yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Connecting income to capital growth and potential inequality | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy


5m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We've already talked quite a bit about the idea that if you look, you if you have a market capitalist economy that some, that this will lead hopefully to economic growth. Economic growth, but by definition, a market economy will have some folks who win more and some folks who don't do as well. And it's going to, you're also going to have inequality. Inequality is essentially a fact of life of a market economy, and it's not necessarily something that you just want to turn off because that might also hurt economic growth.

And that actually might make everyone better off because the economic growth on a per capita basis could also be benefiting people who aren't in the top percentile or decile or quartile. Not always, but it could be. But with that thought in the back of our minds, let's actually think a little bit more about inequality and how, and how it's measured and how it can be tied to things like capital and growth of income to capital and returns on capital.

So this right over here, this is from Thomas Piketty's book, and that's what's neat: he's made all of the charts of his book available online right over there. And this shows income inequality in the United States between 1910 and 2010. And what you see here, he measures it by the share of the top decile in national income. So top decile is the top 10.

So this point right over here tells us that in 1910, the top 10% of earners made a little over 40% of the national income. As we go into the late 20s, that approaches 50 percent at the top, that the top 10% of earners were making close to half of the national income. And then, as we go through the Great Depression and especially after World War II, this drops down into the low 30s.

And then from the 1980s to the present, this has crept back up to the high 40% range. So the top decile, the top 10% of earners are making close to half of the national income. And let's just visualize how this happens just numerically. So let's imagine this is your economy in year one. So this is your economy in year one.

And actually, let me copy and paste that; I think that'll be useful. So copy. All right. And let's say that this is the fraction—I'll do it in orange—that is going to the top decile. So let's say it's roughly a third in year one. So this is the fraction that's going to the top decile; this is one-third right over here.

So the way that you have rising—so on this chart, this would be kind of a 33.3, so it would be someplace around here. So we could pretend like where some date in the 60s or 70s, right over here. And now the way that you have this chart moving up, where you have the top decile having a larger and larger share of national income, is if this orange section grows faster than this green section.

So if, for example, this grew by 10 while this grew by 5—by five percent—over time, this orange section is going to take a larger and larger chunk of the green section. Now, as we saw in previous videos, even if this does happen—and this is, by definition, rising inequality—there could be a scenario where the other 90% are still having a bigger pie and, on a per capita basis, still might be able to be better off.

But the focus of this video is not that; the focus of the video is tying this idea to the idea of increasing returns on capital driving this phenomenon, driving income inequality. So as we've seen before, income and wealth are not the same thing, but wealth could be a proxy; the more wealth that you have, you will have more income from that wealth. You will have a return on that capital.

So another way to divide the economy is, instead of thinking of the top 10% of earners and the other 90% of earners, you could think of how much of this income goes to the owners of capital and how much of it goes to the people who provide the labor. So it's more of a labor-capital split versus a 90-10% split.

So here we could think of this section right over here, and I'll just make it different. So let's say this is right over here. This is how much is going to owners of capital—capital to owners of capital—the people who own the buildings, the real estate, the resources—and how much of national income is going to labor. So this right over here is going to labor.

Now, the same—a similar idea is: look, if this blue section—if this blue section grows consistently, grows faster than the green pie, than the green pie, then the percentage of income that goes to capital is going to grow more and more and more. And because, in capitalist market economies, capital is also not evenly distributed, mainly because income is not evenly distributed, because capital is not evenly distributed, that this would essentially lead—this, as more and more income goes to capital—and that capital is disproportionately owned by the upper decile of income or wealth—then you're going to, it's essentially going to drive this phenomenon right over there.

Now, I want to be very clear: this growth right over here—you'll hear the term return on capital in conjunction with Piketty's book, where they compare the return on capital to growth rates—and this growth right over here is not the return on capital. In order to know the return on capital, you have to know how much—you need to know the income that the capital generated, but you also have to know the value of that capital.

And here in this diagram, all I know is the income that the capital generated, but I don't know the value of that capital, so I can't calculate the return on capital. This growth that I'm showing right over here—maybe after a few years, this blue section grows to over here, while the green section, while the pie, has grown something like this.

This growth right over here, you could view this as the growth of income to capital, which isn't something you hear a lot about. But this growth right over here—this growth, maybe this is plus five percent for the total economy; this is the G that's often referred to—this is the total growth of the economy.

More Articles

View All
Spacex Booster Catch: $3 BILLION BUSTED!!
Everyone is gushing over this now. I know what you’re thinking — there is no way, no way that you can possibly dunk on this. It’s engineering amazing! Well, yeah, it looks impressive. I wonder how much the U.S. taxpayer paid for this, and the answer is th…
Can You Trust Kurzgesagt Videos?
Can you trust Kurzgesagt videos? To answer this question, we’ll first explain how we research them and then talk a bit about past videos, and what we want to achieve with the channel. Making a Kurzgesagt video always begins with a question or an issue. F…
How I Made My First Million Dollars Part 2 | Ask Mr. Wonderful Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary
Hey, Mr. Wonderful here, and welcome to another episode of Ask Mr. Wonderful. Now, this week, as always, has been brought to you by questions from the audience, which I think is the best way to do this. There are two that I found absolutely fascinating, k…
Race to Get on the Water | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
Yo, really? Oh boy, thanks for the info. Oh man, I don’t know if I wanted to get that phone call. What do you think, Reba? I just heard from another fishing pal of mine that the friends he got out today and they’re hooked up. We just traveled a long way t…
Exposing THE TRUTH about Alex Becker ads...
Hmm, see, I wonder what’s on YouTube today. I decided to see what videos I can watch and how much I can learn. Hmm, wait a second, what’s this? Oh, Crank are Donuts always video on it should be good. If you give me 45 seconds, I’m gonna show you how am I …
Use the Force! | Explorer
Innovator Ton Lee is changing the way we study the brain. So that will feel a little wet on your head because this is the nature of this system. Lee’s revolutionary headset records our brain waves and translates them into meaningful data that’s easy to u…