yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe an Accident? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

For centuries, scientists, and especially physicists, have believed that we would be able to show why our universe is as it is, as a necessary consequence of certain fundamental principles and laws. Like finding — having a crossword puzzle with only one solution — the given certain very fundamental principles, like the law of conservation of energy, that there would be only one self-consistent universe allowed.

And that has been sort of the holy grail of physics, and we have been pretty successful in showing such things as why snowflakes have six-sided symmetry, why raindrops are round, why the sky is blue, as necessary consequences of a small number of physical principles.

What has happened in the last ten years or so — or 15 years — is we now believe — when I say we, I mean most theoretical physicists — now believe that our universe is just one of a vast number of universes, all with very different physical properties.

And all of these different universes originate from the same fundamental principles. So there's not one solution to the crossword puzzle. There are many solutions to the crossword puzzles. In that case, there's no possibility of explaining why our universe is a necessary consequence of the fundamental principles.

There are many, many different possibilities. Some of these other universes might have 17 dimensions. Some of them might have planets and stars like ours. Others may have just an amorphous field of energy with no planets and stars. Some of them might allow life like our universe. Some of them may not allow life.

And our universe is just one lucky draw from the hat. In which case, we are accidental. We are an accidental universe. And so the historic mission of science, and especially physics, to show that our universe is the unique result of a certain set of fundamental principles — that historic mission is no longer feasible. It's no longer possible.

This conclusion makes theoretical physicists extremely unhappy because it means that a lot of our mission is an illusion. But that may be the way nature is.

More Articles

View All
5 Things EVERYONE Should Know Before Buying a House!
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So, these are the top 5 things you should know before buying your first property. Now, I’ve been in real estate for about 10 years now, and over this 10 years, I’ve sold about 100 homes, including 5 homes that I bough…
A.I. ‐ Humanity's Final Invention?
Humans rule Earth without competition, but we’re about to create something that may change that: our last invention, the most powerful tool, weapon, or maybe even entity: artificial superintelligence. This sounds like science fiction, so let’s start at th…
Domain and range of lines, segments, and rays | Algebra 1 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
So what we have here is two different F of XS defined by their graphs, and what we want to do is figure out the domain and the range for each of these functions. So pause this video and try to figure that on your own before we do that together. Now let’s…
Proof of expected value of geometric random variable | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
So right here we have a classic geometric random variable. We’re defining it as the number of independent trials we need to get a success, where the probability of success for each trial is lowercase p. We have seen this before when we introduced ourselve…
Federalist No. 10 (part 2) | US government and civics | Khan Academy
In the part 1 video, we already saw James Madison and Federalist number 10 argue strongly that a republican form of government is better for addressing the issues of having a majority faction that might try to overrun minority groups. In this video, we’re…
Meet the preposition | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hey Garans, I want to talk about prepositions. But before I do, I’m going to draw you a little hamster. Is it a hamster? Is it a tiny bear? Who knows? We’re just going to call it a hamster, a little, little rodent-type creature. Now, I’m going to use thi…