yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

There is no axiomatic proof of property rights


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Uh, to avoid confusion, I'll preface this by saying that, um, I'm personally strongly in favor of property rights and their enforcement. So if you're new to my channel, please bear that in mind.

Uh, Stefan Molyneux made a video a while back attempting to offer an axiomatic proof of the existence of property rights. Recently, I made a video where I explained why the phrase "property is theft" is an example of the stolen concept fallacy. A couple of comments made to that video referenced Stefan Molyneux's arguments that a denial of property rights is, in his words, a self-detonating claim.

So the idea is that there is a performative inconsistency involved in expressing the claim "property rights don't exist." Um, so in Molyneux's video, a proof of property rights, Stefan lays out the steps involved in his argument. At one point, uh, he considers the claim "self-ownership is invalid," and his argument depends on rejecting this claim.

So he rejects the claim for the following reason. Um, talking about the person making a claim, he says he is exercising control over his own body to argue that it is impossible to exercise control over his body.

Now, this is a very, there's a very peculiar assumption behind this. Um, for that phrase to be a fair unpacking of the claim "self-ownership is invalid," we need to be defining legitimate ownership of thing X as the ability to exercise control over thing X. Um, and this is a very unusual way of defining property.

Nowhere that I've seen in libertarian writing, or in any other writing for that matter, have I seen property defined this way. If we were to define property in this way, it would have implications that I don't think Molyneux would accept. It would mean, for instance, that if a torturer, um, was able to induce a particular kind of movement in the arm of his victim, it would mean that the torturer was the legitimate owner of the arm.

After all, he would be controlling the arm. It would also mean that if a state official were to seize your laptop and look through your files against your will, then the official would be the legitimate owner of the laptop, uh, since he would be exercising control over it, while you, who had bought the laptop, were not. And the list goes on.

So the definition of property that Molyneux is implicitly depending on, or maybe even explicitly depending on, uh, makes no distinction between legitimate ownership and possession, which is a big blunder in my view. So I think Molyneux fails to demonstrate that the claim property rights exist is a claim that is schematically true. Uh, there's no performative inconsistency involved in the denial of property rights.

More Articles

View All
S&P 500 short. A present for the holidays
So no one actually knows this. It’s a big mystery as to how much money did stock investors actually make. If no one knows how much money stocks have actually returned, why do people think that it’s actually given investors back something positive? There’s…
These Rare Giraffes Were Killed Just for Their Tails (Exclusive Video) | National Geographic
[Music] Seeing these giraffes from the air was really exciting. Seeing them anywhere is exciting, ‘cause there’s so few of them left. But this was my first shot, and there’s a giraffe standing in this small clearing by a small tree. And then the next thin…
The Deadliest Being on Planet Earth – The Bacteriophage
[Music] A war has been raging for billions of years, killing trillions every single day, while we don’t even notice. The war is fought by the single deadliest entity on our planet: the bacteriophage or ‘phage’ for short. [Intro + Music] A phage is a virus…
Naming ionic compound with polyvalent ion | Atoms, compounds, and ions | Chemistry | Khan Academy
So we have the formula for an ionic compound here, and the goal of this video is: what do we call this thing? It clearly involves some cobalt and some sulfur, but how would we name it? Well, the convention is that the first element to be listed is going …
The Largest Star in the Universe – Size Comparison
What is the largest star in the universe and why is it that large? And what are stars anyway? Things That Would Like To Be Stars We begin our journey with Earth. Not to learn anything, just to get a vague sense of scale. The smallest things that have so…
Suhail Doshi - How to Measure Your Product
We are very grateful to have Suhail from Mixpanel, who co-founded Mixpanel almost 10 years ago now and is going to talk about how to measure your product, which, as you heard from Gustav, is really the other side of the coin of growth and everything that …