yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe an Accident? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

For centuries, scientists, and especially physicists, have believed that we would be able to show why our universe is as it is, as a necessary consequence of certain fundamental principles and laws. Like finding — having a crossword puzzle with only one solution — the given certain very fundamental principles, like the law of conservation of energy, that there would be only one self-consistent universe allowed.

And that has been sort of the holy grail of physics, and we have been pretty successful in showing such things as why snowflakes have six-sided symmetry, why raindrops are round, why the sky is blue, as necessary consequences of a small number of physical principles.

What has happened in the last ten years or so — or 15 years — is we now believe — when I say we, I mean most theoretical physicists — now believe that our universe is just one of a vast number of universes, all with very different physical properties.

And all of these different universes originate from the same fundamental principles. So there's not one solution to the crossword puzzle. There are many solutions to the crossword puzzles. In that case, there's no possibility of explaining why our universe is a necessary consequence of the fundamental principles.

There are many, many different possibilities. Some of these other universes might have 17 dimensions. Some of them might have planets and stars like ours. Others may have just an amorphous field of energy with no planets and stars. Some of them might allow life like our universe. Some of them may not allow life.

And our universe is just one lucky draw from the hat. In which case, we are accidental. We are an accidental universe. And so the historic mission of science, and especially physics, to show that our universe is the unique result of a certain set of fundamental principles — that historic mission is no longer feasible. It's no longer possible.

This conclusion makes theoretical physicists extremely unhappy because it means that a lot of our mission is an illusion. But that may be the way nature is.

More Articles

View All
Scale factors and area
We’re told that polygon Q is a scaled copy of polygon P using a scale factor of one half. Polygon Q’s area is what fraction of polygon P’s area? Pause this video and see if you can figure that out. All right, my brain wants to make this a little bit tang…
Great White Shark Hunting Patterns | When Sharks Attack
NARRATOR: South Africa’s Western Cape is notoriously dangerous. Almost one in four of all fatal great white attacks happen here. In other parts of the world, the most dangerous time to enter the water is at dawn or dusk, the times when white sharks typica…
Horrific Freefall into the Deepest Ocean | The Sad Story of Flight 447
What’s happening? I don’t know what’s happening. We’re losing control of the aircraft here! We lost all control of the aircraft! What you’re witnessing is the beginning of one of aviation’s greatest mysteries: a top-notch aircraft, an experienced crew, a…
True Signs You're a Winner or LOSER | Kevin O'Leary
I can sit in a room with somebody for 15 minutes and know if I’ve got a winner or not, and 99% of the time I’m right. So, I listen to the gut, and I listen to the person, I listen to the plan. I know it’s gonna work or it isn’t; I just know I’m that good.…
Why The War on Drugs Is a Huge Failure
Over 40 years ago, US President Richard Nixon declared drug abuse public enemy number one, starting an unprecedented global campaign, the War on Drugs. Today, the numbers are in. The War on Drugs is a huge failure, with devastating unintended consequences…
Interpreting a quadratic in factored form
We are told a rocket is launched from a platform. Its height in meters, x seconds after the launch, is modeled by h of x is equal to negative 4 times x plus 2 times x minus 18. Now the first thing they ask us is, what is the height of the rocket at the t…