yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe an Accident? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

For centuries, scientists, and especially physicists, have believed that we would be able to show why our universe is as it is, as a necessary consequence of certain fundamental principles and laws. Like finding — having a crossword puzzle with only one solution — the given certain very fundamental principles, like the law of conservation of energy, that there would be only one self-consistent universe allowed.

And that has been sort of the holy grail of physics, and we have been pretty successful in showing such things as why snowflakes have six-sided symmetry, why raindrops are round, why the sky is blue, as necessary consequences of a small number of physical principles.

What has happened in the last ten years or so — or 15 years — is we now believe — when I say we, I mean most theoretical physicists — now believe that our universe is just one of a vast number of universes, all with very different physical properties.

And all of these different universes originate from the same fundamental principles. So there's not one solution to the crossword puzzle. There are many solutions to the crossword puzzles. In that case, there's no possibility of explaining why our universe is a necessary consequence of the fundamental principles.

There are many, many different possibilities. Some of these other universes might have 17 dimensions. Some of them might have planets and stars like ours. Others may have just an amorphous field of energy with no planets and stars. Some of them might allow life like our universe. Some of them may not allow life.

And our universe is just one lucky draw from the hat. In which case, we are accidental. We are an accidental universe. And so the historic mission of science, and especially physics, to show that our universe is the unique result of a certain set of fundamental principles — that historic mission is no longer feasible. It's no longer possible.

This conclusion makes theoretical physicists extremely unhappy because it means that a lot of our mission is an illusion. But that may be the way nature is.

More Articles

View All
Markets and property rights | APⓇ Microeconomics | Khan Academy
In other videos, we have touched on the idea of property rights, but in this video, we’re going to go a little bit deeper and think about how property rights connect to the notion of a market. So first of all, think about what a market means to you. You …
Introduction to spectroscopy | Intermolecular forces and properties | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about spectroscopy, which is all about the interactions between light and matter. When we’re talking about light, we’re not just talking about visible light; we’re talking about electromagnetic radiation in general. So, …
David Coleman, College Board CEO, on school closures impact to SAT & AP exams | Homeroom with Sal
Stream. For those of you all who have not been here before, this is a way for us all to stay connected. As you have now school closures around the world, Khan Academy is a not-for-profit with a mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyon…
Highest Resolution Machu Picchu Picture Ever Taken- Smarter Every Day 66
Hey, it’s me Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! So today, we’re in Peru. It’s pretty awesome. We’ve assembled a team of people, and we’re going to capture Machu Picchu in the highest resolution photo that’s ever been made of it. We’re gonna let yo…
How to GET RICH with ChatGPT
What’s up, guys! It’s Grammy here. So, in the middle of a recession, one industry seems to be absolutely booming, with the promise of making a lot of people really rich—and that would be artificial intelligence. For example, I told OpenAI’s ChatGPT to wr…
Time dilation | Special relativity | Physics | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] So let’s revisit a scenario that we have seen in several videos, especially the last video, where we tried to find this neutral frame of reference. Let’s say we’re in spaceship A. We are in an inertial frame of reference. And let’s say right…