yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Most Efficient Way to Destroy the Universe – False Vacuum


4m read
·Nov 2, 2024

What if our universe comes with a self-destruct button to eliminate itself so cleanly and efficiently, that every single physical thing would just stop existing and life would be impossible forever? The ultimate ecological catastrophe - vacuum decay. (Theme music)

To explain how our universe could destroy itself, we need to understand two principles: One - energy levels. A core idea in physics is that everything has an energy level. The higher the level, the more energy is in the system. Wood, for example, has a high level. It can be burnt, a process that releases the chemical energy stored in its molecular bonds and turns it into heat. The ash leftover is at a lower energy level than the wood before.

Two - stability. Everything in our universe tries to move towards its ground state, in which it's completely stable and has as little energy as possible. For example, a ball on a hill is unstable and has a lot of potential energy. When disturbed, it will roll down into the valley and lose its potential energy in the process. The ball is now in its ground state and stable. It will remain like that. Everything in our universe follows these two principles. If something has a lot of energy, it's unstable and wants to get rid of it to become stable and reach its ground state. This is true for every system, even in the weird world of quantum mechanics.

If our current understanding of physics is correct, then the universe gets its properties from quantum fields. We explained them in detail in another video. For this video, imagine them as the rules of the universe. They tell particles how to behave and interact. Like everything in the universe, they want to be in the lowest energy level possible, which is called a vacuum state. This has nothing to do with vacuum in space. It's just called this way because scientists are bad at naming things.

We then call the fields reached their vacuum state, except maybe one. It's possible that the Higgs Field is not stable, but metastable, which is a fancy way of saying that it pretends to be stable but really is not. It would be a false vacuum. The Higgs Field is responsible for giving particles their mass, which rules how almost everything in the universe interacts. What would happen if the Higgs Field is a false vacuum?

Think of our ball in the valley: the ball is the Higgs Field. The valley might not be the lowest energy state for the Higgs Field. There might be an even deeper valley that it wants to get to. This would mean that the Higgs Field has a lot of potential energy, waiting to be released. The Higgs Field could be like a piece of wood but drenched in gasoline, waiting to set the universe on fire. A random spark like quantum tunneling could release the potential energy of the Higgs Fields. This could happen at any time and without warning.

If at any point in space, this so-called vacuum decay starts, there is no turning back. As the Higgs Field crashes into the lower energy state, it releases a massive amount of potential energy. This energy pushes the space around it over the barrier, which releases more potential energy. A sphere of the new stable Higgs Field, or true vacuum, grows at the speed of light in all directions. Imagine it like setting a sea of gasoline, the size of the universe, on fire.

This sphere is surrounded by a shell of energy that devours everything it comes into contact with. Whatever it touches is eliminated from existence. The bubble will continue to grow forever, deleting the universe on its way. There is no way to be warned since it's so fast. But there's nothing we can do anyway. Our destruction would be instant; in a fraction of a second, Earth would be gone.

But it actually gets worse. If the energy level of the Higgs Field changes, it changes all of physics. In the true vacuum of the sphere, the standard model will be overthrown, superseded by different physics that we don't know - how fundamental particles behave, how atoms hold together, how chemicals react. Vacuum decay won't just destroy life; it will destroy chemistry itself, making life as we know it impossible. We simply have no idea what it would be like inside. It might be a shadow of what it is now, or not. We don't know.

If vacuum decay happens, the outlook is indeed grim. If you feel slightly worried now, don't be. At this point, false vacuum is speculation based on our current understanding of particle physics, which might be wrong. It's kind of like using a ruler to measure a continent. (playful music) Sure, you can do it, but you might be off by quite a bit at the end.

Right now, no one can say vacuum decay is a thing that's real or just a scary idea. But even if one or multiple spheres of death have already started expanding, the universe is so big that they might not reach us for billions of years. If they're far enough away, they might not ever be able to reach us because of the expansion of the universe. The speed of light is not that fast on the scale of the universe.

So, while vacuum decay is fascinatingly scary, right now, there are other things we should be more afraid of. In contrast to vacuum decay, we have the power to prepare for most of them. Videos like this one take hundreds of hours to make, so support us on Patreon if you'd like to learn more about the destruction of everything. It really helps us out. We tried to destroy the universe at least once every few months. So let us know in the comments if you have doomsday scenarios you would like us to cover.

Subtitles by the Amara.org community

More Articles

View All
how to learn anything FAST and outsmart the competition
Imagine being able to dive into any subject, quickly grasp it, and master it like a pro. This kind of ultra-efficient learning might sound like a superpower, but there are people out there who seem to have cracked the code on how to absorb new information…
Conclusion for a two sample t test using a P value
We’re told a sociologist studying fertility in Argentina and Bolivia wanted to test if there was a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have. The sociologist obtained a random sample of women from each country. Here are the res…
Equivalent ratios in similar shapes | Transformational geometry | Grade 8 (TX) | Khan Academy
We’re told that quadrilateral ABCD is similar to quadrilateral STUV. So what we’re going to do in this video, this isn’t a question; this is just a statement right over here. But what we’re going to do is think about what does similarity mean? What does i…
How We Make Slow Motion Sounds (Exploding Tomato at 60,000fps) - Smarter Every Day 184
Video one: candle tomato. Video two coming up banana bottle. This is the Phantom V25 11; this is the ultra slow motion workhorse for Smarter Every Day - and sometimes on the Slow Mo Guys. This camera can record at two-thirds of a million frames per second…
The Trouble with the Electoral College
In a fair democracy, everyone’s vote should count equally, but the method that the United States uses to elect its president, called the electoral college, violates this principle by making sure that some people’s votes are more equal than others. The Ele…
Bubbling Disaster | Science of Stupid
Cracking open a bottle of bubbly isn’t just for F1 drivers and stock brokers; it’s also the perfect way to kick off a Christmas party. But like F1 drivers and stock brokers, champagne bottles are under an awful lot of pressure—around six times normal atmo…