yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

More problems with knowing the 'fundamental nature' of X


2m read
·Nov 8, 2024

Npg85 made a video in which he offered an alternative way of trying to distill the fundamental essence of the process. In his video, he used the example of a computer speaker to illustrate his thinking. So I'm going to use the same example to demonstrate why his suggestions are problematic.

Npg85 suggests that if we ignore the specifics of a process, then what we're left with is properties and mechanisms that are fundamental to that process. By specifics, he means quantitative measurements. So, in the speaker example, the length of the wire running to the electromagnet is a specific detail that can be freely varied; it will still work. The shape of the magnet is another specific detail, too. We could vary any of these things, and the process of a speaker playing a sound would still happen.

According to Npg85, these are the fundamentals we would be left with in the case of the computer speaker making sound. Here they are: we'd have electricity traveling down a wire to an electromagnet, which causes a piece of paper to move back and forth, creating a vibration.

So, my objection to this suggestion sort of centers around this issue of what are the specifics of a process. Npg85 suggests that the electromagnet is a fundamental part of the speaker, and our fuzzy intuitions about the word fundamental probably agree with him. Um, but he's attempting to present an objective way of getting to the fundamentals of a process, so our intuitions about that are of no use.

Npg85 doesn't consider the electromagnet to be a specific detail of the speaker; he thinks it's fundamental. But the problem is that we can deconstruct an electromagnet and consider it as a collection of specific details. If we look closely, we can consider the conductivity of the wire in an electromagnet as a specific detail. We could change that so that its conductivity was zero.

If we look at the properties of the electrons inside the iron core of the electromagnet, these are specific details too. So, in principle, by adjusting millions of this kind of specific detail, we could render the electromagnet completely non-functional. In fact, by freely varying specific details like these, most of the time, what would be left with couldn't be called an electromagnet anymore because it wouldn't work as one.

So, yeah, obviously the speaker wouldn't do its job without there being an electromagnet there. But the ability of a component to enable a whole, in this case the speaker, to do its job is not one of Npg85's requirements for making a component fundamental.

So, to summarize, Npg85's revised method for trying to get to the fundamentals of a process is still problematic because crucial patterns like the electromagnet are made up of specific details. If you freely vary these specific details, the crucial patterns dissolve, and the process no longer works.

More Articles

View All
Billionaire John Paulson Warns Bitcoin is Going to $0 | Buy This Instead
What about cryptocurrencies? Are you a believer in cryptocurrencies? No, I’m not a believer in cryptocurrencies, and I would say that cryptocurrencies are a bubble. Billionaire hedge fund manager John Paulson said in a recent interview that Bitcoin is go…
Using quotation marks in titles | Punctuation | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! Hello, Paige! Hi, David! So, today we’re going to be talking about quotation marks. What are they and what do they do? Paige Finch: We use quotation marks to indicate when someone is speaking, right? So if we’re writing dialogue, we ca…
60 Startup Founders Share How They Met Their Co-Founder
How did you meet your co-founder? Yeah, it’s a funny story. So, uh, do you want to take this one? [Music] So we went to school, college, College, college. They’re both French, but actually, we met at Stanford in California. Week two of MIT, we went to …
Escape to the Stunning Wilderness of Ontario | National Geographic
A spirit is everywhere. Spirits in the water, spirits in the land, spirits in the animals. You know, it’s not empty. There’s no such thing as an empty earth, empty land, as the spirits are still learned. So that energy still learned, that life. To me, to …
Order of operations introduction | 6th grade | Khan Academy
Every few months you’ll see an expression like this go viral on social media because it looks simple, but depending on how people interpret this expression, they often get different answers. So first, why don’t you pause this video and think about what yo…
The Next Bank To Fail (What Just Happened)
What’s up? Grandma’s guys here, and as it turns out, the entire banking system could be in a lot more trouble than we initially expected. That’s because just days after the collapse of three national banks in a federal reserve bailout, another domino coul…