yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

E.O. Wilson: Synthetic Biology Will Radically Change the World | Big Think.


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I like to think that ultimate biology, ultimate biology is going to emerge within the next several decades and it's going to be in three domains. One has already begun. And that is the creation of artificial life. And scientists have just very recently put together, from chemicals off the shelf, a genome that is of the entire DNA of a bacterium, inserted it into a bacterial shell and created a functioning reproducing bacterium that way; chemicals off the shelf; a very simple organism.

Now this is momentous because it means that as we develop this technology, we're going to eventually be able to produce multicellular organisms and new kinds of species. We'll have that capacity and it's going to raise all kinds of questions, certainly opportunities. And among the opportunities that it will present, if we don't let the excesses and the deviations and auxiliary consequences unforeseen overwhelm us, is that we're going to be able to produce improvements in the productivity of our food plants and organisms that are vital for the maintenance of human dominated environments.

I say that in that way because I also believe it's going to be absolutely necessary for the welfare of planet Earth that we leave a large part of the planet to the eight million other species that occupy Earth with us because that's the shield that already is in place to which we are exquisitely well adapted. But that's called, that creation of life is called synthetic biology and mark it well. Synthetic biology is just taking off and it means it's going to have an impact in a lot of ways.

And it will segue in its consequences and what it reveals about the nature of life and humanity itself as it comes into the era of artificial intelligence and robotics in a big way. There is ongoing at the present time, I know I just met with a number of them, something of a controversy between the artificial intelligence and humanoid robotic creators, a controversy over whether we're going to duplicate the brain digitally. Most think that that can be done. That's not exactly how neurons really work; they work en masse in creating waves of activities that then trigger other waves, hormonal release, and so on.

But against that viewpoint also exists the analog robotic thinkers who believe the human brain is just so thoroughly analog and that it doesn't really work digitally, but it works on activation of masses of neurons, layers, loci, and web work that passes varying degrees subjectively felt through other pathways and centers until finally they reach decision points, mostly in the subconscious brain.

So we have coming ahead in the development of these various fields the capacity, one, to immensely alter, once we know the full genomes and artificial intelligence, when synthetic biology is advanced, profoundly alter food plants and almost create new ones that can substantially increase the per capita food supply of the world with enormous consequences.

And then on the other hand we have the capacity in time of producing robots that can think like humans and on much lower wattage than our present robots. The human body and the human brain works incidentally at something like 1000th the energy input of an advanced robot. So that's another direction that’s going to be taken.

And what's running through your mind, if you're listening to me or seeing me now is uh-oh, if we keep on going can the robots with their artificial organisms around them and their intelligence and ability to make decisions then replace us? No way. That's great for Hollywood, but since we're going to be approaching robot capacity and genome modification of other organisms, and then even ourselves, we can change our own genomes in some respects, we're going to see the risk of giving control to any other intelligent agent and make sure that it's just not going to happen...

More Articles

View All
When Does Healthy Fitness Become Unhealthy? The Dark Side of Teen Bodybuilding #Shorts
The gym has been a sort of therapy for me, and when I go there, I can turn the world off for an hour or two and just focus on pushing the weight. Going to the gym regularly also teaches discipline, hard work, consistency, and perseverance, all of which ca…
Charlie Munger SELLS 50% of Alibaba Stock!
Well, big news, guys! I just got back from Melbourne. I’m extremely tired, but Charlie Munger just halved his position in Alibaba. He’s always very quick to release the 13F filings right after the quarter ends, and he has done so once again. So, it showe…
How Talking About Your Goals is (secretly) Destroying Your Success
[Music] So pretty much everyone knows that one guy who on New Year’s Eve proclaims to all his friends his ambitious plans to go to the gym every day or wake up at 7 a.m. every morning for the whole year. And they go and buy new workout clothes, install ha…
ATP synthase | Cellular energetics | AP Biology | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about what is arguably my favorite enzyme, and that is ATP synthase. You might be able to predict from its name what it does: it synthesizes ATP. Now, you’ve probably seen it before. We saw it when we looked at respirat…
15 Rules Of Building A Dream Team
If you want to go fast, go alone. And if you want to go far, you go together. But if you want to go beyond where very few have managed to even come close, then you build a dream team. Welcome to Alux! First stop. Creating a dream team is to go beyond car…
The aggregate production function and growth | APⓇ Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
In a previous video, we have introduced the idea of an aggregate production function, which is a fancy way for a mathematical model that an economist might use to tie the factors of production in an economy to the actual aggregate output of an economy. Th…