yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Guns in Space


4m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And what do you say we get outta here… to space and into an orbit? That way we could just float around and be free from the influence of gravity. Except not really. Astronauts orbiting around the Earth experience pretty much the same gravitational pull that you and I are feeling right now. The major difference is that those astronauts are falling, constantly, towards Earth, but their angular velocity is so large that they're falling just as fast as Earth curves away from them.

Now, of course, this is nothing New… ton's Cannon hasn't already taught us. Gravity makes stuff fall and, in particular, Newton realized that it makes objects accelerate towards the Earth the same amount independently of how fast they're moving horizontally. That's called relativity. And, of course, orbiting is just falling, but falling where you move horizontally fast enough that the Earth falls away faster. In order to successfully fall and miss the Earth, unless you dug a tunnel, you need to be travelling at over 17,000 mph or 8 km every second. So, you'd probably incinerate from friction with the air, well before you had a chance to enjoy the trip.

Of course, Newton's thought experiment involved the Earth, but on something smaller, like the Moon, the cannon wouldn't have to throw its projectile nearly as fast for it to complete an orbit. In fact, if you had a powerful enough gun on the Moon and you fired that gun at the horizon and then waited a little bit, you could get hit in the back of the head by the same bullet. Henry calculated that the bullet would have to travel about 1,600 m/s, which is exactly how fast the Paris gun fires. Now, that's a powerful gun; it's no squirt gun.

But if you had a squirt gun, out there in space, and you fired a stream of water at the Sun, how much water would it take to put out the Sun? I mean, in general, putting water on something hot would cause that something hot to lose some heat, especially since the water will be frozen because it's out there in space. But, here's the issue. The Sun is not a big ball of hydrogen on fire. Instead, the Sun is powered by fusion. Fusion of Hydrogen nuclei, which is kind of like the chemical bonds between the Hydrogen and Oxygen that make up water, except on a much smaller and much more powerful scale.

Now, before I get tackled by nuclear physicists from one side and chemists from the other, let me explain. A bond of any sort, whether between planets, molecules, atoms, nuclei or quarks, is just a happenstance where two or more particles together have a lower total energy than when they were apart. Like if you get married and your taxes go down. So, when you form a bond, that extra energy that the two solitary particles had is released, and because of a little relation we called "E=mc²," this actually means that the mass of the pair goes down a little bit too.

For example, every fusion reaction turns a little bit of Hydrogenous mass into light. Sunlight, for example, amounts to a loss of 100 quadrillion kg each year. That's the equivalent of a medium sized asteroid. But stars have a lot of mass, and the more massive a star is, the hotter it burns. And adding a bunch of water to the Sun would only cause it to be more massive, so it would burn brighter, not go out. Of course, it would also burn faster, which means that its life would be shorter. For instance, if you were to add 20 solar masses of water to the Sun, you would decrease its life expectancy from the current 5 billion years to only a few hundred million more years.

But there's a faster way to put out the Sun. Take that water, or whatever material you want, and shoot it into the Sun in a way that causes everything to get spread out and scattered, so that there's no longer the critical density needed for fusion to occur. Now, no matter which avenue of putting out the Sun you pick, both would be a disaster. Literally, disaster. From "Dis," meaning "against," and "aster" meaning star, you would have literally turned our own star against us.

If you were somehow able to avoid that disaster by magically appearing in inter-galactic space, here's a fun experiment to try. Take out your gun and fire a bullet. That bullet will be forever alone. That's because the universe is expanding, and if you were a few megaparsecs away from the nearest galactic cluster, on average those galaxies would be 200 km farther away from you every passing second. In space terms, 200 km per second is pretty slow. It's barely as fast as the solar system orbits the center of the Milky Way. And stars closer to the center of the galaxy can orbit 10 times faster.

But a measly bullet travels only a few km every second and would have no chance of reaching the receding galaxies, ever. It makes you realize how tiny we are compared to the scale of the universe. But it also makes you realize how close together we all are here on Earth. Of course, to get from one side of the Earth to the other, you have to fly over half the sphere. So, what if instead there was a tunnel through the Earth?

Let's jump over to my channel, Minute Physics, to see what happens. Click here and I'll see you on the other side. Oh, and as always, thanks for watching.

More Articles

View All
China Is About To Cause A Global Recession
Two of the world’s biggest economies, the United States and China, are struggling. Business activity in Shanghai was brought to a standstill for weeks. Disastrous. I think there is no other word for it. What’s up guys? It’s Graham here. Throughout the la…
2016 Breakthrough Junior Challenge with Priscilla Chan | National Geographic
The Breakthrough Junior Challenge is a video competition in which we invite you to submit creative and exciting explanations of ideas in math and science. Last year, Ryan Chester won the first Breakthrough Junior Challenge prize. “Make a video about scie…
THE FED JUST BAILED OUT THE STOCK MARKET
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. If the wait is finally over after almost two months of silence, as of a few hours ago, the Federal Reserve just reduced the rate hike to 25 basis points. This is signaling that even higher rate increases could soon be co…
I'm going on live because I'm bored
Okay so now I should be able to go live though. Okay so now, okay you should be able to hear my voice. Okay, why is this thing happening? Okay, can you guys hear my voice? Okay, okay that’s awesome! So hi! Actually, there is no reason for me to do a YouTu…
Hear the Untold Story of a Canadian Code Talker from World War II | Short Film Showcase
If we can just finish up with you reintroducing yourself again or you state your name and if you’d like to say a few quick words. I’m Charles, check accountants. I’m a mentee and have English and premium. I love my country. I do everything they asked me …
Weak base–strong acid titrations | Acids and bases | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Ammonia is an example of a weak base, and hydrochloric acid is an example of a strong acid. If we’re doing a weak base-strong acid titration, that means that ammonia is the analyte, the substance we’re analyzing, and we’re titrating ammonia with hydrochlo…