yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe an Accident? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

For centuries, scientists, and especially physicists, have believed that we would be able to show why our universe is as it is, as a necessary consequence of certain fundamental principles and laws. Like finding — having a crossword puzzle with only one solution — the given certain very fundamental principles, like the law of conservation of energy, that there would be only one self-consistent universe allowed.

And that has been sort of the holy grail of physics, and we have been pretty successful in showing such things as why snowflakes have six-sided symmetry, why raindrops are round, why the sky is blue, as necessary consequences of a small number of physical principles.

What has happened in the last ten years or so — or 15 years — is we now believe — when I say we, I mean most theoretical physicists — now believe that our universe is just one of a vast number of universes, all with very different physical properties.

And all of these different universes originate from the same fundamental principles. So there's not one solution to the crossword puzzle. There are many solutions to the crossword puzzles. In that case, there's no possibility of explaining why our universe is a necessary consequence of the fundamental principles.

There are many, many different possibilities. Some of these other universes might have 17 dimensions. Some of them might have planets and stars like ours. Others may have just an amorphous field of energy with no planets and stars. Some of them might allow life like our universe. Some of them may not allow life.

And our universe is just one lucky draw from the hat. In which case, we are accidental. We are an accidental universe. And so the historic mission of science, and especially physics, to show that our universe is the unique result of a certain set of fundamental principles — that historic mission is no longer feasible. It's no longer possible.

This conclusion makes theoretical physicists extremely unhappy because it means that a lot of our mission is an illusion. But that may be the way nature is.

More Articles

View All
Understanding scatterplots | Representing data | Grade 5 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
We’re told the table below shows the ages of six people and the number of pets they own. So, this row is age of people, and then the second row is the number of pets. So the person who’s nine years old owned four pets. The person who’s eight years old ow…
Growing up around the world
I grew up in New York, New Jersey, Florida. I’ve lived in California, Ohio, London, Paris. I’ve lived in so many places. I’ve moved around a lot. I’m not even a military brat; just for businesses, moving so many different places throughout my lifetime. A…
The Story of the Sacred Pipe | Story of God
INTERVIEWER: I’m on my way to meet a man who has been chosen to lead his people in an epic struggle, one that also requires super human endurance. He’s asked me to come to Devils Tower in Wyoming. This is Chief Arvol Looking Horse, the Chosen One of the N…
Calculating height using energy | Modeling Energy | High School Physics | Khan Academy
So I have an uncompressed spring here, and this spring has a spring constant of 4 newtons per meter. Then, I take a 10 gram mass, a 10 gram ball, and I put it at the top of the spring. I push down to compress that spring by 10 centimeters. Let’s call that…
Discovering Gravitational Waves | StarTalk
[Music] 30 million years ago, in a distant galaxy, 30 million light years away, two black holes collided. Each black hole is itself a significant disturbance in the fabric of space and time. When they collide, it creates an even greater ripple that gets …
Representing solids, liquids, and gases using particulate models | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
What we have depicted here in these four images are matter in different states, and we’re using what’s known as a particulate model. These are two-dimensional particulate models, which are simple ways of imagining what is going on at a molecular scale ins…