yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

THIS is what it will cost to fight Climate Change


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

But I know you. You focus on the big picture, what's practical. So when you look at what it's going to take globally to fight climate change in terms of who has the money, what their motivations are, and what exactly it's going to take to unlock those funds to put those funds to use, what are the answers to those questions?

I'm glad you're asking me because that's the question about being practical. It's going to cost between five and ten trillion dollars a year, whether you spend money on it or whether it's its consequences because you don't spend money on it.

So who's got the money is the big question, and how do you practically do it? Right now, we're spending about one sixth of that. That is on mitigation. By mitigation, I mean trying to find alternative energy sources, making sure temperatures don't rise by 1.5 degrees Celsius—those things that mean that climate change doesn't happen.

And then you go to, if it does happen, adaptation. It's going to cost money to adapt, to build the air conditioning and the water to deal with the high sea levels. And then there's number three: the damages.

So this, any way you cut it, is going to be a lot of money. The problem is that it's not economic. You have to start off by looking at who has the money, where you're going to get the money from.

If you look at that, by and large, I won't take all the time to break it down, it has to be economic to produce a profit. The largest source of money is institutional investor money—about $200 trillion dollars. Only about 3% of that money goes into this issue, and so, as a result, when I say institutional money, I mean pension funds, endowments, foundations, and sovereign wealth funds that have to take care of the population.

So think about it as retirement people. The issue is how do you make it economic to get money into that? And that's where the real impediment is.

More Articles

View All
Mind Reading
Mind reading? Of course not. I love reading. Look, mind reading might sound like pseudoscientific—pardon my language—bullshoot. But its scientific counterpart, thought identification, is very much a real thing. It’s based in neuroimaging and machine learn…
Unraveling a Mapmaker’s Dangerous Decision | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
So I told them that they didn’t have a chance, and for the sake of their wives and children, they should vacate the area and go back. Both of them sunk, and at that time I heard the cocking of weapons. Once both of them cocked their weapons, I knew they m…
DISTORTIONS
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. I am distorted. The pixels you are watching have been time displaced. They’ve been mapped onto a gradient, and the darker the region they’re mapped to, the further behind they lag. The effect is really fun, but it’s certainly no…
Squishy Robot Fingers: A Breakthrough for Underwater Science | National Geographic
We’re in the northern part of the Red Sea, and the reason we’re here is we’re trying to test out our squishy robot fingers for the first time in a reef. So we tested these squishy fingers in a swimming pool, and now we wanted to put them to the true test…
Is This Literally The Best Investing Strategy that Exists?
We’re now almost halfway through 2023, and while we’ve seen inflation cool in recent times, there’s no doubt we’re still battling with high interest rates, which ultimately put the brakes on the economy and slow business. While this kind of environment is…
When to use z or t statistics in significance tests | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What I want to do in this video is give a primer on thinking about when to use a z statistic versus a t statistic when we are doing significance tests. So, there’s two major scenarios that we will see in an introductory statistics class. One is when we a…