yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
Intralase LASIK Procedure with Fear-o-meter and Pain-o-meter
Hey, it’s me, Dustin. I had LASIK surgery here at some random doctor’s office. I’m not going to tell you which one it is, but, uh, anyway, the surgery went well, and I recorded it. Well, kind of recorded the video playing of it, so here it is, check it ou…
The Stickiest *Non-Sticky* Substance
This is one of the strangest materials I have ever seen. It is not sticky at all. You can’t even stick regular tape to it. But if I drape it over this tomato, it holds it up, unless you turn it upside down, in which case it just falls off. Now does it onl…
Embark Trucks' Application Video for YC W16
Hi, I’m Alex. This is Brandon and Mike, and together with our trusty prototype Marvin, we are Varden Labs. I’ve been programming since I was 13 years old. I was ranked as one of the top 20 programmers in Canada in high school, and most recently, I worked…
BEHIND THE SCENES Of Shark Tank During COVID | Kevin O'Leary
I’m um in Las Vegas somewhere in quarantine getting ready to shoot Shark Tank, in the bubble, as they say. [Music] So anyways, I’m um in Las Vegas somewhere in quarantine somewhere and, uh, getting ready to shoot Shark Tank real soon in the bubble, as the…
Warren Buffett's Stark Warning About 'AI Stocks'
We let a genie out of a bottle when we develop nuclear weapons, and AI is somewhat similar. All right team, we’ve got a lot more to talk about. As you guys would have seen in my last video, I am here in Omaha covering the Berkshire Hathaway shareholder m…
Seth Klarman's Warning for "The Everything Bubble"
The first thing is, we’ve been in an everything bubble. I think that a lot of money has flowed into virtually everything. You’ve had speculation during that bubble in all kinds of things from crypto to meme stocks to SPACs. That day is Seth Klam, and he …