yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

E.O. Wilson: Synthetic Biology Will Radically Change the World | Big Think.


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I like to think that ultimate biology, ultimate biology is going to emerge within the next several decades and it's going to be in three domains. One has already begun. And that is the creation of artificial life. And scientists have just very recently put together, from chemicals off the shelf, a genome that is of the entire DNA of a bacterium, inserted it into a bacterial shell and created a functioning reproducing bacterium that way; chemicals off the shelf; a very simple organism.

Now this is momentous because it means that as we develop this technology, we're going to eventually be able to produce multicellular organisms and new kinds of species. We'll have that capacity and it's going to raise all kinds of questions, certainly opportunities. And among the opportunities that it will present, if we don't let the excesses and the deviations and auxiliary consequences unforeseen overwhelm us, is that we're going to be able to produce improvements in the productivity of our food plants and organisms that are vital for the maintenance of human dominated environments.

I say that in that way because I also believe it's going to be absolutely necessary for the welfare of planet Earth that we leave a large part of the planet to the eight million other species that occupy Earth with us because that's the shield that already is in place to which we are exquisitely well adapted. But that's called, that creation of life is called synthetic biology and mark it well. Synthetic biology is just taking off and it means it's going to have an impact in a lot of ways.

And it will segue in its consequences and what it reveals about the nature of life and humanity itself as it comes into the era of artificial intelligence and robotics in a big way. There is ongoing at the present time, I know I just met with a number of them, something of a controversy between the artificial intelligence and humanoid robotic creators, a controversy over whether we're going to duplicate the brain digitally. Most think that that can be done. That's not exactly how neurons really work; they work en masse in creating waves of activities that then trigger other waves, hormonal release, and so on.

But against that viewpoint also exists the analog robotic thinkers who believe the human brain is just so thoroughly analog and that it doesn't really work digitally, but it works on activation of masses of neurons, layers, loci, and web work that passes varying degrees subjectively felt through other pathways and centers until finally they reach decision points, mostly in the subconscious brain.

So we have coming ahead in the development of these various fields the capacity, one, to immensely alter, once we know the full genomes and artificial intelligence, when synthetic biology is advanced, profoundly alter food plants and almost create new ones that can substantially increase the per capita food supply of the world with enormous consequences.

And then on the other hand we have the capacity in time of producing robots that can think like humans and on much lower wattage than our present robots. The human body and the human brain works incidentally at something like 1000th the energy input of an advanced robot. So that's another direction that’s going to be taken.

And what's running through your mind, if you're listening to me or seeing me now is uh-oh, if we keep on going can the robots with their artificial organisms around them and their intelligence and ability to make decisions then replace us? No way. That's great for Hollywood, but since we're going to be approaching robot capacity and genome modification of other organisms, and then even ourselves, we can change our own genomes in some respects, we're going to see the risk of giving control to any other intelligent agent and make sure that it's just not going to happen...

More Articles

View All
I spent 24 hours with my AI girlfriend
In 2014, Spike Jonze released Her, a film about a man falling in love with his AI companion. The main character, Theodore Twombly, lives a lonely life after separating from his wife. One day, he purchases a software upgrade with a virtual assistant built …
Khanmigo for teachers
Hi! I’m Michelle, a professional learning specialist here at KH Academy and a former classroom teacher, just like you. Meet Kigo, your AI-driven companion, who’s revolutionizing teaching for a more engaging and efficient experience. Kigo has many excitin…
Interpreting determinants in terms of area | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
So, I have a two by two matrix here, and we could view it as having two column vectors. The first column can define this vector (3, 1), which I’ve depicted in blue here. Then, that second column you can view it as telling us that we have another vector (1…
The Helicopter Speed Limit - Helicopter Physics Series - #7 - Smarter Every Day 51
Helicopters have a speed limit that has nothing to do with laws. Well, unless you count the laws of physics. Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. The show where we do science. So today I’m gonna explain to you something pretty interes…
Why Startup Founders Should Launch Companies Sooner Than They Think
What’s going on is that founders are just, they’re embarrassed about the state of their own product. They’ve come from companies that have mature, polished products, and they compare their launch to like an Apple launch. If Apple fumbles a launch, the wor…
Example: Transforming a discrete random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Anush is playing a carnival game that involves shooting two free throws. The table below displays the probability distribution of ( x ), the number of shots that Anush makes in a set of two attempts, along with some summary statistics. So here’s the rand…