yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
Connecting limits and graphical behavior | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So, we have the graph of y is equal to g of x right over here, and I want to think about what is the limit as x approaches 5 of g of x. Well, we’ve done this multiple times. Let’s think about what g of x approaches as x approaches 5. From the left, g of …
Medical School Exam Week Vlog | Med School Diaries
This video is sponsored by Psych2Go. Psych2Go is an amazing channel for those who are interested in mental care and different things about mental health, and I’m sure that a lot of you guys are following them. Actually, don’t forget to check out their vid…
Could Sport Fishing Cause Shark Attacks? | When Sharks Attack: Tropical Terror
If tiger sharks are showing up in the shallows in greater numbers, then it’s not because of deep blue. The reason for the attacks remains elusive, but while scouring the ocean for an explanation, experts come across something else that also ensnares large…
Ratios on coordinate plane
We are told that a baker uses eight cups of flour to make one batch of muffins for his bakery. Complete the table for the given ratio. So they’re saying that for every batch, he needs eight cups of flour, or he needs eight cups of flour for every batch. …
Nobel Prize Winner Brian Schmidt - Physics 2011
[Applause] I’m here at the Mount Strow Observatory to talk to one of this year’s Nobel Prize winners for physics, Professor Brian Schmidt. “Still feels kind of weird. I don’t know, I don’t really feel like a Nobel Prize winner when I go and say, ‘Okay, g…
Simplifying rational expressions: common monomial factors | High School Math | Khan Academy
So, I have a rational expression here, and what my goal is, is to simplify it. But while I simplify it, I want to make the simplified expression be algebraically equivalent. So if there are certain x values that would make this thing undefined, then I hav…