to plot ( z ) in the complex plane below. If necessary, round the point coordinates to the nearest integer.

So I encourage you to pause this video and at least think about where we would likely plot this complex number.

All right, now let's work through it together. When you look at it like this, you can see that what's being attempted is a conversion from polar form to rectangular form. If we're thinking about polar form, we can think about the angle of this complex number, which is clearly 346 degrees.

346 degrees would be about... would be about 14 degrees short of a full circle, so it would get us probably something around there. We also see what the magnitude or the modulus of the complex number is right over here: square root of 17.

Square root of 17 is a little bit more than 4 because 4 squared is 16. So if we go in this direction, let's see... that's going to be about 1, 2, 3, 4. We're going to go right about there.

So if I were to just guess where this is going to put us, it's going to put us right around here—right around ( 4 - i ). But let's actually get a calculator out and see if this evaluates to roughly ( 4 - i ).

So for the real part, let's go 346 degrees, and we're going to take the cosine of it, and then we're going to multiply that times the square root of 17. So times 17 square root... a little over four, which is equal to that; actually, yes, the real part does look almost exactly four, especially if we are rounding to the nearest integer; it's a little bit more than four.

Now let's do the imaginary part. So we have 346 degrees, and we're going to take the sine of it, and we're going to multiply that times the square root of 17 times 17 square root... which is equal to... yup, if we were to round to the nearest integer, it's about negative 1.

So we get to this point right over here, which is approximately ( 4 - i ), and we are done.

More Articles

View All
Affirmative action | Civil liberties and civil rights | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is discuss affirmative action, and it can be a sensitive topic. So, I encourage folks to engage on the message boards, but to do so respectfully. So the first question is: what is affirmative action? Generally speakin…
DO THIS To Turn $30,000 Into $3,000,000! | Kevin O'Leary & Sam Sheffer
[Music] Hey everybody, Mr. Wonderful here with another episode of Ask Mr. Wonderful. You know I gotta be honest with you, it’s my favorite show! I love it because it’s your questions that make it happen. And today we’re gonna take a little drive down a te…
Examples establishing conditions for MVT
This table gives us a few values of the function g, so we know what g of x is equal to at these values right over here: x is equal to negative 2, negative 1, 0, and 1. It says Raphael said that since g of 1 minus g of 0 over 1 minus 0 is equal to negative…
A Serious Warning To All Investors
What’s up guys, it’s Grahe here. So I had another video that was scheduled to post today, but given the rather abrupt and dramatic selloff throughout everything, including the official start of an S&P 500 bear market, I felt like it would be more appr…
Jeff Bezos In 1999 On Amazon's Plans Before The Dotcom Crash
It doesn’t matter to me whether we’re a pure internet play. What matters to me is do we provide the best customer service. Internet Shminternet. Given the decades of wisdom that has built up in the business world investors, it sounds like you’re saying yo…
Thought Experiments No One Can Solve
What if I told you that you died last night in your sleep and that your body and mind have been replaced by an exact replica of you, a clone who has all the same characteristics and memories that you had? Impossible, you’d probably reply. But can you prov…