yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
Big Short Investors Weigh In On The Banking Crisis (Credit Suisse - Michael Burry, Steve Eisman)
Hello everyone and welcome back to yet another episode of which major bank is failing this week! What a massive season it’s been for the show. We’ve had Silvergate on the program, we had Silicon Valley Bank bite the dust last week, it was all Signature Ba…
Here’s EXACTLY how much I made from YouTube in 2018 (Not Clickbait)
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So I’ll just get right into it. A month ago, I posted a video showing how much I made from a 1.4 million view viral video, which if you haven’t seen that video yet, make sure to go and check that out so you can go an…
How Long Will You Live?
10,000 years ago, the average human life lasted just over 30 years, and then a hundred years ago that number was up to 50. If you were born in the last few decades in the developed world, then your life expectancy is 80 years. But that is, of course, assu…
Tesla: The Electric Revolution
This decade is set to be the Roaring Twenties of the electric car. Right now, electric cars make up only a tiny fraction of the automobiles sold worldwide, but according to a recent analysis, this is going to change pretty quickly. The same report suggest…
The Billion Ant Mega Colony and the Biggest War on Earth
In nearly every corner of the earth, ants wage war against each other. Their weapons are what nature gave them. Some have strong armor, deathly stingers, or sharp mandibles. And then there’s this tiny and not very impressive ant, but it rules the biggest …
Long run and short run Phillips curves
Let’s talk a little bit about the short run and long run Phillips curve. Now, they’re named after the economist Bill Phillips, who saw in the 1950s what looked like an inverse relationship between inflation and the unemployment rate. He was studying decad…