yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Simulating a beehive with for loops | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy


5m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's design a simulation with for loops. We want to answer the question: How much honey does a beehive produce over a certain period of time?

Now, there are a lot of variables that might impact honey production, like the geography, the weather, and what flowers are nearby. These are all important factors to consider in designing our simulation. But we need to think about what simplifications we can reasonably make. Based on observation, we know that a typical forager bee will make several trips to collect nectar over the course of a day.

I'm thinking the easiest way to model this might be to use a state machine where a bee moves between different states. There's a state where they've left the hive and are collecting nectar, and there's a state where they have nectar, and they're returning to the hive to drop it off. So, say maybe every hour, a bee can optionally move from the needs nectar state to the has nectar state if it's picked up from enough flowers, or it can move from the has nectar state to the needs nectar state if it's dropped off at the hive.

Our simulation then can just repeat these state transitions over some number of hours to calculate the total amount of nectar deposited. We can then use that nectar amount to calculate how much honey that typically produces. To account for some environmental factors, we can use randomness to decide how many bees move from one state to the other each hour.

To start, let's decide what variables we'll need. We want to keep track of the total number of bees in each state, so we'll want a needs nectar and a has nectar. Then we also want to count the total number of nectar deposits that we've made, so we can calculate the amount of honey at the end. All of our bees are going to start out in the needs nectar state; they're waiting in the hive, ready to go. None of them have nectar yet, so we'll initialize that to 20,000 because that's approximately how many forager bees we have.

Before we add the loop, let's just try and get one hour of collection working. Each hour, a random number of bees in the needs nectar state are going to finish collecting nectar. Sounds like we're going to need the random module, so I'm going to add that import statement at the top. The number of bees that pick up each hour is influenced by a lot of factors, but we're just going to simplify that down and say it's somewhere between 1/4 and 3/4 of the bees in the needs nectar state.

All right, now we need to handle the state transitions. Any bees that pick up move from the needs nectar state to the has nectar state, so we need to update both of those variables. Has nectar increases by the number of pickups, and needs nectar decreases by the number of pickups. We're not adding or removing these here, so the total across both states should still equal 20,000. Let's add some print statements to check that and run it a few times.

Okay, let's add our loop now to repeat this hour of activity. We want to calculate how much honey we can produce in a week, so it makes sense to use a for loop here since we already know the number of repetitions. We'll name our loop variable hour since each iteration represents an hour, and we want to repeat for 7 * 24 hours. That's not quite accurate, because bees do sleep; they're not going to be collecting for all 24 hours. So let's change that to 7 * 18.

We want to initialize all our variables before the loop, so we'll leave them up here, but we do want to repeat the state transition on every loop iteration, so we're going to indent all of these lines inside the loop. Now, when we run our simulation, we see that all of our bees move into the has nectar state, and they all eventually complete a pickup. Now we just need to model the drop-off, so the bees can move back from the has nectar state to the needs nectar state.

Each hour, a random number of bees who have nectar drop off that nectar at the hive. We're going to say it's at the same rate, so between a quarter and 3/4 of the bees in the has nectar state. Every drop-off we make is a permanent nectar deposit that other bees in the hive can then use to produce honey. So every hour, we want to increment nectar deposits by the number of drop-offs.

Okay, but when I run it, all of my bees are still stuck in the has nectar state. We still need to transition the bees from the has nectar state to the needs nectar state when they drop off. So, has nectar should decrease by the number of drop-offs, and needs nectar should increase by the number of drop-offs. But I think there's kind of a subtle bug here. What do you think?

At the top of the hour, we let some bees drop off, which means they move back to the needs nectar state, and then at the bottom of the hour, we let some bees in the needs nectar state pick up. That means the same bee could both drop off and pick up within the same hour, which doesn't seem realistic. To fix this, we need to make sure we're not updating the number of bees in each state until after we've calculated the number of drop-offs and the number of pickups because those should be calculated based on the number of bees in each state at the start of the hour.

So I'm just going to move all of the variable updates to the bottom of the loop. Awesome! Our state transitions are looking good, so let's check in on our nectar deposits. It looks like they're steadily increasing by a random amount on each iteration, which is what we'd expect. It should be increasing by the number of drop-offs, so if that total is looking good, it's time to calculate how much honey we produced.

We only want to calculate this once at the end of the week, so we don't want to put this inside of the loop body. We want it to go after the loop, indented outside of it. From our research, it seems like it takes a single bee about 90 trips to make a single gram of honey, so we're going to divide our total number of nectar deposits by 90, which should give us approximately the number of grams of honey.

I'm going to round that so we don't get a weird decimal, and if we run our simulation now a few times, we have our answer: our hive can produce around 7,000 grams of honey a week. This simulation, of course, made a lot of assumptions. There's a lot more things we can model here with more time and research, so as with most simulations, we should think critically about the results that we get.

More Articles

View All
Before MARS: Behind the Scenes | MARS
Oh my God, back in action! I’m Andy Baker from the National Geographic Channel, and we are here in Ellenville, New York. We’re shooting a short film called “Before Mars,” which is essentially the prequel story to the global event series coming called “Mar…
Estimating decimal multiplication
Let’s now get some practice estimating multiplying with decimals. So first, here we have 7.8 times 307 is approximately equal to what? When you see the squiggly equal sign, that means approximately equal to one. What? So pause this video and see if you ca…
Exploring a Seedy Reefer | Lawless Oceans
When I look at this ship, it just speaks seedy to me. There’s something suspicious about it. Not only is it a reefer with a Chinese name, indicating that it could be Chinese or Taiwanese, but now all of a sudden it’s got a Bolivian flag, and that’s a flag…
Pilots can influence the sale of a plane.
So the pilots can influence the decisions on the plank 50% of the time. Really? Yeah, why is that? Course they ask the pilots what they think of the manufacturer, the reliability, the capabilities. 50% of the time they have a big contribution. This is a …
Never Ending Problems (Solution for Life)
We recently went through a series of unfortunate events that got us extremely annoyed. By the way, when we say “us,” we usually mean some of us from the team or all of us. In this case, it was some of us. But the point is, none of these events, taken indi…
Thomson's Plum Pudding Model of the Atom
So the word atom means uncuttable, so the Greeks were thinking of it as a tiny hard sphere. Phil: That’s right. Derek: And even up until the eighteen hundreds, that was the idea of an atom, the smallest piece of matter, a tiny hard sphere. But then we f…