yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Dividing a decimal by a whole number example


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's see if we can compute what 1.86 divided by 2 is. And like always, pause this video and have a go at it. I'll give you a hint: see if you can think about 1.86 as a certain number of hundredths, and then divide that by 2.

All right, now let's work through it together. So, as promised, let's see if we can think of 1.86 as a certain number of hundredths. If we go to the hundredths place, we only see six there, but we could view eight tenths as 80 hundredths. So, you could view the 0.86 as 86 hundredths, and each one is a hundred hundredths. So, we really have 186 hundredths.

This number right over here, I'm going to rewrite as 186 hundredths, and that is what we need to divide by 2. Now, if you're dividing 186 of something by 2, well, it's just going to be 186 divided by 2 of that something. So we could rewrite this as 186 divided by 2, and then that's the number of hundredths this is going to be. So I'll put that in parentheses: so it's going to be that many hundredths—100.

All right, so what is 186 divided by 2? Some of you might be able to do it in your head; some of you might want to use some paper. The way I like to think about it is if I were to take the six ones and divide it by 2, well, that's going to be three ones. And then if I were to take the 18 tens and divide it by 2, that's going to be nine tens. So that gets us to 93.

Now, you could have also thought about it like this: you could have said how many times does 2 go into 186? Let's see, it doesn't go into 1. How many times is it going into 18? 9 times. 9 times 2 is 18; we could subtract, and then you have 0. You bring down that 6, and 2 goes into 6 three times. 3 times 2 is 6; you subtract, and you get no remainder. So either way, you're going to get 93.

And it's 93 what? What's 93 hundredths is what we're talking about—93 hundredths. And now we just want to express 93 hundredths as a decimal. Well, how do we do that? Well, that's going to be zero point. The 90 hundredths is the same thing as nine tenths, and then the three hundredths is, of course, three hundredths—three in the hundredths place. So it's 0.93.

And so we could write it up here: this is going to be equal to 0.93, and we're done.

More Articles

View All
How to Get Started, Doing Things that Don't Scale, and Press (How to Start a Startup 2014: 8)
Thanks for having me, Sam! I’m Stanley, I’m the founder of DoorDash, and it’s really amazing to be here because it wasn’t naturally that long ago where I sat in your seats. I was class of 2014, graduated in CS, as well as my co-founder, Andy. For
Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables. How many trial…
Help Khan Academy Double Down On Our Efforts
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy, and I just wanted to remind you that if you’re in the position to do so, to think about making a donation to Khan Academy. We are a not-for-profit organization, and we can only exist through donations from fol…
Mosquito Protection Plan | Live Free or Die
[Music] I try to use insect repellants that are natural, so my number one ingredient is hogard. Next is genuine old-fashioned turpentine. That, my friends, is insect repellent. There’s a couple other things I might mix in with it, but that’s a secret. So…
Defining appropriate quantities for modeling | Working with units | Algebra I | Khan Academy
So I have data here on two different websites, Website A and Website B. My question to you is which one is more productive? Some of you might be asking yourself what does it mean to be productive? At a very high level, you could view productivity as how e…
Turbulent Flow is MORE Awesome Than Laminar Flow
A portion of this video was sponsored by Cottonelle. This is like a scientist trap. It certainly is; case in point, that is Space Station commander Chris Hadfield. What this isn’t is turbulent. Nope, this is largely laminar flow. “Did somebody say peculia…