yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe an Accident? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

For centuries, scientists, and especially physicists, have believed that we would be able to show why our universe is as it is, as a necessary consequence of certain fundamental principles and laws. Like finding — having a crossword puzzle with only one solution — the given certain very fundamental principles, like the law of conservation of energy, that there would be only one self-consistent universe allowed.

And that has been sort of the holy grail of physics, and we have been pretty successful in showing such things as why snowflakes have six-sided symmetry, why raindrops are round, why the sky is blue, as necessary consequences of a small number of physical principles.

What has happened in the last ten years or so — or 15 years — is we now believe — when I say we, I mean most theoretical physicists — now believe that our universe is just one of a vast number of universes, all with very different physical properties.

And all of these different universes originate from the same fundamental principles. So there's not one solution to the crossword puzzle. There are many solutions to the crossword puzzles. In that case, there's no possibility of explaining why our universe is a necessary consequence of the fundamental principles.

There are many, many different possibilities. Some of these other universes might have 17 dimensions. Some of them might have planets and stars like ours. Others may have just an amorphous field of energy with no planets and stars. Some of them might allow life like our universe. Some of them may not allow life.

And our universe is just one lucky draw from the hat. In which case, we are accidental. We are an accidental universe. And so the historic mission of science, and especially physics, to show that our universe is the unique result of a certain set of fundamental principles — that historic mission is no longer feasible. It's no longer possible.

This conclusion makes theoretical physicists extremely unhappy because it means that a lot of our mission is an illusion. But that may be the way nature is.

More Articles

View All
He Risked Death as First American to Explore Africa's Deepest Parts | National Geographic
We have to go back to who William Stamps Cherry was at the age of 20. He does head out for Africa against everybody’s advice, who said, “You’re going to die over there.” He went into Africa in 1889 and went further in the Congo than any other white man ha…
How To Use The 2023 Recession To Get Rich
What’s up guys? It’s Grammy here! So, this is potentially going to be a once-in-a-generation opportunity to build wealth. Because now, it could be one of the easiest times to increase your net worth dramatically if you know what you’re doing. After all, t…
Charlie Munger's Most Iconic Moments
I don’t think there are good arguments against my position. I think the people that oppose my position are idiots. And well, you don’t want to be like the motion picture executive in California. They said the funeral was so large ‘cause everybody wanted t…
Dividing a decimal by a whole number on the number line
In this video, we’re going to try to figure out what 0.6, or 6 tenths, divided by 2 is. I’ll give you a little bit of a hint; we have 6 tenths plotted on the number line right over here. One way to think about it is if I wanted to go from zero to six ten…
The Amazing Engineering of Rescue Helicopters - Smarter Every Day 289
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. You’re smart; you know how this works by now. We’re in the middle of a deep dive series into the US Coast Guard, and they’re amazing. We’ve talked about how they rescue people. We’ve talked about th…
Impact of removing outliers on regression lines | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
The scatter plot below displays a set of bivariate data along with its least squares regression line. Consider removing the outlier at (95, 1). So, (95, 1) we’re talking about that outlier right over there and calculating a new least squares regression li…