yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

There is no axiomatic proof of property rights


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Uh, to avoid confusion, I'll preface this by saying that, um, I'm personally strongly in favor of property rights and their enforcement. So if you're new to my channel, please bear that in mind.

Uh, Stefan Molyneux made a video a while back attempting to offer an axiomatic proof of the existence of property rights. Recently, I made a video where I explained why the phrase "property is theft" is an example of the stolen concept fallacy. A couple of comments made to that video referenced Stefan Molyneux's arguments that a denial of property rights is, in his words, a self-detonating claim.

So the idea is that there is a performative inconsistency involved in expressing the claim "property rights don't exist." Um, so in Molyneux's video, a proof of property rights, Stefan lays out the steps involved in his argument. At one point, uh, he considers the claim "self-ownership is invalid," and his argument depends on rejecting this claim.

So he rejects the claim for the following reason. Um, talking about the person making a claim, he says he is exercising control over his own body to argue that it is impossible to exercise control over his body.

Now, this is a very, there's a very peculiar assumption behind this. Um, for that phrase to be a fair unpacking of the claim "self-ownership is invalid," we need to be defining legitimate ownership of thing X as the ability to exercise control over thing X. Um, and this is a very unusual way of defining property.

Nowhere that I've seen in libertarian writing, or in any other writing for that matter, have I seen property defined this way. If we were to define property in this way, it would have implications that I don't think Molyneux would accept. It would mean, for instance, that if a torturer, um, was able to induce a particular kind of movement in the arm of his victim, it would mean that the torturer was the legitimate owner of the arm.

After all, he would be controlling the arm. It would also mean that if a state official were to seize your laptop and look through your files against your will, then the official would be the legitimate owner of the laptop, uh, since he would be exercising control over it, while you, who had bought the laptop, were not. And the list goes on.

So the definition of property that Molyneux is implicitly depending on, or maybe even explicitly depending on, uh, makes no distinction between legitimate ownership and possession, which is a big blunder in my view. So I think Molyneux fails to demonstrate that the claim property rights exist is a claim that is schematically true. Uh, there's no performative inconsistency involved in the denial of property rights.

More Articles

View All
Why it's so hard to be happy
A long time ago, humanity rose to become the dominant species on planet Earth. And we were able to do this because of one specific trait. It certainly wasn’t our physical prowess, pretty much any animal the same size as us would absolutely destroy us in a…
Shana Fisher at Startup School NY 2014
Hello. I’m Kat Manalac, and I am a partner at Y Combinator. I’m excited to see you all here today, and I’m also excited to introduce you to Shana Fisher. Shana is the founder and managing partner of High Line Venture Partners, which is based here in New Y…
Area between curves | Applications of definite integrals | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We have already covered the notion of area between a curve and the x-axis using a definite integral. We are now going to then extend this to think about the area between curves. So let’s say we care about the region from x equals a to x equal…
Creativity break: How are math and creativity changing the world? | Algebra 1 | Khan Academy
[Music] The math underpins everything in our universe, so it impacts every corner of our society. But over the past decade, in particular, the advances in computer technology and the introduction of machine learning and artificial intelligence has been ma…
Lagrange multiplier example, part 1
So let’s say you’re running some kind of company, and you guys produce widgets. You produce some little trinket that people enjoy buying. The main costs that you have are labor—you know, the workers that you have creating these—and steel. Let’s just say …
How Much Money You Should SPEND (By EVERY AGE)
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here! So, about a month ago, I made a video going over exactly how much money you should have saved up by every age and each milestone you should aim to hit by every decade. In that video, quite a few of you were very hap…