yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Scaling perimeter and area example 2 | Transformational geometry | Grade 8 (TX) | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told quadrilateral A was dilated by a scale factor of 2/3 to create quadrilateral B. Complete the missing measurements in the table below. So like always, pause this video and then we will do this together. Try to do it yourself, and then we'll do it together.

All right, so in previous videos, we talked about if you have a scale factor, perimeter is going to be scaled by the same amount, while area is going to be scaled by the square of that. So perimeter is also going to be scaled by 2/3. So 30 * 2/3… let me write that a little bit neater. So times 2/3 is going to be 20.

Then the 54 is going to be scaled by (2/3) squared. One way to think about it is, you're scaling in each dimension by 2/3, and so when you multiply the two dimensions to get area, you're going to be multiplying by 2/3 twice to get the new scaled area. So what is (2/3) squared? Well, that is the same thing as 4/9. So what is 54 * (4/9)?

That is equal to 54 * (4 over 9). Both 54 and 9 are divisible by 9, so let's divide them both by 9. This becomes 6, and this becomes 1. So we end up with 6 * 4, which is equal to 24, and we're done.

Now to make this very tangible in your head, let's give an example of where this could actually happen. Let's imagine that quadrilateral A, let's say it looked like this, and I think I can eyeball it. Let's say that that dimension is 6, and that dimension is 9. I think that adds up: 6 plus 6 is 12, and 9 plus 9 is 18. So yes, this perimeter is 30, and the area here is actually 54.

So this is actually the example of quadrilateral A over here. And now quadrilateral B, if we're scaling it by 2/3, then all of these dimensions are going to be scaled by 2/3. So quadrilateral B will, instead of having a length of—or height of—6 over here, it's going to have a height of 4, and instead of having a length or width of 9 here, it's going to be 2/3 of that. It's going to be 6.

So the quadrilateral will look like this, and we can verify that the perimeter now is going to be 4 plus 4, which is 8, plus 6, plus 6, which is 12. So it's 8 plus 12, which is 20, and the new area is 6 * 4, which is 24. Now, you didn't have to do this, but I just wanted to make sure you understood why this was happening.

More Articles

View All
Moon 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] Over 150 moons orbit the solar system’s planets. And one of those moons calls Earth home. The moon was formed about 4.5 billion years ago when, according to one theory, the Earth slammed into another early planet. Debris from this collision beg…
The Entire History of Humanity In 10 Minutes
From sharing the Earth with many other human species merely as hunter-gatherers trying to brave the elements, to building rockets, creating the internet, and now with our eyes set on Mars, the history of humanity is one that is sealed with determination, …
7 Best Questions Asked at Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting
Why are you recommending listeners to buy now yet you’re not comfortable buying now as evidenced by your huge cash position? Well hey, as I just explained, the position isn’t that huge. When I look at worst-case possibilities, I would say that there are …
The Rich Culture of Nelson Tasman | National Geographic
New Zealand’s Nelson Tasman region is the home of sunny beaches, outrageous landscapes and Nelson, a small city that boasts a thriving art scene, craft breweries and wineries, and a farmer’s market famed for its local specialties. National Geographic sent…
A Conversation with Ooshma Garg - Moderated by Adora Cheung
Thank you for coming today. My name is Dora; I’m one of the partners here at Y Combinator. Today we’re going to have a conversation with Oozma Magog, who is the CEO and founder of Gobble, which creates and delivers 15-minute pan dinners to you. I am perso…
YC Founders Made These Fundraising Mistakes
If you look at why the Google founders are the Google founders and still have all this control over their company, you can look all the way back in time to the moment of the earliest fundraisers. They were not desperate for cash and load leveraged. Hey, …