yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe an Accident? | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

For centuries, scientists, and especially physicists, have believed that we would be able to show why our universe is as it is, as a necessary consequence of certain fundamental principles and laws. Like finding — having a crossword puzzle with only one solution — the given certain very fundamental principles, like the law of conservation of energy, that there would be only one self-consistent universe allowed.

And that has been sort of the holy grail of physics, and we have been pretty successful in showing such things as why snowflakes have six-sided symmetry, why raindrops are round, why the sky is blue, as necessary consequences of a small number of physical principles.

What has happened in the last ten years or so — or 15 years — is we now believe — when I say we, I mean most theoretical physicists — now believe that our universe is just one of a vast number of universes, all with very different physical properties.

And all of these different universes originate from the same fundamental principles. So there's not one solution to the crossword puzzle. There are many solutions to the crossword puzzles. In that case, there's no possibility of explaining why our universe is a necessary consequence of the fundamental principles.

There are many, many different possibilities. Some of these other universes might have 17 dimensions. Some of them might have planets and stars like ours. Others may have just an amorphous field of energy with no planets and stars. Some of them might allow life like our universe. Some of them may not allow life.

And our universe is just one lucky draw from the hat. In which case, we are accidental. We are an accidental universe. And so the historic mission of science, and especially physics, to show that our universe is the unique result of a certain set of fundamental principles — that historic mission is no longer feasible. It's no longer possible.

This conclusion makes theoretical physicists extremely unhappy because it means that a lot of our mission is an illusion. But that may be the way nature is.

More Articles

View All
How Do Night Vision Goggles Work? (There's 3 types)
What happens when you take the world’s best night vision goggles into the world’s darkest room? You start to feel a little strange. And sometimes start to get a little bit of vertigo. Can you tell the difference between your eyes being closed and open? Sh…
Discover Ancient Wonders on the Coast of Newfoundland and Labrador | National Geographic
[Music] Mistaken Point around us, missed underfoot, petrified. Deep time rises, and Wealth’s to prod our souls here and there, breaking into sudden vow relief. 88% of Earth’s history is called the Precambrian age. Mistaken Point is the only World Heritage…
7 Principles for AI in Education: Part 1 of 2
So hello everyone, I’m Kristen Deso. I’m the chief learning officer at KH Academy. I want to lay the groundwork a little bit for why we’re here. The first part is because I’m sure all of you are bombarded by the messages around artificial intelligence. W…
The Fall of Empires | World History | Khan Academy
Steve: “What are we doing here? Hey, sell, we’re going to look at this question of why do Empires fall. For those of you who don’t know, Steve Shrer, he is a world history fellow here at Khan Academy, and also a former world history teacher. So, what we …
Less versus fewer | Frequently confused words | Usage | Grammar
Hello Garian, hello Rosie, hi David. Uh, so you’ve called me into the recording booth today? Yes, because uh, you have a bone to pick with me—just a little bit. Yeah, so I have always, in my usage, I always drawn a distinction between less and fewer. I w…
Graphical limit where function undefined
So we have the graph of ( y = f(x) ) right over here. What we want to do is figure out the limit of ( f(x) ) as ( x ) approaches -4. So, what does that mean? Well, a limit is saying, “What is my function approaching as the input of that function approach…