yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

World's Highest Jumping Robot


9m read
·Nov 10, 2024

This tiny robot weighs less than a tennis ball and can jump higher than anything in the world. In the competitive world of jumping robots, the previous record was 3.7 meters, enough to leap a single-story building. This jumper can reach 31 meters, higher than a 10-story building. It could jump all the way from the Statue of Liberty's feet up to eye level.

For something to count as a jump, it must satisfy two criteria. First, motion must be created by pushing off the ground, so a quad-copter doesn't count because it pushes off the air. And second, no mass can be lost, so rockets constantly ejecting burnt fuel are not jumping, and neither is an arrow launched from a bow. The bow would have to come with the arrow for it to count as a jump.

Many animals jump, from sand fleas to grasshoppers to kangaroos, and they launch their bodies into the air with a single stroke of their muscles. The amount of energy delivered in that single stroke determines the jump height. So if you wanna jump higher, you have to maximize the strength of the muscle. The best jumper in the animal kingdom is the Galago or Bush baby. And that's because 30% of their entire muscle mass is dedicated to jumping. This allows the squirrel-sized primate to jump over two meters from a standstill.

It has like very small arms and upper body, and it's just like huge jumping legs. It doesn't have better muscles or anything; it just has more of them. There are some clever jumping toys. (laughs) I used to play with these poppers as a kid, and when you deform a popper, you store energy in its deformed shape. Effectively, it becomes a spring and then, just like an animal in one stroke, it applies a large force to the ground, launching itself into the air. (whimsical music)

All elastic jumpers follow the same principle of storing energy in a spring and releasing that energy in a single stroke to jump. But none of the jumping toys we had could compare to this tiny robot. (bouncy music) Of all the things that I have ever tried to film, this is the most challenging. Because it's so small, it accelerates rapidly and travels a huge distance on each jump. Each takeoff happened faster than we could even register.

Now, jumping might sound like a niche skill, but engineered jumpers would be perfect for exploring other worlds, particularly where the atmosphere is thin or non-existent. On the moon, with one-sixth the gravity of Earth, this robot would be able to leap 125 meters high and half a kilometer forward. Rovers may struggle with steep cliffs and deep craters, but jumpers could hop in and out, fetching samples to bring back to the Rover. And you don't lose much energy when jumping, so if you could store the kinetic energy back in the spring on landing, the efficiency could be near perfect.

The team has already started to build an entire fleet of jumping robots. Some of them can right themselves after landing, so they can take off again right away. Others are steerable. They have three adjustable legs that allow the jumper to launch in any direction. Essentially, what we've done is we've added three additional legs that don't store energy but rather allow it to form a tripod sort of that allows it to point a direction and launch in that direction.

But how does this jumping mechanism work? Well, the main structure consists of four pieces of carbon fiber bound together by elastic bands. Together they create a spring that stores all the energy needed for the jump. At the top of the robot is a small motor; a string wrapped around the axle is connected to the bottom of the robot. So when the motor is turned on, it winds up the string, compressing the robot, and this stores energy in the carbon fiber and rubber bands. After about a minute and a half, the structure reaches maximum compression.

How do you know like when to put it down? Basically, once the bottom there sits inward and it can stand up, right now it would roll over. Right. Then you put it down. Got it. So as soon as you can. And at this point, a trigger releases the latch that's holding the string on the axle. So all the string unspools all at once, and the energy stored in the spring is released.

The jumper goes from a standstill to over a hundred kilometers an hour in only nine milliseconds. That gives an acceleration of over 300 g's. That would be enough to kill basically any living creature. Watch out, watch out, watch out.

But how does it jump so much higher than everything else? Nearly 10 times higher than the previous record holder. Well, this jumper has three special design features. First, the jumper is incredibly light at just 30 grams. It achieves this weight by employing a tiny motor and battery. Plus, its entire structure made of lightweight carbon fiber and rubber doubles as the spring. Per unit mass, natural latex rubber can store more energy than nearly any other elastic material: 7,000 joules per kilogram. And the design of the spring makes it ideal for its purpose.

Initially, they tried using only rubber bands connected to hinged aluminum rods, but with this design, when compressing it, the force rises to a peak and then decreases. Just feels like it all of a sudden got a lot easier to pull. Another design with only carbon fiber slats requires a lot of force to get started, and then it increases linearly after that. There is more and more force required to do this. The ultimate design is a hybrid of these two approaches. The benefit being its force profile is almost flat over the entire range of compression. Feels like that needs a lot of force, and now it feels pretty steady with the amount of force that I need to apply.

Therefore, it provides double the energy storage of a typical spring where force is proportional to displacement. The researchers argue this is the most efficient spring ever made. Sometimes a string will snap; it's not always consistent that it releases when it's supposed to. Ooh. There's a string cut; let me go re-string it. (fingers snap) I'll be right back. All right.

You'd probably expect that lighter would always be better with a jumper, especially if the added weight is simply dead weight rather than anything useful like a spring or a motor. So, we're adding basically a chunk of steel to our jumper, and it's gonna jump higher. And the key is that we're adding it to the top. You want your body, the part that's moving, to weigh at least as much as the foot, and when your body's lighter, it's basically this collision; this energy transfer is very inefficient, and you don't jump very high.

But the real secret to how this jumper can achieve such heights is through something the researchers call work multiplication. Unlike an animal, which can only jump using a single stroke of its muscle, an engineered jumper can store up the energy from many strokes, or in this case, many revolutions of its motor. And that's how the motor can be so small. It doesn't have to deliver the energy all at once; it builds it up gradually over a few minutes. So the trade-off is kind of like time for energy. Exactly.

