yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Le Chȃtelier’s principle: Changing temperature | Equilibrium | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


7m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Le Chatelier's principle says if a stress is applied to a reaction at equilibrium, the net reaction goes in the direction that relieves the stress. One possible stress is to change the temperature of the reaction at equilibrium. As an example, let's look at the hypothetical reaction where gas A turns into gas B. Delta H for this reaction is less than zero, which tells us this is an exothermic reaction, and for an exothermic reaction, heat is given off. Heat is released; therefore, we can go ahead and write plus heat on the product side.

Let's say that our hypothetical reaction is at equilibrium, and then we change the temperature. So we're going to increase the temperature. According to the La Chatelier's principle, the net reaction is going to go in the direction that decreases the stress. If we treat heat like a product and we've increased the temperature, it's as if we've increased the amount of one of our products; therefore, the net reaction is going to shift to the left to decrease a product.

Let's use particulate diagrams and the reaction quotient Q to explain what's going on when we increase the temperature on a reaction at equilibrium. The first particulate diagram shows the reaction at equilibrium, and let's prove that by calculating Qc at this moment in time. We can get the expression for the reaction quotient Qc by looking at the balanced equation. So we have coefficients of one in front of A and in front of B; therefore, Qc is equal to the concentration of B to the first power divided by the concentration of A also to the first power.

To find the concentration of B, we know that B is represented by blue spheres. So there are one, two, three blue spheres. If each sphere represents 0.1 moles of a substance, 3 times 0.1 is equal to 0.3 moles of B. If the volume is equal to 1.0 liter, 0.3 divided by 1.0 liter is 0.3 molar; so the concentration of B is equal to 0.3 molar. There are also three particles of A; therefore, the concentration of A is also equal to 0.3 molar. 0.3 divided by 0.3 is equal to 1, so Qc at this moment of time is equal to 1. Kc for this reaction is equal to 1 at 25 degrees Celsius, so Qc is equal to Kc, and when Qc is equal to Kc, the reaction is at equilibrium. So for this first particulate diagram, the reaction's at equilibrium.

Next, we introduce the stress to the reaction at equilibrium, and the stress is an increase in the temperature. In general, for an exothermic reaction, increasing the temperature lowers the value for the equilibrium constant. So for this hypothetical reaction at 25 degrees Celsius, Kc is equal to 1, but since we've increased the temperature, the value for the equilibrium constant is going to decrease. So let's say it goes to 0.5 if we increase the temperature to 30 degrees Celsius.

So if we calculate Qc for our second particulate diagram, we still have three blues and three reds, and the volume is still the same; therefore, Qc is still equal to one. But the difference is Kc has now changed, so Qc is not equal to Kc. Therefore, we are not at equilibrium, and in this case, Qc is greater than Kc because Qc is equal to 1, and Kc is equal to 0.5. When Qc is greater than Kc, there are too many products and not enough reactants, and therefore the net reaction goes to the left.

When the net reaction goes to the left, we're going to have B turn into A. So we should see one blue sphere turn into one red sphere. If we have three blues and three reds, and one blue turns into a red, that gives us only two blues and four reds now. So when we calculate Qc for our third particular diagram, the concentration of B would be 0.2 molar, and the concentration of A would be 0.4 molar. So 0.2 divided by 0.4 is equal to 0.5. Well, Kc is also equal to 0.5; therefore, Qc is equal to Kc, and the reaction is at equilibrium. When a reaction is at equilibrium, the concentrations of reactants and products are constant.

Let's go back to our hypothetical reaction at equilibrium, but this time we're going to decrease the temperature. If we treat heat like a product, decreasing the temperature is like decreasing the amount of one of the products; therefore, the net reaction will go to the right to make more product. If we approach this problem by thinking about the reaction quotient Q for an exothermic reaction, a decrease in temperature in general causes an increase in the equilibrium constant. If the equilibrium constant increases, then Q would be less than K, and when Q is less than K, the net reaction goes to the right.

The net reaction would continue to go to the right until Q is equal to K, and equilibrium has been reestablished. Next, let's look at an endothermic reaction where delta H is greater than zero. When six water molecules complex to a cobalt two plus ion, the resulting complex ion is pink in color. When four chloride anions complex to a cobalt two plus ion, the resulting complex ion is blue in color. When the pink ion reacts with four chloride anions, the blue ion is formed. Since this reaction is endothermic, we can put heat on the reactant side.

We're going to use these particulate diagrams down here to help us understand what happens to an endothermic reaction at equilibrium when the temperature changes. However, these drawings aren't designed to be completely accurate for this particular reaction; they're just to help us understand what color we would see. For example, let's say that this middle particulate diagram represents the reaction at equilibrium, and if there are decent amounts of both the blue ion and the pink ion at equilibrium, the resulting equilibrium mixture, so this is an aqueous solution, would appear to be purple or violet.

