yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
Philosophies on Failure & Learning
Life looks like this to me: um, you know, you start off and you head in a direction, and you evolve. And then you have your setbacks and the pains and so on. Ideally, you learn and you readapt, and you go on, and you have another one of those. It’s that p…
3-D Technology Offers Clues to How Egypt’s Pyramids Were Built | Nat Geo Live
My archaeological team actually is very unique because I’m the only ecologist, and the other members are computer scientists, software engineers, and applied mathematicians. We are like a crime scene investigation, patiently documenting with the latest te…
AI in your life
So in this video we’re going to talk about where we all have artificial intelligence or AI in our lives. And so before I go into where we’re already seeing it and where we’re likely to start seeing it more and more, I want you to pause this video and thi…
15 Ways People Are Wasting Your Time
Guess what, Aluxer? People waste your time a lot of the time. You may notice sooner rather than later. You might only notice once they’ve taken a big chunk of it. And the worst, you may never notice. You might be giving your time and effort to people who …
Counting by tens | Counting | Early Math | Khan Academy
So we are told, let’s count by tens, and we go 10, 20, blank, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 000. What number did we miss? Pause the video. What number did we miss right over here? Well, if we’re counting by tens, we would go 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, …
Making Physical Retail as Easy as Opening an Online Store - Ali Kriegsman and Alana Branston
So there were a bunch of questions about you guys, kind of like pre-YC. I think maybe the easiest way to do this is to flow through from there. Before you guys were in YC and then fellowship and then Corps, and then now. So going all the way back, Phil Th…