yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

E.O. Wilson: Synthetic Biology Will Radically Change the World | Big Think.


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I like to think that ultimate biology, ultimate biology is going to emerge within the next several decades and it's going to be in three domains. One has already begun. And that is the creation of artificial life. And scientists have just very recently put together, from chemicals off the shelf, a genome that is of the entire DNA of a bacterium, inserted it into a bacterial shell and created a functioning reproducing bacterium that way; chemicals off the shelf; a very simple organism.

Now this is momentous because it means that as we develop this technology, we're going to eventually be able to produce multicellular organisms and new kinds of species. We'll have that capacity and it's going to raise all kinds of questions, certainly opportunities. And among the opportunities that it will present, if we don't let the excesses and the deviations and auxiliary consequences unforeseen overwhelm us, is that we're going to be able to produce improvements in the productivity of our food plants and organisms that are vital for the maintenance of human dominated environments.

I say that in that way because I also believe it's going to be absolutely necessary for the welfare of planet Earth that we leave a large part of the planet to the eight million other species that occupy Earth with us because that's the shield that already is in place to which we are exquisitely well adapted. But that's called, that creation of life is called synthetic biology and mark it well. Synthetic biology is just taking off and it means it's going to have an impact in a lot of ways.

And it will segue in its consequences and what it reveals about the nature of life and humanity itself as it comes into the era of artificial intelligence and robotics in a big way. There is ongoing at the present time, I know I just met with a number of them, something of a controversy between the artificial intelligence and humanoid robotic creators, a controversy over whether we're going to duplicate the brain digitally. Most think that that can be done. That's not exactly how neurons really work; they work en masse in creating waves of activities that then trigger other waves, hormonal release, and so on.

But against that viewpoint also exists the analog robotic thinkers who believe the human brain is just so thoroughly analog and that it doesn't really work digitally, but it works on activation of masses of neurons, layers, loci, and web work that passes varying degrees subjectively felt through other pathways and centers until finally they reach decision points, mostly in the subconscious brain.

So we have coming ahead in the development of these various fields the capacity, one, to immensely alter, once we know the full genomes and artificial intelligence, when synthetic biology is advanced, profoundly alter food plants and almost create new ones that can substantially increase the per capita food supply of the world with enormous consequences.

And then on the other hand we have the capacity in time of producing robots that can think like humans and on much lower wattage than our present robots. The human body and the human brain works incidentally at something like 1000th the energy input of an advanced robot. So that's another direction that’s going to be taken.

And what's running through your mind, if you're listening to me or seeing me now is uh-oh, if we keep on going can the robots with their artificial organisms around them and their intelligence and ability to make decisions then replace us? No way. That's great for Hollywood, but since we're going to be approaching robot capacity and genome modification of other organisms, and then even ourselves, we can change our own genomes in some respects, we're going to see the risk of giving control to any other intelligent agent and make sure that it's just not going to happen...

More Articles

View All
Helium 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] Most people know helium as the lighter than air gas that fills our party balloons. But more importantly, it’s an irreplaceable element for science and industry. Helium was discovered in 1868 during a solar eclipse. Astronomers observed a yellow…
Calculating residual example | Exploring bivariate numerical data | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
VI rents bicycles to tourists. She recorded the height in centimeters of each customer and the frame size in centimeters of the bicycle that customer rented. After plotting her results, she noticed that the relationship between the two variables was fairl…
Understanding scatterplots | Representing data | Grade 5 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
We’re told the table below shows the ages of six people and the number of pets they own. So, this row is age of people, and then the second row is the number of pets. So the person who’s nine years old owned four pets. The person who’s eight years old ow…
Do This To Get INCREASINGLY SMARTER
In a world that constantly raises the bar and places ever-increasing demands on our abilities, intelligence is a valuable asset that can set us apart. Fortunately, the path to becoming smarter isn’t too complicated. It’s a skill that can be cultivated and…
Foraging in the Rainforest | Restaurants at the End of the World | National Geographic
So I’m curious to see what unique ingredients Giorgi will be able to bring to the table, literally. Ow. [Speaking Portuguese] One of the most special species in the rainforest. The name is capicoba. That’s pretty, huh? For you—that looks like that looks v…
Doing these things might feel good, but they won’t derisk your startup.
You could be in that bottomless pit for years and be a startup founder that’s never built a product and has never gotten a single customer because you just cycled in and out of various forms of startup mentorship. The collecting of mentors, advisors—oh, …