yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Labor-leisure tradeoff | Microeconomics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So let's keep talking about labor as a factor of production. In particular, we're going to think about the supply curve of labor.

When you're thinking about the supply or the demand curve for elite labor, when you think about quantity, you could just view that as hours worked in a certain time period—hours worked. And then for the price of labor, you could just view that as wages. We've already thought about what the demand curve for labor would look like. At high wages, not a lot of folks will want to use that labor; it's going to be so expensive they might not be able to afford it.

Then, as wages come down, more people will generally want, will demand that labor, and so they will want more hours for folks to work. This would be our demand curve, or we could call this our labor demand curve.

Now, what about the labor supply curve? What do you think that's going to look like? Well, not a trick question. When wages are low, a lot of folks might say, "Hey, I have other things to do with my time." But then, as wages get higher and higher, they might trade off those other things they're doing. Those other things, in some ways, have a higher opportunity cost; it gets more expensive.

So, they might trade off those other things for working, and so they might collectively work more and more hours. As wages go up, generally speaking, hours worked go up. This is a fairly classic looking labor supply curve.

This dynamic that I just talked about, where people are trying to trade off whether they work or whether they do other things, is typically referred to as the labor-leisure trade-off. Now, in everyday language, when you use the word leisure, it's usually referred to as you relaxing or spending time with friends or enjoying yourself in some ways.

But when people talk about the labor-leisure trade-off in economics, they're really talking about labor or anything that is not labor. So, leisure would include sleeping or eating or using the restroom; all of those would be included. It really should be called the labor-not labor trade-off, but I guess that doesn't sound as good as labor-leisure trade-off.

What you really see happening here is as wages are higher and higher, people are willing to trade off leisure (I'll put that in quotes) for labor.

Now, the effect that we often talk about, why that is, and in a lot of ways it's common sense, that's the substitution effect. As wages go higher, you could view the opportunity cost of leisure; it gets more and more expensive.

If anything gets more expensive, you try to substitute it with other things. In this case, you could substitute it with more labor by just working more.

Now, there is an interesting dynamic that some people talk about, which is the income effect. The income effect is as your wages go up, you tend to want to buy or demand more of everything. You could view leisure as a good that you, as a worker, might want.

So, there might be a dynamic that if income gets above a certain level, that you actually might not want to work more; you actually might want more leisure because you have more than enough to supply all of your needs.

So, if you wanted to imagine what a labor supply curve would look like if you could imagine the income effect kicking in at higher wages, it actually could look something like this: at low wages, it could look very similar to what we just described, but then there might be some wage where people are like, "You know what, I have enough money. Rather than just working that extra hour, I actually might want to spend that time with my family or go on vacation."

In a lot of ways, it's a very healthy mindset. In my personal opinion, I don't think enough people have that mindset. But if that were the case, at some point when wages get to a certain point, people actually might want to work less.

So, you would have this backward bending labor supply curve. So let me write this: this is a labor supply curve with the income effect after a certain point—income effect.

So it's an interesting thing to think about. Is there a certain income level above which people say, "You know what, I have enough, and rather than work harder, I actually might work a little bit less"? Interesting to think about.

More Articles

View All
How To Convert Customers With Cold Emails | Startup School
[Music] Hi, I’m Aarin Epstein, Group Partner at YC, and in this video, I’m going to talk all about how to write cold emails that convert. So first, I’m going to give you the all-time best email outreach hack. You ready? Get a warm intro! This is the most…
Before the Startup with Paul Graham (How to Start a Startup 2014: Lecture 3)
That’s short, like long introductions are no good. Um, Sam knows. Uh, all right, ready, everybody? I’m not going to ask if the mic is working like in every talk so far. Um, I’ll just assume it’s working. I mean, no. [Applause] All right, well, make it wor…
You're Wasting Time : How to Actually Grow Your YouTube Channel With a 9-5
You’re probably juggling a 9 to 5, family, or other responsibilities. Wonder if it’s even possible to grow on YouTube with just 1 hour a day? I completely get it because I personally spent 4 years failing at it. Then, after years of trial and error, somet…
Introduction to nucleic acids and nucleotides | High school biology | Khan Academy
We are now going to talk about what is perhaps the most important macromolecule in life, and that is known as nucleic acid. Now, first of all, where does that name come from? Well, scientists first observed this in the nucleus of cells, and so that’s wher…
15 "Boring" Businesses That Can Get You to 1 Million Dollars
The less you innovate, the better are your chances of making money instead of losing it. 70% of startups fail within the first 10 years, so if you thought the easiest road to $1 million was just about creativity and disruption, you’d be wrong, my friend. …
15 Ways to Create GENERATIONAL WEALTH
By the time 65 rolls around, only one in 100 people will be well off financially. 70% of wealthy families lose their wealth by the second generation and more so around 90% of families lose all wealth by the third generation. So, even if you make a fortune…