yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Converting a complex number from polar to rectangular form | Precalculus | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told to consider the complex number ( z ), which is equal to the square root of 17 times cosine of 346 degrees plus ( i ) sine of 346 degrees. They ask us to plot ( z ) in the complex plane below. If necessary, round the point coordinates to the nearest integer.

So I encourage you to pause this video and at least think about where we would likely plot this complex number.

All right, now let's work through it together. When you look at it like this, you can see that what's being attempted is a conversion from polar form to rectangular form. If we're thinking about polar form, we can think about the angle of this complex number, which is clearly 346 degrees.

346 degrees would be about... would be about 14 degrees short of a full circle, so it would get us probably something around there. We also see what the magnitude or the modulus of the complex number is right over here: square root of 17.

Square root of 17 is a little bit more than 4 because 4 squared is 16. So if we go in this direction, let's see... that's going to be about 1, 2, 3, 4. We're going to go right about there.

So if I were to just guess where this is going to put us, it's going to put us right around here—right around ( 4 - i ). But let's actually get a calculator out and see if this evaluates to roughly ( 4 - i ).

So for the real part, let's go 346 degrees, and we're going to take the cosine of it, and then we're going to multiply that times the square root of 17. So times 17 square root... a little over four, which is equal to that; actually, yes, the real part does look almost exactly four, especially if we are rounding to the nearest integer; it's a little bit more than four.

Now let's do the imaginary part. So we have 346 degrees, and we're going to take the sine of it, and we're going to multiply that times the square root of 17 times 17 square root... which is equal to... yup, if we were to round to the nearest integer, it's about negative 1.

So we get to this point right over here, which is approximately ( 4 - i ), and we are done.

More Articles

View All
Introduction to vector components | Vectors | Precalculus | Khan Academy
In other videos, we have talked about how a vector can be completely defined by a magnitude and a direction. You need both. Here we have done that; we have said that the magnitude of vector A is equal to three units. These parallel lines here on both side…
Calculations using Avogadro's number (part 2) | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s solve a few numerical on Avogadro number and moles. Here’s the first one: how many glucose molecules are in 2.37 moles of glucose? Let’s quickly remind ourselves what moles are. Moles are like dozens. Just like how one dozen equals 12, a mole repre…
AP Microeconomics FRQ on perfect competition | AP(R) Microeconomics | Khan Academy
Is a type of question that you might see on an AP economics exam, and it’s talking about perfectly competitive markets. So it says a typical profit maximizing firm in a perfectly competitive constant cost industry is earning a positive economic profit. S…
The True Cost Of "Success"
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So chances are, if you’re watching this video right now, I have a feeling you’re probably more ambitious than most. You probably set pretty high standards for yourself, and you’re willing to do whatever it takes to ge…
Free energy of formation | Applications of thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
[Instructor] Free energy is symbolized by G. And the change in free energy is delta G. When there’s a subscript of F, this is talking about the change in the free energy of formation, which refers to the change in the free energy for the formation of one …
Worked free response question on unemployment | APⓇ Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
We are told the following table shows labor market data for country X, and they tell us how many are employed, frictionally unemployed, structurally unemployed, cyclically unemployed, and also not in the labor force. So this first question here, and actu…