yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

There is no axiomatic proof of property rights


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Uh, to avoid confusion, I'll preface this by saying that, um, I'm personally strongly in favor of property rights and their enforcement. So if you're new to my channel, please bear that in mind.

Uh, Stefan Molyneux made a video a while back attempting to offer an axiomatic proof of the existence of property rights. Recently, I made a video where I explained why the phrase "property is theft" is an example of the stolen concept fallacy. A couple of comments made to that video referenced Stefan Molyneux's arguments that a denial of property rights is, in his words, a self-detonating claim.

So the idea is that there is a performative inconsistency involved in expressing the claim "property rights don't exist." Um, so in Molyneux's video, a proof of property rights, Stefan lays out the steps involved in his argument. At one point, uh, he considers the claim "self-ownership is invalid," and his argument depends on rejecting this claim.

So he rejects the claim for the following reason. Um, talking about the person making a claim, he says he is exercising control over his own body to argue that it is impossible to exercise control over his body.

Now, this is a very, there's a very peculiar assumption behind this. Um, for that phrase to be a fair unpacking of the claim "self-ownership is invalid," we need to be defining legitimate ownership of thing X as the ability to exercise control over thing X. Um, and this is a very unusual way of defining property.

Nowhere that I've seen in libertarian writing, or in any other writing for that matter, have I seen property defined this way. If we were to define property in this way, it would have implications that I don't think Molyneux would accept. It would mean, for instance, that if a torturer, um, was able to induce a particular kind of movement in the arm of his victim, it would mean that the torturer was the legitimate owner of the arm.

After all, he would be controlling the arm. It would also mean that if a state official were to seize your laptop and look through your files against your will, then the official would be the legitimate owner of the laptop, uh, since he would be exercising control over it, while you, who had bought the laptop, were not. And the list goes on.

So the definition of property that Molyneux is implicitly depending on, or maybe even explicitly depending on, uh, makes no distinction between legitimate ownership and possession, which is a big blunder in my view. So I think Molyneux fails to demonstrate that the claim property rights exist is a claim that is schematically true. Uh, there's no performative inconsistency involved in the denial of property rights.

More Articles

View All
15 Secrets Only Billionaires Know
As of 2023, there are 3,112 billionaires in the world. The billionaire perspective on life is quite different from anything you’ve ever experienced, and it’ll definitely go against many of the things you believe. Here are 15 secrets only billionaires know…
Power dissipation in resistors in series versus in parallel
A student builds a circuit with a battery and two light bulbs in series. Then the student builds a second circuit with two light bulbs in parallel. Which battery runs out of power first? Assume all bulbs have equal resistance. Assume both batteries have …
Using similarity to estimate ratio between side lengths | High school geometry | Khan Academy
So we’ve been given some information about these three triangles here, and then they say use one of the triangles. So use one of these three triangles to approximate the ratio. The ratio is the length of segment PN divided by the length of segment MN. S…
Wolves vs. Bison: On Location | Hostile Planet
The stars of “Hostile Planet” are obviously the animals. But the unsung heroes are the crew that work so hard to bring you that footage. [wolves howling] PETE MCGOWAN: So my name’s Pete McGowan. I’m here in the Canadian Arctic, trying to film wolves hun…
Is the European Union Worth It Or Should We End It?
Do you think the European Union is worth it? Or should we end it? Many people feel a strong disconnect with the EU, while others praise its achievements. Everything considered: Is its existence good or bad for Europeans? Since it looks like the UK is leav…
15 Things That Make Life Worth Living
Nobody can buy a home these days. The rich keep getting richer and the poor poorer. World War Three is buffering on the horizon while the ice caps are melting, and everyone you ask tells you how they just want to get through this week because they’re hold…