yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

E.O. Wilson: Synthetic Biology Will Radically Change the World | Big Think.


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I like to think that ultimate biology, ultimate biology is going to emerge within the next several decades and it's going to be in three domains. One has already begun. And that is the creation of artificial life. And scientists have just very recently put together, from chemicals off the shelf, a genome that is of the entire DNA of a bacterium, inserted it into a bacterial shell and created a functioning reproducing bacterium that way; chemicals off the shelf; a very simple organism.

Now this is momentous because it means that as we develop this technology, we're going to eventually be able to produce multicellular organisms and new kinds of species. We'll have that capacity and it's going to raise all kinds of questions, certainly opportunities. And among the opportunities that it will present, if we don't let the excesses and the deviations and auxiliary consequences unforeseen overwhelm us, is that we're going to be able to produce improvements in the productivity of our food plants and organisms that are vital for the maintenance of human dominated environments.

I say that in that way because I also believe it's going to be absolutely necessary for the welfare of planet Earth that we leave a large part of the planet to the eight million other species that occupy Earth with us because that's the shield that already is in place to which we are exquisitely well adapted. But that's called, that creation of life is called synthetic biology and mark it well. Synthetic biology is just taking off and it means it's going to have an impact in a lot of ways.

And it will segue in its consequences and what it reveals about the nature of life and humanity itself as it comes into the era of artificial intelligence and robotics in a big way. There is ongoing at the present time, I know I just met with a number of them, something of a controversy between the artificial intelligence and humanoid robotic creators, a controversy over whether we're going to duplicate the brain digitally. Most think that that can be done. That's not exactly how neurons really work; they work en masse in creating waves of activities that then trigger other waves, hormonal release, and so on.

But against that viewpoint also exists the analog robotic thinkers who believe the human brain is just so thoroughly analog and that it doesn't really work digitally, but it works on activation of masses of neurons, layers, loci, and web work that passes varying degrees subjectively felt through other pathways and centers until finally they reach decision points, mostly in the subconscious brain.

So we have coming ahead in the development of these various fields the capacity, one, to immensely alter, once we know the full genomes and artificial intelligence, when synthetic biology is advanced, profoundly alter food plants and almost create new ones that can substantially increase the per capita food supply of the world with enormous consequences.

And then on the other hand we have the capacity in time of producing robots that can think like humans and on much lower wattage than our present robots. The human body and the human brain works incidentally at something like 1000th the energy input of an advanced robot. So that's another direction that’s going to be taken.

And what's running through your mind, if you're listening to me or seeing me now is uh-oh, if we keep on going can the robots with their artificial organisms around them and their intelligence and ability to make decisions then replace us? No way. That's great for Hollywood, but since we're going to be approaching robot capacity and genome modification of other organisms, and then even ourselves, we can change our own genomes in some respects, we're going to see the risk of giving control to any other intelligent agent and make sure that it's just not going to happen...

More Articles

View All
How to take AI from vision to practice. Part 1
Welcome everyone! We are so excited for you to be here, uh, to join this amazing conversation. My name is Danielle Sullivan. I’m the senior regional manager of the Northeast Partner District Partnerships at Khan Academy, and I’m really thrilled, uh, that …
Dividing polynomials by linear expressions: missing term | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
In front of us, we have another screenshot from Khan Academy, and I’ve modified a little bit so I have a little bit of extra space. It says, “Divide the polynomials. The form of your answer should either be a straight-up polynomial or a polynomial plus th…
The HIDDEN COST of buying Real Estate…
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So here’s a topic that very few people cover when it comes to buying or investing in real estate, myself included. I’ve been making videos for a year and a half now, and I have yet to cover this topic even though it’s…
What Makes Gum Chewy? | Ingredients With George Zaidan (Episode 5)
What’s in gum that makes it so chewy? How does this chewy stuff work? And can I make it from scratch? Inside your ingredients, chewing gum is one of the weirdest things we put in our mouths. I mean, think about your mouth for a second. Your teeth are har…
Caught in an Underwater Avalanche | Expedition Raw
We’re heading down to explore an underwater cave. We always run a guideline, and you place it very carefully because you have to assume that you’re going to come out in no visibility. Without that line, you have low odds of getting out. Then all of a sud…
Why & How Capitalism Needs to Be Reformed
I see populism as people rising up to reject their leadership. Now, it’s a bad thing. Yes, that they’re not willing to accept the results. I agree with your definition. I agree with your definition. And then also at the same time that that’s happening, t…