yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Scaling perimeter and area example 2 | Transformational geometry | Grade 8 (TX) | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told quadrilateral A was dilated by a scale factor of 2/3 to create quadrilateral B. Complete the missing measurements in the table below. So like always, pause this video and then we will do this together. Try to do it yourself, and then we'll do it together.

All right, so in previous videos, we talked about if you have a scale factor, perimeter is going to be scaled by the same amount, while area is going to be scaled by the square of that. So perimeter is also going to be scaled by 2/3. So 30 * 2/3… let me write that a little bit neater. So times 2/3 is going to be 20.

Then the 54 is going to be scaled by (2/3) squared. One way to think about it is, you're scaling in each dimension by 2/3, and so when you multiply the two dimensions to get area, you're going to be multiplying by 2/3 twice to get the new scaled area. So what is (2/3) squared? Well, that is the same thing as 4/9. So what is 54 * (4/9)?

That is equal to 54 * (4 over 9). Both 54 and 9 are divisible by 9, so let's divide them both by 9. This becomes 6, and this becomes 1. So we end up with 6 * 4, which is equal to 24, and we're done.

Now to make this very tangible in your head, let's give an example of where this could actually happen. Let's imagine that quadrilateral A, let's say it looked like this, and I think I can eyeball it. Let's say that that dimension is 6, and that dimension is 9. I think that adds up: 6 plus 6 is 12, and 9 plus 9 is 18. So yes, this perimeter is 30, and the area here is actually 54.

So this is actually the example of quadrilateral A over here. And now quadrilateral B, if we're scaling it by 2/3, then all of these dimensions are going to be scaled by 2/3. So quadrilateral B will, instead of having a length of—or height of—6 over here, it's going to have a height of 4, and instead of having a length or width of 9 here, it's going to be 2/3 of that. It's going to be 6.

So the quadrilateral will look like this, and we can verify that the perimeter now is going to be 4 plus 4, which is 8, plus 6, plus 6, which is 12. So it's 8 plus 12, which is 20, and the new area is 6 * 4, which is 24. Now, you didn't have to do this, but I just wanted to make sure you understood why this was happening.

More Articles

View All
A Physics Prof Bet Me $10,000 I'm Wrong
I am here to sign a document betting $10,000 that my last video is, in fact, correct. This is the video in question. Some people may have missed it, but in this car, there is no motor, no batteries, no energy source, besides the wind itself. And the count…
Top 5 WTF "Dances" in Video Games: V-LIST #5
Hey B saucers, how you doing? Michael here. First things first, did you see the story about Xbox banning a guy for having offensive language in his profile, only to learn later that he actually did live in Fort Gay, West Virginia? Well, you can read more …
This 18th Century Gold Rush Changed How the World Pans for Gold | National Geographic
Gold is the most powerful metal on earth, and Russia is one of the world’s leading suppliers of it. It all began in 1745 when a peasant named Tiara Fade Markov, while looking for crystal, found something else: a tiny gold speck inside a piece of quartz. H…
Steve Jobs Was the "Toughest Bastard" I Ever Met | Kevin O'Leary
Welcome back to segment 3 with Kevin Oli. All right, two words: Steve Jobs. Um, the toughest bastard you’ve ever met. He is tough. He was, you know, I went to his, uh, I called him up. Um, I said to him, “Listen, Steve, you have 2 and a half% of the marke…
Gamestop Stock CRASHES! But Who Won the Battle?
Well folks, what an amazing ride it has been! But it seems as though the Gamestop saga is finally drawing to a close. So in this video, what we’re going to be looking at is who were the winners and who were the losers out of this whole ordeal that saw Gam…
Interpreting y-intercept in regression model | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Adriana gathered data on different schools’ winning percentages and the average yearly salary of their head coaches in millions of dollars in the years 2000 to 2011. She then created the following scatter plot and trend line. So this is salary in million…