And this is possible because there is a latch under tension preventing the spring from unspooling until the robot is fully compressed. Interestingly, biological organisms do use latches; for example, the sand flea, which can jump incredibly high for its body size. It has a muscle that is attached, let's say right here, is right inside of the pivot point. So as it contracts that muscle, the leg doesn't extend, right? It's actually closing it more, but then it has a second muscle that pulls it out.

It's going to shift this muscle ever so slightly outside the pivot point. That's wild. So there's these two muscles that are working. Yeah. So here's your big power muscle; here's your trigger muscle. It's a torque reversal mechanism, and then all of a sudden it shoots.

But even though the biological world has latches, no organism has developed work multiplication for a jump from standstill. At least not internally; spider monkeys have been observed pulling back a branch hand over hand using multiple muscle strokes stored in the bend of the branch to catapult themselves forward. There's a spider that shoots out a silky string, which they pull back multiple times in order to slingshot themselves to another location.

So it's like slingshotting itself? Yes. So they are called the slingshot spider. Now I tried jumping in moon boots to see if they would help me go higher. That is okay. (laughs) Okay. Ooh. And it certainly felt like they did, but Elliot pointed out that from a standing start, they don't actually help much.

Like kinda build it, build it, build it, and then go. Okay. Only if you jump a few times before, can you store up some of the previous jumps' energy in the elastic bands, and then that energy helps launch you higher on the following jump. For years, engineered jumping was developed to mimic biological jumping, but with work multiplication, it gained an advantage. If you can generate a large burst of energy simply by running a motor for a long time, the power of the motor is no longer the limiting factor; the spring is. So you can focus on making the most powerful spring possible.

This jumper has nearly maximized the achievable height with this spring. Assuming an infinitely light motor with infinite time to wind up, the highest possible jump with this compression spring is only around 19% higher than what they've achieved. If you want to incorporate air resistance and play with aerodynamics, another way to send the jumper higher is to make it 10 times isometrically larger, leading to a 15 to 20% higher jump.

So we're in kind of an intermediate scale where we still are getting hit by air drag, but it's not as bad as the flea. If we went 10 times bigger, we could actually avoid drag completely. This works since if the jumper is scaled up ten times on all sides, the cross-sectional area increases by a hundred, which increases the drag force, but the jumper's mass increases by a thousand. So it has way more inertia, meaning the drag force affects it less.

The entire concept of work multiplication could bring robots to the next level. Currently, motors and robots have to be relatively small so they remain portable. But the simple principle of building up the energy from multiple turns of a motor over time would allow robots to store and then release huge amounts of energy and set some world records in the process. (outro music)

Getting this robot off the ground required more than just engineering. It took a deep understanding of math and physics. And if you wanna take your STEM skills to the next level, I highly recommend this video's sponsor, Brilliant. It's a website, an app that helps you learn math, science, and computer science interactively. They have thousands of lessons with exclusive new content added monthly. So they cover everything from the basics of algebra and graph manipulation through to college level content like calculus and neural networks.

Now, I did my PhD studying how much people learn from videos, and unfortunately, it's often shockingly little. But Brilliant gets around this because it is interactive. You can manipulate simulations and visuals, and you have to answer questions every step of the way. This is the best way to learn because it allows you to check your understanding. And if you get stuck, there are always helpful hints and full explanations.

I like to incorporate Brilliant into my daily routine; with just 30 minutes a day, I can get my brain working and challenge myself to learn something new. And this is way better than wasting time on social media. So I encourage you to go to brilliant.org/veritasium to check out all the courses on offer and see if there's something you want to learn. Plus, the first 200 people to sign up through that link get 20% off an annual premium subscription. I'll put the link down in the description.

So I want to thank Brilliant for supporting Veritasium, and I want to thank you for watching.

More Articles

View All
All Shower Thoughts I Had This Year
have you ever paused to think about how one of the most famous sentences of all time doesn’t make grammatical sense? Well, because we all apparently heard it wrong and continue to say it wrong. According to the man himself, Neil Armstrong, what he did say…
Finding the Titanic | Bob Ballard: An Explorer’s Life
The Titanic was really a cover for a highly classified military operation to investigate two nuclear submarines that we lost during the Cold War with all hands: the USS Thresher and the USS Scorpio. They ironically turned out to be on either side of where…
Why Does Trump Get So Much Attention? Totalitarian Techniques | Tim Wu | Big Think
Trump has followed an ignoble history of attracting attention using techniques that other totalitarian leaders used before him, particularly the fascists. Now, I’m not saying those are the views of Trump, but I’m saying he does use the same methods. And …
How Electricity Actually Works
I made a video about a gigantic circuit with light-second long wires that connect up to a light bulb, which is just one meter away from the battery and switch, and I asked you, after I closed the switch, how long will it take for us to get light from that…
Worked example: Calculating partial pressures | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We’re told that a 10 liter cylinder contains 7.60 grams of argon in gas form and 4.40 grams of molecular nitrogen, once again in gas form at 25 degrees Celsius. Calculate the partial pressure of each gas and the total pressure in the cylinder. Alright, s…
Baidu's AI Lab Director on Advancing Speech Recognition and Simulation
Today we have Adam Coats here for an interview. Um, Adam, uh, you run the AI Lab at Buu in Silicon Valley. Um, could you just give us a quick intro and explain what Buu is for people who don’t know? Yeah, um, so BYU is actually the largest search engine …