yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables.

How many trials do he have to take until he gets a success? Let M be the number of shots it takes Jeremiah to successfully make his first three-point shot.

Okay, so they're defining the random variable here: the number of shots it takes, the number of trials it takes until we get a successful three-point shot. Assume that the results of each shot are independent. All right, the probability that he makes a given shot is not dependent on whether he made or missed the previous shots.

Find the probability that Jeremiah's first successful shot occurs on his third attempt. So, like always, pause this video and see if you could have a go at it.

All right, now let's work through this together. So we want to find the probability that, so M is the number of shots it takes until Jeremiah makes his first successful one. What they're really asking is to find the probability that M is equal to 3, that his first successful shot occurs on his third attempt.

So M is equal to 3. So that the number of shots it takes Jeremiah, not me, to make a successful first shot is 3. So how do we do this?

Well, what's just the probability of that happening? Well, that means he has to miss his first two shots and then make his third shot. So what's the probability of him missing his first shot? Well, if he has a 1/4 chance of making his shots, he has a 3/4 chance of missing his shots. So this will be 3/4.

So he misses the first shot, times he has to miss the second shot, and then he has to make his third shot. So there you have it, that's the probability: miss, miss, make.

So what is this going to be? This is equal to nine over sixty-fourths. So there you have it. If you wanted to have this as a decimal, we could get a calculator out real fast. So this is nine—whoops—nine divided by 64 is equal to zero, roughly 0.14.

Approximately 0.14, or another way to think about it is roughly a fourteen percent chance, or fourteen percent probability that it takes him, that his first successful shot occurs in his third attempt.

More Articles

View All
Who has the Deathly-est Hallows? Harry Potter or Dr Strange --NERD WARS
Hey everybody! Welcome to Nerd Wars. I’m Fatih and I’m Jeff. We decided to do one topical: it’s Harry Potter versus Doctor Strange. I’ll be arguing Harry Potter, and I’ll be arguing Doctor Strange. Harry Potter is real! It’s real! They got a wand, and yo…
Turning Seeds Into an American Icon: A History of Hemp in the U.S. | Short Film Showcase
[Laughter] [Music] They paved my road when I was seven or eight years old. I rode that school bus that first day, and I came home. It was the first time I’d ever looked at my own situation, and it’s like I’m poor. [Music] [Laughter] [Music] [Laughter] In…
How to take AI from vision to practice. Part 3
This conversation forward. Please ask questions, comment in the chat. Uh, we’d love to hear from you. So let, um, yes, we are sharing. We are recording this webinar, and we will be sharing the webinar after it is done, so absolutely you’ll be able to acce…
Andy Bromberg - Startup Investor School Day 4
There was one note that someone had that I thought was a little interesting. He pointed out that, Karl, thank you, that we haven’t really talked about taxes. I can’t imagine why we haven’t talked about taxes. Well, taxes are an interesting issue when you…
Sample size for a given margin of error for a mean | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Nadia wants to create a confidence interval to estimate the mean driving range for her company’s new electric vehicle. She wants the margin of error to be no more than 10 kilometers at a 90 percent level of confidence. A pilot study suggests that the driv…
MIT Dean of Admissions, Stu Schill, says the perfect applicant doesn't exist | Homeroom with Sal
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. Welcome to our daily homeroom live stream. For those of y’all who are new, this is something that we started doing, it feels like a lifetime ago now, almost two and a half months ago, when we started seeing sc…