yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Failing Fast Isn't Really Failure – It's Accelerated Learning | Astro Teller| Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Failure, seen properly, is just a recognition of fast learning. So I have training wheels, which I try to put on this concept within X, to try to help everyone get comfortable with the idea.

Here's an example. You're working on a project. It either has an Achilles’ heel or it doesn't. Would we like to discover that Achilles’ heel, if it exists, now or later? If you say later, you've just signed up to be intellectually dishonest. You're not really going to sign up for that. As soon as you acknowledge that should it have an Achilles’ heel we'd like to know about that now rather than later, then it becomes the right way for us to behave – to check to see if it has an Achilles’ heel now, right now. If it has the Achilles’ heel, we'll end the project and we'll go find something better to do. And if it doesn't have an Achilles’ heel, we can move forward with that increased level of excitement and certainty that we're on the right track.

Let's pretend that you are setting out to make a time machine at X and you have two choices. One, to cause a pebble or a mouse to move backwards one minute in time to actually cause some small amount of time travel, or to design the user interface for the cockpit of the time machine. I think we can all agree in this particular example that working on the user interface for the cockpit, once you get it done, it will look like you've made progress but you haven't, you've made motion. We can all sit there, look at your cockpit and say the chances that we succeed are exactly the same as they were before. We've not actually made any progress because all of the risk was on the part you chose not to do. What you should have done first was the other one. Our shorthand for this at X is we joke #MonkeyFirst.

Similar to the time machine, if you're trying to get a monkey to stand on a pedestal ten feet high and recite Shakespeare monologues and you have a choice between training the monkey first and building the pedestal, if you build the pedestal first, when your boss walks by, he's like, “Hey nice pedestal!” And then you feel good. You just did something useful, you just got a little bit of attaboy. That's why people do that. But you've utterly wasted your company's money if you build the pedestal first because all of the hard part is getting the monkey to recite Shakespeare. If you can get the monkey to recite Shakespeare, we can always build the pedestal afterwards. But if you can't, thank goodness we didn't spend a moment or a penny building what turned out to be a useless pedestal.

Now, in order to get a culture at X to do that, we need to reward people when they do it. So when someone raises their hand and says, “My project looks really good but I've discovered I don't think it's going to work out because of this subtle but important issue,” and those ten people now need to find new jobs. If we say, “Sucks to be you,” no one at X will ever again raise their hand and say that. But if we say to them, “Hey, that was awesome. What incredible intellectual honesty you just displayed and good critical thinking to have discovered this. We're going to work super hard to find all of you new jobs somewhere at X or at Alphabet. We're going to give you all bonuses for having ended your project so thoughtfully. Take long vacations and then when you're done, come back and join another project here and get going again with extra levels of passion because you're now working on something that you don't secretly know is going to fail at some point in the future, which is how you would have felt if you had stuck on your old project.”

People are sad when they have to end their projects. They don't end their projects lightly. But because they've come to understand that ending their project is just being intellectually honest, it's driving for high efficiency, which is why we use the word factory and tie it to moonshots because we're trying to systematize innovation. We're trying to drive to high efficiency innovation. And that can best be done by being honest when you're on the wrong track. And that is failing fast.

More Articles

View All
What Is Life? Is Death Real?
Life is fundamentally different from dead stuff—or is it? Physicist Erwin Schrödinger defined life this way: Living things avoid decay into disorder and equilibrium. What does this mean? Let’s pretend that your download folder is the universe. It started…
Soothing the Pain of the Past Through Spoken Word | Short Film Showcase
Que rico! Is it real? Seems like every day I would have some beautiful earrings with diamonds in it that would hit my songs on the radio. All the little girls would be screaming, “Aah!” Then I’d shake their hands, and a little girl would pass out. “Oh my …
Linear equations with unknown coefficients | Mathematics I | High School Math | Khan Academy
So we have an equation. It says ( ax + 3x = bx + 5 ). And what I want to do together is to solve for ( x ). If we solve for ( x ), it’s going to be in terms of ( a ), ( b ), and other numbers. So pause the video and see if you can do that. All right, no…
Investing During A Recession | Yahoo Finance
[Applause] [Music] Joining us now with more insight on where investors should put their money, we’ve got O’Leary Ventures Chairman, Mr. Wonderful himself, Kevin O’Leary. Kevin, always a pleasure to get some of your time, and thanks for taking it here with…
5 Websites I use as a Value Investor
[Music] Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, uh, coming at you from my computer today because a common question that I get from a lot of you guys is what websites am I going to to kind of source all my information and what you know websit…
Expected value of a binomial variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
So I’ve got a binomial variable ( x ) and I’m going to describe it in very general terms. It is the number of successes after ( n ) trials, where the probability of success for each trial is ( p ). This is a reasonable way to describe really any binomial …