yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

E.O. Wilson: Synthetic Biology Will Radically Change the World | Big Think.


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I like to think that ultimate biology, ultimate biology is going to emerge within the next several decades and it's going to be in three domains. One has already begun. And that is the creation of artificial life. And scientists have just very recently put together, from chemicals off the shelf, a genome that is of the entire DNA of a bacterium, inserted it into a bacterial shell and created a functioning reproducing bacterium that way; chemicals off the shelf; a very simple organism.

Now this is momentous because it means that as we develop this technology, we're going to eventually be able to produce multicellular organisms and new kinds of species. We'll have that capacity and it's going to raise all kinds of questions, certainly opportunities. And among the opportunities that it will present, if we don't let the excesses and the deviations and auxiliary consequences unforeseen overwhelm us, is that we're going to be able to produce improvements in the productivity of our food plants and organisms that are vital for the maintenance of human dominated environments.

I say that in that way because I also believe it's going to be absolutely necessary for the welfare of planet Earth that we leave a large part of the planet to the eight million other species that occupy Earth with us because that's the shield that already is in place to which we are exquisitely well adapted. But that's called, that creation of life is called synthetic biology and mark it well. Synthetic biology is just taking off and it means it's going to have an impact in a lot of ways.

And it will segue in its consequences and what it reveals about the nature of life and humanity itself as it comes into the era of artificial intelligence and robotics in a big way. There is ongoing at the present time, I know I just met with a number of them, something of a controversy between the artificial intelligence and humanoid robotic creators, a controversy over whether we're going to duplicate the brain digitally. Most think that that can be done. That's not exactly how neurons really work; they work en masse in creating waves of activities that then trigger other waves, hormonal release, and so on.

But against that viewpoint also exists the analog robotic thinkers who believe the human brain is just so thoroughly analog and that it doesn't really work digitally, but it works on activation of masses of neurons, layers, loci, and web work that passes varying degrees subjectively felt through other pathways and centers until finally they reach decision points, mostly in the subconscious brain.

So we have coming ahead in the development of these various fields the capacity, one, to immensely alter, once we know the full genomes and artificial intelligence, when synthetic biology is advanced, profoundly alter food plants and almost create new ones that can substantially increase the per capita food supply of the world with enormous consequences.

And then on the other hand we have the capacity in time of producing robots that can think like humans and on much lower wattage than our present robots. The human body and the human brain works incidentally at something like 1000th the energy input of an advanced robot. So that's another direction that’s going to be taken.

And what's running through your mind, if you're listening to me or seeing me now is uh-oh, if we keep on going can the robots with their artificial organisms around them and their intelligence and ability to make decisions then replace us? No way. That's great for Hollywood, but since we're going to be approaching robot capacity and genome modification of other organisms, and then even ourselves, we can change our own genomes in some respects, we're going to see the risk of giving control to any other intelligent agent and make sure that it's just not going to happen...

More Articles

View All
How the Germans Measured Milliseconds MECHANICALLY - Smarter Every Day 283
[Destin] So this is from the 30s, right? [Ari in a Finnish Accent] …So this is very old… Very old technology. You can put it on by turning it here. [Destin] WHAT!? [Ari calmly acknowledges the awesomeness] Yeah…. And then there’s this kind of stroboscope……
Estimating a P-value from a simulation | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
So we have a question here on p-values. It says Evie read an article that said six percent of teenagers were vegetarians, but she thinks it’s higher for students at her school. To test her theory, Evie took a random sample of 25 students at her school, an…
Why Levers are AWESOME- Smarter Every Day 74
Know all right man, so the organization is called Not Forgotten. So what does that mean, Not Forgotten? Uh, we’re basically telling the kids that they are not forgotten. Um, that despite the fact that they’ve been abandoned or abused, there are people out…
How can a private jet make you money?
Can I have two planes, one 420 and then one 48? So you want one airplane that goes from London to Dubai and one airplane that does basically Western Europe? Yeah, my father runs the business. I’m glad that he let me do this dealing. How many hours do you…
Proof: perpendicular lines have negative reciprocal slope | High School Math | Khan Academy
What I’d like to do in this video is use some geometric arguments to prove that the slopes of perpendicular lines are negative reciprocals of each other. So, just to start off, we have lines L and M, and we’re going to assume that they are perpendicular,…
Worked example: Lewis diagram of the cyanide ion (CN⁻) | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to try to get more practice constructing Lewis diagrams, and we’re going to try to do that for a cyanide anion. So, this is interesting; this is the first time we’re constructing a Lewis diagram for an ion. So, pause this video …