yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
Are We At A Turning Point For Crypto? | Crypto Banter
[Music] [Applause] [Music] Oh, it’s a great time to welcome our friend Mr. Wonderful! Welcome back, and Jiren, welcome back to the show. Do you think that we’ve seen the bottom, and is — or are we headed for another leg down? I have a slightly different …
8 Benefits Of Traveling Alone
The first time I truly traveled alone was around five years ago. I didn’t really know what to expect and how it would be to face the world equipped with a small trolley and backpack. Well, it was one of the greatest experiences I’ve ever had. So, I did it…
Crypto Will Be The 12th Sector of The S&P! | Bitcoin 2022
[Music] It’s pretty chaotic here on the first day because nobody knows where to go. There’s 50,000 people showing. The first day probably about 250,000 by the time this is over, and it’s really going to be big this year because there’s so many institution…
Factoring using polynomial division: missing term | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
We’re told the polynomial ( p(x) ) which is equal to this has a known factor of ( x + 6 ). Rewrite ( p(x) ) as a product of linear factors. Pause this video and see if you can have a go at that. All right, now let’s work on this together. Because they gi…
My Thoughts On The 2021 Stock Market Crash
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So first of all, can you believe it? We only got about 40 days left so far in 2020, depending on when I post this. Which means I could finally start using 2021 in the titles of my videos! No, but in all seriousness, …
Howard Marks: A Storm is Brewing in the Stock Market (The "AI Bubble")
Every bubble ensues from widespread conviction. People are now convinced AI will change the world. I imagine it will, but you know, if you go back 25 years ago, exactly to, uh, to mid-1999, everybody was sure that the internet would change the world. And …