If we were to increase the temperature for this endothermic reaction, we treat heat like a reactant, so increasing the temperature is like increasing the amount of a reactant; therefore, the net reaction will shift to the right to get rid of some of that reactant. When the net reaction goes to the right, we're going to increase in the amount of blue ion, and we're going to decrease in the amount of pink ion. Therefore, looking at this particulate diagram on the right, there are now more blue ions than there are pink ions compared to our equilibrium mixture in the middle. Therefore, for this third particular diagram, the resulting aqueous solution is going to look blue.

If we think about this using Q, in general, for an endothermic reaction, an increase in temperature causes an increase in the equilibrium constant K. If K increases, then the reaction quotient Q is less than K, and when Q is less than K, the net reaction goes to the right. Now, let's go back to the middle particular diagram. So there are reactions at equilibrium, and this time we're going to decrease the temperature. If we treat heat as a reactant and we decrease the temperature, it's like we're decreasing one of our reactants; therefore, the net reaction will shift to the left to make more of our reactant.

When the net reaction goes to the left, we're going to decrease in the amount of the blue ion, and we're going to increase in the amount of the pink ion. So when we compare the middle particulate diagram to the one on the left, on the left, there's a lot more of the pink ion than there is of the blue ion. Therefore, the overall solution, the overall aqueous solution, is going to appear pink.

If we think about what's happening using Q for an endothermic reaction, in general, when you decrease the temperature, you decrease the equilibrium constant. If the equilibrium constant decreases, now Q would be greater than K, which means too many products and not enough reactants; therefore, the net reaction would go to the left.

Let's go back to our exothermic reaction. At this time, let's pretend like we're starting with only A. So we start with only A, and we have none of B, and our goal is to make as much B as we possibly can and to do it as fast as possible. One way to increase the rate of a reaction would be to increase the temperature. However, for an exothermic reaction, increasing the temperature decreases the equilibrium constant K. If you decrease the equilibrium constant K, you would decrease the amount of B that you would have when you reach equilibrium.

So we can't run our hypothetical reaction at too high of a temperature because that would decrease the equilibrium constant. So instead, to speed up the rate of the reaction, we could add a catalyst. Look at a graph of concentration of B versus time. We're going to start with this blue curve here, which represents the hypothetical reaction without a catalyst, so the uncatalyzed reaction. When time is equal to zero, the concentration of B is zero because we start with only A. As A turns into B, the concentration of B increases over time, and eventually, the concentration of B becomes constant.

When the concentration of B becomes constant, the reaction reaches equilibrium. This dotted line here represents the concentration of B at equilibrium. The yellow line represents the reaction with a catalyst added. So once again, we're starting with only A. When time is equal to zero, the concentration of B is equal to zero, and as time increases, A turns into B. The concentration of B increases, and eventually, the concentration of B becomes constant, and the reaction reaches equilibrium.

Notice that the reaction reached equilibrium much faster with the addition of the catalyst than it did without the catalyst. So the addition of a catalyst allows a reaction to reach equilibrium faster. However, notice that the final equilibrium concentration of B is the same for both the uncatalyzed reaction and the catalyzed reaction. Therefore, the addition of a catalyst does not change the composition of the equilibrium mixture, and that's because the catalyst speeds up both the forward reaction and the reverse reaction, but the rates are still equal, and since the rates are equal, there's no change in the composition of the equilibrium mixture.

More Articles

View All
The colossal problem with universal income | #7 of Top 10 2019 | Big Think
DOUGLAS RUSHKOFF: For a long time, I was a fan of universal basic income. And the logic I had was that I always hear politicians talking about, “Let’s create jobs for people. That’s what we need is jobs, more jobs,” as if that’s what’s going to solve the …
Say No to Happiness: CBC Ideas
[Music] I’m Paul Kennedy. Welcome to Ideas. Aristotle claimed happiness was the ultimate purpose of life. Mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal believed that all men seek happiness. The poet Alexander Pope enthused, “Oh happiness, our being’s end an…
Metric system unit conversion examples
Tomas dropped off two packages to be shipped. One package weighed 1.38 kg and the other package weighed 720 g. So the first one they given in kilograms and the second one they give us in grams. What was the combined weight of both packages in grams? So w…
The Anatomy of Teamwork: Master the Art of Collaboration | Diane Paulus | Big Think
When you work in the theater, you always begin privately. There isn’t always an audience. But interestingly, there is always a test of what that relationship to the audience is going to be. So you begin with your team of colleagues. On a musical, you have…
Answering Google's Most Asked Questions of 2022
For most of Google’s relatively short existence, we’ve searched small, silly, insignificant questions - things like how to tell if a papaya is ripe. The color is almost fully yellow, and the feeling is slightly soft. Don’t forget to scoop out the seeds! S…
Hive mind: The good, the bad, and the viral | Sarah Rose Cavanagh | Big Think
The hivemind is a couple of different things. It is firstly the idea that we are a collective as much as we are individuals and that we can enter this frame of mind where we’re sharing attention and we’re sharing goals and we’re sharing emotions. You can …