yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

There is no axiomatic proof of property rights


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Uh, to avoid confusion, I'll preface this by saying that, um, I'm personally strongly in favor of property rights and their enforcement. So if you're new to my channel, please bear that in mind.

Uh, Stefan Molyneux made a video a while back attempting to offer an axiomatic proof of the existence of property rights. Recently, I made a video where I explained why the phrase "property is theft" is an example of the stolen concept fallacy. A couple of comments made to that video referenced Stefan Molyneux's arguments that a denial of property rights is, in his words, a self-detonating claim.

So the idea is that there is a performative inconsistency involved in expressing the claim "property rights don't exist." Um, so in Molyneux's video, a proof of property rights, Stefan lays out the steps involved in his argument. At one point, uh, he considers the claim "self-ownership is invalid," and his argument depends on rejecting this claim.

So he rejects the claim for the following reason. Um, talking about the person making a claim, he says he is exercising control over his own body to argue that it is impossible to exercise control over his body.

Now, this is a very, there's a very peculiar assumption behind this. Um, for that phrase to be a fair unpacking of the claim "self-ownership is invalid," we need to be defining legitimate ownership of thing X as the ability to exercise control over thing X. Um, and this is a very unusual way of defining property.

Nowhere that I've seen in libertarian writing, or in any other writing for that matter, have I seen property defined this way. If we were to define property in this way, it would have implications that I don't think Molyneux would accept. It would mean, for instance, that if a torturer, um, was able to induce a particular kind of movement in the arm of his victim, it would mean that the torturer was the legitimate owner of the arm.

After all, he would be controlling the arm. It would also mean that if a state official were to seize your laptop and look through your files against your will, then the official would be the legitimate owner of the laptop, uh, since he would be exercising control over it, while you, who had bought the laptop, were not. And the list goes on.

So the definition of property that Molyneux is implicitly depending on, or maybe even explicitly depending on, uh, makes no distinction between legitimate ownership and possession, which is a big blunder in my view. So I think Molyneux fails to demonstrate that the claim property rights exist is a claim that is schematically true. Uh, there's no performative inconsistency involved in the denial of property rights.

More Articles

View All
Using matrices to represent data: Networks | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
We’re told this network diagram represents the different train routes between three cities. Each node is a city, and each directed arrow represents a direct bus route from city to city. So, for example, this arrow right over here, I guess, would represent…
The Technical Challenges of Measuring Gravitational Waves - Rana Adhikari of LIGO
So maybe, yeah, maybe we should just start out explaining like what is LIGO. LIGO is a huge project aimed at being able to take the bending of space that we think is happening all the time and turn it into some kind of signal that we can use and measure. …
Studying the Dry Valleys of Antarctica | Continent 7: Antarctica
[Music] These systems are very unique, and as things change climate-wise, they’re going to change and could change irreversibly. The Dry Valleys are very similar to Mars’ environment. I mean, it’s incredible. All of the microbial life on the continent has…
Close Call: Flipping Iceberg Nearly Crushes Explorers | Expedition Raw
Icebergs can be some of the most beautiful things in the world, but they can also be very dangerous. One of our team members, with a lot of experience in polar regions, tells me that there is an iceberg that looks pretty stable, so we should go and dive t…
The 2023 Recession Just Started | DO THIS NOW
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So, as it turns out, we might very well be seeing the beginnings of a 2023 bear market. In fact, the slowing inflation was just reported: more than a third of small businesses couldn’t afford to pay all of the rent in Oc…
Physics Nobel Prize 2011 - Brian Schmidt
[Applause] There are few things in the world that seem more constant than the stars in the night sky. If you look up at the Milky Way, you will see the same thing that people have looked at for thousands and thousands of years. But as Professor Schmidt fo…