yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe an Accident? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

For centuries, scientists, and especially physicists, have believed that we would be able to show why our universe is as it is, as a necessary consequence of certain fundamental principles and laws. Like finding — having a crossword puzzle with only one solution — the given certain very fundamental principles, like the law of conservation of energy, that there would be only one self-consistent universe allowed.

And that has been sort of the holy grail of physics, and we have been pretty successful in showing such things as why snowflakes have six-sided symmetry, why raindrops are round, why the sky is blue, as necessary consequences of a small number of physical principles.

What has happened in the last ten years or so — or 15 years — is we now believe — when I say we, I mean most theoretical physicists — now believe that our universe is just one of a vast number of universes, all with very different physical properties.

And all of these different universes originate from the same fundamental principles. So there's not one solution to the crossword puzzle. There are many solutions to the crossword puzzles. In that case, there's no possibility of explaining why our universe is a necessary consequence of the fundamental principles.

There are many, many different possibilities. Some of these other universes might have 17 dimensions. Some of them might have planets and stars like ours. Others may have just an amorphous field of energy with no planets and stars. Some of them might allow life like our universe. Some of them may not allow life.

And our universe is just one lucky draw from the hat. In which case, we are accidental. We are an accidental universe. And so the historic mission of science, and especially physics, to show that our universe is the unique result of a certain set of fundamental principles — that historic mission is no longer feasible. It's no longer possible.

This conclusion makes theoretical physicists extremely unhappy because it means that a lot of our mission is an illusion. But that may be the way nature is.

More Articles

View All
All in for Education Livestream with Sal Khan
And she started using the printing out transcripts of Khan Academy - and get-and giving him these sheets of the stacks of paper when she visited him in prison. Through just the transcripts, Jason was able to start realizing that he, you know, in school, h…
How I find private jet clients.
This is the interior of our Airbus 319. Wow, it’s an airplane! I built the airplane, which is the same airplane that EasyJet buys around. Of course, we’re seating 12 people in there, seating 212 people. You do meet things in there. So, what we do sometim…
Features of a circle from its graph | Mathematics II | High School Math | Khan Academy
So we have a circle right over here. The first question we’ll ask ourselves is: what are the coordinates of the center of that circle? Well, we can eyeball that. We can see it looks like the center is centered on that point right over there. The coordinat…
Homeroom with Sal and Wendy Kopp - Wednesday, September 15
Hi everyone! Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to the Homeroom live stream! It’s been a while since we did one, but we’re back and we have an amazing guest, Wendy Kopp, CEO of Teach For All, also the founder of Teach For America. We’re going to ta…
Climate 101: Deforestation | National Geographic
[Narrator] Forests cover about 30% of the planet. And the ecosystems they create play an essential role in supporting life on earth. But deforestation is clearing earth’s forest on a massive scale. And at the current rate of destruction, the world’s rainf…
The "Sex Factor" for Women in Science | StarTalk
Welcome back to Star Talk! We are featuring my interview with actress Mayim Bialik. She is the neuroscientist on the hit TV series The Big Bang Theory, and I asked her about the portrayal of women scientists. Is it good? Is it bad? Is it working? Let’s ch…