yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

General multiplication rule example: dependent events | Probability & combinatorics


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We're told that Maya and Doug are finalists in a crafting competition. For the final round, each of them will randomly select a card without replacement that will reveal what the star material must be in their craft. Here are the available cards. I guess the star material is the primary material they need to use in this competition. Maya and Doug both want to get silk as their star material. Maya will draw first, followed by Doug.

What is the probability that neither contestant draws silk? Pause this video and see if you can work through that before we work through this together.

All right, now let's work through this together. So the probability that neither contestant draws silk—so that would be, I'll just write it another way: the probability that I'll write MNS for Maya, no silk. So Maya, no silk, and Doug, no silk. That's just another way of saying, what is the probability that neither contestant draws silk?

And so this is going to be equivalent to the probability that Maya does not get silk, Maya no silk, right over here. Times the probability that Doug doesn't get silk, given that Maya did not get silk—given Maya, no silk. This line right over this vertical line, this is shorthand for given.

And so let's calculate each of these. So this is going to be equal to the probability that Maya gets no silk. She picked first; there's six options out of here, five of them are not silk. So it is five over six.

And then the probability that Doug does not get silk, given that Maya did not get silk. So if Maya did not get silk, then that means that silk is still in the mix. But there's only five possibilities left because Maya picked one of them, and four of them are not silk. There's still silk as an option.

It's important to recognize that the probability that Doug gets no silk is dependent on whether Maya got silk or not, so it's very important to have this given right over here. If these were independent events—if Maya picked and then put her card back in, and then Doug were to pick separately—then the probability that Doug gets no silk given that Maya got no silk would be the same thing as the probability that Doug gets no silk regardless of what Maya was doing.

And so this will end up becoming four over six, which is the same thing as two thirds.

More Articles

View All
The Ponzi Factor | Stocks are NOT Ownership Instruments
The reason why finance professionals do not see the stock market as a Ponzi scheme is because they believe the credibility for an idea rests on repetition, tradition, and people who recite it rather than proof, logic, or facts. The first fallacy, which I…
Be a Million-Dollar Real Estate Agent...with 6 Techniques
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So I want to share with you guys the easiest, simplest, fastest, bestest, coolest, most awesomest tips to be a better real estate agent. And just as a forewarning on this, some of these might actually sound like I’m …
Life at Sea | Making the Disney Wish | Mini Episode 6
My name is Sheikha. I’m the senior entertainment manager on board the beautiful Disney Wet. I just love being around the different kinds of people that we have on board and the uniqueness of living at sea. My favorite part of what I do here is the people…
Affect and effect | Frequently confused words | Usage | Grammar
Hello Garian, today we’re going to talk about two of my, well, I don’t know if I’d call them favorite, but two of my most frequently confused words. I make this mistake all the time, you know, and I think it’s important to keep it straight. So, affect and…
r greater than g but less inequality
One of the core ideas of Thomas Piketty’s book is if the return on capital is greater than the growth in economy, then that could drive inequality. Inequality is a natural byproduct of a market capitalist economy, and one could argue that, hey, look, some…
Chad Rigetti at Startup School SV 2016
Everybody, our next speaker is Chad Retti from Retti Quantum Computing. Retti Quantum Computing went through YC in the summer of 2014. Um, at that point they had nothing. Uh, they are now one of the leading Quantum Computing companies in the world. And ne…