yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe an Accident? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

For centuries, scientists, and especially physicists, have believed that we would be able to show why our universe is as it is, as a necessary consequence of certain fundamental principles and laws. Like finding — having a crossword puzzle with only one solution — the given certain very fundamental principles, like the law of conservation of energy, that there would be only one self-consistent universe allowed.

And that has been sort of the holy grail of physics, and we have been pretty successful in showing such things as why snowflakes have six-sided symmetry, why raindrops are round, why the sky is blue, as necessary consequences of a small number of physical principles.

What has happened in the last ten years or so — or 15 years — is we now believe — when I say we, I mean most theoretical physicists — now believe that our universe is just one of a vast number of universes, all with very different physical properties.

And all of these different universes originate from the same fundamental principles. So there's not one solution to the crossword puzzle. There are many solutions to the crossword puzzles. In that case, there's no possibility of explaining why our universe is a necessary consequence of the fundamental principles.

There are many, many different possibilities. Some of these other universes might have 17 dimensions. Some of them might have planets and stars like ours. Others may have just an amorphous field of energy with no planets and stars. Some of them might allow life like our universe. Some of them may not allow life.

And our universe is just one lucky draw from the hat. In which case, we are accidental. We are an accidental universe. And so the historic mission of science, and especially physics, to show that our universe is the unique result of a certain set of fundamental principles — that historic mission is no longer feasible. It's no longer possible.

This conclusion makes theoretical physicists extremely unhappy because it means that a lot of our mission is an illusion. But that may be the way nature is.

More Articles

View All
Welcome to Earth | Official Trailer | Disney+
[Music] Is it magic or is it madness? I’ve got a confession to make. [Music] I’ve never climbed a mountain, never swum in a lake. [Music] I was in a cave once. I’m beginning to think that I might be missing something. Well, ready? Yes, sir! I asked the b…
The Antibiotic Apocalypse Explained
What would you say if we told you that humanity is currently making a collaborative effort to engineer the perfect superbug? A bug that could kill hundreds of millions of people? Well, it is happening right now. We are in the process of creating a superba…
Intro to the comparative and the superlative | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
So we’ve got these three penguins: grammarians. We’ve got Raul, who you may remember from his sweet mohawk. We’ve got Cesar, and we’ve got Gabriella, three Magellanic penguins from Argentina, and they are all different amounts of happy. Cesar is a medium …
Philosophy's Biggest Questions
You’ve probably heard of the trolley problem, especially if you’re at all interested in philosophy or ethics. Lately, it’s been a subject of discussion when discussing autonomous cars and was referenced explicitly in the show “The Good Place.” Some people…
RC step response 2 of 3 solve
In the last video on step response, we set up the differential equation that describes our circuit, and we found that it was a non-homogeneous equation. Now we’re going to follow through on the strategy of solving it with a forced response plus a natural …
The Ponzi Factor: Proof by Definition
I talked with the author who has written a book so dangerous if this information becomes mainstream it alters the entire engine of our economy. Tong Lu has revealed just how our stock market is the dictionary definition of a Ponzi scheme. Here’s my conver…