yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
Confucius and Confucianism
Now, I am going to talk about one of the greatest philosophers and teachers in human history, and that is Confucius, known to the Chinese as Kong Fuzi, which means Master Kong, or Kongzi, which means Grandmaster Kong. Once again, my apologies for my pronu…
Hiroshi Mikitani at Startup School 2012
Thank you for coming. Thank you very much for inviting so many people. There’s a lot of people, so maybe to start, you could just tell us a little bit about what Rakuten is and how you got started. Okay, so I founded it in Japan in 1997, as a matter of f…
Worked example: Predicting whether a precipitate forms by comparing Q and Kₛₚ | Khan Academy
[Instructor] For this problem, our goal is to figure out whether or not a precipitate will form if we mix 0.20 liters of a 4.0 times 10 to the negative third Molar solution of lead two nitrate with 0.80 liters of an 8.0 times 10 to the negative third Mola…
Types of Radiation
At the end of the 1800s, physicists were staggered to find there was radiation coming out of all kinds of things—just dirt and rocks. Uh, the very first time this was discovered was with a jar of uranium salts that was left in a drawer overnight, and in t…
My Thoughts On REAL ESTATE, INVESTING & HOW TO SUCCEED In 2021 | Kevin O'Leary & Barbara Corcoran
I don’t think these commercial properties are going to do well at all. In fact, I think they’re going to lose a substantial portion of their value over the next six months to a year. We have companies where sales are down, but cash flow is up. Now, how di…
How Solving this Medical Mystery Saved Lives | Nat Geo Explores
Not that long ago, we didn’t understand why we got sick. There was no internet, and doctors were basically guessing. But then, in the 19th century, a few scientists figured it out: germs. One of the scientists was Louis Pasteur. The milk, already pasteuri…