yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Converting a complex number from polar to rectangular form | Precalculus | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told to consider the complex number ( z ), which is equal to the square root of 17 times cosine of 346 degrees plus ( i ) sine of 346 degrees. They ask us to plot ( z ) in the complex plane below. If necessary, round the point coordinates to the nearest integer.

So I encourage you to pause this video and at least think about where we would likely plot this complex number.

All right, now let's work through it together. When you look at it like this, you can see that what's being attempted is a conversion from polar form to rectangular form. If we're thinking about polar form, we can think about the angle of this complex number, which is clearly 346 degrees.

346 degrees would be about... would be about 14 degrees short of a full circle, so it would get us probably something around there. We also see what the magnitude or the modulus of the complex number is right over here: square root of 17.

Square root of 17 is a little bit more than 4 because 4 squared is 16. So if we go in this direction, let's see... that's going to be about 1, 2, 3, 4. We're going to go right about there.

So if I were to just guess where this is going to put us, it's going to put us right around here—right around ( 4 - i ). But let's actually get a calculator out and see if this evaluates to roughly ( 4 - i ).

So for the real part, let's go 346 degrees, and we're going to take the cosine of it, and then we're going to multiply that times the square root of 17. So times 17 square root... a little over four, which is equal to that; actually, yes, the real part does look almost exactly four, especially if we are rounding to the nearest integer; it's a little bit more than four.

Now let's do the imaginary part. So we have 346 degrees, and we're going to take the sine of it, and we're going to multiply that times the square root of 17 times 17 square root... which is equal to... yup, if we were to round to the nearest integer, it's about negative 1.

So we get to this point right over here, which is approximately ( 4 - i ), and we are done.

More Articles

View All
Discovering Gravitational Waves | StarTalk
[Music] 30 million years ago, in a distant galaxy, 30 million light years away, two black holes collided. Each black hole is itself a significant disturbance in the fabric of space and time. When they collide, it creates an even greater ripple that gets …
Le Châtelier's principle | Reaction rates and equilibrium | High school chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s imagine a reaction that is in equilibrium: A plus B can react to form C plus D, or you could go the other way around. C plus D could react to form A plus B. We assume that they’ve all been hanging around long enough for this to be in equilibrium, so…
Marcus Aurelius - How to Stay Calm in Uncertain Times
When life feels out of control, it’s important to know how to stay calm, and in his Meditations, Marcus Aurelius, the last of the five good emperors of Rome, offers us several insights on how to do this. By practicing the following five virtues, you’ll be…
How Many Stocks Should Be In Your Portfolio? (Buffett, Lynch, Pabrai Explain)
We think diversification is a practice that generally makes very little sense for anyone that knows what they’re doing. Uh, diversification is a protection against ignorance. [Music] This video is sponsored by Hypercharts. Sign up to Hypercharts using the…
Cell specialization | Genes, cells, and organisms | High school biology | Khan Academy
Ah, the basic building blocks of all living things: cells. These incredible packages of organelles and subcellular components carry out a variety of functions in the body, like taking in nutrients, converting them into energy, and working with other cells…
Definite integral of rational function | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we want to evaluate the definite integral from -1 to 2 from 1 to -2 of 16 - x³ over x³ dx. Now, at first, this might seem daunting. I have this rational expression; I have x’s in the numerator and x’s in the denominator, but we just have to remember w…