yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Maria Mitchell: America’s First Celebrity Scientist | Big Think


2m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Maria Mitchell, whose first name is spelled like mine, MARIA but it's pronounced Maria, not Maria, is the first recognized female astronomer in America and was the first woman elected unanimously to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

In 1831, when she was still a teenager obsessed with stargazing, she heard that the king of Denmark had offered a gold medal valued at 20 ducats, which was a lot of money at the time, to the first person to discover a telescopic comet. It took her 16 years to master the science and the craft of observation, but she did become the first person, and C1847T1 was known for 100 years as Miss Mitchell's Comet.

Later, when she was hired to teach astronomy at Vassar, the newly established Vassar College, she was the first woman on the faculty. According to the official Handbook of College Rules, female students were not allowed to go outside after dark. This was a problem for the study of astronomy.

Mitchell fought tirelessly to overturn not just this but many other roles based on antiquated gender norms that held back women in science. Later, she was hired as the first woman to perform a non-domestic specialized skill for the U.S. federal government. She was paid $300 a year for her job as a computer of Venus for the United States Nautical Almanac.

It was a very, very mathematically rigorous job that required her to perform very complex calculations that would predict the position of Venus in the sky for years to come. In the days before GPS and satellites, this is how sailors all over the world navigated the oceans.

By the time she was 40, Mitchell had reached celebrity status as one of the most famous women in the world, which is a remarkable feat for a scientist. Even today, we don't have many celebrity scientists. But she was most beloved for her extraordinary generosity of spirit that went along with her genius.

She didn't much care for the accolades and the recognition and the celebrity, but she went out of her way to mentor and help cultivate the talents of women in science. This required that she overcame her painful shyness in order to be a public speaker, a public figure, a role model, and an educator, which she continued to be. She continued to teach right up until her death.

More Articles

View All
This TRANSPARENT ENGINE is Fascinating (How Engines Work) - Smarter Every Day 292
Where should the camera be? Oh, wherever. [Smashed the Gas] HOLY…. ENGINE ROARS Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smart Every Day. We have explored internal combustion engines on this channel, and I think they’re amazing. In the past, we visited a You…
Keith Schacht and Doug Peltz on What Traction Feels Like - at YC Edtech Night
This is the last fireside chat tonight, and I am very happy to introduce Quiche Act and Doug Pelts from Mystery Science. Thank you! Whoo! Thanks! Could you guys just start us off by introducing yourselves, please? I’ll let you go first. Okay! I’m Doug f…
15 Steps To Reinvent Yourself And Start Over
You know our time here is too short to live a life that you don’t like. So what’s your best option? Well, by the end of this video, you’ll have a game plan that you’ve been looking for. Your ability to live a life that you’re proud of depends on your unde…
Worked example: Calculating equilibrium concentrations from initial concentrations | Khan Academy
For the reaction bromine gas plus chlorine gas goes to BrCl, Kc is equal to 7.0 at 400 Kelvin. If the initial concentration of bromine is 0.60 Molar and the initial concentration of chlorine is also 0.60 Molar, our goal is to calculate the equilibrium con…
What could be ahead for the US dollar?
Throughout the last, you know, 30-40 years, there have been many moments where we said we’re on the brink of collapse. What is the time frame you think for when this is going to get really bad? And when it does get really bad, what would that actually loo…
Good Explanations Are Hard to Vary
Brett, would you say that a scientific theory is a subset of a good explanation? Yes, they’re the testable kinds of good explanations. Falsifiable theories are actually a dime a dozen. This doesn’t tell you anything about the quality of the explanation yo…