yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
The Last Days of the Romanovs | National Geographic
I think it’s a big tragedy, big tragedy for the country and for the world. For 300 years, the Romanovs ruled Russia as czars—loved, feared, revered, respected. But all too often, those who fly highest fall furthest. World War One brought Russia to revolut…
15 Beliefs That Limit Your Success
Your brain purposely makes you feel like you’re weak. The reason for this is to protect you from potential future pain, and in this process, it creates a series of myths about you which you believe to be true. When, in fact, they are just lies your brain …
Charlie Munger: This One Thing Helped Me Become a Billionaire
Warren and I, we never tried to make money out of the dumb, say, out of the stupidity of our dumb buyers. We tried to make money by buying, and if we were selling horse [ __ ], we didn’t want to pretend it was a cure for arthritis. And I think it’s better…
Inside Bill Gates’ 2021 Stock Portfolio
[Music] So Bill Gates, we all know him, we all love him. He is currently the fourth richest person in the whole world, and we know him because these days he uses his wealth to fund the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which does fantastic charity work a…
Surviving a Firefight | No Man Left Behind
One thing you have to understand about an SCES soldier, you know, during them six months of selection, what we do is knock them soldiers down physically, mentally, everything. And they get back up and they keep moving on, and you just keep getting over ea…
Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person
I’ve been asked to talk to you today about an essay that I wrote, uh, for the New York Times, um, last year, which went under a rather dramatic, uh, heading. Uh, it was called “Why You Will Marry the Wrong Person.” And perhaps we can just begin, um, we’re…