yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
Basic derivative rules (Part 1) | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So these are both ways that you will see limit-based definitions of derivatives. Usually, this is if you’re thinking about the derivative at a point. Here, if you’re thinking about the derivative in general, but these are both equivalent. They’re both bas…
Factorial and counting seat arrangements | Probability and Statistics | Khan Academy
In this video, we are going to introduce ourselves to the idea of permutations, which is a fancy word for a pretty straightforward concept: what are the number of ways that we can arrange things? How many different possibilities are there? To make that a…
Graphical limit example
We are asked what is a reasonable estimate for the limit of g of x as x approaches 3. So, what we have here in blue, this is the graph of y is equal to g of x, and we want to think about what is the limit as x approaches 3. So, this is x equals 3 here. S…
Deadly Waters: Crocodiles and Adventure | Edge of the Unknown on Disney+
[MUSIC PLAYING] Most rivers, when you get to a calm section, you can rest a little bit. But on Murch, that calm, flat water is definitely more terrifying than any of the white water. MAN: Being a kayaker in Central Africa, inevitably, you’re going to hav…
Emotional Manipulation: A Masked Reality
Manipulation is everywhere. The social influence aimed at changing the behavior or belief of a person through emotional coercion. Emotional manipulation has always been prevalent in human interaction. It’s in all of our relationships. Companies use it on …
Divergence formula, part 1
Hello everyone. So, now that we have an intuition for what divergence is trying to represent, let’s start actually drilling in on a formula. The first thing I want to do is just limit our perspective to functions that only have an x component, or rather w…