yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

E.O. Wilson: Synthetic Biology Will Radically Change the World | Big Think.


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I like to think that ultimate biology, ultimate biology is going to emerge within the next several decades and it's going to be in three domains. One has already begun. And that is the creation of artificial life. And scientists have just very recently put together, from chemicals off the shelf, a genome that is of the entire DNA of a bacterium, inserted it into a bacterial shell and created a functioning reproducing bacterium that way; chemicals off the shelf; a very simple organism.

Now this is momentous because it means that as we develop this technology, we're going to eventually be able to produce multicellular organisms and new kinds of species. We'll have that capacity and it's going to raise all kinds of questions, certainly opportunities. And among the opportunities that it will present, if we don't let the excesses and the deviations and auxiliary consequences unforeseen overwhelm us, is that we're going to be able to produce improvements in the productivity of our food plants and organisms that are vital for the maintenance of human dominated environments.

I say that in that way because I also believe it's going to be absolutely necessary for the welfare of planet Earth that we leave a large part of the planet to the eight million other species that occupy Earth with us because that's the shield that already is in place to which we are exquisitely well adapted. But that's called, that creation of life is called synthetic biology and mark it well. Synthetic biology is just taking off and it means it's going to have an impact in a lot of ways.

And it will segue in its consequences and what it reveals about the nature of life and humanity itself as it comes into the era of artificial intelligence and robotics in a big way. There is ongoing at the present time, I know I just met with a number of them, something of a controversy between the artificial intelligence and humanoid robotic creators, a controversy over whether we're going to duplicate the brain digitally. Most think that that can be done. That's not exactly how neurons really work; they work en masse in creating waves of activities that then trigger other waves, hormonal release, and so on.

But against that viewpoint also exists the analog robotic thinkers who believe the human brain is just so thoroughly analog and that it doesn't really work digitally, but it works on activation of masses of neurons, layers, loci, and web work that passes varying degrees subjectively felt through other pathways and centers until finally they reach decision points, mostly in the subconscious brain.

So we have coming ahead in the development of these various fields the capacity, one, to immensely alter, once we know the full genomes and artificial intelligence, when synthetic biology is advanced, profoundly alter food plants and almost create new ones that can substantially increase the per capita food supply of the world with enormous consequences.

And then on the other hand we have the capacity in time of producing robots that can think like humans and on much lower wattage than our present robots. The human body and the human brain works incidentally at something like 1000th the energy input of an advanced robot. So that's another direction that’s going to be taken.

And what's running through your mind, if you're listening to me or seeing me now is uh-oh, if we keep on going can the robots with their artificial organisms around them and their intelligence and ability to make decisions then replace us? No way. That's great for Hollywood, but since we're going to be approaching robot capacity and genome modification of other organisms, and then even ourselves, we can change our own genomes in some respects, we're going to see the risk of giving control to any other intelligent agent and make sure that it's just not going to happen...

More Articles

View All
The kg is dead, long live the kg
On November 16th, representatives from nearly 60 nations will be meeting in Versailles, France, to vote to change the definition of a kilogram. Not only that, they will also be changing the fundamental unit of temperature, the kelvin, the unit for amount …
Cavalieri's principle in 3D | Solid geometry | High school geometry | Khan Academy
So we have two cylinders here, and let’s say we know that they have the exact same volume, and that makes sense because it looks like they have the same area of their base, and they have the same height. Now, what I’m going to do is start cutting up this…
Nassim Taleb - The TRUTH About Employment [w/ Russ Roberts]
Let’s talk a little bit about employment. We may have talked about this in the last episode, but it’s so interesting, I just love it. Talk about the example of, um, flying to, um, Germany for October Fest and with I’ve contracted out my private plane and …
BREAKING: Trump—Flanked By Larry Ellison, Sam Altman, & Masayoshi Son—Announces Project Stargate
Thank you! Nice to see you, some very familiar faces. Well, thank you very much, and it’s an honor to be here today. We have, uh, first full day as president. We’re back and we had a great first term, but we’re going to have an even better second term. I…
Dark Matter: The Unknown Force
A quick thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring this video! What if I told you that your entire life, everything you’ve ever seen, everyone you’ve ever met, every cluster of galaxies, stars, our planet, only makes up for less than 5% of the entire universe?…
Position vector valued functions | Multivariable Calculus | Khan Academy
Let’s say I have some curve C and it’s described; it can be parameterized. I can’t say that word as, let’s say, x is equal to X of t, y is equal to some function y of T, and let’s say that this is valid for T between A and B, so T is greater than or equal…